George Pickens for Isaiah Likely (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
George Pickens WR - DAL  George Pickens WR - DAL | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG  Isaiah Likely TE - NYG |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 18 | # 120 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at NYG | vs. DAL | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs NYG | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs DAL | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 198.9 | 34.7 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.7 | 2.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 31 | 20 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
George Pickens | Isaiah Likely | Add Player |
|
08/06 | #11 | #105 | - |
|
08/06 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
08/06 | #38 | #121 | - |
|
08/06 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/06 | #31 | #144 | - |
|
08/06 | #21 | #123 | - |
|
08/06 | #24 | #129 | - |
|
08/05 | #21 | #96 | - |
|
08/05 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
08/05 | #21 | #180 | - |
|
08/05 | #14 | #105 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #86 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #24 | #110 | - |
|
08/05 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #19 | #105 | - |
|
08/05 | #9 | #137 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #255 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #144 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #86 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #125 | - |
|
08/04 | #14 | #130 | - |
|
08/04 | #46 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #24 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #24 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #21 | #96 | - |
|
08/04 | #24 | #172 | - |
|
08/01 | #19 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #76 | - |
|
08/05 | #21 | #123 | - |
|
08/06 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #11 | #84 | - |
|
08/05 | #35 | #180 | - |
|
07/31 | #31 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #137 | - |
|
07/30 | #11 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #19 | #180 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #84 | - |
|
07/29 | #9 | #255 | - |
|
08/06 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
07/28 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #21 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #14 | #86 | - |
|
07/27 | #11 | #157 | - |
|
08/06 | #19 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #21 | #137 | - |
|
07/25 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
07/24 | #11 | #96 | - |
|
07/23 | #39 | #195 | - |
|
07/23 | #19 | #172 | - |
|
07/22 | #19 | #172 | - |
|
07/21 | #19 | #105 | - |
|
07/20 | #24 | #94 | - |
|
07/19 | #19 | #94 | - |
|
07/19 | #24 | #86 | - |
|
08/04 | #19 | #86 | - |
|
07/18 | #14 | #86 | - |
|
07/17 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
07/17 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #21 | #111 | - |
|
07/16 | #19 | #154 | - |
|
07/26 | #14 | #130 | - |
|
07/15 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
07/14 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
07/14 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
07/13 | #18 | #105 | - |
|
07/30 | #24 | #94 | - |
|
08/03 | #25 | #109 | - |
|
07/12 | #19 | #96 | - |
|
07/12 | #21 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
07/27 | #26 | #110 | - |
|
07/10 | #11 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #35 | #245 | - |
|
07/07 | #19 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
08/03 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
07/25 | #19 | #94 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #84 | - |
|
07/24 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #11 | #96 | - |
|
06/30 | #31 | #123 | - |
|
07/07 | #9 | #86 | - |
|
06/28 | #21 | #130 | - |
|
07/21 | #19 | #105 | - |
|
08/01 | #19 | #180 | - |
|
06/25 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
07/13 | #14 | #96 | - |
|
06/15 | #18 | #111 | - |
|
08/05 | #23 | #101 | - |
|
08/05 | #19 | #105 | - |
|
05/29 | #21 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #130 | - |
|
08/05 | #18 | #86 | - |
|
05/21 | #14 | #225 | - |
|
08/01 | #19 | #137 | - |
|
07/25 | #19 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #19 | #130 | - |
|
08/06 | #18 | #105 | - |
|
05/11 | #19 | #130 | - |
|
07/27 | #14 | #123 | - |
|
08/05 | #35 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #21 | #86 | - |
|
04/28 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
04/27 | #31 | #123 | - |
|
04/27 | #21 | #130 | - |
|
07/28 | #19 | #144 | - |
|
05/20 | #21 | #94 | - |
|
04/20 | #19 | #110 | - |
|
07/09 | #19 | #94 | - |
|
03/24 | #19 | #157 | - |
|
03/09 | #18 | #180 | - |
|
01/07 | #21 | #180 | - |
|
07/15 | #19 | #180 | - |
|
01/07 | #19 | #172 | - |
George Pickens WR - DAL George Pickens WR - DAL | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at NYG | vs. DAL |
| Week 2 | vs. WAS | at LAR |
| Week 3 | vs. BAL | vs. TEN |
| Week 4 | at HOU | vs. ARI |
| Week 5 | vs. TB | at WAS |
| Week 6 | at GB | vs. NO |
| Week 7 | at PHI | at HOU |
| Week 8 | vs. ARI | BYE WEEK |
| Week 9 | at IND | at PHI |
| Week 10 | vs. SF | vs. WAS |
