Tyler Boyd or Marquise Brown
Who Should I Draft?
Experts' Pick | ||
WR - BAL  | WR - CIN  | |
Expert |
59% Recommended by 55 of 94 experts |
41% Recommended by 39 of 94 experts |
| Most Accurate Experts | ||
| Top Experts | 60% | 40% |
| Top WR Experts | 75% | 25% |
| Top Player Experts | 50% | 50% |
| Rankings | ||
| ECR | # 31 | # 32 |
| Best Rank | # 13 | # 13 |
| Worst Rank | # 44 | # 51 |
| Fantasy Points | ||
| Season Total | 100.4 | 132.9 |
| Avg Game | 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Avg Projection | 125.4 | 118.0 |
| Schedule | ||
| SOS Rank | 28 | 20 |
| Misc | ||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ |
| Expert Ranks | ||
|
|
Marquise Brown | Tyler Boyd |
11 h | #25 | #31 |
16 h | #24 | #31 |
1 d | #31 | #39 |
1 d | #29 | #33 |
1 d | #13 | #34 |
1 d | #27 | #34 |
1 d | #29 | #33 |
1 d | #26 | #31 |
1 d | #32 | #33 |
2 d | #36 | #33 |
2 d | #23 | #38 |
2 d | #31 | #42 |
2 d | #26 | #31 |
2 d | #32 | #33 |
2 d | #31 | #33 |
2 d | #26 | #39 |
2 d | #34 | #30 |
2 d | #27 | #30 |
2 d | #30 | #34 |
3 d | #35 | #38 |
3 d | #32 | #21 |
3 d | #28 | #32 |
3 d | #28 | #31 |
3 d | #33 | #28 |
4 d | #32 | #21 |
4 d | #27 | #38 |
4 d | #31 | #32 |
4 d | #28 | #47 |
4 d | #29 | #38 |
4 d | #37 | #46 |
5 d | #38 | #32 |
5 d | #33 | #32 |
5 d | #33 | #34 |
5 d | #24 | #29 |
5 d | #35 | #32 |
6 d | #31 | #32 |
6 d | #39 | #34 |
6 d | #31 | #33 |
7 d | #42 | #32 |
7 d | #33 | #34 |
1 w | #27 | #34 |
1 w | #30 | ‐ |
1 w | #29 | #28 |
1 w | #42 | #31 |
1 w | #33 | #34 |
1 w | #23 | #21 |
1 w | #29 | #44 |
1 w | #29 | #31 |
1 w | #33 | #40 |
1 w | #27 | #34 |
2 w | #37 | #30 |
2 w | #37 | #39 |
2 w | #37 | #31 |
2 w | #33 | #34 |
2 w | #36 | #33 |
2 w | #34 | #30 |
2 w | #34 | #31 |
2 w | #31 | #38 |
2 w | #44 | #29 |
2 w | #33 | #22 |
2 w | #44 | #13 |
2 w | #34 | #32 |
3 w | #29 | #33 |
3 w | #38 | #33 |
3 w | #32 | #33 |
3 w | #34 | #51 |
3 w | #35 | #36 |
3 w | #40 | #35 |
4 w | #30 | #34 |
4 w | #28 | #32 |
2 d | #34 | #33 |
4 w | #49 | #24 |
3 d | #40 | #28 |
4 d | #38 | #36 |
06/07 | #32 | #33 |
4 w | #32 | #33 |
06/02 | #32 | #33 |
1 w | #34 | #33 |
05/29 | #33 | #32 |
05/24 | #32 | #33 |
4 w | #31 | #33 |
1 w | #35 | #34 |
05/20 | #37 | #34 |
05/25 | #37 | #34 |
05/16 | #46 | #22 |
9 h | #37 | #34 |
05/12 | #33 | #34 |
05/11 | #32 | #34 |
05/08 | #36 | #35 |
06/10 | #31 | #34 |
05/04 | #33 | #35 |
04/27 | #33 | #32 |
04/10 | #36 | #35 |
01/14 | #36 | #35 |
WR - BAL | WR - CIN | |
| 2020 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. CLE | vs. LAC |
| Week 2 | at HOU | at CLE |
| Week 3 | vs. KC | at PHI |
| Week 4 | at WAS | vs. JAC |
| Week 5 | vs. CIN | at BAL |
| Week 6 | at PHI | at IND |
| Week 7 | vs. PIT | vs. CLE |
| Week 8 | BYE WEEK | vs. TEN |
| Week 9 | at IND | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | at NE | at PIT |
| Week 11 | vs. TEN | at WAS |
| Week 12 | at PIT | vs. NYG |
| Week 13 | vs. DAL | at MIA |
| Week 14 | at CLE | vs. DAL |
| Week 15 | vs. JAC | vs. PIT |
| Week 16 | vs. NYG | at HOU |
| Week 17 | at CIN | vs. BAL |
WR - BAL | WR - CIN | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 62.2 | 75.5 |
| Rec Yards | 815.2 | 904.3 |
| Rec TDs | 6.6 | 4.6 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 6.3 | 2.2 |
| Rush Yards | 59.0 | 13.1 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 125.4 | 118.0 |
WR - BAL | WR - CIN | |
| 2019 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 26.7 | 6.3 |
| Week 2 | 8.6 | 12.2 |
| Week 3 | 4.9 | 6.8 |
| Week 4 | 2.2 | 3.3 |
| Week 5 | 8.2 | 18.3 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 1.0 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | 3.5 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 6.8 |
| Week 9 | 4.8 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 14.0 | 6.2 |
