Isaiah Likely for Mark Andrews (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Isaiah Likely TE - NYG  Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | Mark Andrews TE - BAL  Mark Andrews TE - BAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 14 | # 12 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. DAL | at IND | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs DAL | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs IND | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 34.7 | 83.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 2.5 | 4.9 | - |
| Avg Projection | 102.4 | 104.6 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 20 | 7 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Isaiah Likely | Mark Andrews | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #13 | #9 | - |
|
08/05 | #16 | #10 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #16 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #30 | #8 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #12 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #13 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #10 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #13 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #12 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #12 | - |
|
08/04 | #7 | #15 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #10 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #13 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #11 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #10 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #10 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #8 | - |
|
08/03 | #14 | #12 | - |
|
08/02 | #17 | #16 | - |
|
08/02 | #10 | #12 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #10 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #16 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #15 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #9 | - |
|
08/01 | #6 | #20 | - |
|
07/31 | #14 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #15 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #13 | - |
|
07/31 | #7 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #21 | #5 | - |
|
07/31 | #10 | #14 | - |
|
07/31 | #17 | #21 | - |
|
08/03 | #16 | #13 | - |
|
07/30 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
07/30 | #21 | #13 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #14 | - |
|
07/29 | #14 | #8 | - |
|
07/29 | #30 | #3 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #12 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #8 | - |
|
07/28 | #12 | #13 | - |
|
07/28 | #8 | #14 | - |
|
07/27 | #19 | #18 | - |
|
08/03 | #14 | #13 | - |
|
07/26 | #15 | #11 | - |
|
07/29 | #16 | #13 | - |
|
07/25 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
07/24 | #10 | #12 | - |
|
07/23 | #22 | #7 | - |
|
07/23 | #20 | #18 | - |
|
07/22 | #20 | #18 | - |
|
07/21 | #11 | #13 | - |
|
07/20 | #9 | #14 | - |
|
07/19 | #9 | #16 | - |
|
07/19 | #8 | #10 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #12 | - |
|
07/18 | #8 | #15 | - |
|
07/17 | #12 | #13 | - |
|
07/17 | #15 | #14 | - |
|
07/17 | #13 | #11 | - |
|
07/16 | #18 | #19 | - |
|
07/26 | #15 | #16 | - |
|
07/15 | #13 | #15 | - |
|
07/14 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
07/14 | #13 | #7 | - |
|
07/14 | #10 | #16 | - |
|
07/13 | #11 | #13 | - |
|
07/30 | #9 | #12 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #6 | - |
|
07/12 | #10 | #14 | - |
|
07/12 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
08/02 | #12 | #8 | - |
|
07/27 | #12 | #7 | - |
|
07/10 | #14 | #13 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #16 | - |
|
07/07 | #11 | #14 | - |
|
08/02 | #12 | #13 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #13 | - |
|
07/25 | #9 | #6 | - |
|
07/31 | #7 | #14 | - |
|
07/24 | #13 | #8 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #15 | - |
|
06/30 | #14 | #16 | - |
|
07/07 | #8 | #16 | - |
|
08/01 | #14 | #11 | - |
|
06/28 | #15 | #9 | - |
|
07/21 | #11 | #18 | - |
|
08/01 | #21 | #15 | - |
|
06/25 | #13 | #14 | - |
|
07/13 | #10 | #11 | - |
|
06/15 | #13 | #14 | - |
|
06/12 | #9 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #12 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #19 | - |
|
05/29 | #16 | #17 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #12 | - |
|
07/29 | #8 | #15 | - |
|
05/21 | #25 | #19 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #11 | - |
|
07/25 | #13 | #7 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #13 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #16 | - |
|
05/11 | #15 | #16 | - |
|
07/27 | #14 | #13 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #15 | - |
|
07/30 | #8 | #12 | - |
|
04/28 | #12 | #18 | - |
|
04/27 | #14 | #16 | - |
|
04/27 | #15 | #17 | - |
|
07/28 | #17 | #16 | - |
|
05/20 | #9 | #11 | - |
|
04/20 | #12 | #20 | - |
|
07/09 | #9 | #17 | - |
|
03/24 | #19 | #18 | - |
|
03/09 | #21 | #17 | - |
|
01/07 | #21 | #17 | - |
|
07/15 | #21 | #17 | - |
|
01/07 | #20 | #18 | - |
Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. DAL | at IND |
| Week 2 | at LAR | vs. NO |
| Week 3 | vs. TEN | at DAL |
| Week 4 | vs. ARI | vs. TEN |
| Week 5 | at WAS | at ATL |
| Week 6 | vs. NO | at CLE |
| Week 7 | at HOU | vs. CIN |
| Week 8 | BYE WEEK | at BUF |
| Week 9 | at PHI | vs. JAC |
| Week 10 | vs. WAS | vs. LAC |
| Week 11 | vs. JAC | at CAR |
| Week 12 | at IND | at HOU |
| Week 13 | vs. SF | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | at SEA | vs. TB |
| Week 15 | vs. CLE | at PIT |
| Week 16 | at DET | vs. CLE |
| Week 17 | at DAL | at CIN |
| Week 18 | vs. PHI | vs. PIT |
Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 62.9 | 58.7 |
| Rec Yards | 746.1 | 608.4 |
| Rec TDs | 5.1 | 7.4 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yards | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 102.4 | 104.6 |
Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Week 2 | ‐ | 0.4 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | 21.1 |
