Colston Loveland for Dalton Schultz (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Colston Loveland TE - CHI  Colston Loveland TE - CHI | Dalton Schultz TE - HOU  Dalton Schultz TE - HOU |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 3 | # 22 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at CAR | vs. BUF | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs CAR | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs BUF | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 107.1 | 95.7 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.7 | 5.6 | - |
| Avg Projection | 131.2 | 82.8 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 26 | 10 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Colston Loveland | Dalton Schultz | Add Player |
|
08/02 | #3 | #28 | - |
|
08/02 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
08/02 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
08/02 | #4 | #24 | - |
|
08/02 | #3 | #21 | - |
|
08/02 | #11 | #24 | - |
|
08/02 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
08/01 | #1 | #27 | - |
|
08/01 | #4 | #21 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #20 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #22 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #22 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/31 | #6 | #18 | - |
|
08/02 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
07/31 | #6 | #27 | - |
|
07/31 | #5 | #25 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #19 | - |
|
07/30 | #6 | #15 | - |
|
07/30 | #1 | #25 | - |
|
07/29 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
07/29 | #3 | #21 | - |
|
07/29 | #1 | #20 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/28 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/28 | #3 | #21 | - |
|
07/28 | #3 | #20 | - |
|
07/27 | #4 | #20 | - |
|
07/27 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
07/26 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
07/29 | #4 | #26 | - |
|
07/25 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/25 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/24 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/24 | #3 | #33 | - |
|
07/23 | #4 | #24 | - |
|
07/23 | #5 | #17 | - |
|
07/22 | #5 | #17 | - |
|
07/21 | #1 | #26 | - |
|
07/20 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/19 | #1 | #15 | - |
|
07/19 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/27 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/18 | #5 | #25 | - |
|
07/17 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/17 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/17 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
07/16 | #4 | #20 | - |
|
07/26 | #3 | #19 | - |
|
07/15 | #3 | #22 | - |
|
07/15 | #8 | #25 | - |
|
07/14 | #3 | #22 | - |
|
07/14 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
07/14 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/13 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
07/13 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/12 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/12 | #4 | #21 | - |
|
08/02 | #4 | #19 | - |
|
07/27 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
07/10 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
08/01 | #4 | #27 | - |
|
07/07 | #5 | #23 | - |
|
07/06 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
08/02 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/28 | #3 | #22 | - |
|
07/25 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/31 | #1 | #18 | - |
|
07/24 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
08/01 | #5 | #25 | - |
|
06/30 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/07 | #1 | #13 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
06/28 | #4 | #24 | - |
|
07/21 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #17 | - |
|
06/26 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
06/25 | #3 | #22 | - |
|
07/13 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
06/15 | #3 | #21 | - |
|
06/12 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #20 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
05/29 | #3 | #23 | - |
|
07/31 | #3 | #20 | - |
|
07/29 | #3 | #28 | - |
|
05/21 | #3 | #20 | - |
|
08/01 | #4 | #26 | - |
|
07/25 | #3 | #27 | - |
|
08/01 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
08/02 | #5 | #25 | - |
|
05/11 | #4 | #21 | - |
|
07/27 | #3 | #24 | - |
|
07/29 | #1 | #22 | - |
|
07/30 | #3 | #26 | - |
|
04/28 | #4 | #29 | - |
|
04/27 | #4 | #25 | - |
|
04/27 | #4 | #26 | - |
|
07/28 | #4 | #23 | - |
|
05/20 | #4 | #19 | - |
|
04/20 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
07/09 | #3 | #25 | - |
|
03/24 | #4 | #20 | - |
|
03/09 | #4 | #18 | - |
|
01/07 | #6 | #20 | - |
|
07/15 | #5 | #18 | - |
|
01/07 | #5 | #16 | - |
Colston Loveland TE - CHI Colston Loveland TE - CHI | Dalton Schultz TE - HOU Dalton Schultz TE - HOU | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at CAR | vs. BUF |
| Week 2 | vs. MIN | vs. CIN |
| Week 3 | vs. PHI | at IND |
| Week 4 | vs. NYJ | vs. DAL |
| Week 5 | at GB | at TEN |
| Week 6 | at ATL | at JAC |
| Week 7 | vs. NE | vs. NYG |
| Week 8 | at SEA | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | vs. TB | at LAC |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | at CLE |
| Week 11 | vs. NO | vs. IND |
| Week 12 | at DET | vs. BAL |
| Week 13 | vs. JAC | at PIT |
| Week 14 | at MIA | at WAS |
| Week 15 | at BUF | vs. JAC |
| Week 16 | vs. GB | at PHI |
| Week 17 | vs. DET | at GB |
| Week 18 | at MIN | vs. TEN |
Colston Loveland TE - CHI Colston Loveland TE - CHI | Dalton Schultz TE - HOU Dalton Schultz TE - HOU | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 78.1 | 65.8 |
| Rec Yards | 916.0 | 629.5 |
| Rec TDs | 6.7 | 3.4 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yards | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 131.2 | 82.8 |
