Parker Washington for Tre Tucker (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Parker Washington WR - JAC  Parker Washington WR - JAC | Tre Tucker WR - LV  Tre Tucker WR - LV |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 36 | # 60 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. CLE | vs. MIA | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs CLE | This is a 5 star matchup. WRs perform better than their average vs MIA | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 126.7 | 104.7 | - |
| Avg Game | 7.9 | 6.2 | - |
| Avg Projection | 117.8 | 91.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 4 | 24 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Parker Washington | Tre Tucker | Add Player |
|
08/02 | #35 | #62 | - |
|
08/02 | #31 | #68 | - |
|
08/02 | #30 | #55 | - |
|
08/02 | #38 | #94 | - |
|
08/02 | #37 | #62 | - |
|
08/02 | #37 | #59 | - |
|
08/02 | #33 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #68 | - |
|
08/01 | #36 | #76 | - |
|
08/01 | #33 | #61 | - |
|
08/01 | #35 | #70 | - |
|
08/01 | #29 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #70 | - |
|
08/01 | #37 | #73 | - |
|
07/31 | #33 | #71 | - |
|
07/31 | #30 | #73 | - |
|
07/31 | #39 | #65 | - |
|
07/31 | #40 | #47 | - |
|
07/31 | #35 | #56 | - |
|
07/31 | #27 | #82 | - |
|
08/02 | #46 | #56 | - |
|
07/31 | #30 | #71 | - |
|
07/31 | #39 | #63 | - |
|
07/31 | #48 | #60 | - |
|
07/31 | #45 | #68 | - |
|
07/30 | #32 | #67 | - |
|
07/30 | #35 | #64 | - |
|
07/30 | #36 | #64 | - |
|
07/30 | #32 | #65 | - |
|
07/30 | #35 | #68 | - |
|
07/30 | #25 | #66 | - |
|
07/30 | #40 | #56 | - |
|
07/29 | #31 | #46 | - |
|
07/29 | #32 | #55 | - |
|
07/29 | #47 | #85 | - |
|
08/01 | #36 | #60 | - |
|
07/28 | #36 | #63 | - |
|
07/28 | #42 | #72 | - |
|
07/28 | #36 | #68 | - |
|
07/27 | #41 | #73 | - |
|
07/27 | #37 | #67 | - |
|
07/26 | #31 | #77 | - |
|
07/29 | #40 | #67 | - |
|
07/25 | #38 | #61 | - |
|
07/25 | #40 | #73 | - |
|
07/24 | #33 | #68 | - |
|
07/24 | #39 | #106 | - |
|
07/23 | #44 | #50 | - |
|
07/23 | #52 | #74 | - |
|
07/22 | #54 | #73 | - |
|
07/21 | #36 | #69 | - |
|
07/20 | #37 | #62 | - |
|
07/19 | #33 | #64 | - |
|
07/19 | #32 | #80 | - |
|
07/27 | #34 | #65 | - |
|
07/18 | #26 | #62 | - |
|
07/17 | #36 | #79 | - |
|
07/17 | #38 | #55 | - |
|
07/17 | #32 | #66 | - |
|
07/16 | #44 | #72 | - |
|
07/26 | #38 | #70 | - |
|
07/15 | #38 | #68 | - |
|
07/15 | #36 | #62 | - |
|
07/14 | #36 | #63 | - |
|
07/14 | #34 | #64 | - |
|
07/14 | #32 | #66 | - |
|
07/13 | #34 | #63 | - |
|
07/30 | #33 | #72 | - |
|
07/13 | #40 | #73 | - |
|
07/12 | #37 | #78 | - |
|
07/12 | #40 | #59 | - |
|
08/02 | #36 | #79 | - |
|
07/27 | #31 | #72 | - |
|
07/10 | #40 | #72 | - |
|
08/01 | #50 | #60 | - |
|
07/07 | #38 | #59 | - |
|
07/06 | #35 | #62 | - |
|
08/02 | #31 | #59 | - |
|
07/28 | #41 | #57 | - |
|
07/25 | #35 | #58 | - |
|
07/31 | #26 | #106 | - |
|
07/24 | #31 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #27 | #79 | - |
|
06/30 | #40 | #73 | - |
|
07/07 | #35 | #37 | - |
|
08/01 | #34 | #62 | - |
|
06/28 | #38 | #62 | - |
|
07/21 | #35 | #63 | - |
|
08/01 | #33 | #62 | - |
|
06/26 | #37 | #72 | - |
|
06/25 | #37 | #66 | - |
|
07/13 | #52 | #72 | - |
|
06/15 | #38 | #68 | - |
|
06/12 | #34 | #72 | - |
|
08/03 | #31 | #90 | - |
|
07/31 | #31 | #70 | - |
|
05/29 | #39 | #70 | - |
|
07/31 | #41 | #94 | - |
|
07/29 | #35 | #61 | - |
|
05/21 | #49 | #69 | - |
|
08/01 | #40 | #76 | - |
|
07/25 | #37 | #72 | - |
|
08/01 | #38 | #58 | - |
|
08/02 | #30 | #68 | - |
|
05/11 | #41 | #72 | - |
|
07/27 | #36 | #64 | - |
|
07/29 | #34 | #58 | - |
|
07/30 | #36 | #70 | - |
|
04/28 | #38 | #76 | - |
|
04/27 | #43 | #69 | - |
|
04/27 | #35 | #72 | - |
|
07/28 | #39 | #76 | - |
|
05/20 | #35 | #68 | - |
|
04/20 | #43 | #84 | - |
|
07/09 | #39 | #75 | - |
|
03/24 | #46 | #77 | - |
|
03/09 | #50 | #77 | - |
|
01/07 | #50 | #72 | - |
|
07/15 | #53 | #68 | - |
|
01/07 | #52 | #73 | - |
Parker Washington WR - JAC Parker Washington WR - JAC | Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. CLE | vs. MIA |
| Week 2 | at DEN | at LAC |
| Week 3 | vs. NE | at NO |
| Week 4 | at CIN | vs. KC |
| Week 5 | vs. PHI | at NE |
| Week 6 | vs. HOU | vs. BUF |
| Week 7 | BYE WEEK | vs. LAR |
| Week 8 | vs. IND | at NYJ |
