Tre' Harris for Tyler Warren (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Tyler Warren TE - IND  Tyler Warren TE - IND | Tre' Harris WR - LAC  Tre' Harris WR - LAC |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 64 | # 172 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. BAL | vs. ARI | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs BAL | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs ARI | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 112.5 | 39.4 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.6 | 2.3 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 21 | 23 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Tyler Warren | Tre' Harris | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #179 | - |
|
08/05 | #76 | #231 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #289 | - |
|
08/04 | #84 | #173 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #209 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #179 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #175 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #200 | - |
|
08/04 | #71 | #171 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/04 | #76 | #147 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #247 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #194 | - |
|
08/04 | #60 | #162 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #298 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #223 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #165 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #200 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
08/02 | #34 | #175 | - |
|
08/02 | #56 | #179 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #226 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #220 | - |
|
08/01 | #76 | #182 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
08/01 | #56 | #183 | - |
|
08/01 | #56 | #203 | - |
|
07/31 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #175 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #217 | - |
|
07/31 | #34 | #203 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #217 | - |
|
07/31 | #67 | #269 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #165 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #175 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #162 | - |
|
08/03 | #76 | #200 | - |
|
07/29 | #67 | #223 | - |
|
07/29 | #86 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/27 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
07/26 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
07/29 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
07/25 | #67 | #198 | - |
|
07/24 | #67 | #129 | - |
|
07/23 | #22 | #243 | - |
|
07/23 | #76 | #177 | - |
|
07/22 | #76 | #169 | - |
|
07/21 | #67 | #168 | - |
|
07/20 | #56 | #173 | - |
|
07/19 | #67 | #142 | - |
|
07/19 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/18 | #56 | #168 | - |
|
07/17 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
07/17 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
07/17 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
07/16 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/26 | #76 | #173 | - |
|
07/15 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/14 | #67 | #175 | - |
|
07/14 | #76 | #194 | - |
|
07/14 | #76 | #179 | - |
|
07/13 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #179 | - |
|
08/03 | #65 | #168 | - |
|
07/12 | #67 | #168 | - |
|
07/12 | #34 | #169 | - |
|
08/02 | #34 | #204 | - |
|
07/27 | #76 | #142 | - |
|
07/10 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/01 | #34 | #198 | - |
|
07/07 | #34 | #179 | - |
|
08/02 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #201 | - |
|
07/25 | #67 | #162 | - |
|
07/31 | #67 | #142 | - |
|
07/24 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
08/05 | #34 | #183 | - |
|
06/30 | #67 | #203 | - |
|
07/07 | #67 | #282 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #217 | - |
|
06/28 | #34 | #220 | - |
|
07/21 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #169 | - |
|
06/25 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/13 | #67 | #174 | - |
|
06/15 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/04 | #53 | #180 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #165 | - |
|
05/29 | #67 | #198 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #200 | - |
|
07/29 | #67 | #200 | - |
|
05/21 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
08/01 | #34 | #183 | - |
|
07/25 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #162 | - |
|
08/05 | #34 | #215 | - |
|
05/11 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
07/27 | #67 | #183 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
04/28 | #67 | #223 | - |
|
04/27 | #67 | #203 | - |
|
04/27 | #67 | #226 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #224 | - |
|
05/20 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
