Terrance Ferguson for Travis Kelce (2026)
Should I Trade... ?
See if your team wins or loses with this trade View Trade Analyzer
Travis Kelce TE - KC  Travis Kelce TE - KC | Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR  Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR |  | |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop TE ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would tradeUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| Rest of Season | # 11 | # 24 | - |
| Draft | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. DEN | vs. SF | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. TEs perform close to their average vs DEN | This is a 2 star matchup. TEs perform a little worse than their average vs SF | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 117.2 | 41.1 | - |
| Avg Game | 6.9 | 3.2 | - |
| Avg Projection | 106.9 | 76.5 | - |
| Schedule | |||
| SOS Rank | 3 | 2 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Travis Kelce | Terrance Ferguson | Add Player |
|
08/05 | #15 | #17 | - |
|
08/05 | #7 | #48 | - |
|
08/05 | #10 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #24 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #28 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #23 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #25 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #24 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #25 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
08/04 | #18 | #38 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #29 | - |
|
08/03 | #9 | #20 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #21 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #23 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #28 | - |
|
08/03 | #13 | #20 | - |
|
08/02 | #10 | #32 | - |
|
08/02 | #13 | #28 | - |
|
08/04 | #6 | #21 | - |
|
08/01 | #13 | #23 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #20 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #23 | - |
|
08/01 | #16 | #25 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #22 | - |
|
07/31 | #12 | #19 | - |
|
08/04 | #10 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
07/31 | #9 | #29 | - |
|
08/04 | #11 | #33 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #21 | - |
|
07/31 | #13 | #20 | - |
|
08/03 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
07/30 | #10 | #25 | - |
|
07/30 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #27 | - |
|
07/29 | #10 | #32 | - |
|
07/29 | #13 | ‐ | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #21 | - |
|
07/28 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
07/28 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
07/28 | #10 | #30 | - |
|
07/27 | #13 | #22 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #21 | - |
|
07/26 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
07/29 | #14 | #32 | - |
|
07/25 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
07/24 | #11 | #25 | - |
|
07/23 | #11 | #54 | - |
|
07/23 | #19 | #21 | - |
|
07/22 | #19 | #21 | - |
|
07/21 | #10 | #28 | - |
|
07/20 | #8 | #28 | - |
|
07/19 | #10 | #20 | - |
|
07/19 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
08/04 | #13 | #22 | - |
|
07/18 | #16 | #28 | - |
|
07/17 | #11 | #28 | - |
|
07/17 | #9 | #28 | - |
|
07/17 | #14 | #28 | - |
|
07/16 | #14 | #21 | - |
|
07/26 | #11 | #32 | - |
|
07/15 | #11 | #24 | - |
|
07/14 | #11 | #28 | - |
|
07/14 | #12 | #27 | - |
|
07/14 | #9 | #31 | - |
|
07/13 | #10 | #28 | - |
|
07/30 | #17 | #19 | - |
|
08/03 | #15 | #20 | - |
|
07/12 | #13 | #22 | - |
|
07/12 | #13 | ‐ | - |
|
08/02 | #11 | #22 | - |
|
07/27 | #11 | #16 | - |
|
07/10 | #11 | #28 | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #38 | - |
|
07/07 | #12 | #33 | - |
|
08/02 | #10 | #21 | - |
|
08/03 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
07/25 | #10 | #21 | - |
|
07/31 | #10 | #34 | - |
|
07/24 | #12 | #26 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #22 | - |
|
06/30 | #11 | #20 | - |
|
07/07 | #14 | ‐ | - |
|
08/01 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
06/28 | #11 | #31 | - |
|
07/21 | #12 | #21 | - |
|
08/01 | #10 | #32 | - |
|
06/25 | #11 | #25 | - |
|
07/13 | #12 | #21 | - |
|
06/15 | #11 | #25 | - |
|
06/12 | #12 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #9 | #27 | - |
|
08/05 | #14 | #21 | - |
|
05/29 | #20 | #21 | - |
|
08/03 | #10 | #33 | - |
|
07/29 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
05/21 | #22 | #21 | - |
|
08/01 | #15 | #22 | - |
|
07/25 | #11 | #21 | - |
|
08/01 | #11 | #27 | - |
|
08/05 | #7 | #21 | - |
|
05/11 | #13 | #22 | - |
|
07/27 | #11 | #21 | - |
|
08/04 | #12 | #20 | - |
|
07/30 | #14 | #20 | - |
|
04/28 | #14 | #25 | - |
|
04/27 | #18 | #21 | - |
|
04/27 | #10 | #25 | - |
|
07/28 | #12 | #22 | - |
|
05/20 | #18 | #24 | - |
|
04/20 | #14 | #23 | - |
|
07/09 | #11 | #32 | - |
|
03/24 | #14 | #21 | - |
|
03/09 | #20 | #22 | - |
|
01/07 | #18 | #19 | - |
|
07/15 | #19 | #20 | - |
|
01/07 | #19 | #22 | - |
Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR | |
| 2026 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. DEN | vs. SF |
| Week 2 | vs. IND | vs. NYG |
| Week 3 | at MIA | at DEN |
| Week 4 | at LV | at PHI |
| Week 5 | BYE WEEK | vs. BUF |
| Week 6 | vs. LAC | vs. ARI |
| Week 7 | at SEA | at LV |
| Week 8 | at DEN | vs. LAC |
| Week 9 | vs. NYJ | at WAS |
| Week 10 | at ATL | at ARI |
| Week 11 | vs. ARI | BYE WEEK |
| Week 12 | at BUF | vs. GB |
| Week 13 | at LAR | vs. KC |
| Week 14 | at CIN | at SF |
| Week 15 | vs. NE | vs. DAL |
| Week 16 | vs. SF | at SEA |
| Week 17 | at LAC | at TB |
| Week 18 | vs. LV | vs. SEA |
Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR | |
