Garrett Wilson for Travis Kelce (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ  Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ | Travis Kelce TE - KC  Travis Kelce TE - KC |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 51 | # 104 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at TEN | vs. DEN | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. WRs perform a little better than their average vs TEN | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs DEN | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 63.5 | 117.2 | - |
| Avg Game | 9.1 | 6.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 8 | 3 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Garrett Wilson | Travis Kelce | Add Player |
|
08/03 | #61 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #46 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #44 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #48 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #54 | #130 | - |
|
08/03 | #48 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #35 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #54 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #65 | #91 | - |
|
08/02 | #38 | #96 | - |
|
08/02 | #69 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #43 | #76 | - |
|
08/02 | #46 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #61 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #51 | #96 | - |
|
08/01 | #61 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #54 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #44 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #65 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #50 | #96 | - |
|
07/31 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #51 | #110 | - |
|
07/31 | #65 | #94 | - |
|
08/02 | #43 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #51 | #110 | - |
|
07/31 | #31 | #111 | - |
|
07/31 | #48 | #94 | - |
|
07/31 | #54 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #65 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #50 | #96 | - |
|
07/30 | #31 | #105 | - |
|
07/30 | #81 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #65 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #61 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #51 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #61 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #51 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #54 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/28 | #51 | #96 | - |
|
07/27 | #44 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #61 | #105 | - |
|
07/26 | #41 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #65 | #123 | - |
|
07/25 | #46 | #111 | - |
|
07/25 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
07/24 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
07/23 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
07/23 | #35 | #157 | - |
|
07/22 | #50 | #157 | - |
|
07/21 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
07/20 | #46 | #86 | - |
|
07/19 | #54 | #96 | - |
|
07/19 | #61 | #105 | - |
|
07/27 | #46 | #111 | - |
|
07/18 | #61 | #137 | - |
|
07/17 | #54 | #105 | - |
|
07/17 | #31 | #94 | - |
|
07/17 | #65 | #123 | - |
|
07/16 | #50 | #123 | - |
|
07/26 | #48 | #105 | - |
|
07/15 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
07/15 | #65 | #96 | - |
|
07/14 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/14 | #54 | #110 | - |
|
07/14 | #65 | #94 | - |
|
07/13 | #65 | #96 | - |
|
07/30 | #59 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #69 | #123 | - |
|
07/12 | #51 | #111 | - |
|
07/12 | #51 | #111 | - |
|
08/02 | #41 | #105 | - |
|
07/27 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/10 | #59 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #69 | #110 | - |
|
07/07 | #48 | #110 | - |
|
08/02 | #61 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #105 | - |
|
07/25 | #50 | #96 | - |
|
07/31 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
07/24 | #46 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #54 | #105 | - |
|
06/30 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/07 | #41 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #59 | #110 | - |
|
06/28 | #39 | #105 | - |
|
07/21 | #59 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #46 | #96 | - |
|
06/26 | #59 | #105 | - |
|
06/25 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/13 | #50 | #110 | - |
|
06/15 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
06/12 | #51 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #50 | #79 | - |
|
08/03 | #54 | #123 | - |
|
05/29 | #54 | #172 | - |
|
08/03 | #48 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #59 | #110 | - |
|
05/21 | #50 | #195 | - |
|
08/01 | #50 | #130 | - |
|
07/25 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #59 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #69 | #84 | - |
|
05/11 | #43 | #111 | - |
|
07/27 | #51 | #105 | - |
|
07/29 | #24 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #54 | #123 | - |
|
04/28 | #48 | #123 | - |
|
04/27 | #44 | #154 | - |
|
04/27 | #41 | #96 | - |
|
07/28 | #44 | #110 | - |
|
05/20 | #50 | #154 | - |
|
04/20 | #39 | #123 | - |
