Jake Ferguson for Saquon Barkley (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI  Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL  Jake Ferguson TE - DAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 15 | # 126 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. WAS | at NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs WAS | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 195.3 | 106.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.2 | 6.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 3 | 29 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Saquon Barkley | Jake Ferguson | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #20 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #154 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #103 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #157 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #154 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #8 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #111 | - |
|
08/02 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #144 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #17 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #144 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #13 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #84 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #137 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
07/26 | #8 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #20 | #110 | - |
|
07/25 | #23 | #144 | - |
|
07/24 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
07/23 | #37 | #130 | - |
|
07/23 | #23 | #110 | - |
|
07/22 | #17 | #110 | - |
|
07/21 | #20 | #144 | - |
|
07/20 | #23 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
07/19 | #13 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
07/18 | #12 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
07/16 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
07/15 | #28 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #13 | #144 | - |
|
07/14 | #20 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #33 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #122 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #154 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #33 | #157 | - |
|
07/10 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #8 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #33 | #137 | - |
|
07/24 | #15 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #111 | - |
|
06/30 | #20 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #49 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #137 | - |
|
06/28 | #28 | #137 | - |
|
07/21 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #137 | - |
|
06/26 | #20 | #123 | - |
|
06/25 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
06/15 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
06/12 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #121 | - |
|
08/03 | #20 | #172 | - |
|
05/29 | #28 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
05/21 | #12 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #154 | - |
|
05/11 | #13 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #13 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #15 | #144 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
04/28 | #28 | #157 | - |
|
04/27 | #28 | #130 | - |
|
04/27 | #23 | #154 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #123 | - |
|
05/20 | #17 | #110 | - |
|
04/20 | #30 | #144 | - |
|
07/09 | #13 | #123 | - |
|
03/24 | #23 | #105 | - |
|
03/09 | #28 | #110 | - |
|
01/07 | #49 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #23 | #123 | - |
|
01/07 | #23 | #110 | - |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. WAS | at NYG |
| Week 2 | at TEN | vs. WAS |
| Week 3 | at CHI | vs. BAL |
| Week 4 | vs. LAR | at HOU |
| Week 5 | at JAC | vs. TB |
| Week 6 | vs. CAR | at GB |
| Week 7 | vs. DAL | at PHI |
| Week 8 | at WAS | vs. ARI |
| Week 9 | vs. NYG | at IND |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | vs. SF |
| Week 11 | vs. PIT | vs. TEN |
| Week 12 | at DAL | vs. PHI |
| Week 13 | at ARI | at SEA |
| Week 14 | vs. IND | BYE WEEK |
| Week 15 | vs. SEA | at LAR |
| Week 16 | vs. HOU | vs. JAC |
| Week 17 | at SF | vs. NYG |
| Week 18 | at NYG | at WAS |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 14.4 | 2.3 |
| Week 2 | 15.4 | 7.8 |
| Week 3 | 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Week 4 | 13.4 | 10.0 |
| Week 5 | 14.8 | 16.9 |
| Week 6 | 6.7 | 9.3 |
| Week 7 | 4.2 | 14.9 |
| Week 8 | 29.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 3.0 |
| Week 10 | 10.1 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 9.0 | 7.6 |
| Week 12 | 5.4 | 6.1 |
| Week 13 | 5.6 | 3.6 |
| Week 14 | 18.2 | 5.8 |
| Week 15 | 15.2 | 1.6 |
| Week 16 | 21.2 | 1.9 |
| Week 17 | 6.8 | 6.6 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Total | 195.3 | 106.1 |
| Average | 12.2 | 6.2 |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson is a competent pass catcher in a prolific offense, but the presence of two star receivers in Dallas could limit Ferguson's fantasy upside. Ferguson had 82 catches for 600 yards and eight touchdowns in 2025. The reception and TD totals were career highs, but Ferguson averaged just 7.3 yards per catch, a career low. He finished TE8 in half point fantasy scoring but was TE13 in fantasy points per game among TEs who played at least five games. The Cowboys have an explosive passing attack, but WRs CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens are QB Dak Prescott's principal targets. The Lamb-Pickens duo combined for 250 targets and 168 receptions last season. Ferguson's 2026 production could be limited as long as Lamb and Pickens are both healthy, so it's best to consider Ferguson a high-end TE2 in this year's drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson averaged just 7.3 PPG when George Pickens and CeeDee Lamb were both healthy (> 50% snap share) in the lineup during the 2025 season (11 games). Five games without Lamb playing at least 50% of the snaps -> 13.5 PPG. Still, the overall production and career-high 8 TDs resulted in TE13 finishing in half-PPR scoring (per game). Top-5 in cumulative scoring in full PPR formats. With George Pickens returning to Dallas....Ferguson is facing a major uphill battle to rise above TD-or-bust TE territory. He's being overvalued as a fringe TE1 based on his teammate's missing games in 2025. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | I tried to tell people last year, but few wanted to listen. After an insane 2024 season, Saquon Barkley was poised to come back down to earth some in 2025. Well, it happened. Barkley finished with 317 touches and 1,413 total yards as the RB14 in fantasy points per game. Part of this could be traced to natural regression, but also, Barkley had a decent dip in efficiency. In 2024, Barkley had an insane 3.55 yards before contact per attempt, which easily led all running backs (minimum 100 carries, per Fantasy Points Data). Last year, that number fell to 2.11, which was 23rd among 49 qualifying backs, essentially a league-average number. From 2024 to 2025, Barkley's explosive run rate dropped from 7.2% (fourth-best) to 4.6% (20th), and his yards after contact per attempt dipped from 2.26 (35th) to 1.96 (39th). Barkley lived off explosive runs and easily getting into the second level of defenses in 2024, but he found more uphill sledding last year. His volume should finish in the neighborhood of 300 touches with double-digit touchdown upside. That should lock him into top-15 running back status with possible top 5-7 upside if the offensive line can stay healthy and the Eagles' passing attack can also bounce back. If the aerial attack can get right, this team and Barkley will have more scoring opportunities in 2026 (last year, 28th in red-zone scoring opportunities per game). | |