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 74.9 | 36.3 |
| Rec Yards | 784.5 | 500.7 |
| Rec TDs | 4.8 | 4.5 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush Yards | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 106.9 | 76.5 |
Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR | |
| 2025 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 10.7 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 6.1 | 0.0 |
| Week 3 | 2.6 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 4.8 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 12.1 | 2.1 |
| Week 6 | 7.8 | 0.0 |
| Week 7 | 5.4 | 9.1 |
| Week 8 | 15.9 | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 8.6 | 5.4 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 3.2 |
| Week 11 | 15.1 | 0.0 |
| Week 12 | 4.4 | 0.0 |
| Week 13 | 10.5 | 0.0 |
| Week 14 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
| Week 15 | 7.0 | 0.6 |
| Week 16 | 0.6 | 9.3 |
| Week 17 | 3.6 | 11.4 |
| Week 18 | 1.2 | ‐ |
| Total | 117.2 | 41.1 |
| Average | 6.9 | 3.2 |
Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR | |
| 2025 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 4 | ‐ |
| Week 2 | 6 | 0 |
| Week 3 | 7 | ‐ |
| Week 4 | 5 | ‐ |
| Week 5 | 8 | 1 |
| Week 6 | 7 | 0 |
| Week 7 | 3 | 3 |
| Week 8 | 8 | ‐ |
| Week 9 | 5 | 3 |
| Week 10 | ‐ | 4 |
| Week 11 | 13 | 0 |
| Week 12 | 6 | 1 |
| Week 13 | 6 | 2 |
| Week 14 | 5 | 1 |
| Week 15 | 9 | 2 |
| Week 16 | 4 | 4 |
| Week 17 | 6 | 4 |
| Week 18 | 6 | ‐ |
Travis Kelce TE - KC Travis Kelce TE - KC | Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR Terrance Ferguson TE - LAR | |
| Expert | ||
| Pat Fitzmaurice FantasyPros | Travis Kelce will turn 37 in October, but he's committed to playing at least one more season for the Chiefs. Kelce finished TE3 in fantasy scoring last season, catching 76 passes for 851 yards and five touchdowns. But the longtime fantasy star's efficiency has been plummeting. Kelce has averaged 8.6 yards per target for his career, but he's averaged just 6.9 YPT over the last two seasons. Kelce has averaged 2.05 yards per route run for his career, but he's been just under 1.50 YPRR each of the last two seasons. The Chiefs didn't add any significant pass catchers in the offseason, so Kelce still figures to be a prominent target earner in Andy Reid's offense. It's just a matter of how much he can do with those targets. The good news is that Kelce has become a budget option at the position and will probably be available in the middle rounds of fantasy drafts. | Terrance Ferguson, a second-round pick in last year's NFL Draft, drew only 25 targets as a rookie and caught only 11 of them, but he averaged 21 yards per catch and 9.2 yards per target. Ferguson is an extraordinary physical specimen who ran a 4.63 and had a 39-inch vertical jump at last year's combine at 6-foot-51/2, 247 pounds. But the Rams are log-jammed at tight end. They rotated four TEs last year - Ferguson, Colby Parkinson, Tyler Higbee and Davis Allen - and Ferguson averaged fewer snaps per game than the other three. The Rams have also added another TE, selecting Max Klare of Ohio State in the second round of this year's draft. On the bright side, Rams head coach Sean McVay used 13 personnel, with three TEs on the field at once, on 30.5% of the Rams' offensive snaps last season. No other team used 13 personnel on more than 14% of its plays. Rams tight ends combined for 150 targets, 103 catches, 1,128 yards and 17 touchdowns last season. Role ambiguity makes Ferguson undraftable in all but the deepest fantasy leagues, but his athleticism and the possibility that he earns a bigger role in a TE-friendly offense make him worth monitoring. |
| Andrew Erickson FantasyPros | Terrance Ferguson will be a stud and possesses an extremely high ceiling. Tyler Higbee is 33 years old, even after signing a 2-year contract extension with L.A. this offseason. Davante Adams is getting older and is a potential salary cap cut candidate despite the Rams wanting him to return next season. We could very much see the Rams' young TE make a major leap in 2026. His 20.8 yards per reception led all TEs in 2025, along with an extremely high average depth of target (17.6). Per Next Gen Stats...Ferguson averaged more air yards per target this season, by more than six full yards. Ferguson was targeted on 12 of his 37 deep routes (32.4%), the highest rate among tight ends to run at least 15 such routes. He hauled in five deep targets for 144 yards and two touchdowns, good for the second-most deep receiving yards by a tight end. | |
| Derek Brown FantasyPros | At this point in his career, we know what to expect out of Travis Kelce. He's a low-end TE1, and that's fine, but I don't see a path for him returning to top 3-5 status for 2026. Over the last two years, he has been the TE9 and TE7 in fantasy points per game. Yes, the Chiefs will remain a pass-first offense, but it's fair to question when we'll see Patrick Mahomes play in 2026 and what version of him will be under center. Mahomes is coming off a torn ACL, and that cast of pass-catching characters at his disposal didn't change a ton this offseason, which isn't great. Travis Kelce's per-route efficiency screams that he's on the back nine of his career. Last year, among 59 qualifying tight ends, Kelce was 19th in yards per route run, 18th in yards after the catch per reception, and 16th in first downs per route run (per Fantasy Points Data). Those aren't damning numbers, but they aren't anything more than solid and just illuminate the point again that Kelce doesn't have the juice to put up elite per-route metrics anymore to vault him back into the top 3-5 conversation. Kelce will likely post another solid season as a low-end TE1 in 2026. | |