| Week 9 | at BAL | at SF |
| Week 10 | at TEN | vs. SEA |
| Week 11 | at NYG | at DEN |
| Week 12 | vs. TEN | at CLE |
| Week 13 | at CHI | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | vs. PIT | vs. LAC |
| Week 15 | at HOU | vs. DEN |
| Week 16 | at DAL | vs. TEN |
| Week 17 | vs. WAS | at ARI |
| Week 18 | at IND | at KC |
Parker Washington WR - JAC Parker Washington WR - JAC | Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 60.9 | 50.1 |
| Rec Yards | 844.0 | 633.7 |
| Rec TDs | 5.4 | 3.8 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 5.3 | 11.2 |
| Rush Yards | 13.6 | 52.9 |
| Rush TDs | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 117.8 | 91.9 |
Parker Washington WR - JAC Parker Washington WR - JAC | Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 0.0 | 11.4 |
| Week 2 | 7.6 | 1.9 |
| Week 3 | 3.4 | 32.9 |
| Week 4 | 5.9 | 2.2 |
| Week 5 | 7.6 | 7.1 |
| Week 6 | 2.9 | 7.0 |
| Week 7 | 6.2 | 3.3 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 9.0 | 3.8 |
| Week 10 | 14.9 | 3.5 |
| Week 11 | 2.0 | 10.7 |
| Week 12 | 13.1 | 2.8 |
| Week 13 | 2.6 | 2.0 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 2.4 |
| Week 15 | 5.3 | 0.0 |
| Week 16 | 20.5 | 5.4 |
| Week 17 | 11.0 | 4.9 |
| Week 18 | 14.7 | 3.4 |
| Total | 126.7 | 104.7 |
| Average | 7.9 | 6.2 |
Parker Washington WR - JAC Parker Washington WR - JAC | Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Week 2 | 5 | 8 |
| Week 3 | 11 | 9 |
| Week 4 | 2 | 2 |
| Week 5 | 3 | 6 |
| Week 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Week 7 | 10 | 6 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 9 | 4 |
| Week 10 | 7 | 3 |
| Week 11 | 2 | 8 |
| Week 12 | 7 | 10 |
| Week 13 | 3 | 3 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 15 | 3 | 3 |
| Week 16 | 10 | 5 |
| Week 17 | 10 | 6 |
| Week 18 | 9 | 6 |
Parker Washington WR - JAC Parker Washington WR - JAC | Tre Tucker WR - LV Tre Tucker WR - LV | |
| Expert | ||
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Parker Washington finished last season with a flurry of insane production; if he picks up right where he left off, he'll be one of the best picks in fantasy football this season. Last year, in Weeks 16-19, Washington asserted himself as the Jags' clear WR1. During that stretch, he averaged 22.3 PPR points per game while soaking up six red zone targets and 13 deep targets (per Fantasy Points Data). In those four games, he had a 28.9% target share, 113.5 receiving yards per game, 3.78 yards per route run, and a 33.3% first-read share. Those are all absolutely elite metrics no matter how you slice it. There's some uncertainty about how the Jags target hierarchy sifts out this season with Brian Thomas Jr. and Travis Hunter healthy. Each player could effectively put a dent in Washington, putting up monster numbers in 2026, but that risk is baked into Washington's price in drafts. He's a wonderful upside swing in the later rounds. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Parker Washington flashed legitimate breakout potential late in 2025, thriving as Jacksonville's primary slot weapon once injuries opened up additional opportunity in the offense. The former Penn State receiver was extremely productive down the stretch (over 14 PPG from Weeks 9-18), dominating air yards and target share while showcasing strong efficiency metrics. However, his second-half surge also coincided with Travis Hunter's injury absence, and the Jaguars now enter 2026 with a much healthier and deeper WR room. Washington proved he can capitalize on expanded volume, but his weekly role could become far less stable if Jacksonville deploys him primarily in three-WR sets. | Tre Tucker quietly put together a solid 2025 season and enters 2026 with a legitimate chance to emerge as the Raiders' top wide receiver, even if Brock Bowers remains the centerpiece of the passing game. The former third-round pick has improved each season, logged nearly every snap last year, and continues to command meaningful downfield volume. New coaches have already praised Tucker's leadership and work ethic, suggesting he will remain heavily involved in the offense. |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | - From Weeks 10-18 Washington ranked as WR12 in Half PPR | |
