James Conner or J.D. McKissic
Who Should I Start? - Week 1
Looking for Draft Advice? Go to Who Should I Draft
Can't Decide? Leave it up to the Fantasy Gods
The Fantasy Gods have spoken. Start {{ state.players[state.winningPlayerIndex].player_name }}
Experts' Pick | |||
James Conner RB - PIT ![]() James Conner RB - PIT at NYG, Mon 7pm EDT |
J.D. McKissic RB - WAS ![]() J.D. McKissic RB - WAS vs. PHI, Sun 1pm EDT |
  | |
Expert |
99% Recommended by 175 of 176 experts |
1% Recommended by 1 of 176 experts |
Add Player |
Most Accurate Experts | |||
Top ExpertsTop RB ExpertsTop Player Experts | ![]() Upgrade Now | ||
Rankings | |||
ECR | # 11 | # 68 | - |
Best Rank | # 4 | # 43 | - |
Worst Rank | # 28 | # 92 | - |
Matchup | |||
Opponent | at NYG | vs. PHI | - |
Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs NYG | This is a 2 star matchup. RBs perform a little worse than their average vs PHI | - |
Stats Allowed | |||
Rush Att | 27 | 30.1 | |
Rush Yds | 111.4 | 125.8 | |
Rush TD | 0.9 | 1.3 | |
Fantasy Points | |||
Season Total | 129.6 | 111.4 | - |
Avg Game | 10.0 | 7.0 | - |
2019 Average | 10.0 | 7.0 | - |
Misc | |||
Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
Weather | ‐ | ‐ | - |
Expert Ranks | |||
|
James Conner | J.D. McKissic | Add Player |
09/29 | #11 | #52 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #65 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #74 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #60 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #66 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #63 | - |
09/10 | #15 | #60 | - |
09/10 | #6 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #11 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #12 | #63 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #69 | - |
09/13 | #16 | #82 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #70 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #59 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #62 | - |
09/13 | #12 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #12 | #69 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #75 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #66 | - |
09/09 | #13 | #63 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #73 | - |
09/10 | #11 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #6 | #64 | - |
08/10 | #12 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #74 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #73 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #51 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #70 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #70 | - |
09/09 | #11 | #72 | - |
09/13 | #14 | #82 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #52 | - |
09/13 | #7 | #61 | - |
09/13 | #6 | #64 | - |
09/10 | #10 | #71 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #73 | - |
09/10 | #10 | #68 | - |
09/10 | #11 | #65 | - |
09/09 | #9 | #67 | - |
09/10 | #13 | #73 | - |
09/13 | #4 | #71 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #69 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #64 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #71 | - |
09/12 | #10 | #68 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #66 | - |
09/13 | #10 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #12 | #64 | - |
09/10 | #9 | #66 | - |
09/12 | #9 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #59 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #81 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #64 | - |
09/13 | #6 | #64 | - |
09/08 | #13 | #74 | - |
09/10 | #13 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #70 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #69 | - |
09/13 | #17 | #50 | - |
09/10 | #12 | #65 | - |
09/09 | #13 | #69 | - |
09/12 | #12 | #64 | - |
09/10 | #10 | #58 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #46 | - |
09/13 | #8 | #74 | - |
09/13 | #16 | #73 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #70 | - |
09/11 | #8 | #63 | - |
