Mike Gesicki or Gerald Everett

Who Should I Start? - Week 8

 
Experts' Pick
 
  Gerald EverettG. Everett
TE - LAR
Gerald Everett
vs. CIN, Sun 1pm EDT
Mike GesickiM. Gesicki
TE - MIA
Mike Gesicki
at PIT, Mon 8pm EDT
 
 
Expert
Recommendation

Updated: Oct 22nd, 2019
100%
Recommended by
8 of 8 experts
0%
Recommended by
0 of 8 experts
Add Player
Most Accurate Experts 
    
Top ExpertsTop TE ExpertsTop Player Experts See who the Most Accurate Experts would start
Upgrade Now
    
Rankings 
    
ECR# 8# 29-
Best Rank# 8# 26-
Worst Rank# 10# 32-
    
Matchup 
    
Opponent vs. CIN at PIT-
Matchup Rank254-
Matchup Rating-
    
    
Stats Allowed   
Rec17.315.9
Rec Yds219.5178
Rec TD1.11.1
    
Fantasy Points 
    
Season Total40.214.3-
Avg Game5.72.9-
Avg Projection5.13.3-
Week 711.04.1-
    
Misc 
    
Injury Alert-
WeatherIndoor64 F, Possible Drizzle-
    
Expert Ranks 
Gerald EverettMike GesickiAdd Player
    
Dalton Del DonD. Del Don
Yahoo! Sports
10 m
#8#30-
    
Raju ByfieldR. Byfield
Win My Fantasy League
1 h
#10#32-
    
Pat FitzmauriceP. Fitz...
The Football Girl
4 h
#8#26-
    
Andy BehrensA. Behrens
Yahoo! Sports
6 h
#10#28-
    
Brad EvansB. Evans
Yahoo! Sports
8 h
#8-
    
Zach GreubelZ. Greubel
Gridiron Experts
11 h
#8-
    
Nick HumphreysN. Hump...
Fantasy Victors
18 h
#8-
    
Nick MarianoN. Mariano
RotoBaller
1 d
#8#26-
    
  Gerald EverettG. Everett
TE - LAR
Gerald Everett
Mike GesickiM. Gesicki
TE - MIA
Mike Gesicki
2019 Schedule 
Week 1 at CAR
1 tar, 1 rec, 7 yds, 0 td
vs. BAL
6 tar, 2 rec, 31 yds, 0 td
Week 2 vs. NO
5 tar, 3 rec, 21 yds, 0 td
1 rush, 0 yds, 0 td
vs. NE
2 tar, 1 rec, 11 yds, 0 td
Week 3 at CLE
2 tar, 2 rec, 15 yds, 0 td
at DAL
3 tar, 3 rec, 9 yds, 0 td
Week 4 vs. TB
8 tar, 5 rec, 44 yds, 1 td
vs. LAC
0 tar, 0 rec, 0 yds, 0 td
Week 5 at SEA
11 tar, 7 rec, 136 yds, 0 td
BYE WEEK
Week 6 vs. SF
5 tar, 2 rec, 9 yds, 0 td
vs. WAS
7 tar, 3 rec, 51 yds, 0 td
Week 7 at ATL
10 tar, 4 rec, 50 yds, 1 td
at BUF
4 tar, 4 rec, 41 yds, 0 td
Week 8 vs. CIN at PIT
Week 9BYE WEEK vs. NYJ
Week 10 at PIT at IND
Week 11 vs. CHI vs. BUF
Week 12 vs. BAL at CLE
Week 13 at ARI vs. PHI
Week 14 vs. SEA at NYJ
Week 15 at DAL at NYG
Week 16 at SF vs. CIN
Week 17 vs. ARI at NE
  Gerald EverettG. Everett
TE - LAR
Gerald Everett
vs. CIN, Sun 1pm EDT
Mike GesickiM. Gesicki
TE - MIA
Mike Gesicki
at PIT, Mon 8pm EDT
Receiving
   
Receptions3.42.3
Rec Yards36.027.8
Rec TDs0.30.1
   
Rushing
   
Rush Attempts0.00.0
Rush Yards0.00.0
Rush TDs0.00.0
   
Points
   
Fantasy Points5.13.3
   
  Gerald EverettG. Everett
TE - LAR
Gerald Everett
Mike GesickiM. Gesicki
TE - MIA
Mike Gesicki
2019 Points 
Week 10.73.1
Week 22.11.1
Week 31.50.9
Week 410.4
Week 513.6
Week 60.95.1
Week 711.04.1
Week 8
Week 9
Week 10
Week 11
Week 12
Week 13
Week 14
Week 15
Week 16
Week 17
  Gerald EverettG. Everett
TE - LAR
Gerald Everett
Mike GesickiM. Gesicki
TE - MIA
Mike Gesicki
2019 Targets 
Week 116
Week 252
Week 323
Week 480
Week 511
Week 657
Week 7104
Week 8
Week 9
Week 10
Week 11
Week 12
Week 13
Week 14
Week 15
Week 16
Week 17
  Gerald EverettG. Everett
TE - LAR
Gerald Everett
vs. CIN, Sun 1pm EDT
Mike GesickiM. Gesicki
TE - MIA
Mike Gesicki
at PIT, Mon 8pm EDT
Expert 
Mike Tagliere
FantasyPros
He's now seen at least five targets in four straight games, and has averaged a robust 8.5 targets in that stretch. Is Everett an every-week lock-and-load play? With that volume, it's hard to say no. He's finished as a top-eight tight end in three of the last four weeks. The Bengals have not faced many targets this year, as just one tight end has totaled more than four targets against them. That tight end was Mark Andrews, who turned eight targets into 6/99/0. So, while it's true the Bengals have allowed the fifth-fewest fantasy points to tight ends, they've allowed the fourth-most yards per target. It's pretty easy to look good when you see just 4.9 targets per game to the position. With Everett's spike in volume, you have to ride him right now, though you have to understand the volatility in this offense, as there are many mouths to feed with not a lot of pass attempts expected. He should be considered a low-end TE1.