Devin Neal for Michael Pittman Jr. (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT ![]() Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT | Devin Neal RB - NO ![]() Devin Neal RB - NO |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 108 | # 254 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. ATL | at DET | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs ATL | This is a 3 star matchup. RBs perform close to their average vs DET | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 122.4 | 43.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 7.2 | 4.8 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 18 | 13 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Michael Pittman Jr. | Devin Neal | Add Player |
|
08/02 | #149 | #312 | - |
|
08/02 | #114 | #265 | - |
|
08/02 | #132 | #257 | - |
|
08/02 | #115 | ‐ | - |
|
08/02 | #135 | ‐ | - |
|
08/02 | #114 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #106 | #257 | - |
|
08/01 | #109 | #285 | - |
|
08/01 | #115 | #230 | - |
|
08/01 | #80 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #120 | #292 | - |
|
08/01 | #101 | #207 | - |
|
08/01 | #125 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #129 | ‐ | - |
|
07/31 | #114 | #242 | - |
|
07/31 | #83 | #174 | - |
|
07/31 | #115 | #207 | - |
|
07/31 | #114 | #227 | - |
|
07/31 | #115 | #230 | - |
|
07/31 | #98 | #357 | - |
|
07/31 | #69 | #181 | - |
|
07/31 | #106 | #242 | - |
|
07/31 | #115 | #270 | - |
|
07/31 | #89 | #325 | - |
|
07/31 | #122 | #167 | - |
|
07/30 | #114 | #240 | - |
|
07/30 | #120 | #242 | - |
|
07/30 | #116 | #250 | - |
|
07/30 | #122 | #283 | - |
|
07/30 | #106 | #167 | - |
|
07/30 | #98 | #218 | - |
|
07/30 | #132 | #218 | - |
|
07/29 | #120 | ‐ | - |
|
07/29 | #83 | ‐ | - |
|
07/29 | #101 | #227 | - |
|
08/01 | #114 | #259 | - |
|
07/28 | #114 | ‐ | - |
|
07/28 | #122 | #167 | - |
|
07/28 | #109 | #236 | - |
|
07/27 | #114 | #207 | - |
|
07/27 | #120 | #262 | - |
|
07/26 | #129 | ‐ | - |
|
07/29 | #115 | #286 | - |
|
07/25 | #115 | #250 | - |
|
07/25 | #115 | #247 | - |
|
07/24 | #91 | #236 | - |
|
07/24 | #116 | #235 | - |
|
07/23 | #80 | ‐ | - |
|
07/23 | #106 | #161 | - |
|
07/22 | #116 | #143 | - |
|
07/21 | #106 | #265 | - |
|
07/20 | #98 | #265 | - |
|
07/19 | #125 | #257 | - |
|
07/19 | #116 | #242 | - |
|
07/27 | #101 | #242 | - |
|
07/18 | #115 | #265 | - |
|
07/17 | #115 | #207 | - |
|
07/17 | #109 | #265 | - |
|
07/17 | #125 | #221 | - |
|
07/16 | #114 | #181 | - |
|
07/26 | #75 | ‐ | - |
|
07/15 | #115 | #236 | - |
|
07/15 | #101 | #274 | - |
|
07/14 | #115 | #274 | - |
|
07/14 | #116 | #286 | - |
|
07/14 | #106 | #262 | - |
|
07/13 | #125 | ‐ | - |
|
07/30 | #115 | #250 | - |
|
07/13 | #138 | ‐ | - |
|
07/12 | #106 | #282 | - |
|
07/12 | #116 | ‐ | - |
|
07/12 | #114 | #257 | - |
|
07/27 | #83 | #207 | - |
|
07/10 | #116 | #221 | - |
|
08/01 | #81 | #282 | - |
|
07/07 | #109 | #250 | - |
|
07/06 | #114 | #227 | - |
|
08/02 | #114 | #270 | - |
|
07/28 | #101 | #232 | - |
|
07/25 | #98 | #270 | - |
|
07/31 | #125 | #262 | - |
|
07/24 | #115 | #283 | - |
|
08/01 | #129 | #247 | - |
|
06/30 | #116 | #240 | - |
|
07/07 | #74 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #98 | #274 | - |
|
06/28 | #109 | ‐ | - |
|
07/21 | #120 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #101 | #277 | - |
