Carnell Tate for Malik Nabers (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Malik Nabers WR - NYG  Malik Nabers WR - NYG | Carnell Tate WR - TEN  Carnell Tate WR - TEN |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 18 | # 33 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. DAL | vs. NYJ | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 5 star matchup. WRs perform better than their average vs DAL | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs NYJ | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 39.1 | 0.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 9.8 | ‐ | - |
| Avg Projection | 152.8 | 115.0 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 5 | 17 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Malik Nabers | Carnell Tate | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #12 | #33 | - |
|
08/05 | #25 | #17 | - |
|
08/05 | #13 | #29 | - |
|
08/04 | #27 | #36 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #32 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #29 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #50 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #30 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #30 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #30 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #31 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #31 | - |
|
08/04 | #16 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #29 | - |
|
08/04 | #7 | #28 | - |
|
08/04 | #16 | #28 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #33 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #28 | - |
|
08/03 | #16 | #33 | - |
|
08/03 | #27 | #40 | - |
|
08/03 | #14 | #33 | - |
|
08/03 | #16 | #32 | - |
|
08/02 | #26 | #35 | - |
|
08/02 | #19 | #33 | - |
|
08/04 | #26 | #29 | - |
|
08/01 | #14 | #32 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #36 | - |
|
08/01 | #27 | #33 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #32 | - |
|
08/01 | #19 | #31 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #32 | - |
|
08/04 | #16 | #32 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #32 | - |
|
07/31 | #6 | #32 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #49 | - |
|
07/31 | #18 | #29 | - |
|
07/31 | #7 | #33 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #31 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #32 | - |
|
07/30 | #24 | #64 | - |
|
08/03 | #27 | #31 | - |
|
07/29 | #26 | #37 | - |
|
07/29 | #31 | #26 | - |
|
08/04 | #25 | #33 | - |
|
07/28 | #21 | #33 | - |
|
07/28 | #18 | #43 | - |
|
07/28 | #22 | #33 | - |
|
07/27 | #30 | #33 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #32 | - |
|
07/26 | #10 | #30 | - |
|
07/29 | #15 | #30 | - |
|
07/25 | #20 | #32 | - |
|
07/24 | #19 | #31 | - |
|
07/23 | #31 | #41 | - |
|
07/23 | #6 | #56 | - |
|
07/22 | #13 | #36 | - |
|
07/21 | #18 | #31 | - |
|
07/20 | #18 | #34 | - |
|
07/19 | #31 | #28 | - |
|
07/19 | #26 | #35 | - |
|
08/04 | #25 | #32 | - |
|
07/18 | #15 | #33 | - |
|
07/17 | #24 | #32 | - |
|
07/17 | #24 | #29 | - |
|
07/17 | #20 | #31 | - |
|
07/16 | #13 | #33 | - |
|
07/26 | #22 | #30 | - |
|
07/15 | #12 | #32 | - |
|
07/14 | #18 | #32 | - |
|
07/14 | #25 | #32 | - |
|
07/14 | #24 | #33 | - |
|
07/13 | #19 | #31 | - |
|
07/30 | #30 | #29 | - |
|
08/03 | #14 | #37 | - |
|
07/12 | #23 | #29 | - |
|
07/12 | #24 | #22 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #32 | - |
|
07/27 | #26 | #35 | - |
|
07/10 | #23 | #35 | - |
|
08/01 | #21 | #32 | - |
|
07/07 | #14 | #35 | - |
|
08/02 | #16 | #32 | - |
|
08/03 | #14 | #29 | - |
|
07/25 | #17 | #32 | - |
|
07/31 | #20 | #31 | - |
|
07/24 | #24 | #30 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #31 | - |
|
06/30 | #13 | #28 | - |
|
07/07 | #38 | #34 | - |
|
08/01 | #25 | #32 | - |
|
06/28 | #20 | #33 | - |
|
07/21 | #34 | #31 | - |
|
08/01 | #26 | #37 | - |
|
06/25 | #15 | #31 | - |
|
07/13 | #23 | #31 | - |
|
06/15 | #12 | #31 | - |
|
06/12 | #13 | #30 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #30 | - |
|
08/05 | #16 | #29 | - |
|
05/29 | #10 | #31 | - |
|
08/03 | #8 | #30 | - |
|
07/29 | #24 | #30 | - |
|
05/21 | #6 | #82 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #26 | - |
|
07/25 | #16 | #32 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #32 | - |
|
08/05 | #16 | #32 | - |
|
05/11 | #8 | #30 | - |
|
07/27 | #15 | #32 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #39 | - |
|
07/30 | #28 | #32 | - |
|
04/28 | #8 | #14 | - |
|
04/27 | #7 | #19 | - |
|
04/27 | #9 | #15 | - |
|
07/28 | #7 | #16 | - |
|
05/20 | #8 | #39 | - |
|
04/20 | #11 | #15 | - |
|
07/09 | #15 | #32 | - |
|
03/24 | #7 | #28 | - |
|
03/09 | #7 | #31 | - |
|
01/07 | #4 | #12 | - |
|
07/15 | #6 | #74 | - |
|
01/07 | #5 | #61 | - |
Malik Nabers WR - NYG Malik Nabers WR - NYG | Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. DAL | vs. NYJ |
| Week 2 | at LAR | vs. PHI |
| Week 3 | vs. TEN | at NYG |
