Ace Bailey NBA Game Log | Utah Jazz | FantasyPros

F - Utah Jazz

6' 9"
200 lbs
Age 19
Rutgers

Rostered In ~31.5% of leagues

Next Game

No Game

Rank: F #100

Eligibility

Yahoo: SG,SF,PF
ESPN: SF,PF
CBS: SF

Availability

Game Log

Game Log
Date	OPP	Score	MIN	FGM	FGA	FG%	3PM	3PA	3P%	FTM	FTA	FT%	OFF	DEF	REB	AST	TO	STL	BLK	PF	PTS
Thu, Feb 12	vs. POR	L, 135-119	35	7	15	46.7	1	5	20.0	0	0	0.0	3	5	8	3	4	0	0	2	15
Wed, Feb 11	vs. SAC	W, 93-121	31	5	9	55.6	3	6	50.0	0	0	0.0	2	2	4	4	0	0	0	2	13
Mon, Feb 9	@ MIA	W, 115-111	37	7	14	50.0	0	3	0.0	2	2	100.0	3	5	8	2	0	1	0	4	16
Sat, Feb 7	@ ORL	L, 117-120	31	4	11	36.4	1	4	25.0	1	2	50.0	1	2	3	3	5	1	0	2	10
Thu, Feb 5	@ ATL	L, 119-121	40	9	26	34.6	2	8	25.0	0	0	0.0	3	3	6	1	0	2	1	3	20
Tue, Feb 3	@ IND	W, 131-122	40	7	10	70.0	2	4	50.0	3	6	50.0	2	2	4	1	1	3	3	2	19
Sun, Feb 1	@ TOR	L, 100-107	27	1	10	10.0	0	2	0.0	2	2	100.0	1	10	11	2	3	1	1	5	4
Fri, Jan 30	vs. BKN	L, 109-99	29	5	10	50.0	2	5	40.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	0	0	2	0	2	12
Wed, Jan 28	vs. GSW	L, 140-124	34	8	15	53.3	3	7	42.9	0	0	0.0	1	6	7	4	0	2	1	3	19
Tue, Jan 27	vs. LAC	L, 115-103	29	8	16	50.0	4	9	44.4	0	0	0.0	0	1	1	0	1	0	0	1	20
Sat, Jan 24	vs. MIA	L, 147-116	28	6	15	40.0	0	5	0.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	2	0	1	2	5	12
Thu, Jan 22	vs. SAS	L, 126-109	32	11	16	68.8	2	3	66.7	1	1	100.0	4	2	6	2	2	0	0	3	25
Tue, Jan 20	vs. MIN	W, 122-127	33	8	17	47.1	3	8	37.5	1	1	100.0	1	4	5	1	3	1	0	2	20
Mon, Jan 19	@ SAS	L, 110-123	27	3	6	50.0	2	3	66.7	0	0	0.0	2	2	4	4	1	0	1	4	8
Sat, Jan 17	@ DAL	L, 120-138	37	8	16	50.0	2	6	33.3	0	0	0.0	2	6	8	1	3	0	0	4	18
Thu, Jan 15	@ DAL	L, 122-144	30	6	15	40.0	1	5	20.0	2	2	100.0	3	2	5	3	3	2	2	4	15
Wed, Jan 14	@ CHI	L, 126-128	31	4	9	44.4	0	3	0.0	2	2	100.0	2	1	3	3	0	0	0	1	10
Mon, Jan 12	@ CLE	W, 123-112	15	2	4	50.0	0	1	0.0	0	0	0.0	2	1	3	2	0	0	1	1	4
Wed, Jan 7	@ OKC	L, 125-129	10	1	3	33.3	0	2	0.0	0	0	0.0	0	1	1	0	0	1	0	1	2
Fri, Dec 26	vs. DET	W, 129-131	11	0	2	0.0	0	0	0.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	0	0	1	1	0	0
Tue, Dec 23	vs. MEM	L, 137-128	29	7	12	58.3	3	5	60.0	0	0	0.0	3	1	4	0	2	1	0	1	17
Mon, Dec 22	@ DEN	L, 112-135	24	4	13	30.8	1	5	20.0	1	2	50.0	1	2	3	0	0	0	0	5	10
Sat, Dec 20	vs. ORL	L, 128-127	34	6	14	42.9	2	7	28.6	0	0	0.0	2	2	4	3	0	0	0	1	14
