Davante Adams for Travis Kelce (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Davante Adams WR - LAR  Davante Adams WR - LAR | Travis Kelce TE - KC  Travis Kelce TE - KC |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 43 | # 104 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. SF | vs. DEN | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs SF | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs DEN | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 162.9 | 117.2 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.6 | 6.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 32 | 3 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Davante Adams | Travis Kelce | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #51 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #46 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #41 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #41 | #110 | - |
|
08/04 | #48 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #35 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #42 | #115 | - |
|
08/04 | #48 | #110 | - |
|
08/04 | #43 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #80 | #110 | - |
|
08/04 | #43 | #154 | - |
|
08/04 | #48 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #55 | #91 | - |
|
08/03 | #31 | #94 | - |
|
08/03 | #48 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #38 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #51 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #32 | #111 | - |
|
08/02 | #35 | #96 | - |
|
08/02 | #48 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #50 | #76 | - |
|
08/01 | #50 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
08/01 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #51 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #50 | #110 | - |
|
08/04 | #43 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #50 | #110 | - |
|
07/31 | #48 | #94 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #61 | #111 | - |
|
07/31 | #39 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #41 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
07/30 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #46 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #35 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #48 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #41 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #35 | #105 | - |
|
07/28 | #39 | #96 | - |
|
07/27 | #39 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #51 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #44 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/24 | #44 | #105 | - |
|
07/23 | #32 | #105 | - |
|
07/23 | #39 | #157 | - |
|
07/22 | #46 | #157 | - |
|
07/21 | #46 | #96 | - |
|
07/20 | #35 | #86 | - |
|
07/19 | #44 | #96 | - |
|
07/19 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #50 | #111 | - |
|
07/18 | #46 | #137 | - |
|
07/17 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #48 | #94 | - |
|
07/17 | #32 | #123 | - |
|
07/16 | #38 | #123 | - |
|
07/26 | #35 | #105 | - |
|
07/15 | #38 | #105 | - |
|
07/14 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
07/14 | #48 | #110 | - |
|
07/14 | #41 | #94 | - |
|
07/13 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
07/30 | #50 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #44 | #123 | - |
|
07/12 | #70 | #111 | - |
|
07/12 | #70 | #111 | - |
|
08/02 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/27 | #48 | #105 | - |
|
07/10 | #31 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #39 | #110 | - |
|
07/07 | #39 | #110 | - |
|
08/02 | #46 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #48 | #105 | - |
|
07/25 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
07/31 | #46 | #96 | - |
|
07/24 | #38 | #110 | - |
|
08/05 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
06/30 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
07/07 | #59 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #39 | #110 | - |
|
06/28 | #35 | #105 | - |
|
07/21 | #46 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #59 | #96 | - |
|
06/25 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
07/13 | #32 | #110 | - |
|
06/15 | #38 | #105 | - |
|
06/12 | #48 | #110 | - |
|
08/04 | #60 | #79 | - |
|
08/05 | #80 | #123 | - |
|
05/29 | #32 | #172 | - |
|
08/03 | #35 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #38 | #110 | - |
|
05/21 | #35 | #195 | - |
|
08/01 | #32 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #32 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #44 | #105 | - |
|
08/05 | #41 | #84 | - |
|
05/11 | #35 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #46 | #123 | - |
|
04/28 | #39 | #123 | - |
|
04/27 | #24 | #154 | - |
