Jake Ferguson for Michael Wilson (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Michael Wilson WR - ARI  Michael Wilson WR - ARI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL  Jake Ferguson TE - DAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 97 | # 126 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at LAC | at NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs LAC | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 142.6 | 106.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 8.4 | 6.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 27 | 29 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Michael Wilson | Jake Ferguson | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #91 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #106 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #93 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #115 | #157 | - |
|
08/04 | #98 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #80 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #100 | #129 | - |
|
08/04 | #116 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #98 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #93 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #98 | #154 | - |
|
08/04 | #125 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #83 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #101 | #103 | - |
|
08/03 | #98 | #157 | - |
|
08/03 | #83 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #109 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #115 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #116 | #154 | - |
|
08/03 | #89 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #80 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #106 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #109 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #109 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #144 | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #114 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #75 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #70 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #91 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #93 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #120 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #109 | #144 | - |
|
07/31 | #106 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #106 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #106 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #83 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #109 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #109 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #50 | #84 | - |
|
08/04 | #101 | #137 | - |
|
07/28 | #101 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #83 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #106 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #109 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #101 | #130 | - |
|
07/26 | #122 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #109 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #80 | #110 | - |
|
07/25 | #109 | #144 | - |
|
07/24 | #114 | #123 | - |
|
07/23 | #135 | #130 | - |
|
07/23 | #91 | #110 | - |
|
07/22 | #106 | #110 | - |
|
07/21 | #75 | #144 | - |
|
07/20 | #106 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #109 | #111 | - |
|
07/19 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #93 | #130 | - |
|
07/18 | #98 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #98 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #98 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
07/16 | #98 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #74 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #91 | #123 | - |
|
07/15 | #114 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #101 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #125 | #144 | - |
|
07/14 | #98 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #114 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #98 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #115 | #122 | - |
|
07/12 | #125 | #154 | - |
|
07/12 | #139 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #115 | #157 | - |
|
07/10 | #109 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #169 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #89 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #109 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #69 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #120 | #137 | - |
|
07/24 | #98 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #111 | - |
|
06/30 | #88 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #93 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #125 | #137 | - |
|
06/28 | #114 | #137 | - |
|
07/21 | #109 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #137 | - |
|
06/25 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #125 | #137 | - |
|
06/15 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
06/12 | #109 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #109 | #121 | - |
|
08/03 | #129 | #172 | - |
|
05/29 | #88 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #98 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #93 | #111 | - |
|
05/21 | #98 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #109 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #89 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #109 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #93 | #154 | - |
|
05/11 | #89 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #106 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #101 | #144 | - |
|
07/30 | #75 | #111 | - |
|
04/28 | #88 | #157 | - |
|
04/27 | #50 | #130 | - |
|
04/27 | #88 | #154 | - |
|
07/28 | #88 | #123 | - |
|
05/20 | #69 | #110 | - |
|
04/20 | #116 | #144 | - |
|
07/09 | #106 | #123 | - |
|
03/24 | #89 | #105 | - |
|
03/09 | #88 | #110 | - |
|
01/07 | #46 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #101 | #123 | - |
|
01/07 | #101 | #110 | - |
Michael Wilson WR - ARI Michael Wilson WR - ARI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at LAC | at NYG |
| Week 2 | vs. SEA | vs. WAS |
| Week 3 | at SF | vs. BAL |
| Week 4 | at NYG | at HOU |
| Week 5 | vs. DET | vs. TB |
| Week 6 | at LAR | at GB |
| Week 7 | vs. DEN | at PHI |
| Week 8 | at DAL | vs. ARI |
| Week 9 | at SEA | at IND |
| Week 10 | vs. LAR | vs. SF |
| Week 11 | at KC | vs. TEN |
| Week 12 | vs. WAS | vs. PHI |
| Week 13 | vs. PHI | at SEA |
| Week 14 | BYE WEEK | BYE WEEK |
| Week 15 | vs. NYJ | at LAR |
| Week 16 | at NO | vs. JAC |
| Week 17 | vs. LV | vs. NYG |
| Week 18 | vs. SF | at WAS |
Michael Wilson WR - ARI Michael Wilson WR - ARI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 0.5 | 2.3 |
| Week 2 | 7.1 | 7.8 |
| Week 3 | 0.5 | 8.2 |
| Week 4 | 1.5 | 10.0 |
| Week 5 | 1.6 | 16.9 |
| Week 6 | 4.4 | 9.3 |
| Week 7 | 4.0 | 14.9 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 9 | 6.1 | 3.0 |
| Week 10 | 3.4 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 18.5 | 7.6 |
| Week 12 | 11.8 | 6.1 |
| Week 13 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| Week 14 | 26.2 | 5.8 |
| Week 15 | 11.4 | 1.6 |
| Week 16 | 11.2 | 1.9 |
| Week 17 | 14.9 | 6.6 |
| Week 18 | 15.9 | 0.5 |
| Total | 142.6 | 106.1 |
| Average | 8.4 | 6.2 |
Michael Wilson WR - ARI Michael Wilson WR - ARI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson is a competent pass catcher in a prolific offense, but the presence of two star receivers in Dallas could limit Ferguson's fantasy upside. Ferguson had 82 catches for 600 yards and eight touchdowns in 2025. The reception and TD totals were career highs, but Ferguson averaged just 7.3 yards per catch, a career low. He finished TE8 in half point fantasy scoring but was TE13 in fantasy points per game among TEs who played at least five games. The Cowboys have an explosive passing attack, but WRs CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens are QB Dak Prescott's principal targets. The Lamb-Pickens duo combined for 250 targets and 168 receptions last season. Ferguson's 2026 production could be limited as long as Lamb and Pickens are both healthy, so it's best to consider Ferguson a high-end TE2 in this year's drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Michael Wilson's 2025 breakout came with massive context attached, as nearly all of his fantasy production occurred when Marvin Harrison Jr. was sidelined. Wilson averaged elite WR1 numbers without MHJ in the lineup, but his role and target rate cratered whenever Arizona's No. 1 receiver was active. The Cardinals are also expected to lean more balanced offensively after investing heavily in the run game during the 2026 NFL Draft with the selection of Jeremiyah Love. Wilson can still provide spike weeks, but expecting last season's counting stats to repeat in a healthier Arizona offense feels overly optimistic. | Jake Ferguson averaged just 7.3 PPG when George Pickens and CeeDee Lamb were both healthy (> 50% snap share) in the lineup during the 2025 season (11 games). Five games without Lamb playing at least 50% of the snaps -> 13.5 PPG. Still, the overall production and career-high 8 TDs resulted in TE13 finishing in half-PPR scoring (per game). Top-5 in cumulative scoring in full PPR formats. With George Pickens returning to Dallas....Ferguson is facing a major uphill battle to rise above TD-or-bust TE territory. He's being overvalued as a fringe TE1 based on his teammate's missing games in 2025. |