| Week 11 | vs. TEN | vs. JAC |
| Week 12 | vs. PHI | at IND |
| Week 13 | at SEA | vs. SF |
| Week 14 | BYE WEEK | at SEA |
| Week 15 | at LAR | vs. CLE |
| Week 16 | vs. JAC | at DET |
| Week 17 | vs. NYG | at DAL |
| Week 18 | at WAS | vs. PHI |
George Pickens WR - DAL George Pickens WR - DAL | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 3.0 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 12.8 | ‐ |
| Week 3 | 12.8 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 25.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 5 | 11.7 | 1.2 |
| Week 6 | 22.8 | 0.6 |
| Week 7 | 8.2 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | 7.8 | 0.8 |
| Week 9 | 7.9 | 6.0 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 1.7 |
| Week 11 | 20.4 | 1.5 |
| Week 12 | 20.6 | 1.0 |
| Week 13 | 10.8 | 7.5 |
| Week 14 | 3.7 | 8.5 |
| Week 15 | 3.3 | 0.0 |
| Week 16 | 19.0 | 0.0 |
| Week 17 | 7.8 | 2.7 |
| Week 18 | 0.9 | 3.2 |
| Total | 198.9 | 34.7 |
| Average | 11.7 | 2.5 |
George Pickens WR - DAL George Pickens WR - DAL | Isaiah Likely TE - NYG Isaiah Likely TE - NYG | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | George Pickens delivered a true breakout in 2025, finishing as a top-6 fantasy WR despite sharing targets with CeeDee Lamb in Dallas. The big-play specialist thrived on efficiency and touchdown production, averaging 84.1 receiving yards per game with nine scores while consistently delivering spike-week upside. Pickens proved capable of producing WR1 numbers even alongside a healthy Lamb, although his high-variance play style makes weekly volatility part of the package. If he avoids a contract-related holdout and maintains his chemistry with Dak Prescott, Pickens should remain a low-end fantasy WR1 with week-winning upside. | The Ravens opted to sign Mark Andrews for more years instead of extending Isaiah Likely in the final year of his rookie deal. Likely struggled with injuries to both himself and to his QB...that dramatically hurt his 2025 production (along with a few TDs that didn't actually result in TDs). Entering free agency and eventually signing with the New York Giants...Likely's stock is nowhere near where it was at this time last year. However, the upside we have seen from Likely when Andrews has missed time in the past - 11 PPG with no Andrews, the TE5 in PPG last year - warrants a shot on Likely if he carves out a clear TE1 role with John Harbaugh in NY. |
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | After spending the first four seasons of his NFL career with the Ravens, Isaiah Likely signed a three-year, $40 million contract with the Giants. Likely shared targets with Mark Andrews for four years and could see increased usage with his new team. The Giants are thin at wide receiver behind young star Malik Nabers, and Nabers has been slow to recover from an ACL tear sustained last September, leaving his early-season status in question. Likely's best season with the Ravens was in 2024, when he had 42 catches for 477 yards and six TDs. He never saw more than 60 targets in any of his four seasons in Baltimore. The world saw Likely's potential when he had nine catches for 111 yards and a touchdown in the Ravens' nationally televised season opener against the Chiefs in 2024. With an expected target increase in 2026, Likely has a chance to be a top-10 fantasy tight end. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Last season was a monster breakout season for George Pickens as the WR5 in fantasy points per game. His splits with CeeDee Lamb out and active were dramatic, but that doesn't mean that Pickens wasn't awesome in both realms. With Lamb in the huddle, Pickens averaged 15 fantasy points per game versus 24.2 with him out. Across that entire season with Lamb, that would have made Pickens the WR11 in fantasy points per game, and without him, he would have been the WR1 in fantasy points per game. With Lamb, Pickens had a 20.2% target share with 2.24 yards per route run, 77.1 receiving yards per game, a 25.2% first-read share, and 0.116 first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Without Lamb, those numbers jumped to a 23.6% target share, 3.14 yards per route run, 106.8 receiving yards per game, a 34.1% first-read share, and 0.154 first downs per route run. No matter how you slice it, Pickens was elite last year, and he should be a WR1 again this season in a pass-first Dallas offense. | Isaiah Likely's 2025 season was crushed by a foot injury that he sustained in the preseason. I can't honestly tell you that he was fully healthy last season, or when that occurred, if so. I'm tossing his 2025 campaign in the trash. So, let's be kind and rewind to 2024. During that season, among 57 qualifying tight ends, Likely ranked 17th in target per route run rate, tenth in yards per route run, and eighth in first downs per route run and fantasy points per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). After signing a lucrative deal with the Giants this offseason, Likely should be their clear starting tight end and a strong part of their passing game, with only Darnell Mooney, Darius Slayton, Calvin Austin, and Malachi Fields to contend with for targets behind Malik Nabers. Likely could easily be a solid TE1 this season and is worth a late-round dart in a ton of drafts in 2026. |
