Jalen Nailor for Travis Kelce (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Travis Kelce TE - KC ![]() Travis Kelce TE - KC | Jalen Nailor WR - LV ![]() Jalen Nailor WR - LV |   | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR,TE ExpertsTop Player Experts | Upgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 103 | # 202 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. DEN | vs. MIA | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs DEN | This is a 5 star matchup. WRs perform better than their average vs MIA | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 117.2 | 71.7 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.9 | 4.2 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 3 | 24 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Travis Kelce | Jalen Nailor | Add Player |
|
08/01 | #137 | #139 | - |
|
08/01 | #130 | #153 | - |
|
08/01 | #91 | #158 | - |
|
08/01 | #105 | #114 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #209 | - |
|
07/31 | #110 | ‐ | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #223 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | ‐ | - |
|
07/31 | #110 | #220 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #138 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #169 | - |
|
07/31 | #110 | #194 | - |
|
07/31 | #110 | #289 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #139 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #147 | - |
|
07/31 | #111 | #237 | - |
|
07/31 | #94 | #168 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #149 | - |
|
07/31 | #111 | #301 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #129 | - |
|
07/30 | #110 | #168 | - |
|
07/30 | #110 | #215 | - |
|
07/30 | #96 | #209 | - |
|
07/30 | #111 | #209 | - |
|
08/01 | #76 | #114 | - |
|
07/30 | #105 | #289 | - |
|
07/30 | #110 | #246 | - |
|
07/30 | #96 | #231 | - |
|
07/29 | #111 | ‐ | - |
|
07/29 | #96 | #162 | - |
|
07/29 | #111 | #98 | - |
|
07/31 | #111 | #203 | - |
|
07/28 | #110 | #200 | - |
|
07/28 | #105 | #267 | - |
|
07/28 | #96 | #115 | - |
|
07/27 | #111 | #272 | - |
|
07/27 | #105 | #175 | - |
|
07/26 | #110 | #142 | - |
|
07/29 | #123 | #285 | - |
|
07/25 | #111 | #215 | - |
|
07/25 | #105 | #243 | - |
|
07/24 | #105 | #231 | - |
|
07/24 | #137 | #106 | - |
|
07/23 | #105 | #175 | - |
|
07/23 | #157 | #300 | - |
|
07/22 | #157 | #300 | - |
|
07/21 | #96 | #198 | - |
|
07/20 | #86 | #217 | - |
|
07/19 | #96 | #106 | - |
|
07/19 | #105 | ‐ | - |
|
07/27 | #111 | #215 | - |
|
07/18 | #137 | #201 | - |
|
07/17 | #105 | #289 | - |
|
07/17 | #96 | #231 | - |
|
07/17 | #94 | #162 | - |
|
07/17 | #123 | #169 | - |
|
07/16 | #123 | #287 | - |
|
07/26 | #105 | #235 | - |
|
07/15 | #105 | #226 | - |
|
07/15 | #96 | #198 | - |
|
07/14 | #105 | #198 | - |
|
07/14 | #110 | #165 | - |
|
07/14 | #94 | #139 | - |
|
07/13 | #96 | #147 | - |
|
07/30 | #144 | #217 | - |
|
07/13 | #112 | #183 | - |
|
07/12 | #111 | #177 | - |
|
07/12 | #111 | #115 | - |
|
07/12 | #105 | #198 | - |
|
07/27 | #105 | #231 | - |
|
07/10 | #105 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #110 | ‐ | - |
|
07/07 | #110 | #215 | - |
|
07/06 | #105 | #220 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #204 | - |
|
07/28 | #105 | #217 | - |
|
07/25 | #96 | #217 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #165 | - |
|
07/03 | #111 | #263 | - |
|
07/24 | #110 | #168 | - |
|
07/31 | #105 | #153 | - |
|
06/30 | #105 | #243 | - |
|
07/07 | #123 | #114 | - |
|
07/27 | #110 | #168 | - |
|
06/28 | #105 | #162 | - |
|
07/21 | #110 | #164 | - |
|
06/28 | #105 | #222 | - |
|
06/26 | #105 | #231 | - |
|
06/25 | #105 | #223 | - |
|
07/13 | #110 | #195 | - |
|
06/15 | #105 | #223 | - |
|
06/12 | #110 | #162 | - |
|
07/31 | #79 | #151 | - |
|
07/31 | #123 | #222 | - |
|
05/29 | #172 | #243 | - |
|
07/31 | #96 | #258 | - |
|
07/29 | #110 | #229 | - |
|
05/21 | #195 | #301 | - |
|
07/30 | #130 | #197 | - |
|
07/25 | #105 | #222 | - |
|
07/01 | #105 | #212 | - |
|
07/31 | #84 | #175 | - |
|
05/11 | #111 | #266 | - |
|
07/27 | #105 | #215 | - |
|
07/29 | #110 | #220 | - |
|
07/30 | #123 | #243 | - |
|
04/28 | #123 | #177 | - |
|
04/27 | #154 | #165 | - |
|
04/27 | #96 | #169 | - |
|
07/28 | #110 | #235 | - |
|
05/20 | #154 | #316 | - |
|
04/20 | #123 | #194 | - |
|
07/09 | #105 | #139 | - |
|
03/24 | #123 | #291 | - |
|
03/09 | #172 | #302 | - |
|
01/07 | #154 | #295 | - |
|
07/15 | #157 | ‐ | - |
|
01/07 | #157 | #303 | - |
