Jordan Addison for Mark Andrews (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Jordan Addison WR - MIN  Jordan Addison WR - MIN | Mark Andrews TE - BAL  Mark Andrews TE - BAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 94 | # 116 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. GB | at IND | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs GB | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs IND | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 93.1 | 83.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.6 | 4.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 1 | 7 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Jordan Addison | Mark Andrews | Add Player |
|
08/03 | #91 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #89 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #93 | #86 | - |
|
08/03 | #91 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #93 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #106 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #106 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #93 | #110 | - |
|
08/02 | #104 | #99 | - |
|
08/02 | #93 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #93 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #114 | #96 | - |
|
08/02 | #93 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #98 | #96 | - |
|
08/01 | #89 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #88 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #93 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #89 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #91 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #147 | #172 | - |
|
07/31 | #101 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #93 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
07/31 | #129 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #106 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #69 | #67 | - |
|
07/31 | #93 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #83 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #88 | #110 | - |
|
07/31 | #88 | #180 | - |
|
07/30 | #101 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #114 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #88 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #164 | #86 | - |
|
07/30 | #115 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #83 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #91 | #86 | - |
|
07/29 | #89 | #34 | - |
|
08/01 | #109 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #98 | #86 | - |
|
07/28 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #93 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #91 | #154 | - |
|
08/03 | #93 | #111 | - |
|
07/26 | #91 | #105 | - |
|
07/29 | #120 | #111 | - |
|
07/25 | #109 | #105 | - |
|
07/25 | #91 | #123 | - |
|
07/24 | #106 | #110 | - |
|
07/23 | #91 | #84 | - |
|
07/23 | #75 | #154 | - |
|
07/22 | #93 | #154 | - |
|
07/21 | #101 | #111 | - |
|
07/20 | #109 | #123 | - |
|
07/19 | #89 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #115 | #96 | - |
|
07/27 | #115 | #110 | - |
|
07/18 | #106 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #106 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #106 | #123 | - |
|
07/17 | #93 | #105 | - |
|
07/16 | #93 | #157 | - |
|
07/26 | #93 | #137 | - |
|
07/15 | #98 | #130 | - |
|
07/15 | #89 | #94 | - |
|
07/14 | #98 | #123 | - |
|
07/14 | #91 | #84 | - |
|
07/14 | #120 | #137 | - |
|
07/13 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #101 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #92 | #79 | - |
|
07/12 | #91 | #123 | - |
|
07/12 | #91 | #172 | - |
|
08/02 | #129 | #86 | - |
|
07/27 | #114 | #84 | - |
|
07/10 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #91 | #137 | - |
|
07/07 | #98 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #106 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #83 | #111 | - |
|
07/25 | #114 | #76 | - |
|
07/31 | #115 | #123 | - |
|
07/24 | #93 | #86 | - |
|
08/01 | #98 | #130 | - |
|
06/30 | #89 | #137 | - |
|
07/07 | #106 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #105 | - |
|
06/28 | #116 | #94 | - |
|
07/21 | #114 | #154 | - |
|
08/01 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
06/26 | #93 | #110 | - |
|
06/25 | #98 | #123 | - |
|
07/13 | #101 | #105 | - |
|
06/15 | #98 | #123 | - |
|
06/12 | #98 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #87 | #104 | - |
|
08/03 | #106 | #157 | - |
|
05/29 | #89 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #83 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
05/21 | #83 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #105 | - |
|
07/25 | #98 | #84 | - |
|
08/01 | #83 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #98 | #137 | - |
|
05/11 | #93 | #137 | - |
|
07/27 | #89 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #91 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #101 | #110 | - |
|
04/28 | #101 | #154 | - |
