Deebo Samuel Sr. for Kyle Pitts Sr. (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL  Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF  Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 86 | # 187 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at PIT | at LAR | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs PIT | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs LAR | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 122.8 | 116.2 | - |
| Avg Game | 7.2 | 7.3 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 19 | 30 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Kyle Pitts Sr. | Deebo Samuel Sr. | Add Player |
|
08/01 | #76 | #165 | - |
|
08/01 | #84 | #149 | - |
|
08/01 | #84 | #229 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #106 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #169 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #142 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #200 | - |
|
07/31 | #76 | #164 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #147 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #109 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | ‐ | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #153 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #129 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | ‐ | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #165 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #120 | - |
|
07/31 | #67 | #129 | - |
|
07/31 | #76 | #183 | - |
|
07/31 | #76 | #135 | - |
|
07/31 | #76 | #125 | - |
|
07/30 | #86 | #231 | - |
|
07/30 | #94 | #220 | - |
|
07/30 | #94 | #229 | - |
|
07/30 | #96 | #142 | - |
|
07/30 | #111 | #215 | - |
|
07/30 | #76 | ‐ | - |
|
07/30 | #96 | #74 | - |
|
07/30 | #94 | #169 | - |
|
07/29 | #94 | #139 | - |
|
07/29 | #94 | ‐ | - |
|
07/29 | #105 | #173 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #243 | - |
|
07/28 | #76 | #209 | - |
|
07/28 | #94 | #149 | - |
|
07/28 | #84 | #223 | - |
|
07/27 | #76 | #139 | - |
|
07/27 | #84 | #204 | - |
|
07/26 | #84 | #269 | - |
|
07/29 | #86 | #204 | - |
|
07/25 | #86 | #261 | - |
|
07/25 | #94 | #149 | - |
|
07/24 | #76 | #209 | - |
|
07/24 | #67 | #165 | - |
|
07/23 | #94 | ‐ | - |
|
07/23 | #94 | #135 | - |
|
07/22 | #94 | #142 | - |
|
07/21 | #76 | #266 | - |
|
07/20 | #67 | #244 | - |
|
07/19 | #86 | #238 | - |
|
07/19 | #94 | #179 | - |
|
07/27 | #96 | #264 | - |
|
07/18 | #96 | #264 | - |
|
07/17 | #94 | #168 | - |
|
07/17 | #86 | #165 | - |
|
07/17 | #76 | #173 | - |
|
07/17 | #76 | #203 | - |
|
07/16 | #86 | #201 | - |
|
07/26 | #94 | ‐ | - |
|
07/15 | #86 | #201 | - |
|
07/15 | #34 | ‐ | - |
|
07/14 | #86 | #229 | - |
|
07/14 | #86 | #173 | - |
|
07/14 | #86 | #237 | - |
|
07/13 | #94 | #153 | - |
|
07/30 | #86 | #164 | - |
|
07/13 | #97 | #204 | - |
|
07/12 | #94 | #226 | - |
|
07/12 | #76 | ‐ | - |
|
07/12 | #96 | #238 | - |
|
07/27 | #94 | #183 | - |
|
07/10 | #94 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #76 | ‐ | - |
|
07/07 | #94 | #226 | - |
|
07/06 | #76 | #204 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #106 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #298 | - |
|
07/25 | #86 | #244 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #93 | - |
|
07/03 | #86 | #175 | - |
|
07/24 | #94 | #223 | - |
|
07/31 | #76 | #169 | - |
|
06/30 | #94 | #169 | - |
|
07/07 | #34 | ‐ | - |
|
07/27 | #96 | #365 | - |
|
06/28 | #84 | ‐ | - |
|
07/21 | #76 | #198 | - |
|
06/28 | #76 | #314 | - |
|
06/26 | #76 | #175 | - |
|
06/25 | #86 | #201 | - |
|
07/13 | #94 | #167 | - |
|
06/15 | #86 | #198 | - |
|
06/12 | #96 | #175 | - |
|
07/31 | #63 | #142 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #142 | - |
|
05/29 | #96 | #173 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #165 | - |
|
07/29 | #96 | #204 | - |
|
05/21 | #86 | #147 | - |
|
07/30 | #76 | #170 | - |
|
07/25 | #86 | #153 | - |
|
07/01 | #86 | #168 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #164 | - |
|
05/11 | #86 | #162 | - |
|
07/27 | #96 | #217 | - |
|
07/29 | #96 | #173 | - |
|
07/30 | #96 | #222 | - |
|
04/28 | #86 | #200 | - |
|
04/27 | #86 | #220 | - |
|
04/27 | #76 | #173 | - |
|
07/28 | #86 | #153 | - |
|
05/20 | #96 | #165 | - |
|
04/20 | #86 | #179 | - |
|
07/09 | #76 | #244 | - |
|
03/24 | #86 | #149 | - |
|
03/09 | #86 | #149 | - |
|
01/07 | #94 | #139 | - |
|
07/15 | #96 | #122 | - |
|
01/07 | #94 | #142 | - |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at PIT | at LAR |
| Week 2 | vs. CAR | vs. MIA |
| Week 3 | at GB | vs. ARI |
| Week 4 | at NO | vs. DEN |
| Week 5 | vs. BAL | at SEA |
| Week 6 | vs. CHI | vs. WAS |
| Week 7 | vs. SF | at ATL |
| Week 8 | at TB | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | vs. CIN | vs. LV |
