Isaiah Likely for Saquon Barkley (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI  Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG  Isaiah Likely TE - NYG |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 16 | # 120 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. WAS | vs. DAL | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs WAS | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs DAL | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 195.3 | 34.7 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.2 | 2.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 3 | 20 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Saquon Barkley | Isaiah Likely | Add Player |
|
08/06 | #17 | #105 | - |
|
08/06 | #12 | #110 | - |
|
08/06 | #12 | #121 | - |
|
08/06 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
08/06 | #20 | #144 | - |
|
08/06 | #13 | #123 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #129 | - |
|
08/05 | #23 | #96 | - |
|
08/05 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
08/05 | #20 | #180 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
08/05 | #20 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #86 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #13 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #105 | - |
|
08/05 | #33 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #255 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #86 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #125 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #8 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #172 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #76 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
08/06 | #12 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #180 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #137 | - |
|
07/30 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #180 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #84 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #255 | - |
|
08/06 | #20 | #123 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #86 | - |
|
07/27 | #15 | #157 | - |
|
08/06 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #137 | - |
|
07/25 | #23 | #110 | - |
|
07/24 | #17 | #96 | - |
|
07/23 | #37 | #195 | - |
|
07/23 | #23 | #172 | - |
|
07/22 | #17 | #172 | - |
|
07/21 | #20 | #105 | - |
|
07/20 | #23 | #94 | - |
|
07/19 | #17 | #94 | - |
|
07/19 | #13 | #86 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #86 | - |
|
07/18 | #12 | #86 | - |
|
07/17 | #17 | #110 | - |
|
07/17 | #23 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
07/16 | #15 | #154 | - |
|
07/26 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/15 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
07/14 | #17 | #110 | - |
|
07/14 | #13 | #111 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
07/30 | #33 | #94 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #109 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #96 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #23 | #110 | - |
|
07/27 | #33 | #110 | - |
|
07/10 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #245 | - |
|
07/07 | #17 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #8 | #110 | - |
|
07/25 | #13 | #94 | - |
|
08/05 | #33 | #84 | - |
|
07/24 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #33 | #96 | - |
|
06/30 | #20 | #123 | - |
|
07/07 | #49 | #86 | - |
|
06/28 | #28 | #130 | - |
|
07/21 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #180 | - |
|
06/25 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #96 | - |
|
06/15 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #101 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #105 | - |
|
05/29 | #28 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #20 | #86 | - |
|
05/21 | #12 | #225 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
07/25 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
05/11 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #13 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #86 | - |
|
04/28 | #28 | #110 | - |
|
04/27 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
04/27 | #23 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #144 | - |
|
05/20 | #17 | #94 | - |
|
04/20 | #30 | #110 | - |
|
07/09 | #13 | #94 | - |
|
03/24 | #23 | #157 | - |
|
03/09 | #28 | #180 | - |
|
01/07 | #49 | #180 | - |
|
07/15 | #23 | #180 | - |
|
01/07 | #23 | #172 | - |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. WAS | vs. DAL |
| Week 2 | at TEN | at LAR |
| Week 3 | at CHI | vs. TEN |
| Week 4 | vs. LAR | vs. ARI |
| Week 5 | at JAC | at WAS |
| Week 6 | vs. CAR | vs. NO |
| Week 7 | vs. DAL | at HOU |
| Week 8 | at WAS | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | vs. NYG | at PHI |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | vs. WAS |
| Week 11 | vs. PIT | vs. JAC |
| Week 12 | at DAL | at IND |
