Los Angeles Rams or Indianapolis Colts
Who Should I Draft?
Experts' Pick | |||
Indianapolis Colts DST - IND | Los Angeles Rams DST - LAR |  | |
Expert |
70% Recommended by 47 of 67 experts |
30% Recommended by 20 of 67 experts |
Add Player |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop DST ExpertsTop Team Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would draftUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| ECR | # 4 | # 8 | - |
| Best Rank | # 2 | # 1 | - |
| Worst Rank | # 16 | # 21 | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 138.0 | 121.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 8.1 | 5.8 | - |
| Avg Projection | 106.8 | 111.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 5 | 32 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Indianapolis Colts | Los Angeles Rams | Add Player |
|
12 h | #8 | #10 | - |
|
18 h | #2 | #6 | - |
|
18 h | #5 | #12 | - |
|
19 h | #5 | #8 | - |
|
19 h | #9 | #7 | - |
|
20 h | #7 | #14 | - |
|
1 d | #6 | #13 | - |
|
1 d | #3 | #21 | - |
|
1 d | #5 | #10 | - |
|
2 d | #7 | #3 | - |
|
2 d | #4 | #14 | - |
|
2 d | #3 | #6 | - |
|
2 d | #9 | #10 | - |
|
2 d | #8 | #7 | - |
|
2 d | #7 | #3 | - |
|
2 d | #4 | #8 | - |
|
3 d | #5 | #10 | - |
|
3 d | #6 | #4 | - |
|
3 d | #6 | #8 | - |
|
3 d | #11 | #2 | - |
|
3 d | #5 | #9 | - |
|
4 d | #9 | #1 | - |
|
4 d | #6 | #7 | - |
|
4 d | #2 | #17 | - |
|
5 d | #3 | #14 | - |
|
5 d | #4 | #7 | - |
|
5 d | #5 | #8 | - |
|
5 d | #9 | #12 | - |
|
5 d | #6 | #12 | - |
|
5 d | #4 | #11 | - |
|
6 d | #10 | #13 | - |
|
6 d | #9 | #3 | - |
|
6 d | #3 | #14 | - |
|
6 d | #10 | #1 | - |
|
6 d | #16 | #3 | - |
|
7 d | #4 | #7 | - |
|
7 d | #3 | #14 | - |
|
7 d | #6 | #7 | - |
|
1 w | #3 | #5 | - |
|
1 w | #5 | #10 | - |
|
1 w | ‐ | #1 | - |
|
1 w | #6 | #1 | - |
|
1 w | #6 | #9 | - |
|
1 w | #4 | #16 | - |
|
2 w | #8 | #9 | - |
|
2 w | #13 | #5 | - |
|
2 w | #5 | #7 | - |
|
2 w | #9 | #13 | - |
|
2 w | #14 | #8 | - |
|
2 w | #8 | #1 | - |
|
2 w | #8 | #13 | - |
|
2 w | #4 | #8 | - |
|
2 w | #3 | #15 | - |
|
3 w | #8 | #11 | - |
|
3 w | #7 | #5 | - |
|
3 w | #9 | #7 | - |
|
4 w | #11 | #6 | - |
|
05/28 | #5 | #8 | - |
|
3 w | #4 | #11 | - |
|
2 w | #25 | #2 | - |
|
05/17 | #1 | #7 | - |
|
05/16 | #4 | #8 | - |
|
05/24 | #5 | #14 | - |
|
05/10 | #8 | #11 | - |
|
4 w | #8 | #3 | - |
|
05/02 | #5 | #7 | - |
|
05/01 | #3 | #5 | - |
Indianapolis Colts DST - IND | Los Angeles Rams DST - LAR | |
| 2022 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at HOU | vs. BUF |
| Week 2 | at JAC | vs. ATL |
| Week 3 | vs. KC | at ARI |
| Week 4 | vs. TEN | at SF |
| Week 5 | at DEN | vs. DAL |
| Week 6 | vs. JAC | vs. CAR |
| Week 7 | at TEN | BYE WEEK |
| Week 8 | vs. WAS | vs. SF |
| Week 9 | at NE | at TB |
| Week 10 | at LV | vs. ARI |
| Week 11 | vs. PHI | at NO |
| Week 12 | vs. PIT | at KC |
| Week 13 | at DAL | vs. SEA |
| Week 14 | BYE WEEK | vs. LV |
| Week 15 | at MIN | at GB |
| Week 16 | vs. LAC | vs. DEN |
| Week 17 | at NYG | at LAC |
| Week 18 | vs. HOU | at SEA |
Indianapolis Colts DST - IND | Los Angeles Rams DST - LAR | |
| Defense | ||
| Sacks | 35.0 | 44.3 |
| Ints | 15.2 | 14.8 |
| Fumble Rec | 11.4 | 9.8 |
| Forced Fumble | 18.0 | 12.8 |
| Def TD | 2.8 | 2.8 |
| Ast Tackles | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Safety | 1.0 | 0.5 |
| Points Allowed | 365.7 | 367.4 |
| Yards Allowed | 5,727.8 | 5,665.8 |
Indianapolis Colts DST - IND | Los Angeles Rams DST - LAR | |
| 2021 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 4.0 | 8.0 |
| Week 2 | 11.0 | 8.0 |
| Week 3 | 7.0 | 3.0 |
| Week 4 | 8.0 | -1.0 |
| Week 5 | 3.0 | 7.0 |
| Week 6 | 15.0 | 16.0 |
| Week 7 | 11.0 | 7.0 |
| Week 8 | 6.0 | 7.0 |
| Week 9 | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Week 10 | 14.0 | 1.0 |
| Week 11 | 10.0 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Week 13 | 18.0 | 10.0 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 8.0 |
| Week 15 | 14.0 | 9.0 |
| Week 16 | 3.0 | 11.0 |
| Week 17 | 6.0 | 13.0 |
| Week 18 | 1.0 | 7.0 |
| Total | 138.0 | 121.0 |
| Average | 8.1 | 5.8 |
Indianapolis Colts DST - IND | Los Angeles Rams DST - LAR | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | The Colts are likely do for some defensive regression with all the turnover they had on that side of the ball this offseason, but it's hard to ignore their two juicy matchups to start the year: @HOU and @JAC. They are definitely worth drafting if you can't get a better option, but don't view them as an elite unit. Two road Divisonal games may not be as easy as they look on paper. Indy also tied Dallas with the highest turnover differential in 2021, despite ranking 31st in pressure rate (18%). | |
