Deebo Samuel Sr. for Tyler Warren (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Tyler Warren TE - IND  Tyler Warren TE - IND | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF  Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 65 | # 159 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. BAL | at LAR | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs BAL | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs LAR | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 112.5 | 116.2 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.6 | 7.3 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 21 | 30 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Tyler Warren | Deebo Samuel Sr. | Add Player |
|
08/06 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
08/06 | #56 | #168 | - |
|
08/06 | #60 | #157 | - |
|
08/06 | #67 | #135 | - |
|
08/06 | #34 | #142 | - |
|
08/06 | #67 | #142 | - |
|
08/06 | #67 | #161 | - |
|
08/05 | #76 | #122 | - |
|
08/05 | #56 | #149 | - |
|
08/05 | #56 | #120 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #142 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #147 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #114 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #101 | - |
|
08/05 | #76 | #135 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #120 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #165 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #139 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #132 | - |
|
08/05 | #76 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #237 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #70 | - |
|
08/04 | #84 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #109 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #217 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #162 | - |
|
08/04 | #71 | #186 | - |
|
08/04 | #76 | #115 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #122 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #101 | - |
|
08/04 | #56 | #162 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #122 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
08/02 | #56 | #120 | - |
|
08/04 | #22 | #91 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #132 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #115 | - |
|
08/01 | #56 | #106 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #139 | - |
|
08/06 | #67 | #198 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #135 | - |
|
07/31 | #34 | #109 | - |
|
08/05 | #56 | #132 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #135 | - |
|
08/03 | #67 | #209 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #229 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | ‐ | - |
|
08/03 | #76 | #168 | - |
|
07/29 | #86 | #173 | - |
|
08/06 | #67 | #162 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #209 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #223 | - |
|
07/27 | #67 | #139 | - |
|
08/06 | #67 | #115 | - |
|
07/29 | #67 | #204 | - |
|
07/25 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
07/24 | #67 | #209 | - |
|
07/23 | #22 | ‐ | - |
|
07/23 | #76 | #135 | - |
|
07/22 | #76 | #142 | - |
|
07/21 | #67 | #266 | - |
|
07/20 | #56 | #244 | - |
|
07/19 | #67 | #238 | - |
|
07/19 | #67 | #179 | - |
|
08/04 | #67 | #243 | - |
|
07/18 | #56 | #264 | - |
|
07/17 | #67 | #168 | - |
|
07/17 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/17 | #67 | #203 | - |
|
07/16 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
07/26 | #76 | ‐ | - |
|
07/15 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
07/14 | #67 | #229 | - |
|
07/14 | #76 | #173 | - |
|
07/13 | #67 | #153 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #164 | - |
|
08/03 | #65 | #172 | - |
|
07/12 | #67 | #226 | - |
|
07/12 | #34 | ‐ | - |
|
08/02 | #34 | #238 | - |
|
07/27 | #76 | #183 | - |
|
07/10 | #67 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #34 | ‐ | - |
|
07/07 | #34 | #226 | - |
|
08/02 | #67 | #101 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #231 | - |
|
07/25 | #67 | #244 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #89 | - |
|
07/24 | #67 | #223 | - |
|
08/05 | #34 | #142 | - |
|
06/30 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
07/07 | #67 | ‐ | - |
|
06/28 | #34 | ‐ | - |
|
07/21 | #67 | #198 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #229 | - |
|
06/25 | #67 | #201 | - |
|
07/13 | #67 | #167 | - |
|
06/15 | #67 | #198 | - |
|
08/05 | #53 | #142 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #106 | - |
|
05/29 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
08/03 | #56 | #114 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #194 | - |
|
05/21 | #67 | #147 | - |
|
08/01 | #34 | #120 | - |
|
07/25 | #67 | #153 | - |
|
08/01 | #67 | #169 | - |
|
08/06 | #34 | #138 | - |
|
05/11 | #67 | #162 | - |
|
07/27 | #67 | #217 | - |
|
08/05 | #67 | #83 | - |
|
07/30 | #67 | #222 | - |
|
04/28 | #67 | #200 | - |
|
04/27 | #67 | #220 | - |
|
04/27 | #67 | #173 | - |
|
07/28 | #67 | #153 | - |
|
05/20 | #67 | #165 | - |
|
04/20 | #67 | #179 | - |
|
07/09 | #67 | #244 | - |
|
03/24 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
03/09 | #67 | #149 | - |
|
01/07 | #67 | #139 | - |
