Elijah Sarratt for Tre' Harris (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Tre' Harris WR - LAC  Tre' Harris WR - LAC | Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL  Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 64 | # 93 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. ARI | at IND | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs ARI | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs IND | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 39.4 | 0.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 2.3 | ‐ | - |
| Avg Projection | 54.9 | 39.7 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 23 | 12 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Tre' Harris | Elijah Sarratt | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #68 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #84 | #113 | - |
|
08/05 | #73 | #92 | - |
|
08/04 | #64 | #92 | - |
|
08/04 | #103 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #65 | #114 | - |
|
08/04 | #76 | #98 | - |
|
08/04 | #68 | #87 | - |
|
08/04 | #66 | #94 | - |
|
08/04 | #72 | #88 | - |
|
08/04 | #64 | #92 | - |
|
08/04 | #65 | #78 | - |
|
08/04 | #57 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #73 | #94 | - |
|
08/04 | #90 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #70 | #76 | - |
|
08/04 | #65 | #91 | - |
|
08/03 | #107 | #95 | - |
|
08/03 | #81 | #77 | - |
|
08/03 | #62 | #84 | - |
|
08/03 | #72 | #90 | - |
|
08/03 | #75 | #93 | - |
|
08/02 | #66 | #106 | - |
|
08/02 | #68 | #93 | - |
|
08/04 | #82 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #79 | #78 | - |
|
08/01 | #69 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #64 | #96 | - |
|
08/01 | #69 | #82 | - |
|
08/01 | #74 | ‐ | - |
|
07/31 | #65 | #108 | - |
|
08/04 | #66 | #93 | - |
|
08/04 | #78 | #94 | - |
|
07/31 | #74 | #89 | - |
|
08/04 | #78 | #97 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #88 | - |
|
07/31 | #62 | ‐ | - |
|
08/03 | #66 | #89 | - |
|
07/30 | #69 | #93 | - |
|
07/30 | #60 | ‐ | - |
|
08/03 | #72 | #92 | - |
|
07/29 | #81 | #109 | - |
|
07/29 | ‐ | #98 | - |
|
08/04 | #64 | #91 | - |
|
07/28 | #65 | ‐ | - |
|
07/28 | #65 | #92 | - |
|
07/28 | #65 | #93 | - |
|
07/27 | #69 | #89 | - |
|
08/03 | #58 | #87 | - |
|
07/26 | #73 | #72 | - |
|
07/29 | #64 | #91 | - |
|
07/25 | #71 | #90 | - |
|
07/24 | #51 | #95 | - |
|
07/23 | #87 | #193 | - |
|
07/23 | #67 | ‐ | - |
|
07/22 | #64 | ‐ | - |
|
07/21 | #63 | #91 | - |
|
07/20 | #65 | #92 | - |
|
07/19 | #56 | #91 | - |
|
07/19 | #75 | #104 | - |
|
08/04 | #65 | #90 | - |
|
07/18 | #63 | #91 | - |
|
07/17 | #69 | #115 | - |
|
07/17 | #69 | #84 | - |
|
07/17 | #69 | #81 | - |
|
07/16 | #65 | #91 | - |
|
07/26 | #65 | #83 | - |
|
07/15 | #65 | #96 | - |
|
07/14 | #66 | #93 | - |
|
07/14 | #70 | #80 | - |
|
07/14 | #68 | #94 | - |
|
07/13 | #73 | #83 | - |
|
07/30 | #68 | #92 | - |
|
08/03 | #64 | #99 | - |
|
07/12 | #63 | #74 | - |
|
07/12 | #64 | #68 | - |
|
08/02 | #75 | #96 | - |
|
07/27 | #56 | #89 | - |
|
07/10 | #65 | #101 | - |
|
08/01 | #71 | #85 | - |
|
07/07 | #68 | #90 | - |
|
08/02 | #65 | #92 | - |
|
08/03 | #73 | #88 | - |
|
07/25 | #60 | #81 | - |
|
07/31 | #56 | #89 | - |
|
07/24 | #75 | #103 | - |
|
08/05 | #69 | #78 | - |
|
06/30 | #74 | #89 | - |
|
07/07 | #106 | #93 | - |
|
08/01 | #78 | #102 | - |
|
06/28 | #79 | #104 | - |
|
07/21 | #65 | #68 | - |
|
08/01 | #64 | #100 | - |
|
06/25 | #65 | #94 | - |
|
07/13 | #67 | #84 | - |
|
06/15 | #65 | #96 | - |
|
06/12 | #69 | #83 | - |
|
08/04 | #69 | #76 | - |
|
08/05 | #62 | #78 | - |
|
05/29 | #71 | #90 | - |
|
08/03 | #72 | #66 | - |
|
07/29 | #72 | #89 | - |
|
05/21 | #64 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #70 | #83 | - |
|
07/25 | #73 | #91 | - |
|
08/01 | #60 | ‐ | - |
|
08/05 | #77 | #98 | - |
|
05/11 | #73 | #83 | - |
|
07/27 | #69 | #84 | - |
|
08/04 | #75 | #90 | - |
|
07/30 | #75 | #100 | - |
|
04/28 | #81 | #74 | - |
|
04/27 | #74 | ‐ | - |
|
04/27 | #82 | #77 | - |
|
07/28 | #82 | #74 | - |
|
05/20 | #64 | #96 | - |
|
04/20 | #88 | #62 | - |
|
07/09 | #59 | #107 | - |
|