09/13 | #5 | #70 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #67 | - |
09/09 | #10 | #66 | - |
09/13 | #14 | #74 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #65 | - |
09/12 | #12 | #74 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #44 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #67 | - |
09/10 | #16 | #73 | - |
09/13 | #6 | #63 | - |
09/09 | #11 | #73 | - |
09/11 | #12 | #70 | - |
09/09 | #12 | #73 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #68 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #65 | - |
09/09 | #14 | #75 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #66 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #75 | - |
09/12 | #10 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #67 | - |
09/10 | #5 | #68 | - |
09/07 | #16 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #10 | #62 | - |
09/12 | #11 | #64 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #58 | - |
09/10 | #10 | #69 | - |
09/09 | #11 | #76 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #66 | - |
09/10 | #10 | ‐ | - |
09/12 | #7 | #63 | - |
09/09 | #17 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #79 | - |
09/10 | #11 | #63 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #51 | - |
09/13 | #5 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #20 | #63 | - |
09/10 | #13 | #65 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #76 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #60 | - |
09/13 | #16 | ‐ | - |
09/08 | #12 | #65 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #69 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #60 | - |
09/13 | #13 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #10 | #70 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #65 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #64 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #72 | - |
09/10 | #16 | ‐ | - |
09/12 | #11 | #60 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #66 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #51 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #63 | - |
09/09 | #12 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #11 | #67 | - |
09/07 | #11 | #62 | - |
09/13 | ‐ | #57 | - |
09/13 | #11 | ‐ | - |
09/13 | #10 | #67 | - |
09/13 | #9 | #73 | - |
09/13 | #11 | #67 | - |
09/09 | #8 | #52 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #74 | - |
09/11 | #10 | ‐ | - |
09/12 | #10 | #64 | - |
09/13 | #11 | ‐ | - |
09/12 | #11 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #5 | #60 | - |
09/13 | #15 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #12 | #60 | - |
09/12 | #6 | ‐ | - |
09/12 | #12 | #52 | - |
09/13 | #13 | #68 | - |
09/09 | #11 | #75 | - |
09/04 | #8 | #54 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #62 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #69 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #43 | - |
09/13 | #12 | #84 | - |
09/10 | #12 | ‐ | - |
09/09 | #13 | #78 | - |
09/01 | #28 | #47 | - |
09/09 | #17 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #14 | #59 | - |
09/13 | #16 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #17 | ‐ | - |
09/12 | #11 | ‐ | - |
09/08 | #9 | #81 | - |
09/12 | #11 | #72 | - |
09/11 | #16 | ‐ | - |
09/11 | #16 | #75 | - |
09/13 | #10 | #70 | - |
09/10 | #14 | #59 | - |
09/10 | #10 | #72 | - |
09/10 | #12 | #75 | - |
09/10 | #10 | #85 | - |
09/10 | #12 | ‐ | - |
09/10 | #8 | #65 | - |
09/10 | #14 | #52 | - |
09/09 | #12 | #80 | - |
09/08 | #11 | #86 | - |
09/08 | #18 | #82 | - |
09/07 | #13 | #74 | - |
09/10 | #15 | #92 | - |
James Conner RB - PIT ![]() James Conner RB - PIT | J.D. McKissic RB - WAS ![]() J.D. McKissic RB - WAS | |
2020 Schedule | ||
Week 1 | at NYG | vs. PHI |
Week 2 | vs. DEN | at ARI |
Week 3 | vs. HOU | at CLE |
Week 4 | BYE WEEK | vs. BAL |
Week 5 | vs. PHI | vs. LAR |
Week 6 | vs. CLE | at NYG |
Week 7 | at TEN | vs. DAL |
Week 8 | at BAL | BYE WEEK |
Week 9 | at DAL | vs. NYG |
Week 10 | vs. CIN | at DET |
