Carnell Tate for Khalil Shakir (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Carnell Tate WR - TEN  Carnell Tate WR - TEN | Khalil Shakir WR - BUF  Khalil Shakir WR - BUF |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 33 | # 54 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. NYJ | at HOU | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs NYJ | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs HOU | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 0.0 | 94.4 | - |
| Avg Game | ‐ | 5.9 | - |
| Avg Projection | 115.0 | 99.4 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 17 | 9 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Carnell Tate | Khalil Shakir | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #32 | #57 | - |
|
08/05 | #30 | #47 | - |
|
08/05 | #41 | #53 | - |
|
08/05 | #33 | #63 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #64 | - |
|
08/05 | #29 | #51 | - |
|
08/04 | #36 | #55 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #29 | #61 | - |
|
08/04 | #50 | #51 | - |
|
08/04 | #30 | #58 | - |
|
08/04 | #30 | #54 | - |
|
08/04 | #30 | #53 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #54 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #54 | - |
|
08/04 | ‐ | #49 | - |
|
08/04 | #29 | #65 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #65 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #55 | - |
|
08/04 | #33 | #52 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #58 | - |
|
08/03 | #33 | #62 | - |
|
08/03 | #40 | #58 | - |
|
08/03 | #33 | #54 | - |
|
08/02 | #35 | #45 | - |
|
08/02 | #33 | #57 | - |
|
08/04 | #29 | #48 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #51 | - |
|
08/01 | #36 | #59 | - |
|
08/01 | #33 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #59 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #54 | - |
|
07/31 | #32 | #59 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #53 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #54 | - |
|
07/31 | #32 | #65 | - |
|
08/04 | #49 | #58 | - |
|
07/31 | #29 | #52 | - |
|
07/31 | #33 | #50 | - |
|
08/03 | #31 | #55 | - |
|
07/30 | #32 | #58 | - |
|
07/30 | #64 | #50 | - |
|
08/03 | #31 | #52 | - |
|
07/29 | #37 | #57 | - |
|
07/29 | #26 | #32 | - |
|
08/04 | #33 | #58 | - |
|
07/28 | #33 | #54 | - |
|
07/28 | #43 | #53 | - |
|
07/28 | #33 | #59 | - |
|
07/27 | #33 | #52 | - |
|
08/03 | #32 | #61 | - |
|
07/29 | #30 | #63 | - |
|
07/25 | #32 | #53 | - |
|
07/24 | #31 | #57 | - |
|
07/23 | #41 | #48 | - |
|
07/23 | #56 | #50 | - |
|
07/22 | #36 | #52 | - |
|
07/21 | #31 | #53 | - |
|
07/20 | #34 | #57 | - |
|
07/19 | #28 | #51 | - |
|
07/19 | #35 | #58 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #55 | - |
|
07/18 | #33 | #53 | - |
|
07/17 | #32 | #53 | - |
|
07/17 | #29 | #59 | - |
|
07/17 | #31 | #57 | - |
|
07/16 | #33 | #51 | - |
|
07/26 | #30 | #58 | - |
|
07/15 | #32 | #53 | - |
|
07/14 | #32 | #52 | - |
|
07/14 | #32 | #58 | - |
|
07/14 | #33 | #54 | - |
|
07/13 | #31 | #60 | - |
|
07/30 | #29 | #56 | - |
|
08/03 | #37 | #52 | - |
|
07/12 | #29 | #59 | - |
|
07/12 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/02 | #32 | #48 | - |
|
07/27 | #35 | #58 | - |
|
07/10 | #35 | #53 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #57 | - |
|
07/07 | #35 | #50 | - |
|
08/02 | #32 | #57 | - |
|
08/03 | #29 | #58 | - |
|
07/25 | #32 | #47 | - |
|
07/31 | #31 | #59 | - |
|
07/24 | #30 | #58 | - |
|
08/05 | #31 | #60 | - |
|
06/30 | #28 | #51 | - |
|
07/07 | #34 | #48 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #59 | - |
|
06/28 | #33 | #51 | - |
|
07/21 | #31 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #37 | #50 | - |
|
06/25 | #31 | #52 | - |
|
07/13 | #31 | #58 | - |
|
06/15 | #31 | #53 | - |
|
08/04 | #30 | #53 | - |
|
08/05 | #29 | #59 | - |
|
05/29 | #31 | #50 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #64 | - |
|
07/29 | #30 | #53 | - |
|
05/21 | #82 | #50 | - |
|
08/01 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
07/25 | #32 | #52 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #52 | - |
|
08/05 | #32 | #47 | - |
|
05/11 | #30 | #53 | - |
|
07/27 | #32 | #57 | - |
|
08/04 | #39 | #59 | - |
|
07/30 | #32 | #51 | - |
|
04/28 | #14 | #64 | - |
|
04/27 | #19 | #61 | - |
|
04/27 | #15 | #67 | - |
|
07/28 | #16 | #57 | - |
|
05/20 | #39 | #46 | - |
|
04/20 | #15 | #61 | - |
|
07/09 | #32 | #57 | - |
|
03/24 | #28 | #52 | - |
|
03/09 | #31 | #53 | - |
|
01/07 | #12 | #56 | - |
|
07/15 | #74 | #51 | - |
|
01/07 | #61 | #49 | - |
Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | Khalil Shakir WR - BUF Khalil Shakir WR - BUF | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. NYJ | at HOU |
| Week 2 | vs. PHI | vs. DET |
| Week 3 | at NYG | vs. LAC |
| Week 4 | at BAL | vs. NE |
| Week 5 | vs. HOU | at LAR |
