Skip to main content

How PPR Should Change The Way You Draft (2020 Fantasy Football)

by Mike Tagliere | @MikeTagliereNFL | Featured Writer
Jul 6, 2020

Davante Adams should be on the short list of first round options in 2020 PPR drafts

While everyone disagrees with rankings and which players should be taken higher, there’s something many fantasy owners overlook. Scoring settings and the impact they can have on the league you’re playing in.

I know that because ADP doesn’t vary enough from format-to-format. When you listen to your favorite analyst tell you that Player X should be a third-round pick, what scoring setting are they referring to? Does it really matter than much? To be clear, yes.

Practice mock drafts with our FREE Dynasty Draft Simulator >>

When doing PPR rankings, most just bump up the players like Jarvis Landry and Julian Edelman, knowing they’re going to be more valuable in that format, that’s no surprise. What rankings don’t tell us is which positions we should be attacking at certain points of our drafts, because positional rankings can only do so much for you when it comes down to deciding whether you should take the No. 18 running back off the board, or the No. 12 wide receiver.

Those who have played fantasy football for a long time likely remember when wide receivers were king in PPR formats, but nowadays, you’ll likely see five running backs come off the board before the first receiver. Is that right? Well, even though wide receivers had a down year in 2019, there were just six running backs who scored more than the No. 6 wide receiver. This isn’t a rare scenario, either, as there’ve been just 23 running backs to score more than 300 PPR points over the last six years, while 30 wide receivers accomplished that feat in the same span. We’ll get more in-depth with PPR formats, but let’s start with standard.

Standard Scoring

This format is starting to fall by the wayside, as ESPN, Yahoo, and NFL have moved to at least half-PPR as their new “standard,” though we’re sticking with calling it standard scoring for now. Call it non-PPR, call it whatever you want, but just know that this is the format that makes most sense to go running back-heavy, though many have adapted this approach in all formats, including PPR. Does it make sense?

Finish RB Finish WR Finish RB Finish WR
RB1 308.9 WR1 231.1 RB26 124.7 WR26 128.2
RB2 273.3 WR2 216.9 RB27 122.4 WR27 126.6
RB3 249.9 WR3 207.5 RB28 119.5 WR28 123.9
RB4 240.5 WR4 201.2 RB29 117.3 WR29 122.6
RB5 230.9 WR5 193.8 RB30 115.4 WR30 121.0
RB6 218.4 WR6 190.3 RB31 111.8 WR31 119.4
RB7 209.5 WR7 180.3 RB32 109.2 WR32 117.2
RB8 200.1 WR8 176.7 RB33 106.4 WR33 116.5
RB9 188.4 WR9 172.3 RB34 103.7 WR34 115.6
RB10 184.9 WR10 167.6 RB35 102.4 WR35 113.0
RB11 180.6 WR11 161.7 RB36 101.6 WR36 112.5
RB12 174.7 WR12 160.8 RB37 98.5 WR37 110.1
RB13 172.7 WR13 156.4 RB38 96.7 WR38 108.1
RB14 165.9 WR14 154.8 RB39 94.6 WR39 106.6
RB15 162.2 WR15 151.2 RB40 93.4 WR40 105.0
RB16 157.1 WR16 148.8 RB41 89.4 WR41 103.0
RB17 155.2 WR17 145.9 RB42 86.7 WR42 101.7
RB18 152.6 WR18 142.7 RB43 85.6 WR43 100.8
RB19 149.2 WR19 141.0 RB44 84.7 WR44 100.0
RB20 146.0 WR20 139.4 RB45 83.8 WR45 98.6
RB21 142.9 WR21 137.6 RB46 82.2 WR46 97.7
RB22 137.4 WR22 137.0 RB47 79.6 WR47 96.2
RB23 134.5 WR23 133.3 RB48 77.9 WR48 94.9
RB24 130.8 WR24 131.1 RB49 75.2 WR49 93.7
RB25 127.7 WR25 130.1 RB50 74.1 WR50 91.5


The numbers listed above represent the average finish for each position since the start of the 2014 season, giving us a solid six-year sample size. As expected, running backs are king in standard formats. The average for the RB5 is practically the same as the average for the WR1 in any given season. On top of the fact that it’s nearly impossible to find potential workhorses later in the draft, but the drop-off in points at running back is much larger than the drop-off at wide receiver. Exercises like this allow us to take the names (and emotions) out of the equation and focus on pure numbers. Running backs should dominate the top of the board in standard leagues.

