George Pickens for Saquon Barkley (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI  Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | George Pickens WR - DAL  George Pickens WR - DAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 15 | # 19 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. WAS | at NYG | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs WAS | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs NYG | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 195.3 | 198.9 | - |
| Avg Game | 12.2 | 11.7 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 3 | 31 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Saquon Barkley | George Pickens | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #17 | #11 | - |
|
08/05 | #33 | #9 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #9 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #18 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #18 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #14 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #46 | - |
|
08/04 | #5 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #24 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #38 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #14 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #24 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #26 | - |
|
08/02 | #8 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #28 | #24 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #24 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #10 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #21 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #11 | - |
|
07/31 | #17 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #11 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #35 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #31 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #18 | - |
|
07/30 | #13 | #11 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/03 | #30 | #11 | - |
|
07/29 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #9 | - |
|
08/04 | #20 | #19 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #21 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #14 | - |
|
07/27 | #15 | #11 | - |
|
08/03 | #17 | #18 | - |
|
07/26 | #8 | #24 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | #21 | - |
|
07/25 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
07/24 | #17 | #11 | - |
|
07/23 | #37 | #39 | - |
|
07/23 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
07/22 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/21 | #20 | #19 | - |
|
07/20 | #23 | #24 | - |
|
07/19 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/19 | #13 | #24 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/18 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
07/17 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/17 | #23 | #11 | - |
|
07/17 | #15 | #21 | - |
|
07/16 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
07/26 | #13 | #14 | - |
|
07/15 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/14 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/14 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
07/14 | #20 | #21 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #18 | - |
|
07/30 | #33 | #24 | - |
|
08/03 | #7 | #25 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #19 | - |
|
07/12 | #20 | #21 | - |
|
08/02 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
07/27 | #33 | #26 | - |
|
07/10 | #15 | #11 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #35 | - |
|
07/07 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
08/02 | #20 | #19 | - |
|
08/03 | #8 | #19 | - |
|
07/25 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
07/31 | #33 | #14 | - |
|
07/24 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #11 | - |
|
06/30 | #20 | #31 | - |
|
07/07 | #49 | #9 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #21 | - |
|
06/28 | #28 | #21 | - |
|
07/21 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #19 | - |
|
06/25 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
07/13 | #15 | #14 | - |
|
06/15 | #17 | #18 | - |
|
06/12 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #17 | #23 | - |
|
08/05 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
05/29 | #28 | #21 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #11 | - |
|
07/29 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
05/21 | #12 | #14 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
07/25 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #19 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #18 | - |
|
05/11 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
07/27 | #13 | #14 | - |
|
08/04 | #15 | #35 | - |
|
07/30 | #15 | #21 | - |
|
04/28 | #28 | #19 | - |
|
04/27 | #28 | #31 | - |
|
04/27 | #23 | #21 | - |
|
