Chris Bell for Tre Tucker (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Tre Tucker WR - LV  Tre Tucker WR - LV | Chris Bell WR - MIA  Chris Bell WR - MIA |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 60 | # 96 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. MIA | at LV | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 5 star matchup. WRs perform better than their average vs MIA | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs LV | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 104.7 | 0.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.2 | ‐ | - |
| Avg Projection | 91.9 | 54.1 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 24 | 19 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Tre Tucker | Chris Bell | Add Player |
|
08/06 | #65 | #118 | - |
|
08/06 | #73 | #102 | - |
|
08/06 | #71 | #92 | - |
|
08/06 | #62 | #98 | - |
|
08/06 | #65 | #82 | - |
|
08/06 | #92 | #130 | - |
|
08/06 | #57 | #97 | - |
|
08/06 | #76 | #96 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #97 | - |
|
08/05 | #68 | #94 | - |
|
08/05 | #63 | #98 | - |
|
08/05 | #66 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #62 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #56 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #62 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #56 | #90 | - |
|
08/05 | #63 | #97 | - |
|
08/05 | #62 | #85 | - |
|
08/05 | #66 | #102 | - |
|
08/05 | #59 | #78 | - |
|
08/04 | #61 | #103 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #70 | - |
|
08/04 | #60 | #77 | - |
|
08/04 | #66 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #62 | #99 | - |
|
08/04 | #68 | #81 | - |
|
08/04 | #60 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #45 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #74 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #100 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #49 | #59 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #65 | #97 | - |
|
08/02 | #62 | #104 | - |
|
08/04 | #59 | #56 | - |
|
08/01 | #76 | #101 | - |
|
08/01 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #73 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #72 | ‐ | - |
|
08/06 | #65 | #97 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #82 | - |
|
07/31 | #82 | #83 | - |
|
08/05 | #58 | #77 | - |
|
07/31 | #68 | #73 | - |
|
08/03 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
07/30 | #64 | #100 | - |
|
07/30 | #68 | #114 | - |
|
08/03 | #58 | ‐ | - |
|
07/29 | #85 | ‐ | - |
|
08/06 | #61 | #98 | - |
|
07/28 | #63 | ‐ | - |
|
07/28 | #72 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #68 | #100 | - |
|
07/27 | #73 | ‐ | - |
|
08/06 | #69 | #93 | - |
|
07/29 | #67 | #82 | - |
|
07/25 | #73 | #85 | - |
|
07/24 | #68 | #99 | - |
|
07/23 | #50 | #94 | - |
|
07/23 | #74 | ‐ | - |
|
07/22 | #73 | ‐ | - |
|
07/21 | #69 | #99 | - |
|
07/20 | #62 | #93 | - |
|
07/19 | #64 | ‐ | - |
|
07/19 | #80 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #63 | #96 | - |
|
07/18 | #62 | #97 | - |
|
07/17 | #79 | #118 | - |
|
07/17 | #55 | #95 | - |
|
07/17 | #66 | #89 | - |
|
07/16 | #72 | ‐ | - |
|
07/26 | #70 | #98 | - |
|
07/15 | #68 | #97 | - |
|
07/14 | #63 | #98 | - |
|
07/14 | #64 | #113 | - |
|
07/13 | #63 | ‐ | - |
|
07/30 | #72 | #99 | - |
|
08/03 | #71 | #108 | - |
|
07/12 | #78 | #80 | - |
|
07/12 | #59 | #69 | - |
|
08/02 | #79 | #102 | - |
|
07/27 | #72 | #92 | - |
|
07/10 | #72 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #60 | #96 | - |
|
07/07 | #59 | #98 | - |
|
08/02 | #59 | #94 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #94 | - |
|
07/25 | #58 | #90 | - |
|
08/05 | #105 | #77 | - |
|
07/24 | #55 | #99 | - |
|
08/05 | #78 | #87 | - |
|
06/30 | #73 | #83 | - |
|
07/07 | #37 | #63 | - |
|
06/28 | #62 | #80 | - |
|
07/21 | #63 | #62 | - |
|
08/01 | #62 | #86 | - |
|
06/25 | #66 | #96 | - |
|
07/13 | #72 | #74 | - |
|
06/15 | #68 | #97 | - |
|
08/05 | #90 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #66 | #78 | - |
|
05/29 | #70 | #82 | - |
|
08/03 | #90 | #75 | - |
|
08/05 | #58 | #88 | - |
|
05/21 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #76 | #77 | - |
|
07/25 | #72 | #82 | - |
|
08/01 | #58 | ‐ | - |
|
08/06 | #70 | #102 | - |
|
05/11 | #72 | #85 | - |
|
07/27 | #64 | #93 | - |
|
08/05 | #49 | #79 | - |
|
07/30 | #70 | #107 | - |
|
04/28 | #76 | #70 | - |
|
04/27 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #72 | #78 | - |
