D'Andre Swift for Jalen Coker (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
D'Andre Swift RB - CHI ![]() D'Andre Swift RB - CHI | Jalen Coker WR - CAR ![]() Jalen Coker WR - CAR |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 55 | # 134 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at CAR | vs. CHI | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs CAR | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs CHI | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 194.6 | 57.4 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.2 | 5.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 22 | 22 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
D'Andre Swift | Jalen Coker | Add Player |
|
08/02 | #52 | #164 | - |
|
08/02 | #64 | #173 | - |
|
08/02 | #63 | #139 | - |
|
08/02 | #63 | #125 | - |
|
08/02 | #52 | #125 | - |
|
08/02 | #34 | #138 | - |
|
08/01 | #49 | #125 | - |
|
08/01 | #49 | #120 | - |
|
08/01 | #57 | #139 | - |
|
08/01 | #60 | #129 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #125 | - |
|
08/01 | #64 | #125 | - |
|
08/01 | #52 | #116 | - |
|
08/01 | #60 | #139 | - |
|
07/31 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/31 | #60 | #125 | - |
|
07/31 | #52 | #142 | - |
|
07/31 | #64 | #139 | - |
|
07/31 | #55 | #162 | - |
|
07/31 | #57 | #114 | - |
|
07/31 | #42 | #129 | - |
|
07/31 | #55 | #115 | - |
|
07/31 | #63 | #142 | - |
|
07/31 | #57 | #122 | - |
|
07/31 | #64 | #149 | - |
|
07/30 | #47 | #142 | - |
|
07/30 | #52 | #149 | - |
|
07/30 | #60 | #142 | - |
|
07/30 | #52 | #153 | - |
|
07/30 | #52 | #168 | - |
|
07/30 | #45 | #115 | - |
|
07/30 | #49 | #147 | - |
|
07/29 | #55 | #153 | - |
|
07/29 | #60 | #142 | - |
|
07/29 | #57 | #177 | - |
|
08/01 | #55 | #122 | - |
|
07/28 | #60 | #139 | - |
|
07/28 | #57 | #147 | - |
|
07/28 | #60 | #138 | - |
|
07/27 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/27 | #60 | #125 | - |
|
07/26 | #52 | #109 | - |
|
07/29 | #66 | #139 | - |
|
07/25 | #57 | #125 | - |
|
07/25 | #57 | #138 | - |
|
07/24 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/24 | #60 | #135 | - |
|
07/23 | #52 | #138 | - |
|
07/23 | #63 | #179 | - |
|
07/22 | #63 | #173 | - |
|
07/21 | #71 | #149 | - |
|
07/20 | #49 | #138 | - |
|
07/19 | #55 | #139 | - |
|
07/19 | #63 | #125 | - |
|
07/27 | #49 | #122 | - |
|
07/18 | #63 | #142 | - |
|
07/17 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/17 | #66 | #122 | - |
|
07/17 | #60 | #138 | - |
|
07/16 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/26 | #55 | #120 | - |
|
07/15 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/15 | #47 | #261 | - |
|
07/14 | #60 | #139 | - |
|
07/14 | #64 | #139 | - |
|
07/14 | #60 | #135 | - |
|
07/13 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/30 | #63 | #129 | - |
|
07/13 | #53 | #141 | - |
|
07/12 | #57 | #139 | - |
|
07/12 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
07/12 | #63 | #101 | - |
|
07/27 | #40 | #164 | - |
|
07/10 | #63 | #142 | - |
|
08/01 | #45 | #173 | - |
|
07/07 | #57 | #138 | - |
|
07/06 | #57 | #147 | - |
|
08/02 | #57 | #139 | - |
|
07/28 | #52 | #142 | - |
|
07/25 | #52 | #198 | - |
|
07/31 | #45 | #139 | - |
|
07/24 | #49 | #138 | - |
|
08/01 | #52 | #120 | - |
|
06/30 | #45 | #139 | - |
|
07/07 | #66 | #220 | - |
|
08/01 | #49 | #122 | - |
|
06/28 | #60 | #139 | - |
|
07/21 | #60 | #169 | - |
|
08/01 | #55 | #122 | - |
|
06/26 | #45 | #142 | - |
|
06/25 | #55 | #139 | - |
|
07/13 | #57 | #162 | - |
|
06/15 | #57 | #142 | - |
|
06/12 | #55 | #142 | - |
|
08/01 | #49 | #141 | - |
|
07/31 | #52 | #135 | - |
|
05/29 | #60 | #142 | - |
|
07/31 | #63 | #204 | - |
|
07/29 | #55 | #139 | - |
|
05/21 | #63 | #153 | - |
|
08/01 | #55 | #165 | - |
|
07/25 | #57 | #135 | - |
|
08/01 | #63 | #139 | - |
|
08/02 | #47 | #164 | - |
|
05/11 | #60 | #138 | - |
|
07/27 | #55 | #122 | - |
|
07/29 | #60 | #129 | - |
|
07/30 | #66 | #138 | - |
|
04/28 | #63 | #147 | - |
|
04/27 | #55 | #101 | - |
|
04/27 | #60 | #129 | - |
|
07/28 | #63 | #142 | - |
|
05/20 | #55 | #164 | - |
|
04/20 | #60 | #139 | - |
|
07/09 | #57 | #120 | - |
|
03/24 | #57 | #153 | - |
|
03/09 | #60 | #164 | - |
|
01/07 | #66 | #177 | - |
|
07/15 | #63 | #168 | - |
|
01/07 | #63 | #183 | - |
