Kyle Pitts Sr. for Mark Andrews (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL ![]() Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Mark Andrews TE - BAL ![]() Mark Andrews TE - BAL |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 8 | # 14 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at PIT | at IND | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs PIT | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs IND | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 122.8 | 83.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 7.2 | 4.9 | - |
| Avg Projection | 116.2 | 106.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 19 | 7 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Kyle Pitts Sr. | Mark Andrews | Add Player |
|
07/21 | #6 | #13 | - |
|
07/21 | #10 | #12 | - |
|
07/21 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/21 | #8 | #13 | - |
|
07/21 | #6 | #13 | - |
|
07/20 | #13 | #7 | - |
|
07/20 | #5 | #14 | - |
|
07/20 | #7 | #15 | - |
|
07/20 | #12 | #9 | - |
|
07/20 | #8 | #11 | - |
|
07/19 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/19 | #9 | #10 | - |
|
07/19 | #10 | #12 | - |
|
07/19 | #5 | #14 | - |
|
07/19 | #13 | #10 | - |
|
07/18 | #10 | #15 | - |
|
07/18 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/20 | #12 | #3 | - |
|
07/17 | #6 | #13 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #10 | - |
|
07/17 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/17 | #6 | #18 | - |
|
07/17 | #6 | #14 | - |
|
07/17 | #6 | #11 | - |
|
07/16 | #8 | #19 | - |
|
07/16 | #5 | #9 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #16 | - |
|
07/15 | #8 | #15 | - |
|
07/15 | #6 | #14 | - |
|
07/16 | #9 | #7 | - |
|
07/15 | #8 | #10 | - |
|
07/15 | #9 | #14 | - |
|
07/15 | #3 | #9 | - |
|
07/14 | #8 | #14 | - |
|
07/14 | #8 | #7 | - |
|
07/14 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/13 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/13 | #8 | #12 | - |
|
07/13 | #10 | #14 | - |
|
07/12 | #9 | #14 | - |
|
07/12 | #6 | #20 | - |
|
07/12 | #10 | #8 | - |
|
07/11 | #8 | #15 | - |
|
07/10 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/14 | #6 | #16 | - |
|
07/20 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/09 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/08 | #7 | #13 | - |
|
07/08 | #9 | #22 | - |
|
07/08 | #10 | #11 | - |
|
07/07 | #9 | #14 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #8 | - |
|
07/06 | #6 | #10 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/05 | #5 | #13 | - |
|
07/19 | #9 | #7 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #14 | - |
|
07/03 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
07/01 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/01 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/21 | #6 | #14 | - |
|
06/30 | #9 | #16 | - |
|
07/07 | #3 | #16 | - |
|
07/10 | #6 | #10 | - |
|
06/28 | #7 | #9 | - |
|
07/21 | #6 | #18 | - |
|
06/28 | #6 | #14 | - |
|
06/26 | #6 | #12 | - |
|
06/25 | #8 | #14 | - |
|
07/13 | #9 | #11 | - |
|
06/19 | #14 | #7 | - |
|
06/15 | #8 | #14 | - |
|
07/02 | #6 | #10 | - |
|
07/08 | #7 | #14 | - |
|
06/12 | #10 | #11 | - |
|
07/20 | #11 | #13 | - |
|
06/08 | #9 | #13 | - |
|
07/21 | #7 | #12 | - |
|
07/20 | #10 | #19 | - |
|
05/29 | #10 | #17 | - |
|
07/15 | #9 | #12 | - |
|
07/08 | #9 | #15 | - |
|
06/04 | #8 | #13 | - |
|
05/21 | #8 | #19 | - |
|
05/18 | #8 | #15 | - |
|
07/01 | #8 | #12 | - |
|
07/21 | #9 | #16 | - |
|
05/11 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
05/09 | #9 | #17 | - |
|
05/11 | #10 | #14 | - |
|
07/20 | #10 | #12 | - |
|
04/28 | #8 | #18 | - |
|
04/27 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
04/27 | #6 | #17 | - |
|
06/09 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
05/20 | #10 | #11 | - |
|
04/20 | #8 | #20 | - |
|
