Malik Washington for Rome Odunze (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Rome Odunze WR - CHI  Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Malik Washington WR - MIA  Malik Washington WR - MIA |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 27 | # 78 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at CAR | at LV | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs CAR | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs LV | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 102.1 | 70.7 | - |
| Avg Game | 8.5 | 4.2 | - |
| Avg Projection | 146.4 | 63.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 15 | 19 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Rome Odunze | Malik Washington | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #28 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #25 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #30 | #81 | - |
|
08/04 | #24 | #99 | - |
|
08/04 | #21 | #62 | - |
|
08/04 | #29 | #78 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #88 | - |
|
08/03 | #21 | #78 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #89 | - |
|
08/03 | #20 | #60 | - |
|
08/03 | #26 | #84 | - |
|
08/03 | #27 | #85 | - |
|
08/03 | #27 | #78 | - |
|
08/02 | #24 | #68 | - |
|
08/02 | #18 | #76 | - |
|
08/03 | #33 | #58 | - |
|
08/02 | #21 | #107 | - |
|
08/01 | #29 | #77 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #93 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #24 | #93 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #75 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #65 | - |
|
07/31 | #33 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #25 | #76 | - |
|
08/04 | #25 | #97 | - |
|
07/31 | #25 | #73 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #66 | - |
|
07/31 | #21 | #81 | - |
|
07/31 | #19 | #107 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #78 | - |
|
07/30 | #26 | #82 | - |
|
07/30 | #29 | #100 | - |
|
07/30 | #29 | #75 | - |
|
08/03 | #37 | #65 | - |
|
07/29 | #29 | #75 | - |
|
07/29 | #39 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #26 | #83 | - |
|
07/28 | #28 | #84 | - |
|
07/28 | #17 | #107 | - |
|
07/28 | #29 | #64 | - |
|
07/27 | #29 | #106 | - |
|
08/03 | #29 | #66 | - |
|
07/26 | #23 | #74 | - |
|
07/29 | #26 | #65 | - |
|
07/25 | #29 | #76 | - |
|
07/25 | #26 | #97 | - |
|
07/24 | #29 | #83 | - |
|
07/23 | #22 | #76 | - |
|
07/23 | #31 | #102 | - |
|
07/22 | #25 | #105 | - |
|
07/21 | #24 | #74 | - |
|
07/20 | #23 | #72 | - |
|
07/19 | #18 | #110 | - |
|
07/19 | #25 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #26 | #77 | - |
|
07/18 | #29 | #75 | - |
|
07/17 | #29 | #107 | - |
|
07/17 | #33 | #80 | - |
|
07/17 | #28 | #72 | - |
|
07/16 | #22 | #106 | - |
|
07/26 | #29 | #76 | - |
|
07/15 | #28 | #87 | - |
|
07/15 | #15 | #95 | - |
|
07/14 | #28 | #76 | - |
|
07/14 | #30 | #79 | - |
|
07/14 | #34 | #79 | - |
|
07/13 | #28 | #85 | - |
|
07/30 | #25 | #63 | - |
|
08/03 | #25 | #92 | - |
|
07/12 | #28 | #102 | - |
|
07/12 | #29 | #52 | - |
|
08/02 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
07/27 | #21 | #90 | - |
|
07/10 | #32 | #70 | - |
|
08/01 | #14 | #77 | - |
|
07/07 | #29 | #75 | - |
|
08/02 | #30 | #75 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #66 | - |
|
07/25 | #33 | #95 | - |
|
07/31 | #36 | #99 | - |
|
07/24 | #29 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #20 | #73 | - |
|
06/30 | #18 | #95 | - |
|
07/07 | #29 | #66 | - |
|
08/01 | #29 | #71 | - |
|
06/28 | #24 | #75 | - |
|
07/21 | #24 | #90 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #84 | - |
|
06/26 | #24 | #93 | - |
|
06/25 | #28 | #84 | - |
|
07/13 | #22 | #95 | - |
|
06/15 | #28 | #86 | - |
|
06/12 | #29 | #93 | - |
|
08/04 | #29 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #93 | - |
|
05/29 | #24 | #95 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #78 | - |
|
07/29 | #16 | #86 | - |
|
05/21 | #15 | #104 | - |
|
08/01 | #17 | #93 | - |
|
07/25 | #28 | #95 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #74 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #76 | - |