|
07/28 | #76 | #92 | - |
|
05/20 | #68 | ‐ | - |
|
04/20 | #84 | #97 | - |
|
07/09 | #75 | #94 | - |
|
03/24 | #77 | #101 | - |
|
03/09 | #77 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #72 | ‐ | - |
|
07/15 | #68 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #73 | ‐ | - |
Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | Chris Bell WR - MIA Chris Bell WR - MIA | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. MIA | at LV |
| Week 2 | at LAC | at SF |
| Week 3 | at NO | vs. KC |
| Week 4 | vs. KC | at MIN |
| Week 5 | at NE | vs. CIN |
| Week 6 | vs. BUF | BYE WEEK |
| Week 7 | vs. LAR | at NYJ |
| Week 8 | at NYJ | vs. NE |
| Week 9 | at SF | vs. DET |
| Week 10 | vs. SEA | at IND |
| Week 11 | at DEN | at BUF |
| Week 12 | at CLE | vs. NYJ |
| Week 13 | BYE WEEK | at DEN |
| Week 14 | vs. LAC | vs. CHI |
| Week 15 | vs. DEN | at GB |
| Week 16 | vs. TEN | vs. LAC |
| Week 17 | at ARI | vs. BUF |
| Week 18 | at KC | at NE |
Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | Chris Bell WR - MIA Chris Bell WR - MIA | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 50.1 | 34.2 |
| Rec Yards | 633.7 | 448.9 |
| Rec TDs | 3.8 | 1.7 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 11.2 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yards | 52.9 | 0.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.2 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 91.9 | 54.1 |
Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | Chris Bell WR - MIA Chris Bell WR - MIA | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 11.4 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 1.9 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 32.9 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 2.2 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 7.1 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 7.0 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 3.3 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 3.8 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 3.5 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 10.7 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | 2.8 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 2.0 | ‐ |
| Week 14 | 2.4 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 16 | 5.4 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | 4.9 | ‐ |
| Week 18 | 3.4 | ‐ |
| Total | 104.7 | 0.0 |
| Average | 6.2 | ‐ |
Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | Chris Bell WR - MIA Chris Bell WR - MIA | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 8 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 9 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 2 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 6 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 6 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 4 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 8 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | 10 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 14 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 16 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | 6 | ‐ |
| Week 18 | 6 | ‐ |
Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | Chris Bell WR - MIA Chris Bell WR - MIA | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Tre Tucker quietly put together a solid 2025 season and enters 2026 with a legitimate chance to emerge as the Raiders' top wide receiver, even if Brock Bowers remains the centerpiece of the passing game. The former third-round pick has improved each season, logged nearly every snap last year, and continues to command meaningful downfield volume. New coaches have already praised Tucker's leadership and work ethic, suggesting he will remain heavily involved in the offense. | Chris Bell's rookie season outlook is tied heavily to his recovery timeline after suffering an ACL injury late in 2025, but Miami offers a strong long-term landing spot given the lack of pass-catching depth. The former Louisville standout brings legitimate alpha traits and was one of college football's premier target earners before getting hurt. Miami can afford to be patient, potentially setting Bell up for a larger role once healthy in an offense lacking long-term answers at receiver. He's a better dynasty investment than immediate redraft target, though his upside remains appealing if he returns to full strength quickly. |
