Drake London for Jake Ferguson (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Drake London WR - ATL ![]() Drake London WR - ATL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 14 | # 126 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at PIT | at NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs PIT | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 133.9 | 106.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.2 | 6.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 14 | 29 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Drake London | Jake Ferguson | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #18 | #154 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #137 | - |
|
08/05 | #31 | #110 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #110 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #105 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #157 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #129 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #154 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #37 | #103 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #157 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #144 | - |
|
08/02 | #14 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #14 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #144 | - |
|
08/01 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #19 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #26 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #14 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #31 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #18 | #144 | - |
|
07/31 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #43 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #9 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #26 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
07/28 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #21 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #18 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #19 | #130 | - |
|
07/29 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #18 | #144 | - |
|
07/24 | #14 | #123 | - |
|
07/23 | #24 | #130 | - |
|
07/23 | #11 | #110 | - |
|
07/22 | #10 | #110 | - |
|
07/21 | #18 | #144 | - |
|
07/20 | #14 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #18 | #111 | - |
|
07/19 | #21 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/18 | #24 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #18 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/16 | #14 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #18 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
07/14 | #14 | #130 | - |
|
07/14 | #18 | #144 | - |
|
07/14 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #21 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #122 | - |
|
07/12 | #18 | #154 | - |
|
07/12 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #11 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #19 | #157 | - |
|
07/10 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #21 | #130 | - |
|
08/02 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/31 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
07/24 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #111 | - |
|
06/30 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
07/07 | #31 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #14 | #137 | - |
|
06/28 | #11 | #137 | - |
|
07/21 | #14 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #14 | #137 | - |
|
06/25 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
07/13 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
06/15 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #121 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #172 | - |
|
05/29 | #14 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
05/21 | #21 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #14 | #154 | - |
|
05/11 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #18 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #144 | - |
|
07/30 | #14 | #111 | - |
|
04/28 | #11 | #157 | - |
|
04/27 | #14 | #130 | - |
|
04/27 | #14 | #154 | - |
|
07/28 | #10 | #123 | - |
|
05/20 | #11 | #110 | - |
|
04/20 | #10 | #144 | - |
|
07/09 | #18 | #123 | - |
|
03/24 | #10 | #105 | - |
|
03/09 | #10 | #110 | - |
|
01/07 | #11 | #110 | - |
|
07/15 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
01/07 | #11 | #110 | - |
Drake London WR - ATL ![]() Drake London WR - ATL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at PIT | at NYG |
| Week 2 | vs. CAR | vs. WAS |
| Week 3 | at GB | vs. BAL |
| Week 4 | at NO | at HOU |
| Week 5 | vs. BAL | vs. TB |
| Week 6 | vs. CHI | at GB |
| Week 7 | vs. SF | at PHI |
| Week 8 | at TB | vs. ARI |
| Week 9 | vs. CIN | at IND |
| Week 10 | vs. KC | vs. SF |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | vs. TEN |
| Week 12 | at MIN | vs. PHI |
| Week 13 | vs. DET | at SEA |
| Week 14 | at CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 15 | at WAS | at LAR |
| Week 16 | vs. TB | vs. JAC |
| Week 17 | vs. NO | vs. NYG |
| Week 18 | at CAR | at WAS |
Drake London WR - ATL ![]() Drake London WR - ATL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 5.5 | 2.3 |
| Week 2 | 2.9 | 7.8 |
| Week 3 | 5.5 | 8.2 |
| Week 4 | 17.0 | 10.0 |
| Week 5 | ‐ | 16.9 |
| Week 6 | 21.8 | 9.3 |
| Week 7 | 4.2 | 14.9 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 0.0 |
| Week 9 | 29.8 | 3.0 |
| Week 10 | 18.4 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 11.9 | 7.6 |
| Week 12 | ‐ | 6.1 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 3.6 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 5.8 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 1.6 |
| Week 16 | 2.7 | 1.9 |
| Week 17 | 0.4 | 6.6 |
| Week 18 | 13.8 | 0.5 |
| Total | 133.9 | 106.1 |
| Average | 11.2 | 6.2 |
Drake London WR - ATL ![]() Drake London WR - ATL | Jake Ferguson TE - DAL ![]() Jake Ferguson TE - DAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Jake Ferguson is a competent pass catcher in a prolific offense, but the presence of two star receivers in Dallas could limit Ferguson's fantasy upside. Ferguson had 82 catches for 600 yards and eight touchdowns in 2025. The reception and TD totals were career highs, but Ferguson averaged just 7.3 yards per catch, a career low. He finished TE8 in half point fantasy scoring but was TE13 in fantasy points per game among TEs who played at least five games. The Cowboys have an explosive passing attack, but WRs CeeDee Lamb and George Pickens are QB Dak Prescott's principal targets. The Lamb-Pickens duo combined for 250 targets and 168 receptions last season. Ferguson's 2026 production could be limited as long as Lamb and Pickens are both healthy, so it's best to consider Ferguson a high-end TE2 in this year's drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Drake London was in the middle of a top-3 finish through 9 games before injuries cut short his 2025 season, finishing top-10 in fantasy points per game while dominating targets in Atlanta's offense. The Falcons' WR1 posted elite production alongside Michael Penix Jr., and there's little threat to his massive target share entering 2026. Even if Atlanta opens the year with Tua Tagovailoa under center while Penix recovers, London's role as the focal point of the passing attack should remain unchanged. With volume, talent, and red-zone usage all working in his favor, London profiles as a top-tier fantasy WR1 once again. | Jake Ferguson averaged just 7.3 PPG when George Pickens and CeeDee Lamb were both healthy (> 50% snap share) in the lineup during the 2025 season (11 games). Five games without Lamb playing at least 50% of the snaps -> 13.5 PPG. Still, the overall production and career-high 8 TDs resulted in TE13 finishing in half-PPR scoring (per game). Top-5 in cumulative scoring in full PPR formats. With George Pickens returning to Dallas....Ferguson is facing a major uphill battle to rise above TD-or-bust TE territory. He's being overvalued as a fringe TE1 based on his teammate's missing games in 2025. |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | I absolutely understand the concern regarding the Falcons' quarterback situation, but that won't stop me from drafting Drake London. London is a bet on talent that I'll continue to make. Despite Michael Penix and Kirk Cousins, London was cooking last year before a PCL injury derailed his season in Week 11. In Weeks 1-10 last year, London was the WR6 in fantasy points per game. During that stretch, he was fourth in target share (30.3%), fourth in receiving yards per game (86.4), sixth in yards per route run (2.74), fifth in first-read share (37.6%), and seventh in first downs per route run (0.135, per Fantasy Points Data). London should be a locked-in WR1 this season with top-five upside if the quarterback situation works itself out. | |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | - #5 in Target Share at 30.3% | |


