David Montgomery for Trey McBride (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Trey McBride TE - ARI  Trey McBride TE - ARI | David Montgomery RB - HOU  David Montgomery RB - HOU |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 21 | # 60 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at LAC | vs. BUF | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs LAC | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs BUF | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 189.9 | 142.9 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.2 | 8.4 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 28 | 11 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Trey McBride | David Montgomery | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/05 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
08/05 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #34 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #64 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #21 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #57 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #29 | #36 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #57 | - |
|
08/02 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
08/02 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #66 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #47 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #40 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #45 | - |
|
07/31 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
07/31 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #47 | - |
|
07/31 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
07/31 | #22 | #108 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
07/30 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
07/30 | #22 | #49 | - |
|
08/03 | #34 | #71 | - |
|
07/29 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
07/29 | #123 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #57 | - |
|
07/28 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
07/28 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/28 | #22 | #49 | - |
|
07/27 | #16 | #63 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #49 | - |
|
07/26 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
07/29 | #22 | #57 | - |
|
07/25 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
07/24 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/23 | #34 | #77 | - |
|
07/23 | #16 | #99 | - |
|
07/22 | #16 | #66 | - |
|
07/21 | #56 | #45 | - |
|
07/20 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/19 | #34 | #60 | - |
|
07/19 | #22 | #47 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
07/18 | #22 | #45 | - |
|
07/17 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
07/17 | #22 | #49 | - |
|
07/17 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
07/16 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
07/26 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
07/15 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/14 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
07/14 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
07/14 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
07/13 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/30 | #22 | #49 | - |
|
08/03 | #31 | #55 | - |
|
07/12 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
07/12 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
08/02 | #22 | #30 | - |
|
07/27 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
07/10 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/07 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
08/02 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
07/25 | #22 | #57 | - |
|
07/31 | #56 | #42 | - |
|
07/24 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
06/30 | #22 | #71 | - |
|
07/07 | #84 | #72 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
06/28 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/21 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
08/01 | #56 | #64 | - |
|
06/25 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/13 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
06/15 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
06/12 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #47 | - |
|
08/05 | #22 | #57 | - |
|
05/29 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
08/03 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
07/29 | #22 | #45 | - |
|
05/21 | #56 | #55 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #66 | - |
|
07/25 | #22 | #60 | - |
|
08/01 | #22 | #55 | - |
|
08/05 | #22 | #47 | - |
|
05/11 | #16 | #63 | - |
|
07/27 | #22 | #52 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
07/30 | #22 | #49 | - |
|
04/28 | #16 | #64 | - |
|
04/27 | #16 | #60 | - |
|
04/27 | #16 | #63 | - |
|
07/28 | #16 | #64 | - |
|
05/20 | #16 | #64 | - |
|
04/20 | #16 | #63 | - |
|
07/09 | #22 | #64 | - |
|
03/24 | #22 | #63 | - |
|
03/09 | #22 | #71 | - |
|
01/07 | #16 | #87 | - |
|
07/15 | #22 | #95 | - |
|
01/07 | #22 | #92 | - |