|
04/27 | #98 | #137 | - |
|
04/27 | #106 | #144 | - |
|
07/28 | #98 | #137 | - |
|
05/20 | #116 | #105 | - |
|
04/20 | #98 | #172 | - |
|
07/09 | #101 | #144 | - |
|
03/24 | #91 | #154 | - |
|
03/09 | #93 | #144 | - |
|
01/07 | #80 | #144 | - |
|
07/15 | #89 | #144 | - |
|
01/07 | #88 | #154 | - |
Jordan Addison WR - MIN Jordan Addison WR - MIN | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. GB | at IND |
| Week 2 | at CHI | vs. NO |
| Week 3 | at TB | at DAL |
| Week 4 | vs. MIA | vs. TEN |
| Week 5 | at NO | at ATL |
| Week 6 | BYE WEEK | at CLE |
| Week 7 | vs. IND | vs. CIN |
| Week 8 | at DET | at BUF |
| Week 9 | vs. BUF | vs. JAC |
| Week 10 | at GB | vs. LAC |
| Week 11 | at SF | at CAR |
| Week 12 | vs. ATL | at HOU |
| Week 13 | vs. CAR | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | at NE | vs. TB |
| Week 15 | vs. DET | at PIT |
| Week 16 | vs. WAS | vs. CLE |
| Week 17 | at NYJ | at CIN |
| Week 18 | vs. CHI | vs. PIT |
Jordan Addison WR - MIN Jordan Addison WR - MIN | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Week 2 | ‐ | 0.4 |
| Week 3 | ‐ | 21.1 |
| Week 4 | 11.4 | 3.0 |
| Week 5 | 10.1 | 2.2 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 2.6 |
| Week 7 | 12.8 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 8.6 | 3.4 |
| Week 9 | 6.4 | 14.6 |
| Week 10 | 3.5 | 7.4 |
| Week 11 | 8.0 | 12.7 |
| Week 12 | 0.0 | 1.1 |
| Week 13 | 3.6 | 4.7 |
| Week 14 | 6.2 | 0.9 |
| Week 15 | 6.6 | 1.8 |
| Week 16 | 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Week 17 | 12.5 | 2.8 |
| Week 18 | 0.8 | 1.4 |
| Total | 93.1 | 83.0 |
| Average | 6.6 | 4.9 |
Jordan Addison WR - MIN Jordan Addison WR - MIN | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Is Mark Andrews poised for a bump in productivity now that TE Isaiah Likely has left the Ravens for the Giants, leaving Andrews as the only established pass-catching tight end on the Baltimore roster? Or is Andrews, who turns 31 on Sept. 6, simply out of gas? Andrews' production cratered last season. He had career lows in yards per game (24.8), yards per catch (8.8) and yards per target (6.0). Some of Andrews' problems were undoubtedly related to Lamar Jackson's 2025 health issues. The Ravens' starting QB missed four regular-season games and didn't appear to be fully healthy in others. If Jackson returns to form and Andrews sees a target increase in the absence of Likely, Andrews could offer midrange TE1 numbers at a low-end TE1/high-end TE2 price. Andrews has drawn 69 and 70 targets the last two seasons despite playing 17 regular-season games both years. He drew 153 targets in 2021 and 113 targets in 15 games in 2022. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Jordan Addison's 2025 fall-off was heavily tied to poor quarterback play and an early-season suspension, leading to the least productive fantasy season of his young career. Still, the former first-round pick flashed upside whenever the Vikings received competent QB play, averaging 77 receiving yards per game with Carson Wentz under center. Addison's downfield role continues to create splash-play potential, but it also makes him more volatile week-to-week. With Kyler Murray now in Minnesota, Addison profiles as a strong bounce-back candidate, although added target competition in the red zone could cap his touchdown upside. | Mark Andrews was a flat-out bust in 75% of his games played last season. He finished as a weekly fantasy TE1 (top-12) in under 20% of his games played (3 of 17 games played). He was the TE16 last season (TE23 in PPG), and he's not getting any younger. I'm very concerned that he might just be closer to being cooked. Posted a career low in yards (422). His yards per route run TANKED at 1.22. His YAC tanked. Dead last in YAC/reception among 49 qualifying tight ends. Zach "never forced a missed tackle in his life" Ertz had more YAC than Andrews did last season. And Andrews was bad with and without Lamar Jackson last season. There's a path for volume in the Ravens' offense, which is why Andrews is being ranked/drafted as a top-15 consensus tight end. But I'm afraid his decline will continue after he has failed to command the same type of volume over the last 2 seasons. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Mark Andrews is coming off easily his worst season in the NFL as the TE23 in fantasy points per game. Last year, Baltimore limited his playing time, as he was 22nd in route share (62.9%, per Fantasy Points Data). I'm expecting that to rebound in 2026 with Isaiah Likely gone, but we still have to see it materialize. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Andrews was ninth in first read share, but his yards per route run (41st) and first downs per route run (27th) were nothing to write home about. He's worth taking a flier on late in drafts as your tight end two with the hopes that he can rebound with more playing time in a new offensive system and give us a throwback season in 2026. | |