|
04/27 | #26 | #96 | - |
|
07/28 | #39 | #110 | - |
|
05/20 | #48 | #154 | - |
|
04/20 | #41 | #123 | - |
|
07/09 | #39 | #105 | - |
|
03/24 | #35 | #123 | - |
|
03/09 | #35 | #172 | - |
|
01/07 | #32 | #154 | - |
|
07/15 | #38 | #157 | - |
|
01/07 | #41 | #157 | - |
Davante Adams WR - LAR Davante Adams WR - LAR | Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. SF | vs. DEN |
| Week 2 | vs. NYG | vs. IND |
| Week 3 | at DEN | at MIA |
| Week 4 | at PHI | at LV |
| Week 5 | vs. BUF | BYE WEEK |
| Week 6 | vs. ARI | vs. LAC |
| Week 7 | at LV | at SEA |
| Week 8 | vs. LAC | at DEN |
| Week 9 | at WAS | vs. NYJ |
| Week 10 | at ARI | at ATL |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | vs. ARI |
| Week 12 | vs. GB | at BUF |
| Week 13 | vs. KC | at LAR |
| Week 14 | at SF | at CIN |
| Week 15 | vs. DAL | vs. NE |
| Week 16 | at SEA | vs. SF |
| Week 17 | at TB | at LAC |
| Week 18 | vs. SEA | vs. LV |
Davante Adams WR - LAR Davante Adams WR - LAR | Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 5.1 | 10.7 |
| Week 2 | 16.6 | 6.1 |
| Week 3 | 11.6 | 2.6 |
| Week 4 | 11.6 | 4.8 |
| Week 5 | 8.8 | 12.1 |
| Week 6 | 3.9 | 7.8 |
| Week 7 | 21.5 | 5.4 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 15.9 |
| Week 9 | 18.0 | 8.6 |
| Week 10 | 13.7 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 6.1 | 15.1 |
| Week 12 | 18.2 | 4.4 |
| Week 13 | 17.8 | 10.5 |
| Week 14 | 2.9 | 0.8 |
| Week 15 | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 0.6 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 3.6 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 1.2 |
| Total | 162.9 | 117.2 |
| Average | 11.6 | 6.9 |
Davante Adams WR - LAR Davante Adams WR - LAR | Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Travis Kelce will turn 37 in October, but he's committed to playing at least one more season for the Chiefs. Kelce finished TE3 in fantasy scoring last season, catching 76 passes for 851 yards and five touchdowns. But the longtime fantasy star's efficiency has been plummeting. Kelce has averaged 8.6 yards per target for his career, but he's averaged just 6.9 YPT over the last two seasons. Kelce has averaged 2.05 yards per route run for his career, but he's been just under 1.50 YPRR each of the last two seasons. The Chiefs didn't add any significant pass catchers in the offseason, so Kelce still figures to be a prominent target earner in Andy Reid's offense. It's just a matter of how much he can do with those targets. The good news is that Kelce has become a budget option at the position and will probably be available in the middle rounds of fantasy drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | The early ECR is pricing Davante Adams as a mid-WR2. Last year was actually a red flag season disguised as an elite one; he posted a career-low catch rate of 53%, his YAC per reception hit a career low, and the bulk of his production was TD-dependent with 15 scores. That kind of touchdown volume is notoriously hard to replicate year over year. Even though Matthew Stafford is back under center in LA, he may not force-feed Adams in the end zone as he did in 2025 en route to an MVP award (7.7% TD rate). On top of that, Adams turns 33 and dealt with a lower-body tissue injury in 2025 that cost him time; at his age, that's not something you just brush off. When you look at the totality: the age, the injury, the TD regression risk, the declining efficiency numbers: easy to see a player far more likely to fall off than to replicate 2025 | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | At this point in his career, we know what to expect out of Travis Kelce. He's a low-end TE1, and that's fine, but I don't see a path for him returning to top 3-5 status for 2026. Over the last two years, he has been the TE9 and TE7 in fantasy points per game. Yes, the Chiefs will remain a pass-first offense, but it's fair to question when we'll see Patrick Mahomes play in 2026 and what version of him will be under center. Mahomes is coming off a torn ACL, and that cast of pass-catching characters at his disposal didn't change a ton this offseason, which isn't great. Travis Kelce's per-route efficiency screams that he's on the back nine of his career. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Kelce was 19th in yards per route run, 18th in yards after the catch per reception, and 16th in first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Those aren't damning numbers, but they aren't anything more than solid and just illuminate the point again that Kelce doesn't have the juice to put up elite per-route metrics anymore to vault him back into the top 3-5 conversation. Kelce will likely post another solid season as a low-end TE1 in 2026. | |