Trey McBride TE - ARI Trey McBride TE - ARI | David Montgomery RB - HOU David Montgomery RB - HOU | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at LAC | vs. BUF |
| Week 2 | vs. SEA | vs. CIN |
| Week 3 | at SF | at IND |
| Week 4 | at NYG | vs. DAL |
| Week 5 | vs. DET | at TEN |
| Week 6 | at LAR | at JAC |
| Week 7 | vs. DEN | vs. NYG |
| Week 8 | at DAL | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | at SEA | at LAC |
| Week 10 | vs. LAR | at CLE |
| Week 11 | at KC | vs. IND |
| Week 12 | vs. WAS | vs. BAL |
| Week 13 | vs. PHI | at PIT |
| Week 14 | BYE WEEK | at WAS |
| Week 15 | vs. NYJ | vs. JAC |
| Week 16 | at NO | at PHI |
| Week 17 | vs. LV | at GB |
| Week 18 | vs. SF | vs. TEN |
Trey McBride TE - ARI Trey McBride TE - ARI | David Montgomery RB - HOU David Montgomery RB - HOU | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 6.1 | 4.3 |
| Week 2 | 7.8 | 12.1 |
| Week 3 | 10.3 | 28.4 |
| Week 4 | 5.2 | 1.2 |
| Week 5 | 4.1 | 17.2 |
| Week 6 | 13.2 | 6.1 |
| Week 7 | 19.4 | 3.9 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 11.5 | 9.0 |
| Week 10 | 18.7 | 9.1 |
| Week 11 | 17.5 | 3.7 |
| Week 12 | 7.9 | 3.7 |
| Week 13 | 14.2 | 10.8 |
| Week 14 | 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Week 15 | 25.4 | 9.2 |
| Week 16 | 2.7 | 1.4 |
| Week 17 | 13.6 | 4.0 |
| Week 18 | 6.5 | 5.5 |
| Total | 189.9 | 142.9 |
| Average | 11.2 | 8.4 |
Trey McBride TE - ARI Trey McBride TE - ARI | David Montgomery RB - HOU David Montgomery RB - HOU | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | It will be hard for Trey McBride to top the year he had in 2025. He finished the season with 126 catches for 1,239 yards and 11 touchdowns on 169 targets. Among all pass catchers, McBride trailed only Puka Nacua in receptions. McBride also ranked third in targets among all pass catchers and tied for second in TD catches. It was an impressive follow-up to a 2024 season in which McBride had 111 catches for 1,146 yards and two touchdowns. There are reasons to think that McBride might have a hard time matching his 2025 numbers this season. The Cardinals threw at the highest rate in the NFL last season. That's not likely to happen again after the team drafted a running back, Jeremiyah Love, No. 3 overall. The Cardinals are also looking to get Marvin Harrison Jr. more involved after two disappointing seasons. McBride is clearly one of the elite tight ends and is worthy of a top-25 draft pick. Just don't expect a full repeat of last year. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Trey McBride was a league-winning pick last year as the TE1 in fantasy points per game (the closest tight end was 3.9 fantasy points per game behind McBride). He was a volume monster in what was a pass-happy Arizona offense. With Jacoby Brissett under center (Weeks 6-18) last year, Arizona was first in neutral passing rate and second in snaps while trailing by seven or more points (per Fantasy Points Data). The Cardinals were throwing a ton while playing catch-up weekly. McBride ran 156 more routes last year than any other tight end. This fact and McBride's talent fueled plenty of fantasy teams to championships last season. Among 59 qualifying tight ends, McBride was first in target share (25.4%), receiving yards per game (72.9), red zone targets (32), and first-read share (33.8%). Among the same sample size of tight ends, McBride was also tenth in yards per route run and 15th in first downs per route run. Arizona will likely be trailing in many games this season again, so we should expect Arizona to be chucking the ball again. In Mike LaFleur's two seasons with the Jets as offensive coordinator, he ranked ninth and fourth in negative script passing rate. McBride could repeat this season as the TE1 overall. | David Montgomery now finds himself as the Texans' do it all workhorse for 2026. Last year, he was phased out of the Lions' offensive plans as the season moved along, which led to his RB32 finish in fantasy points per game. In Weeks 12-18, he was the RB43 in fantasy points per game with a 32.1% snap rate, 8.2 touches per game, and only 42.8 total yards per game. Montgomery still has the juice to produce as a workhorse this season. Last season, he ranked 30th in missed tackle rate, but he was 12th in yards after contact per attempt (per Fantasy Points Data). His receiving chops are also still alive and well, as he was also 22nd in yards per route run and 12th in first downs per route run. Many will worry that Montgomery will split Houston's backfield workload with Woody Marks this season, but I don't see that happening. Montgomery should absorb a workload close to what Joe Mixon saw in 2024. In 2024, Mixon ranked fifth in opportunity share, 14th in snap share, and 13th in carries among running backs, finishing with 281 touches. Last season, Montgomery bested Marks in explosive run rate, missed tackle rate, rushing success rate, yards after contact per attempt, and yards per route run. Legit, every per-touch metric that I care about. Montgomery is the superior back, even at this stage of his career, and he'll be a strong volume-driven RB2 that could flirt with RB1 production. |