07/09 | #6 | #17 | - |
|
03/24 | #8 | #18 | - |
|
03/09 | #8 | #17 | - |
|
01/07 | #9 | #17 | - |
|
07/15 | #10 | #17 | - |
|
01/07 | #9 | #18 | - |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL ![]() Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Mark Andrews TE - BAL ![]() Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at PIT | at IND |
| Week 2 | vs. CAR | vs. NO |
| Week 3 | at GB | at DAL |
| Week 4 | at NO | vs. TEN |
| Week 5 | vs. BAL | at ATL |
| Week 6 | vs. CHI | at CLE |
| Week 7 | vs. SF | vs. CIN |
| Week 8 | at TB | at BUF |
| Week 9 | vs. CIN | vs. JAC |
| Week 10 | vs. KC | vs. LAC |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | at CAR |
| Week 12 | at MIN | at HOU |
| Week 13 | vs. DET | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | at CLE | vs. TB |
| Week 15 | at WAS | at PIT |
| Week 16 | vs. TB | vs. CLE |
| Week 17 | vs. NO | at CIN |
| Week 18 | at CAR | vs. PIT |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL ![]() Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Mark Andrews TE - BAL ![]() Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 79.5 | 58.3 |
| Rec Yards | 881.8 | 607.6 |
| Rec TDs | 4.7 | 7.7 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yards | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 116.2 | 106.5 |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL ![]() Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Mark Andrews TE - BAL ![]() Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 5.9 | 0.5 |
| Week 2 | 3.7 | 0.4 |
| Week 3 | 3.9 | 21.1 |
| Week 4 | 13.0 | 3.0 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 2.2 |
| Week 6 | 1.8 | 2.6 |
| Week 7 | 6.2 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 5.9 | 3.4 |
| Week 9 | 3.8 | 14.6 |
| Week 10 | 3.8 | 7.4 |
| Week 11 | 1.4 | 12.7 |
| Week 12 | 2.5 | 1.1 |
| Week 13 | 8.2 | 4.7 |
| Week 14 | 9.0 | 0.9 |
| Week 15 | 34.6 | 1.8 |
| Week 16 | 11.7 | 2.4 |
| Week 17 | 1.6 | 2.8 |
| Week 18 | 5.8 | 1.4 |
| Total | 122.8 | 83.0 |
| Average | 7.2 | 4.9 |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL ![]() Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Mark Andrews TE - BAL ![]() Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 8 | 1 |
| Week 2 | 5 | 3 |
| Week 3 | 6 | 6 |
| Week 4 | 5 | 8 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 3 |
| Week 6 | 4 | 6 |
| Week 7 | 10 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 9 | 3 |
| Week 9 | 7 | 3 |
| Week 10 | 5 | 5 |
| Week 11 | 3 | 5 |
| Week 12 | 5 | 3 |
| Week 13 | 8 | 6 |
| Week 14 | 10 | 5 |
| Week 15 | 12 | 3 |
| Week 16 | 9 | 3 |
| Week 17 | 3 | 4 |
| Week 18 | 9 | 3 |
Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL ![]() Kyle Pitts Sr. TE - ATL | Mark Andrews TE - BAL ![]() Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Kyle Pitts entered the 2025 season with the reputation of being a perennial fantasy tease. The former No. 3 overall draft pick tried to rehabilitate his image with 88 catches for 928 yards and five touchdowns last year, good for a TE2 finish in half-point PPR fantasy scoring. Pitts scored three of his five touchdowns and had his only 100-yard game of the season in Week 15, when he erupted for 11 catches, 166 yards and three scores vs. the Buccaneers. It was Pitts' best season since his 1,026-yard rookie campaign in 2021. The Falcons don't have a lot of firepower at wide receiver beyond Drake London, so Pitts could very well be Atlanta's No. 2 target earner this season. And while the QB duo of Michael Penix and Tua Tagovailoa doesn't seem very appealing, it's worth remembering that Mike Gesicki and Jonnu Smith had the best fantasy seasons of their careers with Tua as their primary QB. | Is Mark Andrews poised for a bump in productivity now that TE Isaiah Likely has left the Ravens for the Giants, leaving Andrews as the