David Montgomery for Tee Higgins (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Tee Higgins WR - CIN  Tee Higgins WR - CIN | David Montgomery RB - HOU  David Montgomery RB - HOU |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 31 | # 60 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. TB | vs. BUF | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform a little worse than their average vs TB | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs BUF | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 152.6 | 142.9 | - |
| Avg Game | 10.2 | 8.4 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 10 | 11 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Tee Higgins | David Montgomery | Add Player |
|
08/04 | #35 | #55 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #26 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #24 | #64 | - |
|
08/04 | #26 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #33 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #35 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #21 | #49 | - |
|
08/04 | #21 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #48 | #66 | - |
|
08/04 | #35 | #57 | - |
|
08/04 | #32 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #47 | #36 | - |
|
08/03 | #39 | #52 | - |
|
08/03 | #19 | #52 | - |
|
08/03 | #26 | #60 | - |
|
08/03 | #38 | #64 | - |
|
08/03 | #26 | #57 | - |
|
08/03 | #32 | #52 | - |
|
08/02 | #32 | #66 | - |
|
08/02 | #32 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #24 | #66 | - |
|
08/01 | #44 | #47 | - |
|
08/01 | #26 | #40 | - |
|
08/01 | #26 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #45 | - |
|
07/31 | #38 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #64 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #52 | - |
|
07/31 | #50 | #55 | - |
|
08/04 | #51 | #47 | - |
|
07/31 | #21 | #66 | - |
|
07/31 | #35 | #108 | - |
|
08/03 | #35 | #60 | - |
|
07/30 | #35 | #64 | - |
|
07/30 | #32 | #49 | - |
|
08/03 | #50 | #71 | - |
|
07/29 | #26 | #55 | - |
|
07/29 | #43 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #31 | #57 | - |
|
07/28 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
07/28 | #32 | #63 | - |
|
07/28 | #32 | #49 | - |
|
07/27 | #35 | #63 | - |
|
08/03 | #31 | #49 | - |
|
07/26 | #26 | #55 | - |
|
07/29 | #48 | #57 | - |
|
07/25 | #35 | #52 | - |
|
07/25 | #21 | #60 | - |
|
07/24 | #26 | #63 | - |
|
07/23 | #26 | #77 | - |
|
07/23 | #32 | #99 | - |
|
07/22 | #35 | #66 | - |
|
07/21 | #31 | #45 | - |
|
07/20 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
07/19 | #11 | #60 | - |
|
07/19 | #48 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #44 | #60 | - |
|
07/18 | #26 | #45 | - |
|
07/17 | #24 | #64 | - |
|
07/17 | #39 | #49 | - |
|
07/17 | #19 | #52 | - |
|
07/16 | #31 | #66 | - |
|
07/26 | #31 | #52 | - |
|
07/15 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
07/15 | #31 | #71 | - |
|
07/14 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
07/14 | #31 | #52 | - |
|
07/14 | #31 | #66 | - |
|
07/13 | #19 | #63 | - |
|
07/30 | #39 | #49 | - |
|
08/03 | #35 | #55 | - |
|
07/12 | #38 | #52 | - |
|
07/12 | #48 | #66 | - |
|
08/02 | #48 | #30 | - |
|
07/27 | #35 | #66 | - |
|
07/10 | #26 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #41 | #63 | - |
|
07/07 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
08/02 | #24 | #55 | - |
|
08/03 | #32 | #60 | - |
|
07/25 | #26 | #57 | - |
|
07/31 | #26 | #42 | - |
|
07/24 | #26 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #39 | #64 | - |
|
06/30 | #35 | #71 | - |
|
07/07 | #48 | #72 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
06/28 | #32 | #63 | - |
|
07/21 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #64 | - |
|
06/25 | #24 | #63 | - |
|
07/13 | #26 | #52 | - |
|
06/15 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
06/12 | #32 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #45 | #47 | - |
|
08/03 | #38 | #57 | - |
|
05/29 | #24 | #66 | - |
|
08/03 | #32 | #66 | - |
|
07/29 | #26 | #45 | - |
|
05/21 | #26 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #66 | - |
|
07/25 | #31 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #31 | #55 | - |
|
08/03 | #26 | #45 | - |
|
05/11 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
07/27 | #26 | #52 | - |
|
07/29 | #39 | #63 | - |
|
07/30 | #39 | #49 | - |
|
04/28 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
04/27 | #35 | #60 | - |
|
04/27 | #31 | #63 | - |
|
07/28 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
05/20 | #32 | #64 | - |
|
04/20 | #26 | #63 | - |
|
07/09 | #26 | #64 | - |
|
