DK Metcalf for Woody Marks (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | Woody Marks RB - HOU ![]() Woody Marks RB - HOU |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 76 | # 130 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. ATL | vs. BUF | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs ATL | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs BUF | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 128.2 | 127.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 8.5 | 7.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 18 | 11 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
DK Metcalf | Woody Marks | Add Player |
|
08/03 | #81 | #134 | - |
|
08/03 | #74 | #140 | - |
|
08/03 | #70 | #131 | - |
|
08/03 | #89 | #148 | - |
|
08/03 | #81 | #205 | - |
|
08/03 | #83 | #134 | - |
|
08/03 | #80 | #134 | - |
|
08/02 | #83 | #133 | - |
|
08/02 | #51 | #108 | - |
|
08/02 | #80 | #113 | - |
|
08/03 | #83 | #126 | - |
|
08/02 | #80 | #145 | - |
|
08/01 | #89 | #127 | - |
|
08/01 | #75 | #131 | - |
|
08/01 | #74 | #151 | - |
|
08/01 | #89 | #131 | - |
|
08/01 | #74 | #127 | - |
|
08/01 | #81 | #126 | - |
|
08/01 | #83 | #141 | - |
|
07/31 | #88 | #117 | - |
|
08/03 | #70 | #127 | - |
|
07/31 | #54 | #95 | - |
|
07/31 | #69 | #131 | - |
|
07/31 | #83 | #127 | - |
|
08/02 | #54 | #140 | - |
|
07/31 | #81 | #155 | - |
|
07/31 | #74 | #102 | - |
|
07/31 | #65 | #126 | - |
|
07/31 | #80 | #99 | - |
|
07/30 | #80 | #134 | - |
|
07/30 | #74 | #126 | - |
|
07/30 | #80 | #127 | - |
|
07/30 | #69 | #131 | - |
|
07/30 | #50 | #161 | - |
|
07/30 | #61 | #134 | - |
|
07/29 | #88 | #117 | - |
|
07/29 | #69 | #131 | - |
|
07/29 | #69 | #92 | - |
|
08/01 | #70 | #131 | - |
|
07/28 | #70 | ‐ | - |
|
07/28 | #88 | #108 | - |
|
07/28 | #74 | #119 | - |
|
07/27 | #74 | #113 | - |
|
08/03 | #81 | #161 | - |
|
07/26 | #83 | #145 | - |
|
07/29 | #83 | #155 | - |
|
07/25 | #83 | #127 | - |
|
07/25 | #80 | #127 | - |
|
07/24 | #89 | #121 | - |
|
07/23 | #50 | #161 | - |
|
07/23 | #51 | #78 | - |
|
07/22 | #74 | #85 | - |
|
07/21 | #89 | #145 | - |
|
07/20 | #69 | #134 | - |
|
07/19 | #115 | #151 | - |
|
07/19 | #93 | #126 | - |
|
07/27 | #74 | #151 | - |
|
07/18 | #80 | #127 | - |
|
07/17 | #75 | #134 | - |
|
07/17 | #81 | #141 | - |
|
07/17 | #69 | #131 | - |
|
07/16 | #81 | #95 | - |
|
07/26 | #83 | #140 | - |
|
07/15 | #75 | #131 | - |
|
07/15 | #75 | #131 | - |
|
07/14 | #75 | #127 | - |
|
07/14 | #83 | #134 | - |
|
07/14 | #83 | #141 | - |
|
07/13 | #83 | #121 | - |
|
07/30 | #89 | #134 | - |
|
08/03 | #73 | #142 | - |
|
07/12 | #80 | #161 | - |
|
07/12 | #88 | #155 | - |
|
08/02 | #69 | #151 | - |
|
07/27 | #93 | #156 | - |
|
07/10 | #75 | #119 | - |
|
08/01 | #80 | #127 | - |
|
07/07 | #75 | #126 | - |
|
08/02 | #81 | #140 | - |
|
08/03 | #80 | #127 | - |
|
07/25 | #89 | #141 | - |
|
07/31 | #89 | #167 | - |
|
07/24 | #74 | #126 | - |
|
08/01 | #91 | #161 | - |
|
06/30 | #75 | #131 | - |
|
07/07 | #51 | #82 | - |
|
08/01 | #88 | #141 | - |
|
06/28 | #74 | #131 | - |
|
07/21 | #91 | #131 | - |
|
08/01 | #83 | #143 | - |
|
06/26 | #80 | #131 | - |
|
06/25 | #74 | #131 | - |
|
07/13 | #69 | #148 | - |
|
06/15 | #74 | #127 | - |
|
06/12 | #83 | #131 | - |
|
08/03 | #82 | #158 | - |
|
08/03 | #81 | #188 | - |
|
05/29 | #43 | #126 | - |
|
08/03 | #80 | #119 | - |
|
07/29 | #83 | #119 | - |
|
05/21 | #74 | #85 | - |
|
08/01 | #69 | #134 | - |
|
07/25 | #75 | #131 | - |
