| ARI | This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. ARI has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. ARI has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. ARI has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| ATL | This is a 4 star matchup. ATL has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. ATL has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. ATL has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. ATL has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. ATL has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| BAL | This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. BAL has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. BAL has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| BUF | This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. BUF has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. BUF has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| CAR | This is a 3 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. CAR has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CAR has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| CHI | This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. CHI has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CHI has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. CHI has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| CIN | This is a 5 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. CIN has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CIN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| CLE | This is a 1 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CLE has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. CLE has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. CLE has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| DAL | This is a 3 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. DAL has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. DAL has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. DAL has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| DEN | This is a 5 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. DEN has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. DEN has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| DET | This is a 1 star matchup. DET has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. DET has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. DET has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. DET has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| GB | This is a 2 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. GB has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. GB has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. GB has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. GB has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| HOU | This is a 4 star matchup. HOU has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. HOU has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. HOU has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. HOU has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. HOU has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. HOU has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| IND | This is a 2 star matchup. IND has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. IND has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. IND has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. IND has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. IND has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| JAC | This is a 4 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. JAC has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. JAC has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. JAC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| KC | This is a 2 star matchup. KC has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. KC has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. KC has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. KC has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| MIA | This is a 5 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. MIA has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. MIA has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. MIA has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| MIN | This is a 2 star matchup. MIN has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. MIN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. MIN has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| NE | This is a 1 star matchup. NE has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. NE has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. NE has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. NE has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NE has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| NO | This is a 3 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. NO has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. NO has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NO has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| NYG | This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. NYG has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NYG has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| NYJ | This is a 1 star matchup. NYJ has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. NYJ has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. NYJ has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. NYJ has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. NYJ has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| OAK | This is a 2 star matchup. OAK has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. OAK has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. OAK has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. OAK has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. OAK has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. OAK has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| PHI | This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. PHI has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. PHI has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. PHI has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. PHI has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| PIT | This is a 3 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. PIT has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. PIT has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. PIT has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| LAC | This is a 5 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. LAC has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. LAC has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. LAC has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| SEA | This is a 5 star matchup. SEA has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. SEA has an easy schedule in which RBs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. SEA has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. SEA has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. SEA has an easy schedule in which Ks perform better than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. SEA has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| SF | This is a 2 star matchup. SF has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. SF has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. SF has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. SF has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| LAR | This is a 2 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which QBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which WRs perform worse than their average. | This is a 2 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which TEs perform worse than their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. LAR has a tough schedule in which Ks perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. LAR has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
| TB | This is a 5 star matchup. TB has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. TB has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. TB has a neutral schedule in which DSTs perform close to their average. |
| TEN | This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which QBs perform close to their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which RBs perform worse than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which WRs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which TEs perform close to their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. TEN has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 1 star matchup. TEN has a tough schedule in which DSTs perform worse than their average. |
| WAS | This is a 5 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which QBs perform better than their average. | This is a 3 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which RBs perform close to their average. | This is a 5 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which WRs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which TEs perform better than their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has a neutral schedule in which Ks perform close to their average. | This is a 4 star matchup. WAS has an easy schedule in which DSTs perform better than their average. |
