DK Metcalf for Travis Etienne Jr. (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO ![]() Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 50 | # 76 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at DET | vs. ATL | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs DET | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs ATL | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 217.9 | 128.2 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.8 | 8.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 13 | 18 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Travis Etienne Jr. | DK Metcalf | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #49 | #70 | - |
|
08/05 | #57 | #91 | - |
|
08/05 | #63 | #70 | - |
|
08/05 | #49 | #81 | - |
|
08/04 | #49 | #88 | - |
|
08/04 | #37 | #48 | - |
|
08/04 | #72 | #80 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #65 | - |
|
08/04 | #57 | #89 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #80 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
08/04 | #52 | #78 | - |
|
08/04 | #55 | #74 | - |
|
08/04 | #55 | #88 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #83 | - |
|
08/04 | #23 | #81 | - |
|
08/04 | #49 | #54 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #83 | - |
|
08/03 | #49 | #69 | - |
|
08/03 | #55 | #80 | - |
|
08/03 | #47 | #81 | - |
|
08/03 | #40 | #74 | - |
|
08/03 | #47 | #70 | - |
|
08/02 | #57 | #51 | - |
|
08/02 | #47 | #80 | - |
|
08/04 | #66 | #83 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
08/01 | #52 | #74 | - |
|
08/01 | #55 | #89 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #81 | - |
|
08/01 | #33 | #83 | - |
|
07/31 | #55 | #88 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #70 | - |
|
08/04 | #57 | #69 | - |
|
07/31 | #47 | #83 | - |
|
08/04 | #52 | #54 | - |
|
07/31 | #47 | #74 | - |
|
07/31 | #66 | #80 | - |
|
08/03 | #45 | #74 | - |
|
07/30 | #42 | #80 | - |
|
07/30 | #55 | #69 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #65 | - |
|
07/29 | #57 | #69 | - |
|
07/29 | #49 | #69 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #70 | - |
|
07/28 | #47 | #70 | - |
|
07/28 | #49 | #88 | - |
|
07/28 | #55 | #74 | - |
|
07/27 | #49 | #74 | - |
|
08/03 | #57 | #81 | - |
|
07/26 | #49 | #83 | - |
|
07/29 | #55 | #83 | - |
|
07/25 | #47 | #80 | - |
|
07/24 | #47 | #89 | - |
|
07/23 | #47 | #50 | - |
|
07/23 | #45 | #51 | - |
|
07/22 | #45 | #74 | - |
|
07/21 | #52 | #89 | - |
|
07/20 | #57 | #69 | - |
|
07/19 | #40 | #115 | - |
|
07/19 | #40 | #93 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
07/18 | #49 | #80 | - |
|
07/17 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
07/17 | #55 | #81 | - |
|
07/17 | #47 | #69 | - |
|
07/16 | #49 | #81 | - |
|
07/26 | #60 | #83 | - |
|
07/15 | #49 | #75 | - |
|
07/14 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
07/14 | #40 | #83 | - |
|
07/14 | #47 | #83 | - |
|
07/13 | #37 | #83 | - |
|
07/30 | #47 | #89 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #73 | - |
|
07/12 | #47 | #80 | - |
|
07/12 | #30 | #88 | - |
|
08/02 | #42 | #69 | - |
|
07/27 | #57 | #93 | - |
|
07/10 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
08/01 | #72 | #80 | - |
|
07/07 | #42 | #75 | - |
|
08/02 | #52 | #81 | - |
|
08/03 | #20 | #80 | - |
|
07/25 | #49 | #89 | - |
|
07/31 | #64 | #89 | - |
|
07/24 | #57 | #74 | - |
|
08/05 | #55 | #91 | - |
|
06/30 | #52 | #75 | - |
|
07/07 | #28 | #51 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #88 | - |
|
06/28 | #52 | #74 | - |
|
07/21 | #49 | #91 | - |
|
08/01 | #40 | #83 | - |
|
06/25 | #47 | #74 | - |
|
07/13 | #47 | #69 | - |
|
06/15 | #49 | #74 | - |
|