|
07/15 | #94 | #122 | - |
|
01/07 | #76 | #142 | - |
Tyler Warren TE - IND Tyler Warren TE - IND | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. BAL | at LAR |
| Week 2 | at KC | vs. MIA |
| Week 3 | vs. HOU | vs. ARI |
| Week 4 | at WAS | vs. DEN |
| Week 5 | at PIT | at SEA |
| Week 6 | vs. TEN | vs. WAS |
| Week 7 | at MIN | at ATL |
| Week 8 | at JAC | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | vs. DAL | vs. LV |
| Week 10 | vs. MIA | at DAL |
| Week 11 | at HOU | vs. MIN |
| Week 12 | vs. NYG | vs. SEA |
| Week 13 | BYE WEEK | at NYG |
| Week 14 | at PHI | vs. LAR |
| Week 15 | at TEN | at LAC |
| Week 16 | vs. CIN | at KC |
| Week 17 | at CLE | vs. PHI |
| Week 18 | vs. JAC | at ARI |
Tyler Warren TE - IND Tyler Warren TE - IND | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 7.9 | 15.6 |
| Week 2 | 7.9 | 10.4 |
| Week 3 | 3.8 | 2.9 |
| Week 4 | 13.3 | 14.1 |
| Week 5 | 10.4 | 15.6 |
| Week 6 | 12.3 | 1.4 |
| Week 7 | 12.9 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 5.3 | 1.2 |
| Week 9 | 2.6 | 4.4 |
| Week 10 | 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | 13.7 |
| Week 12 | 4.5 | ‐ |
| Week 13 | 8.2 | 6.1 |
| Week 14 | 1.7 | 2.7 |
| Week 15 | 1.9 | 4.3 |
| Week 16 | 3.0 | 3.5 |
| Week 17 | 4.3 | 9.3 |
| Week 18 | 2.6 | 2.1 |
| Total | 112.5 | 116.2 |
| Average | 6.6 | 7.3 |
Tyler Warren TE - IND Tyler Warren TE - IND | Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF Deebo Samuel Sr. WR - SF | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Tyler Warren's rookie season got off to a fast start, but his production slowed down markedly late in the season, leaving us with a challenging evaluation for 2026. Over his first 10 games of 2025, Warren averaged 5.0 catches, 61.7 receiving yards and 11.1 half-point PPR fantasy points per game, with four touchdowns. Over his last seven games, Warren averaged 3.7 catches, 28.6 receiving yards and 5.6 half-point PPR fantasy points per game, with one touchdown. The net result: 76 catches for 817 yards and four touchdowns (plus one TD run) and a TE5 fantasy finish. Daniel Jones' late-season injuries might partly account for Warren's late-season slowdown, and Jones' health status might still be an issue early in the 2026 season. But the Colts traded away WR Michael Pittman in the offseason and didn't make any significant pass-catching acquisitions in free agency or the draft, bolstering Warren's 2026 target outlook. Warren might not be one of the elite fantasy TEs in 2026, but he should still be one of the first five tight ends off the board in this year's drafts. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Tyler Warren had a fantastic rookie season as the TE10 in fantasy points per game, but there was plenty of meat left on the bone that should have fantasy gamers excited going into 2026. Warren was the TE4 in expected fantasy points per game last year. Let's begin the convo there. He should naturally see some regression this season even before we discuss the fact that the Colts moved on from Michael Pittman Jr. this offseason. Warren also ranked fifth in red zone targets and eighth in end zone targets last year among tight ends, and he only had four receiving touchdowns to show for it. Warren was excellent last year on a per-route basis. Among 59 qualifying tight ends, he was sixth in target share, ninth in receiving yards per game, 18th in yards per route run and first downs per route run, and sixth in first-read-read share (per Fantasy Points Data). His target share and first-read share should increase this season with Pittman Jr. gone, and his per-route productivity should also improve if Daniel Jones can stay healthy for the entire season and be at least a shadow of his healthy self. Warren is a top-five tight end this season that could sniff top-three status if everything goes according to plan. | Deebo Samuel rejoins the San Francisco 49ers on a one-year deal after a one-year dalliance with the Commanders. Samuel will compete with De'Zhaun Stribling to be the WR2 in the pecking order behind Mike Evans. Last year, Samuel was the WR29 in fantasy points per game while putting up a varied stat line. Samuel posted some metrics that make me want to feel bullish about his 2026 outlook, but there are also concerning pieces of his analytical profile. Let's start out with the good. Last year, among 109 qualifying receivers, Samuel was 18th in target share (22.4%), ninth in yards after the catch per reception (6.6), 21st in first-read share (27.3%), and ninth-best in missed tackles forced per reception. Unfortunately, though, among the same sample of receivers, he was also 38th in yards per route run and 53rd in first downs per route run (0.076) while seeing his usual bevy of underneath targets (5.3 aDOT, 103rd out of 109 qualifying receivers). I find myself more in than out with Samuel for 2026. His ability to break tackles and create with the ball in his hands has always been his calling card, and he's still posting stellar metrics in those departments and target-earning areas. The per-route efficiency worries I'll chalk up to Washington's struggling offense last season. Samuel should be a viable WR3/flex with upside for 2026 in the 49ers' offense. |
