James Washington or Tony Pollard
Who Should I Start? - Week 2
Can't Decide? Leave it up to the Fantasy Gods
The Fantasy Gods have spoken. Start {{ state.players[state.winningPlayerIndex].player_name }}
Experts' Pick | |||
WR - PIT  vs. DEN, Sun 1pm EDT |
RB - DAL  vs. ATL, Sun 1pm EDT |
 | |
Expert |
87% Recommended by 140 of 161 experts |
13% Recommended by 21 of 161 experts |
Add Player |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would startUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| ECR | # 134 | # 140 | - |
| Best Rank | # 82 | # 74 | - |
| Worst Rank | # 173 | # 228 | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. DEN | vs. ATL | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform worse than their average vs DEN | This is a 2 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs ATL | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 11.6 | 4.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 5.8 | 2.1 | - |
| Week 1 | 9.4 | 3.2 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Weather | 63 F, Clear | Indoor | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
James Washington | Tony Pollard | Add Player |
1 d | #122 | #156 | - |
1 d | #135 | #160 | - |
1 d | #137 | #156 | - |
1 d | #144 | #146 | - |
1 d | #122 | #160 | - |
1 d | #134 | #146 | - |
1 d | #145 | #160 | - |
1 d | #145 | #160 | - |
1 d | #159 | #169 | - |
1 d | #158 | #169 | - |
1 d | #127 | #146 | - |
1 d | #122 | #146 | - |
1 d | #127 | #143 | - |
1 d | #144 | #133 | - |
1 d | #145 | #143 | - |
1 d | #135 | #136 | - |
1 d | #122 | #143 | - |
1 d | #141 | #146 | - |
1 d | #135 | #143 | - |
1 d | #127 | #142 | - |
1 d | #127 | #160 | - |
1 d | #142 | #155 | - |
1 d | #122 | #160 | - |
1 d | #122 | #141 | - |
1 d | #127 | #143 | - |
1 d | #141 | #156 | - |
1 d | #153 | #134 | - |
1 d | #149 | #155 | - |
1 d | #105 | #147 | - |
1 d | #145 | #228 | - |
1 d | #135 | #117 | - |
1 d | #127 | #144 | - |
1 d | #123 | #141 | - |
1 d | #135 | #143 | - |
1 d | #145 | #147 | - |
1 d | #109 | #172 | - |
1 d | #122 | #134 | - |
1 d | #123 | #143 | - |
1 d | #135 | #155 | - |
1 d | #127 | #172 | - |
1 d | #122 | #131 | - |
1 d | #142 | #155 | - |
1 d | #123 | #129 | - |
1 d | #127 | #143 | - |
1 d | #119 | #160 | - |
1 d | #123 | #134 | - |
1 d | #146 | #172 | - |
1 d | #122 | #133 | - |
1 d | #135 | #160 | - |
1 d | ‐ | #131 | - |
1 d | #122 | #147 | - |
1 d | #173 | #174 | - |
1 d | #149 | #147 | - |
1 d | #116 | #130 | - |
1 d | #135 | #155 | - |
1 d | #123 | #144 | - |
1 d | #145 | #155 | - |
1 d | #123 | #144 | - |
1 d | #116 | #147 | - |
1 d | #142 | #160 | - |
1 d | #145 | #160 | - |
1 d | #127 | #133 | - |
1 d | #123 | #143 | - |
1 d | #122 | #143 | - |
1 d | #146 | #144 | - |
1 d | #125 | #155 | - |
1 d | #139 | #156 | - |
1 d | #123 | #143 | - |
1 d | #123 | #144 | - |
1 d | #142 | #133 | - |
1 d | #121 | #160 | - |
1 d | #127 | #143 | - |
1 d | #141 | #143 | - |
1 d | #107 | #134 | - |
1 d | #128 | #144 | - |
1 d | #123 | #145 | - |
1 d | #140 | #155 | - |
1 d | #126 | #160 | - |
1 d | #123 | #147 | - |
1 d | #142 | #145 | - |
1 d | #126 | #145 | - |
1 d | #107 | #160 | - |
1 d | #122 | #133 | - |
1 d | #129 | ‐ | - |
1 d | ‐ | #141 | - |
1 d | #123 | #134 | - |
1 d | #122 | #134 | - |
1 d | #122 | #143 | - |
1 d | #123 | #134 | - |
1 d | #125 | #144 | - |
1 d | #157 | #172 | - |
1 d | #98 | #155 | - |
1 d | #140 | #151 | - |
1 d | #125 | #144 | - |
1 d | #138 | #147 | - |
1 d | #128 | #170 | - |
1 d | #123 | #134 | - |
1 d | #136 | #156 | - |
1 d | #142 | #156 | - |
1 d | #123 | #144 | - |
1 d | #123 | #134 | - |
1 d | #113 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #128 | #145 | - |
1 d | #140 | #145 | - |
1 d | #139 | #164 | - |
1 d | ‐ | #143 | - |
1 d | #122 | #133 | - |
1 d | #115 | #131 | - |
1 d | #152 | #156 | - |
1 d | #141 | #163 | - |
1 d | #167 | #175 | - |
1 d | #133 | #155 | - |
1 d | #133 | #155 | - |
1 d | #121 | #132 | - |
1 d | #135 | #158 | - |
1 d | #128 | #143 | - |
1 d | #122 | #114 | - |
