CeeDee Lamb for Wan'Dale Robinson (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL  CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN  Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 5 | # 48 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at NYG | vs. NYJ | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs NYG | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs NYJ | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 125.9 | 125.9 | - |
| Avg Game | 9.0 | 7.9 | - |
| Avg Projection | 175.6 | 105.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 31 | 17 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
CeeDee Lamb | Wan'Dale Robinson | Add Player |
|
08/06 | #9 | #49 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #56 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #50 | - |
|
08/06 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
08/06 | #4 | #50 | - |
|
08/06 | #6 | #48 | - |
|
08/06 | #6 | #61 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #45 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #50 | - |
|
08/05 | #6 | #59 | - |
|
08/05 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #64 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #45 | - |
|
08/05 | #6 | #51 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
08/05 | #4 | #49 | - |
|
08/05 | #12 | #48 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #51 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #33 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #53 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #8 | #46 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
08/03 | #6 | #46 | - |
|
08/03 | #5 | #47 | - |
|
08/02 | #6 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #7 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
08/01 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
08/01 | #5 | #40 | - |
|
08/05 | #4 | #44 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
07/31 | #9 | #48 | - |
|
08/05 | #7 | #48 | - |
|
07/31 | #5 | #35 | - |
|
08/03 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
07/30 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
07/30 | #6 | #48 | - |
|
08/03 | #4 | #46 | - |
|
07/29 | #12 | #33 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
07/28 | #6 | #50 | - |
|
07/28 | #3 | #39 | - |
|
07/28 | #7 | #51 | - |
|
07/27 | #4 | #50 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
07/29 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
07/25 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
07/24 | #5 | #36 | - |
|
07/23 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
07/23 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
07/22 | #4 | #53 | - |
|
07/21 | #5 | #50 | - |
|
07/20 | #5 | #50 | - |
|
07/19 | #5 | #37 | - |
|
07/19 | #6 | #37 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #47 | - |
|
07/18 | #4 | #49 | - |
|
07/17 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
07/17 | #6 | #48 | - |
|
07/17 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
07/16 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
07/26 | #4 | #50 | - |
|
07/15 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
07/14 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
07/14 | #6 | #52 | - |
|
07/13 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
07/30 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
08/03 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
07/12 | #8 | #51 | - |
|
07/12 | #15 | #34 | - |
|
08/02 | #8 | #47 | - |
|
07/27 | #5 | #47 | - |
|
07/10 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
08/01 | #4 | #73 | - |
|
07/07 | #6 | #48 | - |
|
08/02 | #5 | #51 | - |
|
08/03 | #4 | #48 | - |
|
07/25 | #7 | #51 | - |
|
08/05 | #6 | #41 | - |
|
07/24 | #5 | #52 | - |
|
08/05 | #9 | #42 | - |
|
06/30 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
07/07 | #8 | #46 | - |
|
06/28 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
07/21 | #6 | #59 | - |
|
08/01 | #6 | #52 | - |
|
06/25 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
07/13 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
06/15 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
08/05 | #6 | #41 | - |
|
08/05 | #7 | #51 | - |
|
05/29 | #6 | #49 | - |
|
08/03 | #6 | #47 | - |
|
08/05 | #6 | #51 | - |
|
05/21 | #7 | #51 | - |
|
08/01 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
07/25 | #5 | #50 | - |
|
08/01 | #5 | #50 | - |
|
08/06 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
05/11 | #5 | #48 | - |
|
07/27 | #5 | #53 | - |
|
08/05 | #5 | #52 | - |
|
07/30 | #5 | #47 | - |
|
04/28 | #5 | #54 | - |
|
04/27 | #4 | #54 | - |
|
04/27 | #5 | #52 | - |
|
07/28 | #4 | #54 | - |
|
05/20 | #4 | #49 | - |
|
04/20 | #5 | #44 | - |
|
07/09 | #5 | #49 | - |
|
03/24 | #4 | #48 | - |
|
03/09 | #5 | #52 | - |
|
01/07 | #5 | #52 | - |
|
07/15 | #4 | #50 | - |
|
01/07 | #6 | #47 | - |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at NYG | vs. NYJ |
| Week 2 | vs. WAS | vs. PHI |
| Week 3 | vs. BAL | at NYG |
| Week 4 | at HOU | at BAL |
| Week 5 | vs. TB | vs. HOU |
| Week 6 | at GB | at IND |
| Week 7 | at PHI | vs. CLE |
| Week 8 | vs. ARI | at CIN |
| Week 9 | at IND | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | vs. SF | vs. JAC |
