Isaac TeSlaa for Ty Chandler (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET ![]() Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET | Ty Chandler RB - NO ![]() Ty Chandler RB - NO |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 204 | # 436 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. NO | at DET | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs NO | This is a 3 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs DET | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 59.9 | 5.8 | - |
| Avg Game | 3.5 | 1.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 7 | 13 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Isaac TeSlaa | Ty Chandler | Add Player |
|
05/31 | #285 | ‐ | - |
|
05/31 | #220 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #194 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #198 | #341 | - |
|
05/30 | #306 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #194 | ‐ | - |
|
05/27 | #200 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #200 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #200 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #203 | ‐ | - |
|
05/28 | #198 | ‐ | - |
|
05/27 | #201 | ‐ | - |
|
05/26 | #217 | ‐ | - |
|
05/26 | #215 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #177 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #201 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #194 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #175 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #175 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #203 | #316 | - |
|
05/22 | #194 | ‐ | - |
|
05/21 | #177 | ‐ | - |
|
04/26 | #198 | ‐ | - |
|
05/21 | #175 | ‐ | - |
|
05/18 | #194 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #179 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #193 | ‐ | - |
|
05/27 | #198 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #198 | ‐ | - |
|
05/09 | #198 | ‐ | - |
|
05/08 | #177 | ‐ | - |
|
05/06 | #174 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #200 | ‐ | - |
|
05/02 | #198 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #179 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #226 | ‐ | - |
|
04/29 | #177 | ‐ | - |
|
04/28 | #183 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #169 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #179 | ‐ | - |
|
05/14 | #183 | ‐ | - |
|
05/20 | #209 | ‐ | - |
|
04/20 | #173 | ‐ | - |
|
04/12 | #177 | ‐ | - |
|
04/15 | #162 | ‐ | - |
|
04/06 | #173 | ‐ | - |
|
04/02 | #173 | ‐ | - |
|
05/04 | #226 | ‐ | - |
|
03/24 | #175 | ‐ | - |
|
03/23 | #194 | ‐ | - |
|
03/15 | #175 | ‐ | - |
|
03/09 | #200 | ‐ | - |
|
02/08 | #179 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #168 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #177 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #177 | ‐ | - |
Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET ![]() Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET | Ty Chandler RB - NO ![]() Ty Chandler RB - NO | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. NO | at DET |
| Week 2 | at BUF | at BAL |
| Week 3 | vs. NYJ | vs. LV |
| Week 4 | at CAR | vs. ATL |
| Week 5 | at ARI | vs. MIN |
| Week 6 | BYE WEEK | at NYG |
| Week 7 | vs. GB | vs. PIT |
| Week 8 | vs. MIN | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | at MIA | vs. CLE |
| Week 10 | vs. NE | vs. CAR |
| Week 11 | vs. TB | at CHI |
| Week 12 | vs. CHI | at CIN |
| Week 13 | at ATL | vs. GB |
| Week 14 | vs. TEN | at CAR |
| Week 15 | at MIN | at TB |
| Week 16 | vs. NYG | vs. ARI |
| Week 17 | at CHI | at ATL |
| Week 18 | at GB | vs. TB |
Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET ![]() Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET | Ty Chandler RB - NO ![]() Ty Chandler RB - NO | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 7.3 | 0.0 |
| Week 2 | 2.9 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 7.2 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 1.1 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 9.5 | ‐ |
| Week 14 | 8.0 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 16 | 11.2 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | 10.9 | 2.4 |
| Week 18 | 1.8 | 3.4 |
| Total | 59.9 | 5.8 |
| Average | 3.5 | 1.9 |
Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET ![]() Isaac TeSlaa WR - DET | Ty Chandler RB - NO ![]() Ty Chandler RB - NO | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Isaac TeSlaa barely saw the field as a rookie, but he flashed intriguing upside by turning just 16 receptions into six touchdowns. Detroit clearly believes in the former third-round pick after trading up for him in 2025, and Dan Campbell has already hinted at a potential Year 2 leap. With Kalif Raymond gone, TeSlaa has a clear path to the Lions' No. 3 WR role behind Amon-Ra St. Brown and Jameson Williams. He's still more dynasty/deep-league upside stash than reliable redraft option, but the athletic traits and red-zone usage are worth monitoring closely. | |