Travis Kelce TE - KC ![]() Travis Kelce TE - KC | Jalen Nailor WR - LV ![]() Jalen Nailor WR - LV | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. DEN | vs. MIA |
| Week 2 | vs. IND | at LAC |
| Week 3 | at MIA | at NO |
| Week 4 | at LV | vs. KC |
| Week 5 | BYE WEEK | at NE |
| Week 6 | vs. LAC | vs. BUF |
| Week 7 | at SEA | vs. LAR |
| Week 8 | at DEN | at NYJ |
| Week 9 | vs. NYJ | at SF |
| Week 10 | at ATL | vs. SEA |
| Week 11 | vs. ARI | at DEN |
| Week 12 | at BUF | at CLE |
| Week 13 | at LAR | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | at CIN | vs. LAC |
| Week 15 | vs. NE | vs. DEN |
| Week 16 | vs. SF | vs. TEN |
| Week 17 | at LAC | at ARI |
| Week 18 | vs. LV | at KC |
Travis Kelce TE - KC ![]() Travis Kelce TE - KC | Jalen Nailor WR - LV ![]() Jalen Nailor WR - LV | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 10.7 | 2.8 |
| Week 2 | 6.1 | 3.1 |
| Week 3 | 2.6 | 3.7 |
| Week 4 | 4.8 | 8.2 |
| Week 5 | 12.1 | 4.2 |
| Week 6 | 7.8 | ‐ |
| Week 7 | 5.4 | 3.7 |
| Week 8 | 15.9 | 0.0 |
| Week 9 | 8.6 | 1.6 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 18.4 |
| Week 11 | 15.1 | 1.6 |
| Week 12 | 4.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 13 | 10.5 | 0.0 |
| Week 14 | 0.8 | 3.0 |
| Week 15 | 7.0 | 16.5 |
| Week 16 | 0.6 | 0.0 |
| Week 17 | 3.6 | 0.0 |
| Week 18 | 1.2 | 4.9 |
| Total | 117.2 | 71.7 |
| Average | 6.9 | 4.2 |
Travis Kelce TE - KC ![]() Travis Kelce TE - KC | Jalen Nailor WR - LV ![]() Jalen Nailor WR - LV | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Travis Kelce will turn 37 in October, but he's committed to playing at least one more season for the Chiefs. Kelce finished TE3 in fantasy scoring last season, catching 76 passes for 851 yards and five touchdowns. But the longtime fantasy star's efficiency has been plummeting. Kelce has averaged 8.6 yards per target for his career, but he's averaged just 6.9 YPT over the last two seasons. Kelce has averaged 2.05 yards per route run for his career, but he's been just under 1.50 YPRR each of the last two seasons. The Chiefs didn't add any significant pass catchers in the offseason, so Kelce still figures to be a prominent target earner in Andy Reid's offense. It's just a matter of how much he can do with those targets. The good news is that Kelce has become a budget option at the position and will probably be available in the middle rounds of fantasy drafts. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | At this point in his career, we know what to expect out of Travis Kelce. He's a low-end TE1, and that's fine, but I don't see a path for him returning to top 3-5 status for 2026. Over the last two years, he has been the TE9 and TE7 in fantasy points per game. Yes, the Chiefs will remain a pass-first offense, but it's fair to question when we'll see Patrick Mahomes play in 2026 and what version of him will be under center. Mahomes is coming off a torn ACL, and that cast of pass-catching characters at his disposal didn't change a ton this offseason, which isn't great. Travis Kelce's per-route efficiency screams that he's on the back nine of his career. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Kelce was 19th in yards per route run, 18th in yards after the catch per reception, and 16th in first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Those aren't damning numbers, but they aren't anything more than solid and just illuminate the point again that Kelce doesn't have the juice to put up elite per-route metrics anymore to vault him back into the top 3-5 conversation. Kelce will likely post another solid season as a low-end TE1 in 2026. | It wouldn't shock me at all if Jalen Nailor steps up as the clear number two option for the Raiders this season behind Brock Bowers through the air. Nailor isn't facing stiff competition from Tre Tucker, Jack Bech, Dont'e Thornton, and company. Yes, last year Nailor had only a 10.3% target share, 1.19 yards per route run, and a 10.8% first-read share (per Fantasy Points Data). None of those metrics will or should get you excited, but when we dig deeper, his per-route numbers are QUITE INTERESTING. Last year, among 109 qualifying receivers, he was 33rd in separation and 51st in route win rate. As a perimeter receiver among the same sample, his numbers look even better (141 routes) as he was sixth-best in separation and 13th in route win rate. Nailor is the final pick in a draft that could pay dividends and become a weekly WR3 or flex if it all works out. |