only established pass-catching tight end on the Baltimore roster? Or is Andrews, who turns 31 on Sept. 6, simply out of gas? Andrews' production cratered last season. He had career lows in yards per game (24.8), yards per catch (8.8) and yards per target (6.0). Some of Andrews' problems were undoubtedly related to Lamar Jackson's 2025 health issues. The Ravens' starting QB missed four regular-season games and didn't appear to be fully healthy in others. If Jackson returns to form and Andrews sees a target increase in the absence of Likely, Andrews could offer midrange TE1 numbers at a low-end TE1/high-end TE2 price. Andrews has drawn 69 and 70 targets the last two seasons despite playing 17 regular-season games both years. He drew 153 targets in 2021 and 113 targets in 15 games in 2022. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Last year, Kyle Pitts had a tale of two seasons. Yes, overall it was a wonderful year as the TE5 in fantasy points per game and easily his best statistical season since his rookie year, but it was wildly different with Drake London in and out of the lineup. Without London, Pitts had a 26.7% target share with 84.4 receiving yards per game, 2.81 yards per route run, a 27.8% first-read share, 0.120 first downs per route run, and 19 fantasy points per game (per Fantasy Points Data). Those are all elite numbers, and if Pitts had put up those stats all year, especially the fantasy points per game, he would have been the TE1 for fantasy. The problem is that with Drake London active, Pitts had a 19% target share, 42.2 receiving yards per game, 1.43 yards per route run, a 20.2% first-read share, 0.093 first downs per route run, and 9.6 fantasy points per game. All of those per route metrics were still quite strong, but the fantasy points per game mark would have made Pitts the TE20 last year. With Kevin Stefanski in town and a passing attack that boils down to London and Pitts at the top alongside Bijan Robinson, the reality of Pitts' 2026 projection falls somewhere in the middle of all of this. He's a strong TE1 that still has top-five upside if Tua Tagovailoa and Michael Penix Jr. can give Atlanta at least league-average quarterback play all season. | Mark Andrews is coming off easily his worst season in the NFL as the TE23 in fantasy points per game. Last year, Baltimore limited his playing time, as he was 22nd in route share (62.9%, per Fantasy Points Data). I'm expecting that to rebound in 2026 with Isaiah Likely gone, but we still have to see it materialize. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Andrews was ninth in first read share, but his yards per route run (41st) and first downs per route run (27th) were nothing to write home about. He's worth taking a flier on late in drafts as your tight end two with the hopes that he can rebound with more playing time in a new offensive system and give us a throwback season in 2026. |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Mark Andrews was a flat-out bust in 75% of his games played last season. He finished as a weekly fantasy TE1 (top-12) in under 20% of his games played (3 of 17 games played). He was the TE16 last season (TE23 in PPG), and he's not getting any younger. I'm very concerned that he might just be closer to being cooked. Posted a career low in yards (422). His yards per route run TANKED at 1.22. His YAC tanked. Dead last in YAC/reception among 49 qualifying tight ends. Zach "never forced a missed tackle in his life" Ertz had more YAC than Andrews did last season. And Andrews was bad with and without Lamar Jackson last season. There's a path for volume in the Ravens' offense, which is why Andrews is being ranked/drafted as a top-15 consensus tight end. But I'm afraid his decline will continue after he has failed to command the same type of volume over the last 2 seasons. | |


