Mark Andrews for Omarion Hampton (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Omarion Hampton RB - LAC  Omarion Hampton RB - LAC | Mark Andrews TE - BAL  Mark Andrews TE - BAL |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE,RB ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 20 | # 116 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. ARI | at IND | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 4 star matchup. RBs perform a little better than their average vs ARI | This is a 4 star matchup. TEs perform a little better than their average vs IND | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 103.7 | 83.0 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.5 | 4.9 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 20 | 7 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Omarion Hampton | Mark Andrews | Add Player |
|
08/03 | #20 | #96 | - |
|
08/03 | #40 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #28 | #137 | - |
|
08/03 | #23 | #110 | - |
|
08/02 | #15 | #99 | - |
|
08/02 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
08/02 | #17 | #137 | - |
|
08/02 | #33 | #110 | - |
|
08/02 | #15 | #96 | - |
|
08/02 | #17 | #110 | - |
|
08/01 | #20 | #96 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #130 | - |
|
08/01 | #20 | #123 | - |
|
08/01 | #30 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #94 | - |
|
08/01 | #17 | #172 | - |
|
07/31 | #23 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #28 | #111 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
07/31 | #30 | #137 | - |
|
07/31 | #28 | #105 | - |
|
08/02 | #23 | #67 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #105 | - |
|
07/31 | #5 | #123 | - |
|
07/31 | #28 | #110 | - |
|
07/31 | #30 | #180 | - |
|
07/30 | #28 | #96 | - |
|
07/30 | #28 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
07/30 | #28 | #110 | - |
|
07/30 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #49 | #86 | - |
|
07/30 | #47 | #123 | - |
|
07/29 | #30 | #96 | - |
|
07/29 | #23 | #86 | - |
|
07/29 | #37 | #34 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #110 | - |
|
07/28 | #23 | #86 | - |
|
07/28 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/27 | #13 | #154 | - |
|
08/03 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
07/26 | #20 | #105 | - |
|
07/29 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
07/25 | #30 | #105 | - |
|
07/25 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
07/24 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
07/23 | #23 | #84 | - |
|
07/23 | #17 | #154 | - |
|
07/22 | #13 | #154 | - |
|
07/21 | #15 | #111 | - |
|
07/20 | #15 | #123 | - |
|
07/19 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
07/19 | #17 | #96 | - |
|
07/27 | #15 | #110 | - |
|
07/18 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
07/17 | #28 | #111 | - |
|
07/17 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
07/17 | #20 | #105 | - |
|
07/16 | #8 | #157 | - |
|
07/26 | #23 | #137 | - |
|
07/15 | #23 | #130 | - |
|
07/15 | #37 | #94 | - |
|
07/14 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
07/14 | #23 | #84 | - |
|
07/14 | #13 | #137 | - |
|
07/13 | #20 | #111 | - |
|
07/30 | #30 | #110 | - |
|
07/13 | #16 | #123 | - |
|
07/12 | #28 | #123 | - |
|
07/12 | #13 | #172 | - |
|
08/02 | #17 | #86 | - |
|
07/27 | #28 | #84 | - |
|
07/10 | #33 | #111 | - |
|
08/01 | #42 | #137 | - |
|
07/07 | #37 | #123 | - |
|
07/06 | #28 | #96 | - |
|
08/02 | #17 | #111 | - |
|
07/28 | #45 | #111 | - |
|
07/25 | #30 | #76 | - |
|
07/31 | #17 | #123 | - |
|
07/24 | #33 | #86 | - |
|
08/01 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
06/30 | #15 | #137 | - |
|
07/07 | #55 | #137 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #105 | - |
|
06/28 | #37 | #94 | - |
|
07/21 | #28 | #154 | - |
|
08/01 | #28 | #130 | - |
|
06/26 | #30 | #110 | - |
|
06/25 | #23 | #123 | - |
|
07/13 | #30 | #105 | - |
|
06/15 | #23 | #123 | - |
|
06/12 | #20 | #105 | - |
|
08/03 | #18 | #104 | - |
|
07/31 | #15 | #157 | - |
|
05/29 | #23 | #144 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
07/29 | #17 | #130 | - |
|
05/21 | #37 | #157 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #105 | - |
|
07/25 | #23 | #84 | - |
|
08/01 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
08/03 | #40 | #137 | - |
|
05/11 | #23 | #137 | - |
|
07/27 | #23 | #111 | - |
|
07/29 | #30 | #130 | - |
|
07/30 | #13 | #110 | - |
|
04/28 | #17 | #154 | - |
|
04/27 | #20 | #137 | - |
|
04/27 | #40 | #144 | - |
|
07/28 | #37 | #137 | - |
|
05/20 | #42 | #105 | - |
|
04/20 | #20 | #172 | - |
|
07/09 | #23 | #144 | - |
|
03/24 | #20 | #154 | - |
|
03/09 | #20 | #144 | - |
|
01/07 | #33 | #144 | - |
|
07/15 | #17 | #144 | - |
|
01/07 | #17 | #154 | - |
Omarion Hampton RB - LAC Omarion Hampton RB - LAC | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. ARI | at IND |
| Week 2 | vs. LV | vs. NO |
| Week 3 | at BUF | at DAL |
| Week 4 | at SEA | vs. TEN |
| Week 5 | vs. DEN | at ATL |
| Week 6 | at KC | at CLE |
| Week 7 | BYE WEEK | vs. CIN |
| Week 8 | at LAR | at BUF |
| Week 9 | vs. HOU | vs. JAC |
| Week 10 | at BAL | vs. LAC |
| Week 11 | vs. NYJ | at CAR |
| Week 12 | vs. NE | at HOU |
| Week 13 | at TB | BYE WEEK |
| Week 14 | at LV | vs. TB |
| Week 15 | vs. SF | at PIT |
| Week 16 | at MIA | vs. CLE |
| Week 17 | vs. KC | at CIN |
| Week 18 | at DEN | vs. PIT |
Omarion Hampton RB - LAC Omarion Hampton RB - LAC | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 6.1 | 0.5 |
