CeeDee Lamb for Jake Ferguson (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL  CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL  Jake Ferguson TE - DAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 9 | # 126 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at NYG | at NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs NYG | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 125.9 | 106.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 9.0 | 6.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 31 | 29 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
CeeDee Lamb | Jake Ferguson | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #14 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #23 | #103 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #157 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #154 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #7 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #111 | - |
|
08/02 | #14 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #14 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #9 | #144 | - |
|
08/01 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #144 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #7 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #18 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #9 | #154 | - |
|
07/31 | #9 | #144 | - |
|
07/31 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #9 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #18 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #24 | #84 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
07/28 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #6 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #7 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/26 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #9 | #110 | - |
|
07/25 | #10 | #144 | - |
|
07/24 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/23 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/23 | #9 | #110 | - |
|
07/22 | #7 | #110 | - |
|
07/21 | #9 | #144 | - |
|
07/20 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #9 | #111 | - |
|
07/19 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/18 | #7 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/16 | #9 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #7 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/15 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #10 | #144 | - |
|
07/14 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #122 | - |
|
07/12 | #14 | #154 | - |
|
07/12 | #32 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #14 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #9 | #157 | - |
|
07/10 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #7 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
07/24 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #18 | #111 | - |
|
06/30 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #14 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
06/28 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
07/21 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
06/26 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
06/25 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
06/15 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
06/12 | #9 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #121 | - |
|
08/03 | #14 | #172 | - |
|
05/29 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
05/21 | #11 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #154 | - |
|
05/11 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #9 | #144 | - |
|
07/30 | #9 | #111 | - |
|
04/28 | #9 | #157 | - |
|
04/27 | #7 | #130 | - |
|
04/27 | #9 | #154 | - |
|
07/28 | #7 | #123 | - |
|
05/20 | #7 | #110 | - |
|
04/20 | #9 | #144 | - |
|
07/09 | #9 | #123 | - |
|
03/24 | #7 | #105 | - |
|
03/09 | #9 | #110 | - |
|
01/07 | #9 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #7 | #123 | - |
|
01/07 | #10 | #110 | - |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at NYG | at NYG |
| Week 2 | vs. WAS | vs. WAS |
| Week 3 | vs. BAL | vs. BAL |
| Week 4 | at HOU | at HOU |
| Week 5 | vs. TB | vs. TB |
| Week 6 | at GB | at GB |
| Week 7 | at PHI | at PHI |
| Week 8 | vs. ARI | vs. ARI |
| Week 9 | at IND | at IND |
| Week 10 | vs. SF | vs. SF |
| Week 11 | vs. TEN | vs. TEN |
| Week 12 | vs. PHI | vs. PHI |
| Week 13 | at SEA | at SEA |
| Week 14 | BYE WEEK | BYE WEEK |
| Week 15 | at LAR | at LAR |
| Week 16 | vs. JAC | vs. JAC |
| Week 17 | vs. NYG | vs. NYG |
| Week 18 | at WAS | at WAS |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 11.0 | 2.3 |
| Week 2 | 11.2 | 7.8 |
| Week 3 | 0.0 | 8.2 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 10.0 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 16.9 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 9.3 |
| Week 7 | 17.0 | 14.9 |
| Week 8 | 7.6 | 0.0 |
| Week 9 | 8.5 | 3.0 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 12.6 | 7.6 |
| Week 12 | 7.5 | 6.1 |
| Week 13 | 17.2 | 3.6 |
| Week 14 | 12.1 | 5.8 |
| Week 15 | 11.1 | 1.6 |
| Week 16 | 5.1 | 1.9 |
| Week 17 | 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Week 18 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| Total | 125.9 | 106.1 |
| Average | 9.0 | 6.2 |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson is a competent pass catcher in a prolific offense, but the presence of two star receivers in Dallas could limit Ferguson's fantasy upside. Ferguson had 82 catches for 600 yards and eight touchdowns in 2025. The reception and TD totals were career highs, but Ferguson averaged just 7.3 yards per catch, a career low. He finished TE8 in half point fantasy scoring but was TE13 in fantasy points per game among TEs who played at least five games. The Cowboys have an explosive passing attack, but WRs CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens are QB Dak Prescott's principal targets. The Lamb-Pickens duo combined for 250 targets and 168 receptions last season. Ferguson's 2026 production could be limited as long as Lamb and Pickens are both healthy, so it's best to consider Ferguson a high-end TE2 in this year's drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | CeeDee Lamb took a step back in 2025, as injuries and the arrival of George Pickens cut into both his target dominance and touchdown production. Lamb finished as the WR15 on a per-game basis, averaging 76.9 receiving yards per game, but his weekly ceiling wasn't nearly as consistent alongside Pickens. Still, Lamb remains one of fantasy football's safest WR1 options attached to Dak Prescott, especially considering his elite production from 2023-2024. Even after a relatively disappointing season by his standards, the combination of talent, volume, and offensive environment keeps Lamb firmly in the top tier of fantasy receivers. | Jake Ferguson averaged just 7.3 PPG when George Pickens and CeeDee Lamb were both healthy (> 50% snap share) in the lineup during the 2025 season (11 games). Five games without Lamb playing at least 50% of the snaps -> 13.5 PPG. Still, the overall production and career-high 8 TDs resulted in TE13 finishing in half-PPR scoring (per game). Top-5 in cumulative scoring in full PPR formats. With George Pickens returning to Dallas....Ferguson is facing a major uphill battle to rise above TD-or-bust TE territory. He's being overvalued as a fringe TE1 based on his teammate's missing games in 2025. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | CeeDee Lamb had a "down" year last season as the WR11 in fantasy points per game, but that finish doesn't really tell the entire story of Lamb's season. In Week 3, he played only seven snaps, and in Week 18, he played only 45.5% of the snaps. If we remove those two games, he averaged 16.6 PPR points per game, which would have him as the WR9 in fantasy points per game last season. In that 12-game sample, Lamb drew a 24.8% target share with 89.4 receiving yards per game, 2.51 yards per route run, a 32.3% first-read share, and 0.098 first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Overall, those marks would have ranked 13th, third, ninth, 12th, and 26th among all receivers with at least 200 routes last season. Lamb remains a locked-in WR1 with a stellar quarterback in his prime and George Pickens alongside him to keep defenses honest. | |