| Week 10 | vs. KC | at DAL |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | vs. MIN |
| Week 12 | at MIN | vs. SEA |
| Week 13 | vs. DET | at NYG |
| Week 14 | at CLE | vs. LAR |
| Week 15 | at WAS | at LAC |
| Week 16 | vs. TB | at KC |
| Week 17 | vs. NO | vs. PHI |
| Week 18 | at CAR | at ARI |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 5.9 | 15.6 |
| Week 2 | 3.7 | 10.4 |
| Week 3 | 3.9 | 2.9 |
| Week 4 | 13.0 | 14.1 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 15.6 |
| Week 6 | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Week 7 | 6.2 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 5.9 | 1.2 |
| Week 9 | 3.8 | 4.4 |
| Week 10 | 3.8 | 8.9 |
| Week 11 | 1.4 | 13.7 |
| Week 12 | 2.5 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 8.2 | 6.1 |
| Week 14 | 9.0 | 2.7 |
| Week 15 | 34.6 | 4.3 |
| Week 16 | 11.7 | 3.5 |
| Week 17 | 1.6 | 9.3 |
| Week 18 | 5.8 | 2.1 |
| Total | 122.8 | 116.2 |
| Average | 7.2 | 7.3 |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Kyle Pitts entered the 2025 season with the reputation of being a perennial fantasy tease. The former No. 3 overall draft pick tried to rehabilitate his image with 88 catches for 928 yards and five touchdowns last year, good for a TE2 finish in half-point PPR fantasy scoring. Pitts scored three of his five touchdowns and had his only 100-yard game of the season in Week 15, when he erupted for 11 catches, 166 yards and three scores vs. the Buccaneers. It was Pitts' best season since his 1,026-yard rookie campaign in 2021. The Falcons don't have a lot of firepower at wide receiver beyond Drake London, so Pitts could very well be Atlanta's No. 2 target earner this season. And while the QB duo of Michael Penix and Tua Tagovailoa doesn't seem very appealing, it's worth remembering that Mike Gesicki and Jonnu Smith had the best fantasy seasons of their careers with Tua as their primary QB. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Last year, Kyle Pitts had a tale of two seasons. Yes, overall it was a wonderful year as the TE5 in fantasy points per game and easily his best statistical season since his rookie year, but it was wildly different with Drake London in and out of the lineup. Without London, Pitts had a 26.7% target share with 84.4 receiving yards per game, 2.81 yards per route run, a 27.8% first-read share, 0.120 first downs per route run, and 19 fantasy points per game (per Fantasy Points Data). Those are all elite numbers, and if Pitts had put up those stats all year, especially the fantasy points per game, he would have been the TE1 for fantasy. The problem is that with Drake London active, Pitts had a 19% target share, 42.2 receiving yards per game, 1.43 yards per route run, a 20.2% first-read share, 0.093 first downs per route run, and 9.6 fantasy points per game. All of those per route metrics were still quite strong, but the fantasy points per game mark would have made Pitts the TE20 last year. With Kevin Stefanski in town and a passing attack that boils down to London and Pitts at the top alongside Bijan Robinson, the reality of Pitts' 2026 projection falls somewhere in the middle of all of this. He's a strong TE1 that still has top-five upside if Tua Tagovailoa and Michael Penix Jr. can give Atlanta at least league-average quarterback play all season. | Deebo Samuel rejoins the San Francisco 49ers on a one-year deal after a one-year dalliance with the Commanders. With Ricky Pearsall likely sidelined for the entire season, Samuel will compete with De'Zhaun Stribling to be the WR2 in the pecking order behind Mike Evans. Last year, Samuel was the WR29 in fantasy points per game while putting up a varied stat line. Samuel posted some metrics that make me want to feel bullish about his 2026 outlook, but there are also concerning pieces of his analytical profile. Let's start out with the good. Last year, among 109 qualifying receivers, Samuel was 18th in target share (22.4%), ninth in yards after the catch per reception (6.6), 21st in first-read share (27.3%), and ninth-best in missed tackles forced per reception. Unfortunately, though, among the same sample of receivers, he was also 38th in yards per route run and 53rd in first downs per route run (0.076) while seeing his usual bevy of underneath targets (5.3 aDOT, 103rd out of 109 qualifying receivers). I find myself more in than out with Samuel for 2026. His ability to break tackles and create with the ball in his hands has always been his calling card, and he's still posting stellar metrics in those departments and target-earning areas. The per-route efficiency worries I'll chalk up to Washington's struggling offense last season. Samuel should be a viable WR3/flex with upside for 2026 in the 49ers' offense. |