| Week 4 | vs. ARI | at BAL |
| Week 5 | at WAS | vs. HOU |
| Week 6 | vs. NO | at IND |
| Week 7 | at HOU | vs. CLE |
| Week 8 | BYE WEEK | at CIN |
| Week 9 | at PHI | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | vs. WAS | vs. JAC |
| Week 11 | vs. JAC | at DAL |
| Week 12 | at IND | at JAC |
| Week 13 | vs. SF | vs. WAS |
| Week 14 | at SEA | at DET |
| Week 15 | vs. CLE | vs. IND |
| Week 16 | at DET | at LV |
| Week 17 | at DAL | vs. PIT |
| Week 18 | vs. PHI | at HOU |
Malik Nabers WR - NYG Malik Nabers WR - NYG | Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 78.5 | 66.3 |
| Rec Yards | 1,047.5 | 902.4 |
| Rec TDs | 8.0 | 4.5 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 2.7 | 0.7 |
| Rush Yards | 7.9 | 3.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 152.8 | 115.0 |
Malik Nabers WR - NYG Malik Nabers WR - NYG | Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 7.1 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 28.7 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 1.3 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 2.0 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 6 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 18 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total | 39.1 | 0.0 |
| Average | 9.8 | ‐ |
Malik Nabers WR - NYG Malik Nabers WR - NYG | Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 12 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 13 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 7 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 6 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 18 | ‐ | ‐ |
Malik Nabers WR - NYG Malik Nabers WR - NYG | Carnell Tate WR - TEN Carnell Tate WR - TEN | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Malik Nabers remains an elite talent, but his 2026 outlook is heavily tied to recovery from a complicated ACL injury that wiped out nearly all of his sophomore season. Before going down, Nabers was producing like a fantasy WR1 in the Giants' offense. The concern isn't ability - it's availability, especially after requiring a second procedure during rehab. Nabers still offers league-winning upside once fully healthy, but fantasy managers should build in the expectation of missed time and a slower early-season ramp-up. However Nabers seems more than likely to be available for Week 1 after avoiding the PUP list while participating at the start of the Giants' training camp. | Carnell Tate lands in an ideal long-term situation after being selected fourth overall by Tennessee, where he has a clear path to becoming the Titans' No. 1 receiver. The former Ohio State standout excelled against man coverage in college and enters an offense led by Brian Daboll alongside ascending second-year quarterback Cam Ward. While veterans like Calvin Ridley and Wan'Dale Robinson should remain involved early, Tate possesses the profile of a future No. 1 receiver with immediate fantasy upside. Historically, top-five WR selections have produced quickly, making Tate one of the most no-brainer rookie wideouts to target in 2026 fantasy drafts. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Last year, before he was lost to a torn ACL (with subsequent meniscus damage), Malik Nabers was the WR9 in fantasy points per game. In Weeks 1-3, he drew a 26.4% target share with 83.7 receiving yards per game, 2.15 yards per route run, and a 41.5% first-read share (per Fantasy Points Data). Those are all elite WR1 per game numbers no matter how you slice it. The worry surrounding Nabers this season is the recovery from the devastating knee injury. The early returns in camp have been positive. Nabers looks good from the few practice routes I have seen, displaying good acceleration off the line and precision with his route breaks. There are also concerns with Matt Nagy's hiring as the new offensive coordinator for the Giants. I'm willing to buy into Nabers at his ADP with more and more positive reports coming out. I don't plan on being overweight on him this season across my leagues, but he has moved from my do-not-draft list to a player I'm willing to absorb the risk depending upon my team build. | Drafting Carnell Tate is a bet on talent and Cam Ward's ability to take off in his second season with Brian Daboll calling plays. I want to bet on Tate as I'm in love with the talent. Tate is an amazing route runner who can separate at all three levels of the field after ranking tenth in yards per route run and fourth in receiving grade last season (per PFF). He finished college with an otherworldly 68.8% contested catch rate, and he had zero drops in his final season despite a 14.6 aDOT. Tate will have to contend with Wan'Dale Robinson and Calvin Ridley for the WR1 spot in the Tennessee offense, but he has the talent to be the clear WR1 from Week 1. It just comes down to how quickly he can hit the ground running and how many weapons can Ward support in 2026. I'll be drafting Tate a ton. |