| Week 6 | at IND | at LV |
| Week 7 | vs. CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 8 | at CIN | vs. BAL |
| Week 9 | BYE WEEK | at MIN |
| Week 10 | vs. JAC | at NYJ |
| Week 11 | at DAL | vs. MIA |
| Week 12 | at JAC | vs. KC |
| Week 13 | vs. WAS | at NE |
| Week 14 | at DET | at GB |
| Week 15 | vs. IND | vs. CHI |
| Week 16 | at LV | at DEN |
| Week 17 | vs. PIT | at MIA |
| Week 18 | at HOU | vs. NYJ |
Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | Khalil Shakir WR - BUF Khalil Shakir WR - BUF | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 66.3 | 72.4 |
| Rec Yards | 902.4 | 747.7 |
| Rec TDs | 4.5 | 4.2 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.7 | 1.1 |
| Rush Yards | 3.0 | 5.5 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 115.0 | 99.4 |
Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | Khalil Shakir WR - BUF Khalil Shakir WR - BUF | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | ‐ | 6.4 |
| Week 2 | ‐ | 1.2 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | 10.5 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 12.9 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 5.0 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 3.3 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 14.8 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 4.3 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 5.8 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | -0.3 |
| Week 12 | ‐ | 9.0 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 7.6 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 6.5 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 3.4 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 3.5 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total | 0.0 | 94.4 |
| Average | ‐ | 5.9 |
Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | Khalil Shakir WR - BUF Khalil Shakir WR - BUF | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | ‐ | 9 |
| Week 2 | ‐ | 2 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | 4 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 9 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 7 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 8 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 9 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | 3 |
| Week 12 | ‐ | 10 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 4 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 3 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 7 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | ‐ |
Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | Khalil Shakir WR - BUF Khalil Shakir WR - BUF | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Carnell Tate lands in an ideal long-term situation after being selected fourth overall by Tennessee, where he has a clear path to becoming the Titans' No. 1 receiver. The former Ohio State standout excelled against man coverage in college and enters an offense led by Brian Daboll alongside ascending second-year quarterback Cam Ward. While veterans like Calvin Ridley and Wan'Dale Robinson should remain involved early, Tate possesses the profile of a future No. 1 receiver with immediate fantasy upside. Historically, top-five WR selections have produced quickly, making Tate one of the most no-brainer rookie wideouts to target in 2026 fantasy drafts. | Khalil Shakir once again provided stability without much ceiling, finishing as a WR3/4 despite operating as one of Josh Allen's most trusted targets. His short-area role created a reliable weekly floor, but limited downfield and red-zone usage continued to cap his fantasy upside. The addition of DJ Moore adds even more competition for targets, making it difficult to project meaningful volume growth in 2026. Shakir still profiles as Buffalo's safest receiver from a consistency standpoint, but fantasy managers should view him more as a floor-based depth option than a breakout candidate. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Drafting Carnell Tate is a bet on talent and Cam Ward's ability to take off in his second season with Brian Daboll calling plays. I want to bet on Tate as I'm in love with the talent. Tate is an amazing route runner who can separate at all three levels of the field after ranking tenth in yards per route run and fourth in receiving grade last season (per PFF). He finished college with an otherworldly 68.8% contested catch rate, and he had zero drops in his final season despite a 14.6 aDOT. Tate will have to contend with Wan'Dale Robinson and Calvin Ridley for the WR1 spot in the Tennessee offense, but he has the talent to be the clear WR1 from Week 1. It just comes down to how quickly he can hit the ground running and how many weapons can Ward support in 2026. I'll be drafting Tate a ton. | |