| Week 2 | 2.5 | 0.4 |
| Week 3 | 18.9 | 21.1 |
| Week 4 | 22.5 | 3.0 |
| Week 5 | 7.0 | 2.2 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 2.6 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | 3.4 |
| Week 9 | ‐ | 14.6 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 7.4 |
| Week 11 | ‐ | 12.7 |
| Week 12 | ‐ | 1.1 |
| Week 13 | ‐ | 4.7 |
| Week 14 | 12.7 | 0.9 |
| Week 15 | 6.5 | 1.8 |
| Week 16 | 15.5 | 2.4 |
| Week 17 | 12.0 | 2.8 |
| Week 18 | ‐ | 1.4 |
| Total | 103.7 | 83.0 |
| Average | 11.5 | 4.9 |
Omarion Hampton RB - LAC Omarion Hampton RB - LAC | Mark Andrews TE - BAL Mark Andrews TE - BAL | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Is Mark Andrews poised for a bump in productivity now that TE Isaiah Likely has left the Ravens for the Giants, leaving Andrews as the only established pass-catching tight end on the Baltimore roster? Or is Andrews, who turns 31 on Sept. 6, simply out of gas? Andrews' production cratered last season. He had career lows in yards per game (24.8), yards per catch (8.8) and yards per target (6.0). Some of Andrews' problems were undoubtedly related to Lamar Jackson's 2025 health issues. The Ravens' starting QB missed four regular-season games and didn't appear to be fully healthy in others. If Jackson returns to form and Andrews sees a target increase in the absence of Likely, Andrews could offer midrange TE1 numbers at a low-end TE1/high-end TE2 price. Andrews has drawn 69 and 70 targets the last two seasons despite playing 17 regular-season games both years. He drew 153 targets in 2021 and 113 targets in 15 games in 2022. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | Last year, Omarion Hampton's rookie season was derailed by an ankle injury in Week 5. When he came back, he wasn't close to 100% healthy and had only one game with over a 55% snap rate. Any games after Week 4 last year, I'm just tossing in the trash because that wasn't the "real" Hampton. In 2025, in Weeks 1-4, Hampton averaged 17 touches and 95 total yards as the RB13 in fantasy points per game. In that small sample of games, he posted a 7.4% explosive run rate, a 19% missed tackle rate, and 2.54 yards after contact per attempt (per Fantasy Points Data). If he had kept up that pace the entire year in those three categories, he would have ranked fourth, tenth, and eighth in those categories (minimum 100 carries). Those are impressive numbers and speak to his talent and upside in 2026 as Mike McDaniel's possible bellcow. Hampton also contributed through the air in his first four NFL games with a 10.1% target share, 27.5 receiving yards per game, and 1.12 yards per route run. McDaniel is sure to get Hampton involved through the air after designing offenses of the last three seasons that have ranked third, third, and seventh in target share to the running back position. Yes, I know that Hampton isn't De'Von Achane, but this is still a feather in Hampton's cap. Hampton should be a rock-solid RB1 with massive upside in 2026. | Mark Andrews is coming off easily his worst season in the NFL as the TE23 in fantasy points per game. Last year, Baltimore limited his playing time, as he was 22nd in route share (62.9%, per Fantasy Points Data). I'm expecting that to rebound in 2026 with Isaiah Likely gone, but we still have to see it materialize. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Andrews was ninth in first read share, but his yards per route run (41st) and first downs per route run (27th) were nothing to write home about. He's worth taking a flier on late in drafts as your tight end two with the hopes that he can rebound with more playing time in a new offensive system and give us a throwback season in 2026. |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Omarion Hampton finished his rookie season as RB16 in PPG in 9 games played, but he suffered from a tough situation. The Chargers were gutted by injuries on their offensive line and to their starting QB. The rookie RB dealt with own injuries as well. But Hampton flashed enough upside to be worth buying into as a fantasy RB1 behind a healthy OL in 2026 with Mike McDaniel stepping in as the Chargers new offensive coordinator. He played four games with a 79% plus snap share, averaging 17.5 PPG. The former UNC product received bell-cow level usage, averaging 17.3 touches per game (tied for top-12 at the position). Also played four games with five or more catches (7th in receptions per game at 3.6). PFF ranked him as the 8th-best graded rusher, finishing 11th in yards after contact per attempt (3.34). | Mark Andrews was a flat-out bust in 75% of his games played last season. He finished as a weekly fantasy TE1 (top-12) in under 20% of his games played (3 of 17 games played). He was the TE16 last season (TE23 in PPG), and he's not getting any younger. I'm very concerned that he might just be closer to being cooked. Posted a career low in yards (422). His yards per route run TANKED at 1.22. His YAC tanked. Dead last in YAC/reception among 49 qualifying tight ends. Zach "never forced a missed tackle in his life" Ertz had more YAC than Andrews did last season. And Andrews was bad with and without Lamar Jackson last season. There's a path for volume in the Ravens' offense, which is why Andrews is being ranked/drafted as a top-15 consensus tight end. But I'm afraid his decline will continue after he has failed to command the same type of volume over the last 2 seasons. |