03/24 | #75 | #86 | - |
|
03/09 | #78 | #76 | - |
|
01/07 | #71 | ‐ | - |
|
07/15 | #61 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #64 | ‐ | - |
Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. ARI | at IND |
| Week 2 | vs. LV | vs. NO |
| Week 3 | at BUF | at DAL |
| Week 4 | at SEA | vs. TEN |
| Week 5 | vs. DEN | at ATL |
| Week 6 | at KC | at CLE |
| Week 7 | BYE WEEK | vs. CIN |
| Week 8 | at LAR | at BUF |
| Week 9 | vs. HOU | vs. JAC |
| Week 10 | at BAL | vs. LAC |
| Week 11 | vs. NYJ | at CAR |
| Week 12 | vs. NE | at HOU |
| Week 13 | at TB | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | at LV | vs. TB |
| Week 15 | vs. SF | at PIT |
| Week 16 | at MIA | vs. CLE |
| Week 17 | vs. KC | at CIN |
| Week 18 | at DEN | vs. PIT |
Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 34.5 | 19.5 |
| Rec Yards | 408.4 | 294.6 |
| Rec TDs | 2.5 | 1.8 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yards | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 54.9 | 39.7 |
Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 1.1 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 3.4 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 2.7 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 2.3 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 6.8 | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 1.8 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 0.4 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 1.2 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 3.0 | ‐ |
| Week 14 | 2.1 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 4.9 | ‐ |
| Week 16 | 5.4 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | 1.5 | ‐ |
| Week 18 | 2.8 | ‐ |
| Total | 39.4 | 0.0 |
| Average | 2.3 | ‐ |
Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 1 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 1 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 1 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 0 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 2 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 2 | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 2 | ‐ |
| Week 10 | 2 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 1 | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 4 | ‐ |
| Week 14 | 2 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 16 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | 1 | ‐ |
| Week 18 | 6 | ‐ |
Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL Elijah Sarratt WR - BAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Tre Harris has to be one of the best WR sleepers to take in 2026. The second-year WR is being grouped into the "elite" Chargers WR conversation alongside Ladd McConkey and Quentin Johnston by HC John Harbaugh. And even though his rookie year didn't feature a ton of highlight-reel plays or counting stats, his playing time increased because of his contributions as a run-blocker. That suggests he could see much more playing time (and targets) than his bottom-dwelling ADP would indicate in 2026. Harris can create big plays and is versatile enough to line up all over the formation. He also averaged 5.5 targets in the last two games that QJ missed in the second half of the season. If the Chargers lean into the run game more with their new OC, Mike McDaniel, Harris could be a major benefactor in terms of snaps/routes based on how well he does the dirty work. | 2026 4th-rounder Elijah Sarratt may have been overshadowed by Baltimore's earlier selection of Ja'Kobi Lane, but the former Indiana receiver offers an intriguing pathway to Year 1 relevance. Sarratt enters a crowded, run-heavy offense, yet his strong production profile, early breakout age, and red-zone skill set could help him carve out a role quickly if Mark Andrews continues declining. The Ravens already have their No.1 WR in Zay Flowers, so expectations should remain tempered, but Sarratt's ability to win contested catches and earn targets gives him sleeper appeal. Among Baltimore's rookie receivers, he might be the better value bet relative to cost. |