Thu, Dec 18	vs. LAL	L, 143-135	26	7	13	53.8	3	6	50.0	2	6	33.3	2	2	4	0	1	1	0	2	19
Mon, Dec 15	vs. DAL	W, 133-140	24	3	9	33.3	1	4	25.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	3	1	0	0	6	7
Fri, Dec 12	@ MEM	W, 130-126	31	4	12	33.3	0	3	0.0	0	0	0.0	1	3	4	0	1	0	2	2	8
Sun, Dec 7	vs. OKC	L, 131-101	32	5	14	35.7	3	8	37.5	0	0	0.0	0	1	1	4	3	1	1	2	13
Fri, Dec 5	@ NYK	L, 112-146	34	5	13	38.5	2	6	33.3	1	3	33.3	1	4	5	1	3	1	1	3	13
Thu, Dec 4	@ BKN	W, 123-110	25	2	6	33.3	1	1	100.0	0	0	0.0	0	2	2	0	0	0	0	4	5
Mon, Dec 1	vs. HOU	W, 125-133	28	5	11	45.5	3	8	37.5	0	0	0.0	0	3	3	3	1	2	3	4	13
Sun, Nov 30	vs. HOU	L, 129-101	31	8	12	66.7	3	5	60.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	1	2	0	0	3	19
Fri, Nov 28	vs. SAC	W, 119-128	17	2	5	40.0	1	2	50.0	0	0	0.0	0	4	4	2	0	1	0	2	5
Mon, Nov 24	@ GSW	L, 117-134	29	8	15	53.3	3	8	37.5	2	2	100.0	1	2	3	2	2	1	1	0	21
Sun, Nov 23	vs. LAL	L, 108-106	32	4	10	40.0	2	7	28.6	0	0	0.0	1	4	5	3	0	1	0	3	10
Fri, Nov 21	vs. OKC	L, 144-112	21	6	9	66.7	3	5	60.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	3	2	3	0	1	15
Tue, Nov 18	@ LAL	L, 126-140	23	6	12	50.0	1	6	16.7	0	0	0.0	1	0	1	1	1	1	0	3	13
Sun, Nov 16	vs. CHI	W, 147-150	10	2	5	40.0	1	3	33.3	0	0	0.0	1	0	1	0	0	0	1	6	5
Thu, Nov 13	vs. ATL	L, 132-122	32	8	13	61.5	4	7	57.1	1	3	33.3	3	2	5	3	3	2	0	3	21
Tue, Nov 11	vs. IND	W, 128-152	26	7	13	53.8	4	8	50.0	2	2	100.0	3	1	4	1	1	0	0	3	20
Mon, Nov 10	vs. MIN	L, 120-113	28	4	9	44.4	0	3	0.0	2	2	100.0	4	3	7	2	2	3	0	4	10
Fri, Nov 7	@ MIN	L, 97-137	24	4	9	44.4	2	4	50.0	2	2	100.0	4	2	6	3	3	1	0	1	12
Wed, Nov 5	@ DET	L, 103-114	19	3	6	50.0	0	0	0.0	3	4	75.0	3	1	4	1	1	0	0	5	9
Mon, Nov 3	@ BOS	W, 105-103	18	2	4	50.0	0	0	0.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	0	2	0	0	3	4
Sun, Nov 2	@ CHA	L, 103-126	19	3	8	37.5	0	3	0.0	0	0	0.0	0	0	0	1	1	1	0	1	6
Fri, Oct 31	@ PHO	L, 96-118	23	2	8	25.0	0	3	0.0	2	2	100.0	3	5	8	3	3	1	0	1	6
Wed, Oct 29	vs. POR	L, 136-134	15	3	5	60.0	0	2	0.0	2	2	100.0	1	2	3	2	1	0	1	2	8
Mon, Oct 27	vs. PHO	W, 134-138	14	2	9	22.2	2	5	40.0	0	0	0.0	1	0	1	1	0	0	0	1	6
Fri, Oct 24	@ SAC	L, 104-105	13	0	5	0.0	0	0	0.0	0	0	0.0	1	1	2	1	0	0	0	1	0
Wed, Oct 22	vs. LAC	W, 108-129	20	1	5	20.0	0	2	0.0	0	0	0.0	1	3	4	2	1	0	0	1	2