Denzel Boston for Luke Musgrave (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Denzel Boston WR - CLE ![]() Denzel Boston WR - CLE | Luke Musgrave TE - GB ![]() Luke Musgrave TE - GB |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 156 | # 415 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at JAC | at MIN | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs JAC | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs MIN | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 0.0 | 25.2 | - |
| Avg Game | ‐ | 1.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 16 | 25 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Denzel Boston | Luke Musgrave | Add Player |
|
05/31 | #164 | #389 | - |
|
05/31 | #153 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #149 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #142 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #179 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #162 | #349 | - |
|
05/27 | #149 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #175 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #149 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #168 | ‐ | - |
|
05/28 | #149 | ‐ | - |
|
05/27 | #142 | ‐ | - |
|
05/26 | #203 | ‐ | - |
|
05/26 | #153 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #165 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #147 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #147 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #129 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #149 | #362 | - |
|
05/22 | #261 | ‐ | - |
|
04/26 | #149 | ‐ | - |
|
05/21 | #115 | ‐ | - |
|
05/18 | #173 | #354 | - |
|
05/30 | #153 | ‐ | - |
|
06/01 | #142 | #335 | - |
|
05/27 | #179 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #168 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #147 | ‐ | - |
|
05/09 | #168 | ‐ | - |
|
05/08 | #101 | ‐ | - |
|
05/06 | #147 | #320 | - |
|
05/11 | #169 | ‐ | - |
|
05/02 | #217 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #169 | #362 | - |
|
05/23 | #106 | ‐ | - |
|
04/29 | #89 | ‐ | - |
|
05/04 | #153 | ‐ | - |
|
04/28 | #120 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #132 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #91 | #369 | - |
|
05/14 | #120 | ‐ | - |
|
05/20 | #217 | ‐ | - |
|
04/20 | #91 | #375 | - |
|
04/15 | #83 | ‐ | - |
|
05/04 | #164 | ‐ | - |
|
03/24 | #114 | ‐ | - |
|
03/23 | #80 | ‐ | - |
|
03/15 | #98 | ‐ | - |
|
03/09 | #115 | ‐ | - |
Denzel Boston WR - CLE ![]() Denzel Boston WR - CLE | Luke Musgrave TE - GB ![]() Luke Musgrave TE - GB | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at JAC | at MIN |
| Week 2 | at TB | at NYJ |
| Week 3 | vs. CAR | vs. ATL |
| Week 4 | vs. PIT | at TB |
| Week 5 | at NYJ | vs. CHI |
| Week 6 | vs. BAL | vs. DAL |
| Week 7 | at TEN | at DET |
| Week 8 | at PIT | vs. CAR |
| Week 9 | at NO | at NE |
| Week 10 | vs. HOU | vs. MIN |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | BYE WEEK |
| Week 12 | vs. LV | at LAR |
| Week 13 | vs. CIN | at NO |
| Week 14 | vs. ATL | vs. BUF |
| Week 15 | at NYG | vs. MIA |
| Week 16 | at BAL | at CHI |
| Week 17 | vs. IND | vs. HOU |
| Week 18 | at CIN | vs. DET |
Denzel Boston WR - CLE ![]() Denzel Boston WR - CLE | Luke Musgrave TE - GB ![]() Luke Musgrave TE - GB | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | ‐ | 0.4 |
| Week 2 | ‐ | 3.2 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 0.6 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 0.7 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 3.4 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 2.3 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | -0.1 |
| Week 12 | ‐ | 0.7 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 2.3 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 2.2 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 5.2 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 3.8 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Total | 0.0 | 25.2 |
| Average | ‐ | 1.5 |
Denzel Boston WR - CLE ![]() Denzel Boston WR - CLE | Luke Musgrave TE - GB ![]() Luke Musgrave TE - GB | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Denzel Boston lands in Cleveland with intriguing draft capital and a skill set that fills a clear need in the Browns offense. The 6-foot-4 receiver brings size, physicality, and contested-catch ability to a WR room lacking true boundary presence. However, Boston faces an uphill battle for immediate fantasy relevance while competing with first-round pick KC Concepcion and tight end Harold Fannin Jr. for targets in an offense with lingering quarterback concerns. His profile suggests more boom-or-bust production early in his career, relying heavily on downfield plays and red-zone opportunities. | |