|
05/11 | #28 | #99 | - |
|
07/27 | #29 | #82 | - |
|
07/29 | #23 | #62 | - |
|
07/30 | #23 | #72 | - |
|
04/28 | #33 | #78 | - |
|
04/27 | #30 | #77 | - |
|
04/27 | #31 | #79 | - |
|
07/28 | #30 | #96 | - |
|
05/20 | #34 | #116 | - |
|
04/20 | #35 | #79 | - |
|
07/09 | #29 | #118 | - |
|
03/24 | #29 | #110 | - |
|
03/09 | #29 | #108 | - |
|
01/07 | #39 | #102 | - |
|
07/15 | #31 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #31 | #102 | - |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Malik Washington WR - MIA Malik Washington WR - MIA | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at CAR | at LV |
| Week 2 | vs. MIN | at SF |
| Week 3 | vs. PHI | vs. KC |
| Week 4 | vs. NYJ | at MIN |
| Week 5 | at GB | vs. CIN |
| Week 6 | at ATL | BYE WEEK |
| Week 7 | vs. NE | at NYJ |
| Week 8 | at SEA | vs. NE |
| Week 9 | vs. TB | vs. DET |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | at IND |
| Week 11 | vs. NO | at BUF |
| Week 12 | at DET | vs. NYJ |
| Week 13 | vs. JAC | at DEN |
| Week 14 | at MIA | vs. CHI |
| Week 15 | at BUF | at GB |
| Week 16 | vs. GB | vs. LAC |
| Week 17 | vs. DET | vs. BUF |
| Week 18 | at MIN | at NE |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Malik Washington WR - MIA Malik Washington WR - MIA | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 63.4 | 43.5 |
| Rec Yards | 980.2 | 390.0 |
| Rec TDs | 8.1 | 2.3 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.3 | 13.4 |
| Rush Yards | 1.3 | 80.2 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.7 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 146.4 | 63.5 |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Malik Washington WR - MIA Malik Washington WR - MIA | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 9.7 | 2.9 |
| Week 2 | 24.8 | 8.5 |
| Week 3 | 12.2 | 3.2 |
| Week 4 | 12.9 | 2.1 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 6 | 3.2 | 2.3 |
| Week 7 | 3.1 | 3.0 |
| Week 8 | 11.4 | 9.6 |
| Week 9 | 0.0 | 4.1 |
| Week 10 | 14.6 | 7.3 |
| Week 11 | 4.1 | 4.2 |
| Week 12 | 5.3 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 1.0 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 1.0 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 9.2 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 0.5 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 8.8 |
| Total | 102.1 | 70.7 |
| Average | 8.5 | 4.2 |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Malik Washington WR - MIA Malik Washington WR - MIA | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 9 | 5 |
| Week 2 | 11 | 2 |
| Week 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Week 4 | 8 | 3 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Week 7 | 6 | 8 |
| Week 8 | 10 | 5 |
| Week 9 | 3 | 3 |
| Week 10 | 10 | 3 |
| Week 11 | 6 | 3 |
| Week 12 | 9 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 6 | 5 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 4 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 1 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 1 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 3 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 4 |
Rome Odunze WR - CHI Rome Odunze WR - CHI | Malik Washington WR - MIA Malik Washington WR - MIA | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Rome Odunze's second season was a tale of two halves, as injuries and poor catchable targets derailed what started as a breakout campaign. Before Week 9, he ranked top-10 in WR fantasy points per game while dominating high-value usage, leading the Bears in targets, red-zone looks, and air yards share. The concerns are real with Colston Loveland and Luther Burden taking larger roles in Year 2 but Chicago also lost significant WR volume and touchdown production entering 2026 with the departure of DJ Moore. Odunze remains a strong positive regression candidate tied to Caleb Williams, especially if the Bears' passing game takes another step forward under HC Ben Johnson. | |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | - 4th in Air Yards Per Target at 14.1 | |