The running backs average more points per player all the way down to RB24 when the tide finally turns to wide receivers. Does this mean wide receviers should hold the tiebreaker when choosing between the two in that range? Not necessarily, because in traditional leagues, you start two running backs and three wide receivers. Let’s assume you’re in a 12-team league, which would mean you’re starting three of the top-36 receivers and two of the top-24 running backs. The last starting wide receiver (WR36) has averaged 112.5 standard points compared to 130.8 standard points to the last running back (RB24). Current ADP has the 24th running back coming off the board five picks before the 24th wide receiver, which is much better than the gap last year, where there was a 16-spot difference.

The biggest question you’d like answered in this article is how to approach the flex spot and whether you should go wide receiver or running back. To do that, we’d compared the running backs in the 25-36 range to the wide receivers in the 37-48 range because that’s what’s left after the starting lineup requirements have been met. If your league starts just two receivers, I’ll save you the hassle – wide receivers should probably occupy your flex spot when you consider the cost of what it’d take to get the No. 25 running back or No. 25 wide receiver (the receiver is nearly a full round cheaper and averages more points). Now, back to the standard two running back, three wide receiver leagues. The flex spot should probably go to running backs considering the running backs in the 25-36 ranged from 101.6-127.7 points while the wide receivers in the 37-48 range averaged 94.9-110.1 points. Not only do they average more points, but you’re getting guaranteed touches with most running backs.

This is not an end-all-be-all scenario where you can’t lose if you draft a running back for your flex spot, because as the chart shows, if you can draft the 35th wide receiver off the board or the 35th running back off the board, go with the wide receiver. You can say we don’t know who is going to finish as the No. 35 running back and who is the No. 35 wide receiver, and you’re absolutely right, but then why do by rankings at all? Because it’s how you think it will wind up – this is just a way to put yourself in the best position to win if you do, in fact, pick the right players.

PPR Scoring

Some don’t like the PPR scoring format, citing it gives fantasy players “free points.” While there are moments when a player will catch a pass that goes for negative yardage, and yes, that shouldn’t be worth more than a five-yard carry, but there’s a flip side to that argument. It’s much easier to predict when a receiver will catch five passes for 70 yards than it is a receiver with one 60-yard catch for a touchdown. My advice for those against PPR leagues: Embrace predictability. Want to separate the best from the rest in your league? Make your starting rosters as big as possible and include PPR to increase predictability.

Finish RB Finish WR Finish RB Finish WR
RB1 389.2 WR1 348.2 RB26 157.9 WR26 194.0
RB2 329.9 WR2 323.7 RB27 154.3 WR27 191.7
RB3 317.5 WR3 309.6 RB28 151.3 WR28 188.8
RB4 298.8 WR4 300.3 RB29 148.0 WR29 187.8
RB5 285.2 WR5 291.2 RB30 145.8 WR30 185.3
RB6 273.1 WR6 282.8 RB31 143.2 WR31 183.1
RB7 252.6 WR7 274.5 RB32 140.2 WR32 181.6
RB8 244.0 WR8 268.7 RB33 138.6 WR33 179.0
RB9 231.7 WR9 262.1 RB34 137.1 WR34 176.5
RB10 227.0 WR10 252.8 RB35 135.6 WR35 173.5
RB11 220.3 WR11 251.2 RB36 132.8 WR36 170.3
RB12 213.9 WR12 246.8 RB37 130.2 WR37 169.2
RB13 208.4 WR13 238.6 RB38 129.9 WR38 167.1
RB14 203.0 WR14 234.8 RB39 125.9 WR39 165.5
RB15 198.6 WR15 230.8 RB40 121.2 WR40 164.2
RB16 196.2 WR16 223.7 RB41 119.2 WR41 159.9
RB17 191.5 WR17 221.1 RB42 115.7 WR42 158.6
RB18 188.0 WR18 216.9 RB43 110.8 WR43 156.5
RB19 184.6 WR19 215.6 RB44 108.2 WR44 155.5
RB20 179.5 WR20 211.2 RB45 105.7 WR45 153.3
RB21 174.9 WR21 209.3 RB46 103.6 WR46 150.9
RB22 169.6 WR22 206.3 RB47 102.5 WR47 148.3
RB23 167.8 WR23 204.0 RB48 100.9 WR48 146.3
RB24 162.9 WR24 200.2 RB49 97.0 WR49 142.9
RB25 160.2 WR25 195.7 RB50 95.1 WR50 140.8


