Travis Etienne Jr. for Wan'Dale Robinson (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO  Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN  Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 49 | # 123 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at DET | vs. NYJ | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs DET | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs NYJ | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 217.9 | 125.9 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.8 | 7.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 13 | 17 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Travis Etienne Jr. | Wan'Dale Robinson | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #55 | #120 | - |
|
08/04 | #57 | #164 | - |
|
08/04 | #55 | #129 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #116 | - |
|
08/04 | #23 | #115 | - |
|
08/04 | #49 | #129 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #128 | - |
|
08/03 | #49 | #115 | - |
|
08/03 | #55 | #149 | - |
|
08/03 | #47 | #135 | - |
|
08/03 | #40 | #116 | - |
|
08/03 | #47 | #135 | - |
|
08/03 | #49 | #122 | - |
|
08/03 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
08/02 | #57 | #125 | - |
|
08/02 | #47 | #168 | - |
|
08/03 | #66 | #139 | - |
|
08/02 | #72 | #135 | - |
|
08/01 | #57 | #125 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
08/01 | #52 | #109 | - |
|
08/01 | #55 | #135 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #149 | - |
|
08/01 | #33 | #93 | - |
|
07/31 | #55 | #109 | - |
|
08/03 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
07/31 | #52 | #135 | - |
|
07/31 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
08/03 | #52 | #116 | - |
|
07/31 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
07/31 | #66 | #81 | - |
|
08/03 | #45 | #120 | - |
|
07/30 | #42 | #129 | - |
|
07/30 | #55 | #120 | - |
|
07/30 | #37 | #70 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #115 | - |
|
07/29 | #57 | #132 | - |
|
07/29 | #49 | #75 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #125 | - |
|
07/28 | #47 | #125 | - |
|
07/28 | #49 | #91 | - |
|
07/28 | #55 | #129 | - |
|
07/27 | #49 | #125 | - |
|
08/03 | #57 | #129 | - |
|
07/26 | #49 | #149 | - |
|
07/29 | #55 | #135 | - |
|
07/25 | #49 | #129 | - |
|
07/25 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
07/24 | #47 | #83 | - |
|
07/23 | #47 | #129 | - |
|
07/23 | #45 | #120 | - |
|
07/22 | #45 | #135 | - |
|
07/21 | #52 | #125 | - |
|
07/20 | #57 | #125 | - |
|
07/19 | #40 | #88 | - |
|
07/19 | #40 | #88 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #116 | - |
|
07/18 | #49 | #122 | - |
|
07/17 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
07/17 | #55 | #120 | - |
|
07/17 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
07/16 | #49 | #122 | - |
|
07/26 | #60 | #125 | - |
|
07/15 | #49 | #120 | - |
|
07/15 | #72 | #122 | - |
|
07/14 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
07/14 | #40 | #132 | - |
|
07/14 | #47 | #109 | - |
|
07/13 | #37 | #135 | - |
|
07/30 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #124 | - |
|
07/12 | #47 | #129 | - |
|
07/12 | #30 | #80 | - |
|
08/02 | #42 | #116 | - |
|
07/27 | #57 | #116 | - |
|
07/10 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
08/01 | #72 | #201 | - |
|
07/07 | #42 | #120 | - |
|
08/02 | #52 | #129 | - |
|
08/03 | #20 | #120 | - |
|
07/25 | #49 | #129 | - |
|
07/31 | #64 | #88 | - |
|
07/24 | #57 | #132 | - |
|
08/01 | #55 | #101 | - |
|
06/30 | #52 | #122 | - |
|
07/07 | #28 | #115 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
06/28 | #52 | #122 | - |
|
07/21 | #49 | #153 | - |
|
08/01 | #40 | #132 | - |
|
06/26 | #49 | #122 | - |
|
06/25 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
07/13 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
06/15 | #49 | #120 | - |
|
06/12 | #45 | #129 | - |
|
08/04 | #76 | #100 | - |
|
08/03 | #40 | #125 | - |
|
05/29 | #37 | #122 | - |
|
08/03 | #45 | #116 | - |
|
07/29 | #52 | #125 | - |
|
05/21 | #47 | #129 | - |
|
08/01 | #45 | #135 | - |
|
07/25 | #49 | #125 | - |
|
08/01 | #47 | #125 | - |
|
08/03 | #57 | #116 | - |
|
05/11 | #47 | #120 | - |
|
07/27 | #45 | #135 | - |
|
07/29 | #49 | #116 | - |
|
07/30 | #47 | #116 | - |
|