| Week 11 | vs. TEN | at DAL |
| Week 12 | vs. PHI | at JAC |
| Week 13 | at SEA | vs. WAS |
| Week 14 | BYE WEEK | at DET |
| Week 15 | at LAR | vs. IND |
| Week 16 | vs. JAC | at LV |
| Week 17 | vs. NYG | vs. PIT |
| Week 18 | at WAS | at HOU |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 97.3 | 83.0 |
| Rec Yards | 1,296.7 | 833.8 |
| Rec TDs | 7.5 | 3.6 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 2.4 | 2.0 |
| Rush Yards | 12.5 | 9.5 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.1 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 175.6 | 105.9 |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 11.0 | 5.5 |
| Week 2 | 11.2 | 20.2 |
| Week 3 | 0.0 | 2.6 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 1.4 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 3.2 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 14.4 |
| Week 7 | 17.0 | 9.5 |
| Week 8 | 7.6 | 4.8 |
| Week 9 | 8.5 | 4.6 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 6.2 |
| Week 11 | 12.6 | 3.6 |
| Week 12 | 7.5 | 21.6 |
| Week 13 | 17.2 | 3.4 |
| Week 14 | 12.1 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 11.1 | 11.4 |
| Week 16 | 5.1 | 2.2 |
| Week 17 | 4.6 | 11.3 |
| Week 18 | 0.4 | ‐ |
| Total | 125.9 | 125.9 |
| Average | 9.0 | 7.9 |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 13 | 8 |
| Week 2 | 11 | 10 |
| Week 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 7 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 7 |
| Week 7 | 8 | 12 |
| Week 8 | 10 | 4 |
| Week 9 | 12 | 11 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 11 |
| Week 11 | 7 | 9 |
| Week 12 | 11 | 14 |
| Week 13 | 9 | 8 |
| Week 14 | 8 | ‐ |
| Week 15 | 10 | 10 |
| Week 16 | 7 | 6 |
| Week 17 | 10 | 14 |
| Week 18 | 1 | ‐ |
CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL CeeDee Lamb WR - DAL | Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN Wan'Dale Robinson WR - TEN | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | CeeDee Lamb took a step back in 2025, as injuries and the arrival of George Pickens cut into both his target dominance and touchdown production. Lamb finished as the WR15 on a per-game basis, averaging 76.9 receiving yards per game, but his weekly ceiling wasn't nearly as consistent alongside Pickens. Still, Lamb remains one of fantasy football's safest WR1 options attached to Dak Prescott, especially considering his elite production from 2023-2024. Even after a relatively disappointing season by his standards, the combination of talent, volume, and offensive environment keeps Lamb firmly in the top tier of fantasy receivers. | Wan'Dale Robinson quietly delivered a breakout campaign in 2025, finishing as a top-20 WR in points per game while cementing himself as one of the most underrated volume earners. The former Giant expanded beyond his underneath role, seeing more downfield usage while surpassing 1,000 receiving yards for the first time in his career. Now reunited with Brian Daboll in Tennessee, Robinson profiles as a natural fit alongside young QB Cam Ward thanks to his separation skills and reliability underneath. His massive target-earning profile gives him sneaky upside, especially in full-PPR formats where volume is king. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | CeeDee Lamb had a "down" year last season as the WR11 in fantasy points per game, but that finish doesn't really tell the entire story of Lamb's season. In Week 3, he played only seven snaps, and in Week 18, he played only 45.5% of the snaps. If we remove those two games, he averaged 16.6 PPR points per game, which would have him as the WR9 in fantasy points per game last season. In that 12-game sample, Lamb drew a 24.8% target share with 89.4 receiving yards per game, 2.51 yards per route run, a 32.3% first-read share, and 0.098 first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Overall, those marks would have ranked 13th, third, ninth, 12th, and 26th among all receivers with at least 200 routes last season. Lamb remains a locked-in WR1 with a stellar quarterback in his prime and George Pickens alongside him to keep defenses honest. | Last year, Wan'Dale Robinson had his best season to date, easily, with a true breakout campaign as the WR14 in fantasy points per game. Among 109 qualifying receivers, he ranked 11th in target share (26.8%), 15th in receiving yards per game (63.4), 28th in yards per route run (1.94), and 11th in first-read share (32.9%, per Fantasy Points Data). A huge change for Robinson was that he wasn't just a checkdown or underneath option anymore, as his aDOT rose to 8.7 and he was 21st among that sample of receivers in deep targets. This season, Robinson will have more target competition alongside Carnell Tate and Calvin Ridley, but I expect him to be the clear WR2 in the offense. It's wonderful that he stays tied to Brian Daboll in Tennessee, who oversaw his breakout and usage last year, which gives me hope for his 2026 outlook. His floor and ceiling this season will be tied to Cam Ward taking a big step with this new coaching staff. If that happens, Robinson could be a weekly WR2/3 this season. |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | - #8 in Target Share at 29.7% | |
