Jake Ferguson for Rhamondre Stevenson (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE ![]() Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 79 | # 126 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at SEA | at NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 1 star matchup. RBs perform worse than their average vs SEA | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 146.8 | 106.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 10.5 | 6.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 21 | 29 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Rhamondre Stevenson | Jake Ferguson | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #72 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #78 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #78 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #85 | #157 | - |
|
08/04 | #77 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #78 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #82 | #129 | - |
|
08/04 | #71 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #71 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #87 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #85 | #154 | - |
|
08/04 | #78 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #99 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #68 | #103 | - |
|
08/03 | #95 | #157 | - |
|
08/03 | #71 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #64 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #87 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #78 | #154 | - |
|
08/03 | #78 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #72 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #78 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #85 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #78 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #77 | #144 | - |
|
08/01 | #85 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #78 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #77 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #78 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #82 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #72 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #77 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #85 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #77 | #144 | - |
|
07/31 | #78 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #113 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #78 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #113 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #55 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #64 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #66 | #84 | - |
|
08/04 | #72 | #137 | - |
|
07/28 | #72 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #85 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #95 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #72 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #102 | #130 | - |
|
07/26 | #77 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #78 | #110 | - |
|
07/25 | #85 | #144 | - |
|
07/24 | #78 | #123 | - |
|
07/23 | #113 | #130 | - |
|
07/23 | #92 | #110 | - |
|
07/22 | #95 | #110 | - |
|
07/21 | #64 | #144 | - |
|
07/20 | #78 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #77 | #111 | - |
|
07/19 | #78 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #85 | #130 | - |
|
07/18 | #77 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #77 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #71 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #72 | #130 | - |
|
07/16 | #85 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #95 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #78 | #123 | - |
|
07/15 | #64 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #72 | #144 | - |
|
07/14 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #71 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #78 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #62 | #122 | - |
|
07/12 | #82 | #154 | - |
|
07/12 | #99 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #77 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #60 | #157 | - |
|
07/10 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #78 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #63 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #77 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #72 | #137 | - |
|
07/24 | #72 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #78 | #111 | - |
|
06/30 | #99 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #99 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #71 | #137 | - |
|
06/28 | #85 | #137 | - |
|
07/21 | #77 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #95 | #137 | - |
|
06/25 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #85 | #137 | - |
|
06/15 | #82 | #130 | - |
|
06/12 | #64 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #97 | #121 | - |
|
08/03 | #78 | #172 | - |
|
05/29 | #99 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #85 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #92 | #111 | - |
|
05/21 | #95 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #85 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #92 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #82 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #71 | #154 | - |
|
05/11 | #85 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #72 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #72 | #144 | - |
|
07/30 | #85 | #111 | - |
|
04/28 | #85 | #157 | - |
|
04/27 | #72 | #130 | - |
|
04/27 | #72 | #154 | - |
|
07/28 | #82 | #123 | - |
|
05/20 | #108 | #110 | - |
|
04/20 | #78 | #144 | - |
|
07/09 | #82 | #123 | - |
|
03/24 | #82 | #105 | - |
|
03/09 | #77 | #110 | - |
|
01/07 | #95 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #99 | #123 | - |
|
01/07 | #95 | #110 | - |
Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE ![]() Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at SEA | at NYG |
| Week 2 | vs. PIT | vs. WAS |
| Week 3 | at JAC | vs. BAL |
| Week 4 | at BUF | at HOU |
| Week 5 | vs. LV | vs. TB |
| Week 6 | vs. NYJ | at GB |
| Week 7 | at CHI | at PHI |
| Week 8 | at MIA | vs. ARI |
| Week 9 | vs. GB | at IND |
| Week 10 | at DET | vs. SF |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | vs. TEN |
| Week 12 | at LAC | vs. PHI |
| Week 13 | vs. BUF | at SEA |
| Week 14 | vs. MIN | BYE WEEK |
| Week 15 | at KC | at LAR |
| Week 16 | at NYJ | vs. JAC |
| Week 17 | vs. DEN | vs. NYG |
| Week 18 | vs. MIA | at WAS |
Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE ![]() Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 2.7 | 2.3 |
| Week 2 | 16.2 | 7.8 |
| Week 3 | 1.6 | 8.2 |
| Week 4 | 4.1 | 10.0 |
| Week 5 | 12.7 | 16.9 |
| Week 6 | 1.8 | 9.3 |
| Week 7 | 14.8 | 14.9 |
| Week 8 | 4.9 | 0.0 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 3.0 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | 7.6 |
| Week 12 | 1.0 | 6.1 |
| Week 13 | 8.0 | 3.6 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 5.8 |
| Week 15 | 7.7 | 1.6 |
| Week 16 | 15.8 | 1.9 |
| Week 17 | 22.2 | 6.6 |
| Week 18 | 33.3 | 0.5 |
| Total | 146.8 | 106.1 |
| Average | 10.5 | 6.2 |
Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE ![]() Rhamondre Stevenson RB - NE | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson is a competent pass catcher in a prolific offense, but the presence of two star receivers in Dallas could limit Ferguson's fantasy upside. Ferguson had 82 catches for 600 yards and eight touchdowns in 2025. The reception and TD totals were career highs, but Ferguson averaged just 7.3 yards per catch, a career low. He finished TE8 in half point fantasy scoring but was TE13 in fantasy points per game among TEs who played at least five games. The Cowboys have an explosive passing attack, but WRs CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens are QB Dak Prescott's principal targets. The Lamb-Pickens duo combined for 250 targets and 168 receptions last season. Ferguson's 2026 production could be limited as long as Lamb and Pickens are both healthy, so it's best to consider Ferguson a high-end TE2 in this year's drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson averaged just 7.3 PPG when George Pickens and CeeDee Lamb were both healthy (> 50% snap share) in the lineup during the 2025 season (11 games). Five games without Lamb playing at least 50% of the snaps -> 13.5 PPG. Still, the overall production and career-high 8 TDs resulted in TE13 finishing in half-PPR scoring (per game). Top-5 in cumulative scoring in full PPR formats. With George Pickens returning to Dallas....Ferguson is facing a major uphill battle to rise above TD-or-bust TE territory. He's being overvalued as a fringe TE1 based on his teammate's missing games in 2025. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Rhamondre Stevenson was the Pats' lead back last year as the RB21 in fantasy points per game, and I don't see that changing in 2026. Stevenson was amazing on a per-touch basis, and he bested TreVeyon Henderson in EVERY discernible metric that I care about. Last year, Stevenson was fifth in explosive run rate, missed tackle rate, and yards after contact per attempt (per Fantasy Points Data). Stevenson also surpassed Henderson in yards per route run (1.41 vs. 0.98) and pass protection. Unless Stevenson falls off in 2026, he should remain the lead back for New England after playing at least 57% of the snaps in nine of his 14 games played in 2025. Stevenson should be a nice value for fantasy managers again this season. | |