Remember when we had to get down to the No. 24 wide receiver in order to pass the No. 24 running back in standard leagues? There’s suddenly a 38-point gap at that point. Or how about when the No. 5 running back was worth as much as the No. 1 running back? That’s not the case in PPR. This proves my point that fantasy owners underrate scoring settings. How do I know this? Because 12 of the top 17 picks in PPR leagues are running backs while just five of them are wide receivers.

Similar to the way we did in standard leagues, let’s take a look at which players we should aim to have in our flex spots. Again, this is assuming the top-24 running backs and top-36 wide receivers are started. In the PPR format, wide receivers are a much better bet, averaging in between 146.3-169.2 points in the 37-48 range, while running backs in the 25-36 range average anywhere from 132.8-160.2 points. This chart shows that the No. 40 wide receiver scores almost as much as the No. 25 running back. The current ADP for the No. 40 wide receiver is 106th overall, while the No. 25 running back is coming off the board at 54th overall. Wide receivers continue to be extremely undervalued in PPR formats.

What We Learned

The game is changing as we know it, which is why we stuck with the last six years rather than going back to a time where running backs regularly topped 1,000 yards on the ground. While we’ve been losing workhorse running backs, we’ve also been losing extremely high-targeted wide receivers, as teams are running more and more three and four wide receiver sets. Over the last four years, there have been just three wide receivers who’ve seen more than 170 targets. In the three prior years, there were 10 such wide receivers. So, while workhorse running backs are rare, so are heavy-targeted wide receivers.

Going by the data, wide receivers are king in PPR formats. This doesn’t mean you should completely ignore running backs in the early rounds. In fact, there’s a lot of value to be had with wide receivers later in the draft (as indicated by the No. 40 wide receiver going 52 picks later than the No. 25 running back despite scoring the same number of points). Because of that, I’d look to secure one of the rare running backs who are guaranteed 300-plus touches if healthy in the first round. Those running backs include Christian McCaffrey, Ezekiel Elliott, Saquon Barkley, Dalvin Cook, Derrick Henry, and Joe Mixon. Others to consider because of their work in the passing game are Alvin Kamara and Kenyan Drake. After those guys, start loading up on wide receivers in PPR formats. You’re likely going to be playing a wide receiver in your flex spot, so give yourself more of a selection.

It’s different in standard leagues because there isn’t much of a gap between the running backs and wide receivers, so you should lean towards the position that comes with a guaranteed workload, particularly on the goal-line, and that’s the running backs. You still want to pay attention to value, however, as your league may be going running back heavy, leaving value at the wide receiver position. You can use the value chart above to give you an idea as to what each position would be projected for if ADP were aligned with the season’s results.

Like everything in fantasy football, you want to adapt to what’s taking place around you. This article should have showed you why the change in scoring setting should have a massive impact on overall rankings, though judging by ADP, most fantasy players don’t adjust enough for their scoring format.

SubscribeApple Podcasts | Spotify | Google Podcasts | Stitcher | SoundCloud | iHeartRadio

Mike Tagliere is a featured writer at FantasyPros. For more from Mike, check out his archive and follow him @MikeTagliereNFL.

What's your take? Leave a comment

Follow the Pros!

Follow us on Twitter @FantasyPros for exclusive advice and contests