
Ranger Suarez
RP - PHI
Age: 25Bats: LThrows: L
2021 Outlook
Draft Rank (ECR)
P #648
Best / Worst
#606 / #606
ADP
N/A
Ownership
Yahoo
0%
ESPN
0%
Eligibility
Yahoo
RP
ESPN
RP
CBS
RP
Season
(2021)
Source | G | GS | W | L | SV | BS | HD | IP | H | ER | HR | BB | K | ERA | WHIP |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 Zeile Consensus FantasyPros | 30 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | - | 3 | 43.1 | 45 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 35 | 4.45 | 1.39 |
Depth Charts Projections FanGraphs | 30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | - | 1 | 30.0 | 31 | 15 | 4 | 10 | 25 | 4.37 | 1.37 |
ZiPS Projections Baseball Think Factory | 33 | 12 | 5 | 5 | - | - | - | 91.0 | 94 | 46 | 12 | 30 | 76 | 4.55 | 1.36 |
Steamer Projections Steamer Blog | 30 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 30.0 | 30 | 14 | 4 | 11 | 26 | 4.20 | 1.37 |
Clay Davenport Clay Davenport | 17 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | - | - | 36.7 | 41 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 26 | 4.67 | 1.46 |
THE BAT Derek Carty | 30 | 0 | 2 | 1 | - | - | - | 30.0 | 28 | 12 | 3 | 10 | 25 | 3.67 | 1.29 |
Site Projections Razzball | 52 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | - | 5 | 68.0 | 71 | 33 | 10 | 25 | 57 | 4.30 | 1.40 |
ATC Projections FanGraphs | 30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | - | 2 | 36.0 | 39 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 29 | 4.53 | 1.40 |
Site Projections numberFire | - | - | 1 | - | 0 | - | - | 40.0 | - | - | - | 14 | 30 | 4.46 | 1.46 |
Site Projections ESPN | 19 | - | 1 | 2 | - | - | - | 26.0 | 29 | 14 | 4 | 8 | 20 | 4.85 | 1.42 |
Note: Individual projections are not shown for premium projection sources.
History
2020 Performance
(Yahoo Scoring *)
Game Date | Projected Pts | Actual Pts | +/- | Exceeded Expectations? |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sun, Sep 13 | 1.5 | 2 | +0.5 | Yes |
Fri, Sep 11 | 1.5 | -1.4 | -2.9 | No |
Sat, Sep 5 | 0.8 | 1.2 | +0.4 | Yes |
* Point values are calculated using the default settings for Yahoo Points scoring
Who Should I Draft?
![]() | Taylor Hearn RP-TEX recommended by 100% of experts |
![]() | Edgar Santana RP-PIT recommended by 100% of experts |
![]() | Jesse Chavez SP,RP-LAA recommended by 0% of experts |
![]() | Bryan Abreu RP-HOU recommended by 0% of experts |