1 d | #101 | #126 | - |
1 d | #82 | #147 | - |
1 d | #123 | #142 | - |
1 d | #127 | #143 | - |
1 d | #120 | #134 | - |
1 d | #128 | #143 | - |
1 d | #137 | #134 | - |
1 d | #121 | #113 | - |
1 d | ‐ | #123 | - |
1 d | #128 | #147 | - |
1 d | #127 | #146 | - |
1 d | #117 | #155 | - |
2 d | #137 | #146 | - |
2 d | #128 | #134 | - |
2 d | #127 | #146 | - |
2 d | #150 | #114 | - |
2 d | #127 | #134 | - |
2 d | #123 | #146 | - |
2 d | ‐ | #131 | - |
2 d | #144 | #119 | - |
2 d | ‐ | #74 | - |
2 d | #128 | #155 | - |
2 d | #109 | #141 | - |
2 d | #128 | #147 | - |
2 d | #116 | #155 | - |
2 d | #98 | #160 | - |
2 d | #124 | #137 | - |
2 d | ‐ | #123 | - |
2 d | #127 | #152 | - |
2 d | #155 | #145 | - |
3 d | #122 | #136 | - |
3 d | #128 | #143 | - |
3 d | #123 | #157 | - |
3 d | #104 | #128 | - |
3 d | #138 | #147 | - |
4 d | #136 | #148 | - |
4 d | #135 | #157 | - |
4 d | #137 | #139 | - |
4 d | #121 | #150 | - |
4 d | #137 | #143 | - |
4 d | #127 | #178 | - |
4 d | #105 | #122 | - |
4 d | #136 | #148 | - |
5 d | #139 | #133 | - |
WR - PIT | RB - DAL | |
| 2020 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at NYG 3 tar, 2 rec, 34 yds, 1 td | at LAR 2 rush, 10 yds, 0 td 3 tar, 2 rec, 22 yds, 0 td |
| Week 2 | vs. DEN | vs. ATL |
| Week 3 | vs. HOU | at SEA |
| Week 4 | at TEN | vs. CLE |
| Week 5 | vs. PHI | vs. NYG |
| Week 6 | vs. CLE | vs. ARI |
| Week 7 | at BAL | at WAS |
| Week 8 | BYE WEEK | at PHI |
| Week 9 | at DAL | vs. PIT |
| Week 10 | vs. CIN | BYE WEEK |
| Week 11 | at JAC | at MIN |
| Week 12 | vs. BAL | vs. WAS |
| Week 13 | vs. WAS | at BAL |
| Week 14 | at BUF | at CIN |
| Week 15 | at CIN | vs. SF |
| Week 16 | vs. IND | vs. PHI |
| Week 17 | at CLE | at NYG |
WR - PIT | RB - DAL | |
| 2020 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 9.4 | 3.2 |
| Week 2 | 2.2 | 0.9 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 4 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 6 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total | 11.6 | 4.1 |
| Average | 5.8 | 2.1 |
WR - PIT | RB - DAL | |
| 2020 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 3 | 3 |
| Week 2 | 5 | 1 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 4 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 6 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
WR - PIT vs. DEN, Sun 1pm EDT |
RB - DAL vs. ATL, Sun 1pm EDT |
|
| Expert | ||
| Isaiah Sirois FantasyPros | James Washington flashed some big-play potential with Ben Roethlisberger last week, but that's all he is now -- a deep threat. Washington doesn't have much floor, and it's clear that both Diontae Johnson and JuJu Smith-Schuster are ahead of him on the depth chart. In what's likely to be a low-scoring game against the Broncos, I would leave Washington on bench (or on waivers) for Week 2. | |
| Kyle Yates FantasyPros | Pollard could see an uptick in work in this appealing matchup, but it's impossible to trust him anywhere near your starting lineup without a guarantee. | |
| Mike Tagliere FantasyPros | As expected, these two split the snaps as the third wide receiver on the field in Week 1. It was Washington who edged in snaps (37 to 19) targets (3 to 2) and production, but there's not a big gap and you can't clearly say to start one over the other, as Claypool should continue to grow as a young receiver. When starting either of them, you're just looking for that big play because it's very unlikely either of them see more than five targets in any given week. We'll continue to monitor the snaps between these two moving forward, but don't start either of them in season-long leagues until one separates from the other. | Pollard is not someone you can play with any confidence after he totaled just four touches in his first game under McCarthy. It seems like he'll have a bigger role in games that are blowouts, which is certainly within the realm of possibilities this week considering they're five-point favorites, but I wouldn't bank on it. He's just a handcuff right now. |