04/28 | #45 | #138 | - |
|
04/27 | #45 | #138 | - |
|
04/27 | #45 | #132 | - |
|
07/28 | #40 | #138 | - |
|
05/20 | #47 | #122 | - |
|
04/20 | #42 | #109 | - |
|
07/09 | #45 | #122 | - |
|
03/24 | #49 | #120 | - |
|
03/09 | #49 | #132 | - |
|
01/07 | #28 | #132 | - |
|
07/15 | #49 | #125 | - |
|
01/07 | #49 | #116 | - |
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at DET | vs. NYJ |
| Week 2 | at BAL | vs. PHI |
| Week 3 | vs. LV | at NYG |
| Week 4 | vs. ATL | at BAL |
| Week 5 | vs. MIN | vs. HOU |
| Week 6 | at NYG | at IND |
| Week 7 | vs. PIT | vs. CLE |
| Week 8 | BYE WEEK | at CIN |
| Week 9 | vs. CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | vs. CAR | vs. JAC |
| Week 11 | at CHI | at DAL |
| Week 12 | at CIN | at JAC |
| Week 13 | vs. GB | vs. WAS |
| Week 14 | at CAR | at DET |
| Week 15 | at TB | vs. IND |
| Week 16 | vs. ARI | at LV |
| Week 17 | at ATL | vs. PIT |
| Week 18 | vs. TB | at HOU |
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 15.6 | 5.5 |
| Week 2 | 14.9 | 20.2 |
| Week 3 | 11.6 | 2.6 |
| Week 4 | 18.5 | 1.4 |
| Week 5 | 5.8 | 3.2 |
| Week 6 | 5.5 | 14.4 |
| Week 7 | 5.5 | 9.5 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 4.8 |
| Week 9 | 11.5 | 4.6 |
| Week 10 | 13.7 | 6.2 |
| Week 11 | 19.3 | 3.6 |
| Week 12 | 17.6 | 21.6 |
| Week 13 | 4.1 | 3.4 |
| Week 14 | 20.2 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 28.5 | 11.4 |
| Week 16 | 12.6 | 2.2 |
| Week 17 | 9.2 | 11.3 |
| Week 18 | 3.8 | ‐ |
| Total | 217.9 | 125.9 |
| Average | 12.8 | 7.9 |
Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO Travis Etienne Jr. RB - NO | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Wan'Dale Robinson quietly delivered a breakout campaign in 2025, finishing as a top-20 WR in points per game while cementing himself as one of the most underrated volume earners. The former Giant expanded beyond his underneath role, seeing more downfield usage while surpassing 1,000 receiving yards for the first time in his career. Now reunited with Brian Daboll in Tennessee, Robinson profiles as a natural fit alongside young QB Cam Ward thanks to his separation skills and reliability underneath. His massive target-earning profile gives him sneaky upside, especially in full-PPR formats where volume is king. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Travis Etienne excelled last year as the Jags RB1 with an RB13 finish in fantasy points per game. After a down 2024 season, it was nice to see the new Saints' lead back bounce back. He lands with New Orleans after a season where he was 11th in snap share, 13th in opportunity share, tenth in weighted opportunities, and fifth in red zone touches. Etienne soaked up 296 touches, producing 1,399 total yards. He's set to see a similar workload in 2026 with the Saints. Etienne was disappointing on a per-touch basis, ranking 37th in explosive run rate, 31st in missed tackle rate, and 34th in yards after contact per attempt. Those metrics are worrisome, but Etienne should see enough volume that it won't matter this season. He's a solid RB2 that could outkick that projection if the Saints' offense takes a leap forward and surprises this year. | Last year, Wan'Dale Robinson had his best season to date, easily, with a true breakout campaign as the WR14 in fantasy points per game. Among 109 qualifying receivers, he ranked 11th in target share (26.8%), 15th in receiving yards per game (63.4), 28th in yards per route run (1.94), and 11th in first-read share (32.9%, per Fantasy Points Data). A huge change for Robinson was that he wasn't just a checkdown or underneath option anymore, as his aDOT rose to 8.7 and he was 21st among that sample of receivers in deep targets. This season, Robinson will have more target competition alongside Carnell Tate and Calvin Ridley, but I expect him to be the clear WR2 in the offense. It's wonderful that he stays tied to Brian Daboll in Tennessee, who oversaw his breakout and usage last year, which gives me hope for his 2026 outlook. His floor and ceiling this season will be tied to Cam Ward taking a big step with this new coaching staff. If that happens, Robinson could be a weekly WR2/3 this season. |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | - #8 in Target Share at 29.7% | |
