Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Who has the Easiest Schedule in 2021?

What is fantasy Strength of Schedule?
Each team's Strength of Schedule (SOS) displays the relative ease or difficulty of their matchups for the season. SOS is based on each opponent's Fantasy Points Allowed to a position, adjusted for strength of schedule. Favorable matchups receive better matchup star ratings. You can learn more about the methodology here.

TeamQBRBWRTEKDST
ARI
This is a 2 star matchup. ARI has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. ARI has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
ATL
This is a 3 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. ATL has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
BAL
This is a 2 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. BAL has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. BAL has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
BUF
This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. BUF has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. BUF has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. BUF has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. BUF has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
CAR
This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CAR has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
CHI
This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. CHI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. CHI has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
CIN
This is a 2 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. CIN has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
CLE
This is a 3 star matchup. CLE has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. CLE has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. CLE has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
DAL
This is a 2 star matchup. DAL has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. DAL has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. DAL has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. DAL has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. DAL has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. DAL has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
DEN
This is a 5 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. DEN has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
DET
This is a 1 star matchup. DET has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 0 star matchup. DET has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. DET has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. DET has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. DET has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
GB
This is a 2 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 0 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. GB has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 0 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. GB has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
HOU
This is a 4 star matchup. HOU has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. HOU has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. HOU has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. HOU has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. HOU has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
IND
This is a 4 star matchup. IND has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. IND has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. IND has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. IND has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
JAC
This is a 4 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
KC
This is a 4 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. KC has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. KC has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. KC has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
MIA
This is a 4 star matchup. MIA has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. MIA has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. MIA has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. MIA has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
MIN
This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 0 star matchup. MIN has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
NE
This is a 5 star matchup. NE has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NE has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. NE has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NE has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 0 star matchup. NE has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
NO
This is a 3 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NO has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
NYG
This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. NYG has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
NYJ
This is a 3 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NYJ has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. NYJ has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
LV
This is a 3 star matchup. LV has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. LV has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. LV has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. LV has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. LV has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. LV has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
PHI
This is a 4 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. PHI has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
PIT
This is a 4 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
LAC
This is a 2 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
SEA
This is a 0 star matchup. SEA has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. SEA has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. SEA has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.
This is a 1 star matchup. SEA has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. SEA has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. SEA has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
SF
This is a 5 star matchup. SF has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. SF has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. SF has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
LAR
This is a 4 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 4 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. LAR has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
TB
This is a 2 star matchup. TB has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 0 star matchup. TB has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. TB has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 5 star matchup. TB has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
TEN
This is a 2 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
WAS
This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.
This is a 3 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. WAS has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.
This is a 2 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.