| Week 13 | at ARI | vs. SF |
| Week 14 | vs. IND | at SEA |
| Week 15 | vs. SEA | vs. CLE |
| Week 16 | vs. HOU | at DET |
| Week 17 | at SF | at DAL |
| Week 18 | at NYG | vs. PHI |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 14.4 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 15.4 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 5.5 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 13.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 5 | 14.8 | 1.2 |
| Week 6 | 6.7 | 0.6 |
| Week 7 | 4.2 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 29.4 | 0.8 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 6.0 |
| Week 10 | 10.1 | 1.7 |
| Week 11 | 9.0 | 1.5 |
| Week 12 | 5.4 | 1.0 |
| Week 13 | 5.6 | 7.5 |
| Week 14 | 18.2 | 8.5 |
| Week 15 | 15.2 | 0.0 |
| Week 16 | 21.2 | 0.0 |
| Week 17 | 6.8 | 2.7 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 3.2 |
| Total | 195.3 | 34.7 |
| Average | 12.2 | 2.5 |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | The Ravens opted to sign Mark Andrews for more years instead of extending Isaiah Likely in the final year of his rookie deal. Likely struggled with injuries to both himself and to his QB...that dramatically hurt his 2025 production (along with a few TDs that didn't actually result in TDs). Entering free agency and eventually signing with the New York Giants...Likely's stock is nowhere near where it was at this time last year. However, the upside we have seen from Likely when Andrews has missed time in the past - 11 PPG with no Andrews, the TE5 in PPG last year - warrants a shot on Likely if he carves out a clear TE1 role with John Harbaugh in NY. | |
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | After spending the first four seasons of his NFL career with the Ravens, Isaiah Likely signed a three-year, $40 million contract with the Giants. Likely shared targets with Mark Andrews for four years and could see increased usage with his new team. The Giants are thin at wide receiver behind young star Malik Nabers, and Nabers has been slow to recover from an ACL tear sustained last September, leaving his early-season status in question. Likely's best season with the Ravens was in 2024, when he had 42 catches for 477 yards and six TDs. He never saw more than 60 targets in any of his four seasons in Baltimore. The world saw Likely's potential when he had nine catches for 111 yards and a touchdown in the Ravens' nationally televised season opener against the Chiefs in 2024. With an expected target increase in 2026, Likely has a chance to be a top-10 fantasy tight end. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | I tried to tell people last year, but few wanted to listen. After an insane 2024 season, Saquon Barkley was poised to come back down to earth some in 2025. Well, it happened. Barkley finished with 317 touches and 1,413 total yards as the RB14 in fantasy points per game. Part of this could be traced to natural regression, but also, Barkley had a decent dip in efficiency. In 2024, Barkley had an insane 3.55 yards before contact per attempt, which easily led all running backs (minimum 100 carries, per Fantasy Points Data). Last year, that number fell to 2.11, which was 23rd among 49 qualifying backs, essentially a league-average number. From 2024 to 2025, Barkley's explosive run rate dropped from 7.2% (fourth-best) to 4.6% (20th), and his yards after contact per attempt dipped from 2.26 (35th) to 1.96 (39th). Barkley lived off explosive runs and easily getting into the second level of defenses in 2024, but he found more uphill sledding last year. His volume should finish in the neighborhood of 300 touches with double-digit touchdown upside. That should lock him into top-15 running back status with possible top 5-7 upside if the offensive line can stay healthy and the Eagles' passing attack can also bounce back. If the aerial attack can get right, this team and Barkley will have more scoring opportunities in 2026 (last year, 28th in red-zone scoring opportunities per game). | Isaiah Likely's 2025 season was crushed by a foot injury that he sustained in the preseason. I can't honestly tell you that he was fully healthy last season, or when that occurred, if so. I'm tossing his 2025 campaign in the trash. So, let's be kind and rewind to 2024. During that season, among 57 qualifying tight ends, Likely ranked 17th in target per route run rate, tenth in yards per route run, and eighth in first downs per route run and fantasy points per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). After signing a lucrative deal with the Giants this offseason, Likely should be their clear starting tight end and a strong part of their passing game, with only Darnell Mooney, Darius Slayton, Calvin Austin, and Malachi Fields to contend with for targets behind Malik Nabers. Likely could easily be a solid TE1 this season and is worth a late-round dart in a ton of drafts in 2026. |