04/20 | #67 | #244 | - |
|
07/09 | #67 | #153 | - |
|
03/24 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
03/09 | #67 | #217 | - |
|
01/07 | #67 | #198 | - |
|
07/15 | #94 | #164 | - |
|
01/07 | #76 | #169 | - |
Tyler Warren TE - IND Tyler Warren TE - IND | Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. BAL | vs. ARI |
| Week 2 | at KC | vs. LV |
| Week 3 | vs. HOU | at BUF |
| Week 4 | at WAS | at SEA |
| Week 5 | at PIT | vs. DEN |
| Week 6 | vs. TEN | at KC |
| Week 7 | at MIN | BYE WEEK |
| Week 8 | at JAC | at LAR |
| Week 9 | vs. DAL | vs. HOU |
| Week 10 | vs. MIA | at BAL |
| Week 11 | at HOU | vs. NYJ |
| Week 12 | vs. NYG | vs. NE |
| Week 13 | BYE WEEK | at TB |
| Week 14 | at PHI | at LV |
| Week 15 | at TEN | vs. SF |
| Week 16 | vs. CIN | at MIA |
| Week 17 | at CLE | vs. KC |
| Week 18 | vs. JAC | at DEN |
Tyler Warren TE - IND Tyler Warren TE - IND | Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 7.9 | 1.1 |
| Week 2 | 7.9 | 3.4 |
| Week 3 | 3.8 | 0.0 |
| Week 4 | 13.3 | 0.0 |
| Week 5 | 10.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 6 | 12.3 | 2.7 |
| Week 7 | 12.9 | 2.3 |
| Week 8 | 5.3 | 6.8 |
| Week 9 | 2.6 | 1.8 |
| Week 10 | 9.9 | 0.4 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | 1.2 |
| Week 12 | 4.5 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 8.2 | 3.0 |
| Week 14 | 1.7 | 2.1 |
| Week 15 | 1.9 | 4.9 |
| Week 16 | 3.0 | 5.4 |
| Week 17 | 4.3 | 1.5 |
| Week 18 | 2.6 | 2.8 |
| Total | 112.5 | 39.4 |
| Average | 6.6 | 2.3 |
Tyler Warren TE - IND Tyler Warren TE - IND | Tre' Harris WR - LAC Tre' Harris WR - LAC | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Tyler Warren's rookie season got off to a fast start, but his production slowed down markedly late in the season, leaving us with a challenging evaluation for 2026. Over his first 10 games of 2025, Warren averaged 5.0 catches, 61.7 receiving yards and 11.1 half-point PPR fantasy points per game, with four touchdowns. Over his last seven games, Warren averaged 3.7 catches, 28.6 receiving yards and 5.6 half-point PPR fantasy points per game, with one touchdown. The net result: 76 catches for 817 yards and four touchdowns (plus one TD run) and a TE5 fantasy finish. Daniel Jones' late-season injuries might partly account for Warren's late-season slowdown, and Jones' health status might still be an issue early in the 2026 season. But the Colts traded away WR Michael Pittman in the offseason and didn't make any significant pass-catching acquisitions in free agency or the draft, bolstering Warren's 2026 target outlook. Warren might not be one of the elite fantasy TEs in 2026, but he should still be one of the first five tight ends off the board in this year's drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Tre Harris has to be one of the best WR sleepers to take in 2026. The second-year WR is being grouped into the "elite" Chargers WR conversation alongside Ladd McConkey and Quentin Johnston by HC John Harbaugh. And even though his rookie year didn't feature a ton of highlight-reel plays or counting stats, his playing time increased because of his contributions as a run-blocker. That suggests he could see much more playing time (and targets) than his bottom-dwelling ADP would indicate in 2026. Harris can create big plays and is versatile enough to line up all over the formation. He also averaged 5.5 targets in the last two games that QJ missed in the second half of the season. If the Chargers lean into the run game more with their new OC, Mike McDaniel, Harris could be a major benefactor in terms of snaps/routes based on how well he does the dirty work. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Tyler Warren had a fantastic rookie season as the TE10 in fantasy points per game, but there was plenty of meat left on the bone that should have fantasy gamers excited going into 2026. Warren was the TE4 in expected fantasy points per game last year. Let's begin the convo there. He should naturally see some regression this season even before we discuss the fact that the Colts moved on from Michael Pittman Jr. this offseason. Warren also ranked fifth in red zone targets and eighth in end zone targets last year among tight ends, and he only had four receiving touchdowns to show for it. Warren was excellent last year on a per-route basis. Among 59 qualifying tight ends, he was sixth in target share, ninth in receiving yards per game, 18th in yards per route run and first downs per route run, and sixth in first-read-read share (per Fantasy Points Data). His target share and first-read share should increase this season with Pittman Jr. gone, and his per-route productivity should also improve if Daniel Jones can stay healthy for the entire season and be at least a shadow of his healthy self. Warren is a top-five tight end this season that could sniff top-three status if everything goes according to plan. | |