07/28 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
05/20 | #17 | #21 | - |
|
04/20 | #30 | #19 | - |
|
07/09 | #13 | #19 | - |
|
03/24 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
03/09 | #28 | #18 | - |
|
01/07 | #49 | #21 | - |
|
07/15 | #23 | #19 | - |
|
01/07 | #23 | #19 | - |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | George Pickens WR - DAL George Pickens WR - DAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. WAS | at NYG |
| Week 2 | at TEN | vs. WAS |
| Week 3 | at CHI | vs. BAL |
| Week 4 | vs. LAR | at HOU |
| Week 5 | at JAC | vs. TB |
| Week 6 | vs. CAR | at GB |
| Week 7 | vs. DAL | at PHI |
| Week 8 | at WAS | vs. ARI |
| Week 9 | vs. NYG | at IND |
| Week 10 | BYE WEEK | vs. SF |
| Week 11 | vs. PIT | vs. TEN |
| Week 12 | at DAL | vs. PHI |
| Week 13 | at ARI | at SEA |
| Week 14 | vs. IND | BYE WEEK |
| Week 15 | vs. SEA | at LAR |
| Week 16 | vs. HOU | vs. JAC |
| Week 17 | at SF | vs. NYG |
| Week 18 | at NYG | at WAS |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | George Pickens WR - DAL George Pickens WR - DAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 14.4 | 3.0 |
| Week 2 | 15.4 | 12.8 |
| Week 3 | 5.5 | 12.8 |
| Week 4 | 13.4 | 25.4 |
| Week 5 | 14.8 | 11.7 |
| Week 6 | 6.7 | 22.8 |
| Week 7 | 4.2 | 8.2 |
| Week 8 | 29.4 | 7.8 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 7.9 |
| Week 10 | 10.1 | ‐ |
| Week 11 | 9.0 | 20.4 |
| Week 12 | 5.4 | 20.6 |
| Week 13 | 5.6 | 10.8 |
| Week 14 | 18.2 | 3.7 |
| Week 15 | 15.2 | 3.3 |
| Week 16 | 21.2 | 19.0 |
| Week 17 | 6.8 | 7.8 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 0.9 |
| Total | 195.3 | 198.9 |
| Average | 12.2 | 11.7 |
Saquon Barkley RB - PHI Saquon Barkley RB - PHI | George Pickens WR - DAL George Pickens WR - DAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | George Pickens delivered a true breakout in 2025, finishing as a top-6 fantasy WR despite sharing targets with CeeDee Lamb in Dallas. The big-play specialist thrived on efficiency and touchdown production, averaging 84.1 receiving yards per game with nine scores while consistently delivering spike-week upside. Pickens proved capable of producing WR1 numbers even alongside a healthy Lamb, although his high-variance play style makes weekly volatility part of the package. If he avoids a contract-related holdout and maintains his chemistry with Dak Prescott, Pickens should remain a low-end fantasy WR1 with week-winning upside. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | I tried to tell people last year, but few wanted to listen. After an insane 2024 season, Saquon Barkley was poised to come back down to earth some in 2025. Well, it happened. Barkley finished with 317 touches and 1,413 total yards as the RB14 in fantasy points per game. Part of this could be traced to natural regression, but also, Barkley had a decent dip in efficiency. In 2024, Barkley had an insane 3.55 yards before contact per attempt, which easily led all running backs (minimum 100 carries, per Fantasy Points Data). Last year, that number fell to 2.11, which was 23rd among 49 qualifying backs, essentially a league-average number. From 2024 to 2025, Barkley's explosive run rate dropped from 7.2% (fourth-best) to 4.6% (20th), and his yards after contact per attempt dipped from 2.26 (35th) to 1.96 (39th). Barkley lived off explosive runs and easily getting into the second level of defenses in 2024, but he found more uphill sledding last year. His volume should finish in the neighborhood of 300 touches with double-digit touchdown upside. That should lock him into top-15 running back status with possible top 5-7 upside if the offensive line can stay healthy and the Eagles' passing attack can also bounce back. If the aerial attack can get right, this team and Barkley will have more scoring opportunities in 2026 (last year, 28th in red-zone scoring opportunities per game). | Last season was a monster breakout season for George Pickens as the WR5 in fantasy points per game. His splits with CeeDee Lamb out and active were dramatic, but that doesn't mean that Pickens wasn't awesome in both realms. With Lamb in the huddle, Pickens averaged 15 fantasy points per game versus 24.2 with him out. Across that entire season with Lamb, that would have made Pickens the WR11 in fantasy points per game, and without him, he would have been the WR1 in fantasy points per game. With Lamb, Pickens had a 20.2% target share with 2.24 yards per route run, 77.1 receiving yards per game, a 25.2% first-read share, and 0.116 first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Without Lamb, those numbers jumped to a 23.6% target share, 3.14 yards per route run, 106.8 receiving yards per game, a 34.1% first-read share, and 0.154 first downs per route run. No matter how you slice it, Pickens was elite last year, and he should be a WR1 again this season in a pass-first Dallas offense. |
