Ben Sinnott for Rome Odunze (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Rome Odunze WR - CHI ![]() Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Ben Sinnott TE - WAS ![]() Ben Sinnott TE - WAS |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 59 | # 391 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at CAR | at PHI | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs CAR | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs PHI | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 102.1 | 17.4 | - |
| Avg Game | 8.5 | 1.1 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 15 | 32 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Rome Odunze | Ben Sinnott | Add Player |
|
05/31 | #51 | ‐ | - |
|
05/31 | #46 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #59 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #70 | #380 | - |
|
05/29 | #65 | #354 | - |
|
05/27 | #51 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #46 | ‐ | - |
|
05/29 | #50 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #48 | ‐ | - |
|
05/28 | #46 | ‐ | - |
|
05/27 | #54 | ‐ | - |
|
05/26 | #46 | ‐ | - |
|
05/26 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #83 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #50 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
05/25 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
05/27 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #59 | ‐ | - |
|
05/23 | #38 | #351 | - |
|
05/22 | #74 | ‐ | - |
|
05/21 | #32 | ‐ | - |
|
04/26 | #46 | ‐ | - |
|
05/21 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
05/18 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
05/30 | #74 | ‐ | - |
|
06/01 | #68 | #309 | - |
|
05/27 | #32 | #279 | - |
|
05/11 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
05/09 | #50 | ‐ | - |
|
05/08 | #48 | ‐ | - |
|
05/06 | #51 | #312 | - |
|
05/11 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
05/02 | #50 | ‐ | - |
|
05/11 | #50 | #324 | - |
|
05/23 | #75 | #319 | - |
|
04/29 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
05/04 | #54 | ‐ | - |
|
04/28 | #75 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
05/14 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
05/20 | #80 | ‐ | - |
|
04/20 | #81 | #372 | - |
|
04/12 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
04/15 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
04/06 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
04/02 | #54 | ‐ | - |
|
05/04 | #51 | ‐ | - |
|
03/24 | #65 | ‐ | - |
|
03/23 | #65 | ‐ | - |
|
03/15 | #43 | ‐ | - |
|
03/09 | #65 | ‐ | - |
|
02/08 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #91 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #70 | ‐ | - |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI ![]() Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Ben Sinnott TE - WAS ![]() Ben Sinnott TE - WAS | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at CAR | at PHI |
| Week 2 | vs. MIN | at DAL |
| Week 3 | vs. PHI | vs. SEA |
| Week 4 | vs. NYJ | vs. IND |
| Week 5 | at GB | vs. NYG |
| Week 6 | at ATL | at SF |
| Week 7 | vs. NE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 8 | at SEA | vs. PHI |
| Week 9 | vs. TB | vs. LAR |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | at NYG |
| Week 11 | vs. NO | vs. CIN |
| Week 12 | at DET | at ARI |
| Week 13 | vs. JAC | at TEN |
| Week 14 | at MIA | vs. HOU |
| Week 15 | at BUF | vs. ATL |
| Week 16 | vs. GB | at MIN |
| Week 17 | vs. DET | at JAC |
| Week 18 | at MIN | vs. DAL |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI ![]() Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Ben Sinnott TE - WAS ![]() Ben Sinnott TE - WAS | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 9.7 | 0.0 |
| Week 2 | 24.8 | 0.7 |
| Week 3 | 12.2 | 0.0 |
| Week 4 | 12.9 | 0.0 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 6 | 3.2 | 0.0 |
| Week 7 | 3.1 | 0.0 |
| Week 8 | 11.4 | 2.2 |
| Week 9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Week 10 | 14.6 | 6.4 |
| Week 11 | 4.1 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | 5.3 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 0.8 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 3.6 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 2.9 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 0.3 |
| Total | 102.1 | 17.4 |
| Average | 8.5 | 1.1 |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI ![]() Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Ben Sinnott TE - WAS ![]() Ben Sinnott TE - WAS | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Rome Odunze's second season was a tale of two halves, as injuries and poor catchable targets derailed what started as a breakout campaign. Before Week 9, he ranked top-10 in WR fantasy points per game while dominating high-value usage, leading the Bears in targets, red-zone looks, and air yards share. The concerns are real with Colston Loveland and Luther Burden taking larger roles in Year 2 but Chicago also lost significant WR volume and touchdown production entering 2026 with the departure of DJ Moore. Odunze remains a strong positive regression candidate tied to Caleb Williams, especially if the Bears' passing game takes another step forward under HC Ben Johnson. | |