Colston Loveland TE - CHI Colston Loveland TE - CHI | Dalton Schultz TE - HOU Dalton Schultz TE - HOU | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 1.2 | 2.8 |
| Week 2 | 0.0 | 2.9 |
| Week 3 | 3.1 | 3.9 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 3.0 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 6.0 |
| Week 6 | 1.1 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 2.4 | 9.8 |
| Week 8 | 3.8 | 2.4 |
| Week 9 | 23.8 | 7.7 |
| Week 10 | 5.5 | 11.3 |
| Week 11 | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| Week 12 | 10.9 | 0.8 |
| Week 13 | 2.8 | 5.5 |
| Week 14 | 8.9 | 2.2 |
| Week 15 | 6.1 | 13.6 |
| Week 16 | 3.0 | 9.5 |
| Week 17 | 15.4 | 1.9 |
| Week 18 | 15.1 | 7.3 |
| Total | 107.1 | 95.7 |
| Average | 6.7 | 5.6 |
Colston Loveland TE - CHI Colston Loveland TE - CHI | Dalton Schultz TE - HOU Dalton Schultz TE - HOU | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 2 | 5 |
| Week 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Week 3 | 3 | 6 |
| Week 4 | ‐ | 6 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 6 |
| Week 6 | 3 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 4 | 10 |
| Week 8 | 5 | 3 |
| Week 9 | 7 | 8 |
| Week 10 | 4 | 11 |
| Week 11 | 4 | 9 |
| Week 12 | 5 | 4 |
| Week 13 | 6 | 8 |
| Week 14 | 5 | 4 |
| Week 15 | 5 | 9 |
| Week 16 | 5 | 5 |
| Week 17 | 10 | 4 |
| Week 18 | 13 | 4 |
Colston Loveland TE - CHI Colston Loveland TE - CHI | Dalton Schultz TE - HOU Dalton Schultz TE - HOU | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | The 10th overall pick of the 2025 NFL Draft, Colston Loveland put together an impressive rookie season that got better and better as it wore on. Loveland finished TE12 in half-point PPR scoring as a rookie with 58 catches for 713 yards and six touchdowns. From Week 9 on, Loveland was TE2 in fantasy scoring behind only Trey McBride. Over Chicago's last four games - two in the regular season, two in the playoffs - Bears head coach Ben Johnson fully unleashed Loveland. The rookie tight end had 10 or more targets in each of those games, averaging 12.0 targets, 7.0 catches and 94.5 receiving yards over that stretch, with a pair of TDs. In the Bears' playoff win over the Packers, Loveland was targeted 15 times and had eight catches for 137 yards. The 6-6, 241-pound Loveland is a matchup nightmare with his size and speed. Loveland is the consensus TE3 for 2026 fantasy drafts behind only Brock Bowers and Trey McBride. | Dalton Schultz had 82 catches for 777 yards and three touchdowns in 2025 to finish TE11 in half-point PPR fantasy scoring. The modest TD total limited his fantasy impact, but Schultz finished tied with Jake Ferguson for third among tight ends in receptions behind only Trey McBride and Kyle Pitts. Schultz finished sixth among TEs in receiving yards. The Texans have an established star at wide receiver with Nico Collins, and Jayden Higgins, Jaylin Noel and (if healthy) Tank Dell round out a pretty good WR corps. With robust target competition, Schultz might be hard-pressed to match the career-high 106 targets he saw last season. And since Houston has one of the best defenses in the league, the Texans aren't likely to be a pass-heavy team in 2026. It's best to consider Schultz a midrange TE2 for fantasy, even though he was more than that last season. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Sure, Colston Loveland disappointed last season if you only look at his overall stats as the TE15 in fantasy points per game, but that was because he was languishing in a part-time role for most of the season. It wasn't until after Week 15 that Loveland was consistently featured as a full-time member of the offense. In Weeks 16-20, he exploded as the Bears' WR1 with a 25.6% target share, 81.6 receiving yards per game, 2.49 yards per route run, a 34% first-read share, 0.116 first downs per route run, and 17.2 PPR points per game (per Fantasy Points Data). If Loveland had produced like that over the course of the entire season, he would have given Trey McBride a run for his money as the TE1 in fantasy. Last year, those numbers, among all tight ends with at least 20 targets, would have ranked first, first, fourth, first, fourth, and second. If you compare those numbers against Trey McBride's 2025 season and Brock Bowers' 2024 campaign, Loveland would have beaten both players in every single category except for fantasy points per game with McBride's 2025 season. Loveland could easily pick up right where he left off this season and compete with Brock Bowers and Trey McBride for the TE1 crown. With D.J. Moore gone, Loveland has only Rome Odunze and Luther Burden to compete with for the top spot in the target pecking order in Chicago. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Colston Loveland finished the regular season top-5 among TEs in PFF receiving grade and yards per route run (1.97). From Week 7 onward...the Bears TE ranked top-5 in targets, catches and yards (26% target rate and TE4 in PPG at 11.1). Only Trey McBride had more receiving yards per game (61/game) compared to the Bears' TE. The former Michigan product went NUCLEAR in the first round of the playoffs: Loveland recorded 8 receptions for 137 yards on 15 targets against the Packers, with the majority of his production coming when he created separation. Loveland generated 111 yards on 6 receptions (10 targets) when wide open (3+ yards of separation), while adding 94 yards on 4 receptions (6 targets) on vertical routes. The rookie tight end particularly excelled against zone coverage, where he hauled in all 8 of his receptions for 137 yards on 13 targets via Next Gen Stats. Cole Kmet also has an out in his contract, so the team could move on from him to shift MORE focus toward Loveland. The Bears' offense did so over the team's last four games when Loveland commanded a whopping 28.5% target share (nearly 12 targets per game). | |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | 2nd in EPA per target +0.57 (NFLsavant) - Tied 1st in Air Yards Per Target at 9 | |