| Week 11 | 2.3 | 1.0 |
| Week 12 | 16.2 | 14.1 |
| Week 13 | 0.1 | 11.9 |
| Week 14 | -0.2 | 8.2 |
| Week 15 | 10.5 | 2.6 |
| Week 16 | 0.6 | 24.8 |
| Week 17 | 1.5 | 5.9 |
WR - BAL | WR - CIN | |
| 2019 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 5 | 12 |
| Week 2 | 13 | 10 |
| Week 3 | 9 | 11 |
| Week 4 | 7 | 6 |
| Week 5 | 5 | 14 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 7 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | 14 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 9 |
| Week 9 | 4 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 4 | 8 |
| Week 11 | 4 | 3 |
| Week 12 | 7 | 9 |
| Week 13 | 2 | 10 |
| Week 14 | 3 | 6 |
| Week 15 | 4 | 7 |
| Week 16 | 2 | 15 |
| Week 17 | 2 | 7 |
WR - BAL | WR - CIN | |
| Expert | ||
| Kyle Yates FantasyPros | Unfortunately, Brown doesn't exactly play in the best offense to maximize his skills for fantasy football. He has the talent to be a top-24 WR, but the Ravens simply do not pass the ball enough for him to return value. He's a boom/bust play that's best plugged in as a WR3/FLEX option on a weekly basis. | Boyd has plenty of competition for targets this season, but this offense is going to be among the league's best. There should be plenty of scoring opportunities for Boyd and he's a steal at his current ADP. He's a fantastic WR2/WR3 option for your roster. |
| Mike Tagliere FantasyPros | When your team is throwing the ball just 439 times the entire season, it's going to be hard to become a consistent fantasy option. It's going to be even harder when you're a rookie who was coming off foot surgery and dealing with ankle injuries throughout the year. That was the reality for Brown, who played just 14 games, yet finished as a top-50 fantasy wide receiver. The team added a few wide receivers in the draft ,but no one who should trump him in targets. If the Ravens drop back to pass a bit more in 2020, Brown could be a legitimate breakout option, though he shouldn't be drafted as anything more than an upside WR3/4. | Do you believe the Bengals will be a better football team in 2020? If you do, that could be harmful to Boyd's output. He totaled 60-plus yards in nine games last year, with all of them being losses where he racked up some targets. Granted, the Bengals didn't win many games in 2019, but the return of A.J. Green will also cap his target share. Still, there is some reason for optimism, as Boyd has now finished with 1,000 yards in back-to-back seasons, and will get an upgrade at quarterback. He's best viewed as a WR3 with upside to make it into the top 15. |
| Kevin Wheeler Draftwize | Boyd 2018 16 game pace (played 13.5): 128 targets, 90 receptions, 1218 receiving yards, 8 TDs 2019 Non-Ryan Finley 16 game pace (played 13): 156 targets, 96 receptions, 1085 receiving yards, 5 TDs. @FF_RyanB | |
| Seth Miller Crossroads Fantasy Football | The good news: He was the leading target getter at WR. The Bad: The Ravens were 32nd in attempts in 2019, meaning Marquise had 71 targets. I do believe he can be an elite deep threat, with plenty of opportunity to gash the defense when they cheat up to sop the run but that is a narrative versus the numbers that Baltimore is most likely to repeat. He did have the screw removed from his foot this offseason so hopefully he can stay healthy. I see him as a flex play with upside, but the upside is not the ceiling in this case.. There are big Trusses in the way | I might be in the minority but barely putting up 1000 yards on 150 targets is more of a caution for me than anything. QB play was bad, no doubt. Think he is more of a complimentary piece in an offense That can be Jarvis Landry like at best. Not a bad thing to be, but I think his athleticism caps him. |
