Julian Edelman or Miles Sanders
Who Should I Start? - Week 7
Can't Decide? Leave it up to the Fantasy Gods
The Fantasy Gods have spoken. Start {{ state.players[state.winningPlayerIndex].player_name }}
Experts' Pick | |||
Julian Edelman WR - NE  Julian Edelman WR - NE vs. SF, Sun 4pm EDT Questionable |
Miles Sanders RB - PHI  Miles Sanders RB - PHI vs. NYG, Thu 8pm EDT OUT |
 | |
Expert |
100% Recommended by 154 of 154 experts |
0% Recommended by 0 of 154 experts |
Add Player |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would startUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| ECR | # 71 | ‐ | - |
| Best Rank | # 67 | ‐ | - |
| Worst Rank | # 98 | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. SF | vs. NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs SF | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 33.9 | 68.5 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.8 | 13.7 | - |
| Week 6 | 2.3 | 11.2 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | Knee | Knee | - |
| Weather | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Julian Edelman | Miles Sanders | Add Player |
2 h | #87 | ‐ | - |
3 h | #79 | ‐ | - |
3 h | #75 | ‐ | - |
4 h | #80 | ‐ | - |
4 h | #77 | ‐ | - |
5 h | #79 | ‐ | - |
5 h | #75 | ‐ | - |
5 h | #81 | ‐ | - |
7 h | #69 | ‐ | - |
7 h | #53 | ‐ | - |
7 h | #93 | ‐ | - |
8 h | #75 | ‐ | - |
8 h | #77 | ‐ | - |
8 h | #95 | ‐ | - |
9 h | #86 | ‐ | - |
9 h | #72 | ‐ | - |
9 h | #72 | ‐ | - |
9 h | #77 | ‐ | - |
9 h | #77 | ‐ | - |
9 h | #73 | ‐ | - |
10 h | #77 | ‐ | - |
10 h | #67 | ‐ | - |
10 h | #71 | ‐ | - |
10 h | #97 | ‐ | - |
10 h | #84 | ‐ | - |
10 h | #72 | ‐ | - |
11 h | #84 | ‐ | - |
11 h | #93 | ‐ | - |
11 h | #73 | ‐ | - |
11 h | #74 | ‐ | - |
11 h | #85 | ‐ | - |
12 h | #74 | ‐ | - |
12 h | #73 | ‐ | - |
12 h | #73 | ‐ | - |
13 h | #77 | ‐ | - |
14 h | #70 | ‐ | - |
14 h | #71 | ‐ | - |
14 h | #73 | ‐ | - |
14 h | #74 | ‐ | - |
15 h | #74 | ‐ | - |
17 h | #85 | ‐ | - |
18 h | #75 | ‐ | - |
20 h | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #68 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #89 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #60 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #70 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #71 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #87 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #71 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #92 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #70 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #88 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #67 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #98 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #80 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #71 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #67 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #71 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #68 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #89 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #70 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #116 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #90 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #79 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #89 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
1 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #75 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #71 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #93 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #84 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #84 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #83 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #73 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #84 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #80 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #80 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #68 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #109 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #72 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #80 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #71 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #74 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #64 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #76 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #76 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #76 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #76 | ‐ | - |
3 d | #78 | ‐ | - |
4 d | #77 | ‐ | - |
Julian Edelman WR - NE Julian Edelman WR - NE | Miles Sanders RB - PHI Miles Sanders RB - PHI | |
| 2020 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. MIA 7 tar, 5 rec, 57 yds, 0 td 1 rush, 23 yds, 0 td | at WAS |
| Week 2 | at SEA 11 tar, 8 rec, 179 yds, 0 td | vs. LAR 20 rush, 95 yds, 1 td 7 tar, 3 rec, 36 yds, 0 td |
| Week 3 | vs. LV 6 tar, 2 rec, 23 yds, 0 td 1 rush, -1 yds, 0 td | vs. CIN 18 rush, 95 yds, 0 td 8 tar, 4 rec, 12 yds, 0 td |
| Week 4 | at KC 6 tar, 3 rec, 35 yds, 0 td | at SF 13 rush, 46 yds, 0 td 4 tar, 2 rec, 30 yds, 0 td |
| Week 5 | BYE WEEK | at PIT 11 rush, 80 yds, 2 td 4 tar, 2 rec, 19 yds, 0 td |
| Week 6 | vs. DEN 6 tar, 2 rec, 8 yds, 0 td | vs. BAL 9 rush, 118 yds, 0 td 2 tar, 1 rec, -6 yds, 0 td |
| Week 7 | vs. SF | vs. NYG |
| Week 8 | at BUF | vs. DAL |
| Week 9 | at NYJ | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | vs. BAL | at NYG |
| Week 11 | at HOU | at CLE |
| Week 12 | vs. ARI | vs. SEA |
| Week 13 | at LAC | at GB |
| Week 14 | at LAR | vs. NO |
| Week 15 | at MIA | at ARI |
| Week 16 | vs. BUF | at DAL |
| Week 17 | vs. NYJ | vs. WAS |
Julian Edelman WR - NE Julian Edelman WR - NE | Miles Sanders RB - PHI Miles Sanders RB - PHI | |
| 2020 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 8.0 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 17.9 | 17.1 |
| Week 3 | 2.2 | 10.7 |
| Week 4 | 3.5 | 7.6 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 21.9 |
| Week 6 | 2.3 | 11.2 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total | 33.9 | 68.5 |
| Average | 6.8 | 13.7 |
Julian Edelman WR - NE Julian Edelman WR - NE | Miles Sanders RB - PHI Miles Sanders RB - PHI | |
| 2020 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 7 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 11 | 7 |
| Week 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Week 4 | 6 | 4 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 4 |
| Week 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
Julian Edelman WR - NE Julian Edelman WR - NE vs. SF, Sun 4pm EDT Questionable |
Miles Sanders RB - PHI Miles Sanders RB - PHI vs. NYG, Thu 8pm EDT OUT |
|
| Expert | ||
| Kyle Yates FantasyPros | Edelman's had a few disappointing performances recently and it's hard to trust him anywhere near your starting lineup right now. If you are forced into playing him, he should be viewed as a FLEX play at best. | |
| Mike Tagliere FantasyPros | Remember the first two weeks where Edelman was on pace for his best season yet? I remember the Twitter streets flooded with "Edelman just posted a career-high 179 yards with Cam Newton." Since that time (three games), Edelman has seen 18 targets and caught seven of them for 64 yards. My mentions have been flooded with questions about dropping Edelman. I typically give veterans the benefit of the doubt, but we can't forget that Edelman is 34 years old. The 49ers were a brutal matchup for slot receivers, but the loss of K'Waun Williams didn't help. That moved Jamar Taylor into the slot, and though we didn't see Cooper Kupp do much last week, Taylor has been one to target over his years in the league. Over the course of his seven-plus years in the league, he's allowed a 111.9 QB Rating in his coverage. And to be fair, Kupp should've had a better game, as he dropped a touchdown, and Goff missed him on two deep targets. The Patriots are a run-first offense under Newton (called a pass play just 50.2 percent of the time), so expectations should be limited for Edelman, but he does have the best matchup on the field among Patriots receivers. He should be considered a low-end WR3/high-end WR4 with less of a ceiling than most in that area. | |