|
07/09 | #50 | #105 | - |
|
03/24 | #38 | #123 | - |
|
03/09 | #39 | #172 | - |
|
01/07 | #44 | #154 | - |
|
07/15 | #44 | #157 | - |
|
01/07 | #35 | #157 | - |
Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ | Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at TEN | vs. DEN |
| Week 2 | vs. GB | vs. IND |
| Week 3 | at DET | at MIA |
| Week 4 | at CHI | at LV |
| Week 5 | vs. CLE | BYE WEEK |
| Week 6 | at NE | vs. LAC |
| Week 7 | vs. MIA | at SEA |
| Week 8 | vs. LV | at DEN |
| Week 9 | at KC | vs. NYJ |
| Week 10 | vs. BUF | at ATL |
| Week 11 | at LAC | vs. ARI |
| Week 12 | at MIA | at BUF |
| Week 13 | BYE WEEK | at LAR |
| Week 14 | vs. DEN | at CIN |
| Week 15 | at ARI | vs. NE |
| Week 16 | vs. NE | vs. SF |
| Week 17 | vs. MIN | at LAC |
| Week 18 | at BUF | vs. LV |
Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ | Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 15.5 | 10.7 |
| Week 2 | 5.0 | 6.1 |
| Week 3 | 14.4 | 2.6 |
| Week 4 | 14.2 | 4.8 |
| Week 5 | 13.1 | 12.1 |
| Week 6 | 1.3 | 7.8 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | 5.4 |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 15.9 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 8.6 |
| Week 10 | 0.0 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | 15.1 |
| Week 12 | ‐ | 4.4 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 10.5 |
| Week 14 | ‐ | 0.8 |
| Week 15 | ‐ | 7.0 |
| Week 16 | ‐ | 0.6 |
| Week 17 | ‐ | 3.6 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 1.2 |
| Total | 63.5 | 117.2 |
| Average | 9.1 | 6.9 |
Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ Garrett Wilson WR - NYJ | Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Travis Kelce will turn 37 in October, but he's committed to playing at least one more season for the Chiefs. Kelce finished TE3 in fantasy scoring last season, catching 76 passes for 851 yards and five touchdowns. But the longtime fantasy star's efficiency has been plummeting. Kelce has averaged 8.6 yards per target for his career, but he's averaged just 6.9 YPT over the last two seasons. Kelce has averaged 2.05 yards per route run for his career, but he's been just under 1.50 YPRR each of the last two seasons. The Chiefs didn't add any significant pass catchers in the offseason, so Kelce still figures to be a prominent target earner in Andy Reid's offense. It's just a matter of how much he can do with those targets. The good news is that Kelce has become a budget option at the position and will probably be available in the middle rounds of fantasy drafts. | |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Garrett Wilson's injury-shortened 2025 masked what looked like a target monster season before he got hurt. The Jets star commanded an elite 30% target share early in the season despite subpar quarterback play, reinforcing his status as one of the league's top target earners. With Geno Smith now under center and improved offensive line play in New York, Wilson is set up for a bounce-back campaign. Even with added target competition in the form of two first-round rookies, Wilson projects as the clear centerpiece of the Jets passing attack and an underrated fantasy WR1 candidate in 2026. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Last year, before being lost to a knee injury (Weeks 1-6), Garrett Wilson was the WR10 in fantasy points per game. During that span, he commanded a 31.2% target share with 65.8 receiving yards per game, 1.92 yards per route run, a whopping 45.9% first-read share, and 0.087 first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). With more weapons installed around him this offseason (Omar Cooper Jr. and Kenyon Sadiq), Wilson's target share and first-read share could dip some, but he'll still be the clear leader of the passing attack with (hopefully) improved quarterback play with Geno Smith under center. Wilson is a strong WR2 with WR1 upside if the Jets new look offense gels in 2026. | At this point in his career, we know what to expect out of Travis Kelce. He's a low-end TE1, and that's fine, but I don't see a path for him returning to top 3-5 status for 2026. Over the last two years, he has been the TE9 and TE7 in fantasy points per game. Yes, the Chiefs will remain a pass-first offense, but it's fair to question when we'll see Patrick Mahomes play in 2026 and what version of him will be under center. Mahomes is coming off a torn ACL, and that cast of pass-catching characters at his disposal didn't change a ton this offseason, which isn't great. Travis Kelce's per-route efficiency screams that he's on the back nine of his career. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Kelce was 19th in yards per route run, 18th in yards after the catch per reception, and 16th in first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Those aren't damning numbers, but they aren't anything more than solid and just illuminate the point again that Kelce doesn't have the juice to put up elite per-route metrics anymore to vault him back into the top 3-5 conversation. Kelce will likely post another solid season as a low-end TE1 in 2026. |
| Chris Welsh FantasyPros | - #2 in Target Share at 33.7 - | |