D'Andre Swift RB - CHI ![]() D'Andre Swift RB - CHI | Jalen Coker WR - CAR ![]() Jalen Coker WR - CAR | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at CAR | vs. CHI |
| Week 2 | vs. MIN | at ATL |
| Week 3 | vs. PHI | at CLE |
| Week 4 | vs. NYJ | vs. DET |
| Week 5 | at GB | BYE WEEK |
| Week 6 | at ATL | at PHI |
| Week 7 | vs. NE | vs. TB |
| Week 8 | at SEA | at GB |
| Week 9 | vs. TB | vs. DEN |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | at NO |
| Week 11 | vs. NO | vs. BAL |
| Week 12 | at DET | at TB |
| Week 13 | vs. JAC | at MIN |
| Week 14 | at MIA | vs. NO |
| Week 15 | at BUF | vs. CIN |
| Week 16 | vs. GB | at PIT |
| Week 17 | vs. DET | vs. SEA |
| Week 18 | at MIN | vs. ATL |
D'Andre Swift RB - CHI ![]() D'Andre Swift RB - CHI | Jalen Coker WR - CAR ![]() Jalen Coker WR - CAR | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 6.5 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 10.9 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 7.8 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 12.0 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 23.5 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 19.8 | 0.0 |
| Week 8 | 13.1 | 3.6 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 0.9 |
| Week 10 | 9.8 | 2.1 |
| Week 11 | 9.0 | 7.2 |
| Week 12 | 0.9 | 3.2 |
| Week 13 | 19.8 | 13.4 |
| Week 14 | 8.2 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 21.6 | 10.0 |
| Week 16 | 7.0 | 4.7 |
| Week 17 | 19.9 | 1.6 |
| Week 18 | 4.8 | 10.7 |
| Total | 194.6 | 57.4 |
| Average | 12.2 | 5.2 |
D'Andre Swift RB - CHI ![]() D'Andre Swift RB - CHI | Jalen Coker WR - CAR ![]() Jalen Coker WR - CAR | |
| Expert | ||
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | D'Andre Swift arguably had a career year last season for the Bears as the RB16 in fantasy points per game. He finished with 257 touches and 1,386 total yards while splitting work with Kyle Monangai. Monangai's presence didn't hurt Swift a ton as he was the RB20 in fantasy points per game after Monangai's emergence in Week 9. During Weeks 10-18, Swift remained the preferred passing down back for Chicago with a 43% route share (Monangai 28.8%, per Fantasy Points Data), but he split up the red zone work with Monangai, with 18 red zone rushing attempts to Monangai's 19. This is worrisome, but not something to freak out about in today's NFL, where most teams are utilizing some form of committee approach. It was nice to see Swift's efficiency numbers bounce back after a horrible 2024 season. Last year, he ranked 13th in explosive run rate, 11th in rushing success rate, and 20th in missed tackle rate. Swift should be a mid-range RB2 again this season. | The Carolina passing attack will flow through Tetairoa McMillan and Jalen Coker this season, especially with Chris Brazzell now missing up to eight weeks with a torn LCL. Last year, when Coker was at his healthiest (quad injury early in the year) during Weeks 13-19, he was challenging Tetairoa McMillan for the top spot in Carolina's aerial attack. During that stretch, Coker had a 20% target share (McMillan 18.3%), 2.30 yards per route run (McMillan 1.78), four red zone targets (McMillan, one), and a 28.3% first-read share (McMillan 26.1% per Fantasy Points Data). In those six games played, Coker finished with at least 14 PPR points four times. Coker is a late-round priority for me this season. The massive divide between McMillan and Coker in ADP should not exist. Enjoy the value. |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Jalen Coker continued proving he belongs after entering the league as an undrafted free agent, flashing whenever he was healthy enough to stay on the field. The Panthers slot receiver finished the year strong, highlighted by a huge playoff performance and a stretch of consistent production that hinted at a larger role. Coker's strong hands and reliability helped him emerge as one of Bryce Young's trusted options, and he enters 2026 as the favorite for Carolina's No. 2 WR job behind Tetairoa McMillan. If he can finally stay healthy for a full season, Coker has sneaky value in deeper formats. In Coker's last nine games played, he was averaging 10.1 PPG in half-PPR. | |