03/24 | #26 | #63 | - |
|
03/09 | #31 | #71 | - |
|
01/07 | #35 | #87 | - |
|
07/15 | #31 | #95 | - |
|
01/07 | #32 | #92 | - |
Tee Higgins WR - CIN Tee Higgins WR - CIN | David Montgomery RB - HOU David Montgomery RB - HOU | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. TB | vs. BUF |
| Week 2 | at HOU | vs. CIN |
| Week 3 | at PIT | at IND |
| Week 4 | vs. JAC | vs. DAL |
| Week 5 | at MIA | at TEN |
| Week 6 | BYE WEEK | at JAC |
| Week 7 | at BAL | vs. NYG |
| Week 8 | vs. TEN | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | at ATL | at LAC |
| Week 10 | vs. PIT | at CLE |
| Week 11 | at WAS | vs. IND |
| Week 12 | vs. NO | vs. BAL |
| Week 13 | at CLE | at PIT |
| Week 14 | vs. KC | at WAS |
| Week 15 | at CAR | vs. JAC |
| Week 16 | at IND | at PHI |
| Week 17 | vs. BAL | at GB |
| Week 18 | vs. CLE | vs. TEN |
Tee Higgins WR - CIN Tee Higgins WR - CIN | David Montgomery RB - HOU David Montgomery RB - HOU | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 3.3 | 4.3 |
| Week 2 | 11.6 | 12.1 |
| Week 3 | 1.5 | 28.4 |
| Week 4 | 3.2 | 1.2 |
| Week 5 | 8.2 | 17.2 |
| Week 6 | 6.2 | 6.1 |
| Week 7 | 15.6 | 3.9 |
| Week 8 | 10.4 | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 26.1 | 9.0 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 9.1 |
| Week 11 | 12.3 | 3.7 |
| Week 12 | 3.1 | 3.7 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 10.8 |
| Week 14 | 21.2 | 13.3 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 9.2 |
| Week 16 | 11.3 | 1.4 |
| Week 17 | 5.9 | 4.0 |
| Week 18 | 12.7 | 5.5 |
| Total | 152.6 | 142.9 |
| Average | 10.2 | 8.4 |
Tee Higgins WR - CIN Tee Higgins WR - CIN | David Montgomery RB - HOU David Montgomery RB - HOU | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Tee Higgins continues to thrive as Cincinnati's high-end No. 2 option, finishing as the WR12 overall in 2025 thanks to strong efficiency and double-digit touchdown production. Even with a modest target share, Higgins maximizes his opportunities in one of the NFL's premier passing offenses led by Joe Burrow. His weekly ceiling remains extremely high, especially near the end zone, although Ja'Marr Chase's presence naturally caps Higgins' overall target volume. As long as he stays healthy, Higgins profiles once again as a reliable fantasy WR2 with league-winning upside if Chase ever misses time. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Over the last two seasons, Tee Higgins has been the WR13 and WR5 in fantasy points per game. Last season, with Joe Burrow under center in Weeks 14-18, Higgins had an 18.8% target share with 67.8 receiving yards per game, 2.20 yards per route run, a 25.6% first-read share, and 0.106 first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Those are all incredibly impressive per-route metrics. For context, if Higgins had kept up that pace for an entire season with Burrow, he would have ranked 12th in receiving yards per game, 19th in yards per route run, 28th in first-read share, and 17th in first downs per route run among wideouts (minimum 200 routes). Higgins is a strong bet for fantasy again this season. If Joe Burrow can stay healthy this season, Higgins should be a locked-in top-15 wideout with WR1 upside again. | David Montgomery now finds himself as the Texans' do it all workhorse for 2026. Last year, he was phased out of the Lions' offensive plans as the season moved along, which led to his RB32 finish in fantasy points per game. In Weeks 12-18, he was the RB43 in fantasy points per game with a 32.1% snap rate, 8.2 touches per game, and only 42.8 total yards per game. Montgomery still has the juice to produce as a workhorse this season. Last season, he ranked 30th in missed tackle rate, but he was 12th in yards after contact per attempt (per Fantasy Points Data). His receiving chops are also still alive and well, as he was also 22nd in yards per route run and 12th in first downs per route run. Many will worry that Montgomery will split Houston's backfield workload with Woody Marks this season, but I don't see that happening. Montgomery should absorb a workload close to what Joe Mixon saw in 2024. In 2024, Mixon ranked fifth in opportunity share, 14th in snap share, and 13th in carries among running backs, finishing with 281 touches. Last season, Montgomery bested Marks in explosive run rate, missed tackle rate, rushing success rate, yards after contact per attempt, and yards per route run. Legit, every per-touch metric that I care about. Montgomery is the superior back, even at this stage of his career, and he'll be a strong volume-driven RB2 that could flirt with RB1 production. |
