Saquon Barkley for Tre' Harris (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI  Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Tre' Harris WR - LAC  Tre' Harris WR - LAC |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 15 | # 171 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. WAS | vs. ARI | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs WAS | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs ARI | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 195.3 | 39.4 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.2 | 2.3 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 3 | 23 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Saquon Barkley | Tre' Harris | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #20 | #173 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #201 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #147 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #201 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #247 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #194 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #162 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #298 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #223 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #165 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #200 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #204 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #203 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #169 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #175 | - |
|
08/02 | #8 | #179 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #226 | - |
|
08/02 | #15 | #173 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #198 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #220 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #182 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #169 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #183 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #203 | - |
|
07/31 | #17 | #173 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #175 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #222 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #203 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #217 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #269 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #165 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #175 | - |
|
07/30 | #13 | #183 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #162 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #297 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #200 | - |
|
07/29 | #15 | #223 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #169 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #173 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #173 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #173 | - |
|
07/27 | #15 | #183 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #149 | - |
|
07/26 | #8 | #201 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #169 | - |
|
07/25 | #20 | #179 | - |
|
07/25 | #23 | #198 | - |
|
07/24 | #17 | #129 | - |
|
07/23 | #37 | #243 | - |
|
07/23 | #23 | #177 | - |
|
07/22 | #17 | #169 | - |
|
07/21 | #20 | #168 | - |
|
07/20 | #23 | #173 | - |
|
07/19 | #17 | #142 | - |
|
07/19 | #13 | #204 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #173 | - |
|
07/18 | #12 | #168 | - |
|
07/17 | #17 | #183 | - |
|
07/17 | #23 | #183 | - |
|
07/17 | #15 | #183 | - |
|
07/16 | #15 | #173 | - |
|
07/26 | #13 | #173 | - |
|
07/15 | #17 | #173 | - |
|
07/15 | #28 | #237 | - |
|
07/14 | #17 | #175 | - |
|
07/14 | #13 | #194 | - |
|
07/14 | #20 | #179 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #201 | - |
|
07/30 | #33 | #179 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #168 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #168 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #169 | - |
|
08/02 | #23 | #204 | - |
|
07/27 | #33 | #142 | - |
|
07/10 | #15 | #173 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #198 | - |
|
07/07 | #17 | #179 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #173 | - |
|
08/03 | #8 | #201 | - |
|
07/25 | #13 | #162 | - |
|
07/31 | #33 | #142 | - |
|
07/24 | #15 | #204 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #183 | - |
|
06/30 | #20 | #203 | - |
|
07/07 | #49 | #282 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #217 | - |
|
06/28 | #28 | #220 | - |
|
07/21 | #15 | #173 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #169 | - |
|
06/26 | #20 | #201 | - |
|
06/25 | #17 | #173 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #174 | - |
|
06/15 | #17 | #173 | - |
|
06/12 | #15 | #183 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #180 | - |
|
08/03 | #20 | #165 | - |
|
05/29 | #28 | #198 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #200 | - |
|
07/29 | #23 | #200 | - |
|
05/21 | #12 | #169 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #183 | - |
|
07/25 | #15 | #201 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #162 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #223 | - |
|
05/11 | #13 | #201 | - |
|
07/27 | #13 | #183 | - |
|
07/29 | #15 | #204 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #204 | - |
|
04/28 | #28 | #223 | - |
|
04/27 | #28 | #203 | - |
|
04/27 | #23 | #226 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #224 | - |
|
05/20 | #17 | #169 | - |
|
04/20 | #30 | #244 | - |
|
07/09 | #13 | #153 | - |
|
03/24 | #23 | #204 | - |
|
03/09 | #28 | #217 | - |
|
01/07 | #49 | #198 | - |
|
07/15 | #23 | #164 | - |
|
01/07 | #23 | #169 | - |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. WAS | vs. ARI |
| Week 2 | at TEN | vs. LV |
| Week 3 | at CHI | at BUF |
| Week 4 | vs. LAR | at SEA |
| Week 5 | at JAC | vs. DEN |
| Week 6 | vs. CAR | at KC |
| Week 7 | vs. DAL | BYE WEEK |
| Week 8 | at WAS | at LAR |
| Week 9 | vs. NYG | vs. HOU |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | at BAL |
| Week 11 | vs. PIT | vs. NYJ |
| Week 12 | at DAL | vs. NE |
| Week 13 | at ARI | at TB |
| Week 14 | vs. IND | at LV |
| Week 15 | vs. SEA | vs. SF |
| Week 16 | vs. HOU | at MIA |
| Week 17 | at SF | vs. KC |
| Week 18 | at NYG | at DEN |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 14.4 | 1.1 |
| Week 2 | 15.4 | 3.4 |
| Week 3 | 5.5 | 0.0 |
| Week 4 | 13.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 5 | 14.8 | 0.0 |
| Week 6 | 6.7 | 2.7 |
| Week 7 | 4.2 | 2.3 |
| Week 8 | 29.4 | 6.8 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 1.8 |
| Week 10 | 10.1 | 0.4 |
| Week 11 | 9.0 | 1.2 |
| Week 12 | 5.4 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 5.6 | 3.0 |
| Week 14 | 18.2 | 2.1 |
| Week 15 | 15.2 | 4.9 |
| Week 16 | 21.2 | 5.4 |
| Week 17 | 6.8 | 1.5 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 2.8 |
| Total | 195.3 | 39.4 |
| Average | 12.2 | 2.3 |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Tre Harris has to be one of the best WR sleepers to take in 2026. The second-year WR is being grouped into the "elite" Chargers WR conversation alongside Ladd McConkey and Quentin Johnston by HC John Harbaugh. And even though his rookie year didn't feature a ton of highlight-reel plays or counting stats, his playing time increased because of his contributions as a run-blocker. That suggests he could see much more playing time (and targets) than his bottom-dwelling ADP would indicate in 2026. Harris can create big plays and is versatile enough to line up all over the formation. He also averaged 5.5 targets in the last two games that QJ missed in the second half of the season. If the Chargers lean into the run game more with their new OC, Mike McDaniel, Harris could be a major benefactor in terms of snaps/routes based on how well he does the dirty work. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | I tried to tell people last year, but few wanted to listen. After an insane 2024 season, Saquon Barkley was poised to come back down to earth some in 2025. Well, it happened. Barkley finished with 317 touches and 1,413 total yards as the RB14 in fantasy points per game. Part of this could be traced to natural regression, but also, Barkley had a decent dip in efficiency. In 2024, Barkley had an insane 3.55 yards before contact per attempt, which easily led all running backs (minimum 100 carries, per Fantasy Points Data). Last year, that number fell to 2.11, which was 23rd among 49 qualifying backs, essentially a league-average number. From 2024 to 2025, Barkley's explosive run rate dropped from 7.2% (fourth-best) to 4.6% (20th), and his yards after contact per attempt dipped from 2.26 (35th) to 1.96 (39th). Barkley lived off explosive runs and easily getting into the second level of defenses in 2024, but he found more uphill sledding last year. His volume should finish in the neighborhood of 300 touches with double-digit touchdown upside. That should lock him into top-15 running back status with possible top 5-7 upside if the offensive line can stay healthy and the Eagles' passing attack can also bounce back. If the aerial attack can get right, this team and Barkley will have more scoring opportunities in 2026 (last year, 28th in red-zone scoring opportunities per game). | |
