Strength of Schedule (SOS)

Who has the Easiest Schedule in 2020?

What is fantasy Strength of Schedule?
Each team's Strength of Schedule (SOS) displays the relative ease or difficulty of their matchups for the season. SOS is based on each opponent's Fantasy Points Allowed to a position, adjusted for strength of schedule. Favorable matchups receive better matchup star ratings. You can learn more about the methodology here.

Team	QB	RB	WR	TE	K	DST
ARI	This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. ARI has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. ARI has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
ATL	This is a 1 star matchup. ATL has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. ATL has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. ATL has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
BAL	This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. BAL has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. BAL has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
BUF	This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. BUF has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. BUF has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
CAR	This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. CAR has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
CHI	This is a 5 star matchup. CHI has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. CHI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. CHI has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. CHI has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. CHI has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
CIN	This is a 4 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
CLE	This is a 5 star matchup. CLE has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CLE has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CLE has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. CLE has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. CLE has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
DAL	This is a 4 star matchup. DAL has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. DAL has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
DEN	This is a 1 star matchup. DEN has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. DEN has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
DET	This is a 3 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. DET has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. DET has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
GB	This is a 4 star matchup. GB has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. GB has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. GB has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. GB has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
HOU	This is a 2 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. HOU has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
IND	This is a 4 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. IND has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. IND has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
JAC	This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
KC	This is a 2 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. KC has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. KC has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
MIA	This is a 1 star matchup. MIA has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. MIA has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. MIA has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. MIA has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 0 star matchup. MIA has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
MIN	This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. MIN has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
NE	This is a 2 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. NE has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
NO	This is a 2 star matchup. NO has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 0 star matchup. NO has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. NO has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. NO has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. NO has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. NO has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
NYG	This is a 3 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. NYG has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. NYG has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
NYJ	This is a 2 star matchup. NYJ has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. NYJ has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. NYJ has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. NYJ has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
LV	This is a 1 star matchup. LV has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. LV has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. LV has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. LV has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. LV has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. LV has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
PHI	This is a 4 star matchup. PHI has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. PHI has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. PHI has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
PIT	This is a 4 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
LAC	This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
SEA	This is a 4 star matchup. SEA has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. SEA has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. SEA has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. SEA has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. SEA has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. SEA has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.
SF	This is a 4 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. SF has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. SF has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. SF has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
LAR	This is a 3 star matchup. LAR has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. LAR has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 5 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average.
TB	This is a 2 star matchup. TB has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. TB has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. TB has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
TEN	This is a 2 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average.	This is a 1 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average.
WAS	This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average.	This is a 3 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average.	This is a 2 star matchup. WAS has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average.	This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average.