| Week 4 | 0.0 | 3.0 |
| Week 5 | 1.2 | 2.2 |
| Week 6 | 0.6 | 2.6 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 0.8 | 3.4 |
| Week 9 | 6.0 | 14.6 |
| Week 10 | 1.7 | 7.4 |
| Week 11 | 1.5 | 12.7 |
| Week 12 | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Week 13 | 7.5 | 4.7 |
| Week 14 | 8.5 | 0.9 |
| Week 15 | 0.0 | 1.8 |
| Week 16 | 0.0 | 2.4 |
| Week 17 | 2.7 | 2.8 |
| Week 18 | 3.2 | 1.4 |
| Total | 34.7 | 83.0 |
| Average | 2.5 | 4.9 |
Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | ‐ | 1 |
| Week 2 | ‐ | 3 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | 6 |
| Week 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Week 5 | 1 | 3 |
| Week 6 | 2 | 6 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 2 | 3 |
| Week 9 | 4 | 3 |
| Week 10 | 4 | 5 |
| Week 11 | 3 | 5 |
| Week 12 | 3 | 3 |
| Week 13 | 6 | 6 |
| Week 14 | 6 | 5 |
| Week 15 | 0 | 3 |
| Week 16 | 0 | 3 |
| Week 17 | 3 | 4 |
| Week 18 | 2 | 3 |
Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | After spending the first four seasons of his NFL career with the Ravens, Isaiah Likely signed a three-year, $40 million contract with the Giants. Likely shared targets with Mark Andrews for four years and could see increased usage with his new team. The Giants are thin at wide receiver behind young star Malik Nabers, and Nabers has been slow to recover from an ACL tear sustained last September, leaving his early-season status in question. Likely's best season with the Ravens was in 2024, when he had 42 catches for 477 yards and six TDs. He never saw more than 60 targets in any of his four seasons in Baltimore. The world saw Likely's potential when he had nine catches for 111 yards and a touchdown in the Ravens' nationally televised season opener against the Chiefs in 2024. With an expected target increase in 2026, Likely has a chance to be a top-10 fantasy tight end. | Is Mark Andrews poised for a bump in productivity now that TE Isaiah Likely has left the Ravens for the Giants, leaving Andrews as the only established pass-catching tight end on the Baltimore roster? Or is Andrews, who turns 31 on Sept. 6, simply out of gas? Andrews' production cratered last season. He had career lows in yards per game (24.8), yards per catch (8.8) and yards per target (6.0). Some of Andrews' problems were undoubtedly related to Lamar Jackson's 2025 health issues. The Ravens' starting QB missed four regular-season games and didn't appear to be fully healthy in others. If Jackson returns to form and Andrews sees a target increase in the absence of Likely, Andrews could offer midrange TE1 numbers at a low-end TE1/high-end TE2 price. Andrews has drawn 69 and 70 targets the last two seasons despite playing 17 regular-season games both years. He drew 153 targets in 2021 and 113 targets in 15 games in 2022. |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | The Ravens opted to sign Mark Andrews for more years instead of extending Isaiah Likely in the final year of his rookie deal. Likely struggled with injuries to both himself and to his QB...that dramatically hurt his 2025 production (along with a few TDs that didn't actually result in TDs). Entering free agency and eventually signing with the New York Giants...Likely's stock is nowhere near where it was at this time last year. However, the upside we have seen from Likely when Andrews has missed time in the past - 11 PPG with no Andrews, the TE5 in PPG last year - warrants a shot on Likely if he carves out a clear TE1 role with John Harbaugh in NY. | Mark Andrews was a flat-out bust in 75% of his games played last season. He finished as a weekly fantasy TE1 (top-12) in under 20% of his games played (3 of 17 games played). He was the TE16 last season (TE23 in PPG), and he's not getting any younger. I'm very concerned that he might just be closer to being cooked. Posted a career low in yards (422). His yards per route run TANKED at 1.22. His YAC tanked. Dead last in YAC/reception among 49 qualifying tight ends. Zach "never forced a missed tackle in his life" Ertz had more YAC than Andrews did last season. And Andrews was bad with and without Lamar Jackson last season. There's a path for volume in the Ravens' offense, which is why Andrews is being ranked/drafted as a top-15 consensus tight end. But I'm afraid his decline will continue after he has failed to command the same type of volume over the last 2 seasons. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Isaiah Likely's 2025 season was crushed by a foot injury that he sustained in the preseason. I can't honestly tell you that he was fully healthy last season, or when that occurred, if so. I'm tossing his 2025 campaign in the trash. So, let's be kind and rewind to 2024. During that season, among 57 qualifying tight ends, Likely ranked 17th in target per route run rate, tenth in yards per route run, and eighth in first downs per route run and fantasy points per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). After signing a lucrative deal with the Giants this offseason, Likely should be their clear starting tight end and a strong part of their passing game, with only Darnell Mooney, Darius Slayton, Calvin Austin, and Malachi Fields to contend with for targets behind Malik Nabers. Likely could easily be a solid TE1 this season and is worth a late-round dart in a ton of drafts in 2026. | Mark Andrews is coming off easily his worst season in the NFL as the TE23 in fantasy points per game. Last year, Baltimore limited his playing time, as he was 22nd in route share (62.9%, per Fantasy Points Data). I'm expecting that to rebound in 2026 with Isaiah Likely gone, but we still have to see it materialize. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Andrews was ninth in first read share, but his yards per route run (41st) and first downs per route run (27th) were nothing to write home about. He's worth taking a flier on late in drafts as your tight end two with the hopes that he can rebound with more playing time in a new offensive system and give us a throwback season in 2026. |