|
08/01 | #80 | #127 | - |
|
08/03 | #75 | #145 | - |
|
05/11 | #75 | #119 | - |
|
07/27 | #75 | #127 | - |
|
07/29 | #81 | #159 | - |
|
07/30 | #89 | #117 | - |
|
04/28 | #81 | #159 | - |
|
04/27 | #80 | #131 | - |
|
04/27 | #83 | #155 | - |
|
07/28 | #81 | #134 | - |
|
05/20 | #75 | #143 | - |
|
04/20 | #83 | #167 | - |
|
07/09 | #75 | #127 | - |
|
03/24 | #75 | #108 | - |
|
03/09 | #74 | #102 | - |
|
01/07 | #69 | #72 | - |
|
07/15 | #50 | #78 | - |
|
01/07 | #48 | #78 | - |
DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | Woody Marks RB - HOU ![]() Woody Marks RB - HOU | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. ATL | vs. BUF |
| Week 2 | at NE | vs. CIN |
| Week 3 | vs. CIN | at IND |
| Week 4 | at CLE | vs. DAL |
| Week 5 | vs. IND | at TEN |
| Week 6 | at TB | at JAC |
| Week 7 | at NO | vs. NYG |
| Week 8 | vs. CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | BYE WEEK | at LAC |
| Week 10 | at CIN | at CLE |
| Week 11 | at PHI | vs. IND |
| Week 12 | vs. DEN | vs. BAL |
| Week 13 | vs. HOU | at PIT |
| Week 14 | at JAC | at WAS |
| Week 15 | vs. BAL | vs. JAC |
| Week 16 | vs. CAR | at PHI |
| Week 17 | at TEN | at GB |
| Week 18 | at BAL | vs. TEN |
DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | Woody Marks RB - HOU ![]() Woody Marks RB - HOU | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 8.3 | 0.3 |
| Week 2 | 8.0 | 5.1 |
| Week 3 | 9.2 | 3.6 |
| Week 4 | 18.6 | 23.9 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 2.4 |
| Week 6 | 15.5 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 5.0 | 9.5 |
| Week 8 | 11.5 | 11.1 |
| Week 9 | 0.6 | 2.7 |
| Week 10 | 3.5 | 14.1 |
| Week 11 | 4.9 | 5.1 |
| Week 12 | 9.4 | 6.9 |
| Week 13 | 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Week 14 | 14.8 | 13.6 |
| Week 15 | 11.5 | 9.8 |
| Week 16 | 4.2 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 7.5 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 4.8 |
| Total | 128.2 | 127.1 |
| Average | 8.5 | 7.9 |
DK Metcalf WR - PIT ![]() DK Metcalf WR - PIT | Woody Marks RB - HOU ![]() Woody Marks RB - HOU | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | DK Metcalf's first season in Pittsburgh largely reinforced what fantasy managers have seen over the last several years — good, not great, fantasy consistency (WR26 overall and WR24 in PPG). The Steelers receiver once again finished outside the top tier at the position, and now faces even more target competition in a new-look offense entering 2026. His role has increasingly trended toward volatile WR3 territory rather than true fantasy alpha production. With Aaron Rodgers at quarterback and additional mouths to feed, his ceiling appears lower than his reputation might suggest. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | With David Montgomery in Houston now, Woody Marks becomes his immediate backup and handcuff. Marks is a solid option among handcuffs. Last year, during his run as Houston's starter (Weeks 10-18), he averaged 17.5 touches and 63.2 total yards per game as the RB32 in fantasy points per game. Last year, overall, he was solid but not spectacular on a per-touch basis, ranking 34th in explosive run rate, 48th in missed tackle rate, and 40th in rushing success rate (per Fantasy Points Data). Marks is a decent late-round handcuff option to draft, but you'll likely be able to get him off the waiver wire in season if Montgomery misses any time. | |