08/04 | #76 | #82 | - |
|
08/05 | #40 | #81 | - |
|
05/29 | #37 | #43 | - |
|
08/03 | #45 | #80 | - |
|
07/29 | #52 | #83 | - |
|
05/21 | #47 | #74 | - |
|
08/01 | #45 | #69 | - |
|
07/25 | #49 | #75 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #80 | - |
|
08/05 | #57 | #75 | - |
|
05/11 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
07/27 | #45 | #75 | - |
|
08/04 | #49 | #80 | - |
|
07/30 | #47 | #89 | - |
|
04/28 | #45 | #81 | - |
|
04/27 | #45 | #80 | - |
|
04/27 | #45 | #83 | - |
|
07/28 | #40 | #81 | - |
|
05/20 | #47 | #75 | - |
|
04/20 | #42 | #83 | - |
|
07/09 | #45 | #75 | - |
|
03/24 | #49 | #75 | - |
|
03/09 | #49 | #74 | - |
|
01/07 | #28 | #69 | - |
|
07/15 | #49 | #50 | - |
|
01/07 | #49 | #48 | - |
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO ![]() Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at DET | vs. ATL |
| Week 2 | at BAL | at NE |
| Week 3 | vs. LV | vs. CIN |
| Week 4 | vs. ATL | at CLE |
| Week 5 | vs. MIN | vs. IND |
| Week 6 | at NYG | at TB |
| Week 7 | vs. PIT | at NO |
| Week 8 | BYE WEEK | vs. CLE |
| Week 9 | vs. CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | vs. CAR | at CIN |
| Week 11 | at CHI | at PHI |
| Week 12 | at CIN | vs. DEN |
| Week 13 | vs. GB | vs. HOU |
| Week 14 | at CAR | at JAC |
| Week 15 | at TB | vs. BAL |
| Week 16 | vs. ARI | vs. CAR |
| Week 17 | at ATL | at TEN |
| Week 18 | vs. TB | at BAL |
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO ![]() Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 15.6 | 8.3 |
| Week 2 | 14.9 | 8.0 |
| Week 3 | 11.6 | 9.2 |
| Week 4 | 18.5 | 18.6 |
| Week 5 | 5.8 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 5.5 | 15.5 |
| Week 7 | 5.5 | 5.0 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 11.5 |
| Week 9 | 11.5 | 0.6 |
| Week 10 | 13.7 | 3.5 |
| Week 11 | 19.3 | 4.9 |
| Week 12 | 17.6 | 9.4 |
| Week 13 | 4.1 | 3.2 |
| Week 14 | 20.2 | 14.8 |
| Week 15 | 28.5 | 11.5 |
| Week 16 | 12.6 | 4.2 |
| Week 17 | 9.2 | ‐ |
| Week 18 | 3.8 | ‐ |
| Total | 217.9 | 128.2 |
| Average | 12.8 | 8.5 |
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO ![]() Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | DK Metcalf's first season in Pittsburgh largely reinforced what fantasy managers have seen over the last several years — good, not great, fantasy consistency (WR26 overall and WR24 in PPG). The Steelers receiver once again finished outside the top tier at the position, and now faces even more target competition in a new-look offense entering 2026. His role has increasingly trended toward volatile WR3 territory rather than true fantasy alpha production. With Aaron Rodgers at quarterback and additional mouths to feed, his ceiling appears lower than his reputation might suggest. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Travis Etienne excelled last year as the Jags RB1 with an RB13 finish in fantasy points per game. After a down 2024 season, it was nice to see the new Saints' lead back bounce back. He lands with New Orleans after a season where he was 11th in snap share, 13th in opportunity share, tenth in weighted opportunities, and fifth in red zone touches. Etienne soaked up 296 touches, producing 1,399 total yards. He's set to see a similar workload in 2026 with the Saints. Etienne was disappointing on a per-touch basis, ranking 37th in explosive run rate, 31st in missed tackle rate, and 34th in yards after contact per attempt. Those metrics are worrisome, but Etienne should see enough volume that it won't matter this season. He's a solid RB2 that could outkick that projection if the Saints' offense takes a leap forward and surprises this year. | |