Week 11 | at JAC | vs. CIN |
Week 12 | vs. BAL | at DAL |
Week 13 | vs. WAS | at PIT |
Week 14 | at BUF | at SF |
Week 15 | at CIN | vs. SEA |
Week 16 | vs. IND | vs. CAR |
Week 17 | at CLE | at PHI |
James Conner RB - PIT ![]() James Conner RB - PIT | J.D. McKissic RB - WAS ![]() J.D. McKissic RB - WAS | |
2020 Points | ||
Week 1 | 1.7 | -0.1 |
Week 2 | 18.1 | 5.3 |
Week 3 | 20.9 | 5.2 |
Week 4 | ‐ | 2.6 |
Week 5 | 12.3 | 4.9 |
Week 6 | 16.2 | 8.4 |
Week 7 | 11.1 | 5.1 |
Week 8 | 12.0 | ‐ |
Week 9 | 2.0 | 8.2 |
Week 10 | 4.8 | 10.9 |
Week 11 | 9.9 | 6.9 |
Week 12 | ‐ | 2.7 |
Week 13 | ‐ | 7.8 |
Week 14 | 1.8 | 8.6 |
Week 15 | ‐ | 16.7 |
Week 16 | 12.6 | 15.2 |
Week 17 | 6.2 | 3.0 |
Total | 129.6 | 111.4 |
Average | 10.0 | 7.0 |
James Conner RB - PIT ![]() James Conner RB - PIT | J.D. McKissic RB - WAS ![]() J.D. McKissic RB - WAS | |
2020 Targets | ||
Week 1 | 4 | 5 |
Week 2 | 2 | 0 |
Week 3 | 5 | 4 |
Week 4 | ‐ | 8 |
Week 5 | 3 | 8 |
Week 6 | 1 | 6 |
Week 7 | 5 | 2 |
Week 8 | 3 | ‐ |
Week 9 | 2 | 14 |
Week 10 | 2 | 15 |
Week 11 | 3 | 4 |
Week 12 | ‐ | 2 |
Week 13 | ‐ | 10 |
Week 14 | 0 | 4 |
Week 15 | ‐ | 10 |
Week 16 | 5 | 10 |
Week 17 | 8 | 8 |
James Conner RB - PIT ![]() James Conner RB - PIT at NYG, Mon 7pm EDT |
J.D. McKissic RB - WAS ![]() J.D. McKissic RB - WAS vs. PHI, Sun 1pm EDT |
|
Expert | ||
Mike Tagliere FantasyPros | I'm pretty sure Conner and the other running backs will be happy to have Roethlisberger back under center, as it'll surely force defenses to be honest. The Giants defense was horrendous last year, but their run defense was better than the pass, as they allowed just 0.78 PPR points per opportunity last year, which ranked as the seventh fewest in football. They actually held opposing running backs to just 3.96 yards per attempt, making them one of just eight teams who allowed fewer than four yards per carry. It's a new defense under Joe Judge, so we can't automatically assume that all remains status quo, especially considering how bad their secondary was last year. It's possible they place more emphasis on slowing down teams through the air this year, though they may not have the talent to do so. Whatever the case, it's a near-certainty that Conner touches the ball 18-plus times in a game they're favored, automatically bumping him into RB2 territory. Knowing the Steelers will likely take it slow in Roethlisberger's return, we could see them lean on Conner even more than normal. He's a safe low-end RB1/high-end RB2 this week with multiple touchdown potential. | |
Isaiah Sirois FantasyPros | Mike Tomlin called James Conner his workhorse earlier this week. That's good news for Conner, as the Pittsburgh star logged 215 carries just two seasons ago. With Ben Roethlisberger back in the lineup, opposing teams will have to take the passing game more seriously, and that should open up some opportunities for Conner. He's a safe bet at RB2 with low-end RB1 upside this week. | |
Jacob Wayne Lineups | I was a little queasy to draft James Conner this season after how unproductive he was last year and how he's struggled to stay on the field. However, as long as he is healthy and playing in this offense, he's going to be productive for fantasy football. The Giants allowed the 18th-most fantasy points to running backs last year and I expect Conner to take advantage with a big Week 1. | |
Kyle Yates FantasyPros | McKissic is a borderline RB3/RB4 in this matchup in Half PPR formats, but he does get a boost in Full PPR. Washington should be trailing in this matchup, which leads to some garbage time opportunity for McKissic in the receiving game. This is going to be a messy backfield and we need to see how it plays out on the field before we start any of these options with confidence. McKissic can be deployed as a FLEX option in Full PPR leagues, but only if you absolutely need. | |
Derek Lofland FantasyPros | The Giants were 18th against fantasy running backs, if Conner is going to have a rebound season, it starts with a nice matchup against the Giants D. |