|
06/26 | #115 | #230 | - |
|
06/25 | #114 | #232 | - |
|
07/13 | #115 | #246 | - |
|
06/15 | #114 | #221 | - |
|
06/12 | #125 | #242 | - |
|
08/01 | #93 | #279 | - |
|
07/31 | #93 | #283 | - |
|
05/29 | #115 | #240 | - |
|
07/31 | #125 | #230 | - |
|
07/29 | #120 | #188 | - |
|
05/21 | #114 | #163 | - |
|
08/01 | #115 | #200 | - |
|
07/25 | #120 | #236 | - |
|
08/01 | #115 | ‐ | - |
|
08/02 | #81 | #250 | - |
|
05/11 | #114 | #236 | - |
|
07/27 | #116 | #236 | - |
|
07/29 | #106 | #236 | - |
|
07/30 | #109 | #250 | - |
|
04/28 | #125 | #259 | - |
|
04/27 | #122 | #232 | - |
|
04/27 | #120 | #309 | - |
|
07/28 | #116 | #230 | - |
|
05/20 | #129 | #207 | - |
|
04/20 | #129 | #291 | - |
|
07/09 | #116 | #270 | - |
|
03/24 | #109 | #230 | - |
|
03/09 | #116 | #221 | - |
|
01/07 | #120 | #188 | - |
|
07/15 | #114 | #156 | - |
|
01/07 | #98 | #181 | - |
Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT ![]() Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT | Devin Neal RB - NO ![]() Devin Neal RB - NO | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. ATL | at DET |
| Week 2 | at NE | at BAL |
| Week 3 | vs. CIN | vs. LV |
| Week 4 | at CLE | vs. ATL |
| Week 5 | vs. IND | vs. MIN |
| Week 6 | at TB | at NYG |
| Week 7 | at NO | vs. PIT |
| Week 8 | vs. CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | BYE WEEK | vs. CLE |
| Week 10 | at CIN | vs. CAR |
| Week 11 | at PHI | at CHI |
| Week 12 | vs. DEN | at CIN |
| Week 13 | vs. HOU | vs. GB |
| Week 14 | at JAC | at CAR |
| Week 15 | vs. BAL | at TB |
| Week 16 | vs. CAR | vs. ARI |
| Week 17 | at TEN | at ATL |
| Week 18 | at BAL | vs. TB |
Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT ![]() Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT | Devin Neal RB - NO ![]() Devin Neal RB - NO | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 14.0 | 0.9 |
| Week 2 | 4.0 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 13.3 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 10.1 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 9.9 | ‐ |
| Week 6 | 2.0 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 13.8 | 0.1 |
| Week 8 | 15.5 | 1.1 |
| Week 9 | 11.5 | 1.2 |
| Week 10 | 1.9 | 3.1 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | 8.7 | 6.1 |
| Week 13 | 1.3 | 6.9 |
| Week 14 | 7.9 | 14.4 |
| Week 15 | 2.6 | 9.2 |
| Week 16 | 3.2 | ‐ |
| Week 17 | 1.6 | ‐ |
| Week 18 | 1.1 | ‐ |
| Total | 122.4 | 43.0 |
| Average | 7.2 | 4.8 |
Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT ![]() Michael Pittman Jr. WR - PIT | Devin Neal RB - NO ![]() Devin Neal RB - NO | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Michael Pittman Jr. quietly remained productive in 2025 despite losing ground to Alec Pierce in the Colts offense and dealing with declining efficiency. Now in Pittsburgh, Pittman projects as a reliable possession receiver who could quickly become Aaron Rodgers' preferred underneath target. His fantasy ceiling may be limited compared to DK Metcalf's splash-play upside, but Pittman's volume and red-zone involvement should keep him firmly in the WR3 mix in a pass-happier offense led by HC MIke McCarthy. If the Steelers lean heavily on quick-game concepts, Pittman could easily lead the team in receptions/targets. | |


