Alexander Mattison or Stefon Diggs
Who Should I Start? - Week 8
Can't Decide? Leave it up to the Fantasy Gods
The Fantasy Gods have spoken. Start {{ state.players[state.winningPlayerIndex].player_name }}
Experts' Pick | |||
Stefon Diggs WR - BUF  Stefon Diggs WR - BUF vs. NE, Sun 1pm EST |
Alexander Mattison RB - MIN  Alexander Mattison RB - MIN at GB, Sun 1pm EST |
 | |
Expert |
100% Recommended by 144 of 144 experts |
0% Recommended by 0 of 144 experts |
Add Player |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop RB,WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would startUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| ECR | # 27 | # 117 | - |
| Best Rank | # 22 | # 103 | - |
| Worst Rank | # 36 | # 148 | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | vs. NE | at GB | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 3 star matchup. WRs perform close to their average vs NE | This is a 5 star matchup. RBs perform better than their average vs GB | - |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 78.3 | 36.6 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.2 | 6.1 | - |
| Week 7 | 4.8 | ‐ | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Weather | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Stefon Diggs | Alexander Mattison | Add Player |
16 m | #35 | #119 | - |
2 h | #30 | #117 | - |
2 h | #30 | #115 | - |
2 h | #30 | #129 | - |
2 h | #30 | #112 | - |
2 h | #29 | #105 | - |
2 h | #29 | #111 | - |
2 h | #19 | #99 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #14 | #108 | - |
2 h | #29 | #129 | - |
2 h | #14 | #73 | - |
2 h | #29 | #129 | - |
2 h | #30 | #111 | - |
2 h | #30 | #108 | - |
2 h | #29 | #108 | - |
2 h | #29 | #107 | - |
2 h | #29 | #111 | - |
2 h | #23 | #115 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #129 | - |
2 h | #29 | #111 | - |
2 h | #23 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #129 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #115 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #33 | #137 | - |
2 h | #29 | #111 | - |
2 h | #30 | #120 | - |
2 h | #16 | #129 | - |
2 h | #29 | #120 | - |
2 h | #38 | #115 | - |
2 h | #20 | #141 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #29 | #132 | - |
2 h | #30 | #120 | - |
2 h | #19 | #117 | - |
2 h | #38 | #66 | - |
2 h | #29 | #117 | - |
2 h | #32 | #133 | - |
2 h | #20 | #105 | - |
2 h | #23 | #132 | - |
2 h | #29 | #112 | - |
3 h | #29 | #132 | - |
3 h | #32 | #60 | - |
3 h | #29 | #129 | - |
3 h | #30 | #105 | - |
3 h | #23 | #108 | - |
3 h | #35 | #111 | - |
3 h | #35 | #103 | - |
3 h | #29 | #129 | - |
3 h | #23 | #129 | - |
3 h | #30 | #132 | - |
3 h | #29 | #115 | - |
3 h | #29 | #107 | - |
3 h | #29 | #117 | - |
3 h | #23 | #121 | - |
3 h | #23 | #129 | - |
3 h | #32 | #129 | - |
3 h | #23 | #112 | - |
3 h | #29 | #129 | - |
3 h | #29 | #112 | - |
3 h | #29 | #117 | - |
3 h | #23 | #129 | - |
3 h | #23 | #88 | - |
3 h | #23 | #107 | - |
3 h | #32 | #115 | - |
3 h | #23 | #112 | - |
3 h | #29 | #132 | - |
3 h | #29 | #132 | - |
3 h | #23 | #121 | - |
4 h | #29 | #121 | - |
4 h | #29 | #117 | - |
4 h | #29 | #115 | - |
4 h | #29 | #133 | - |
4 h | #23 | #115 | - |
4 h | #29 | #108 | - |
4 h | #20 | #117 | - |
4 h | #23 | #132 | - |
4 h | #23 | #121 | - |
4 h | #30 | #111 | - |
4 h | #13 | #121 | - |
5 h | #29 | #115 | - |
5 h | #29 | #117 | - |
5 h | #29 | #121 | - |
5 h | #23 | #112 | - |
5 h | #23 | #112 | - |
5 h | #29 | #107 | - |
5 h | #30 | #115 | - |
5 h | #29 | #117 | - |
5 h | #23 | #62 | - |
5 h | #29 | #112 | - |
6 h | #29 | #117 | - |
6 h | #30 | #117 | - |
6 h | #23 | #149 | - |
6 h | #29 | #132 | - |
6 h | #23 | #117 | - |
6 h | #30 | #117 | - |
6 h | #30 | #115 | - |
6 h | #36 | #148 | - |
6 h | #30 | #108 | - |
6 h | #16 | #117 | - |
6 h | #36 | #139 | - |
6 h | #30 | #117 | - |
6 h | #22 | #121 | - |
7 h | #23 | #118 | - |
7 h | #23 | #118 | - |
7 h | #23 | #132 | - |
7 h | #29 | #116 | - |
8 h | #20 | #134 | - |
8 h | #29 | #118 | - |
8 h | #29 | #72 | - |
8 h | #23 | #118 | - |
8 h | #30 | #118 | - |
8 h | #20 | #109 | - |
8 h | #29 | #130 | - |
9 h | #29 | #113 | - |
9 h | #33 | #112 | - |
9 h | #29 | #118 | - |
10 h | #29 | #108 | - |
10 h | #29 | #133 | - |
11 h | #29 | #117 | - |
11 h | #30 | #119 | - |
11 h | #29 | #93 | - |
11 h | #29 | #111 | - |
11 h | #29 | #105 | - |
14 h | #28 | #287 | - |
14 h | #29 | #128 | - |
15 h | #21 | #93 | - |
16 h | #28 | #131 | - |
18 h | #31 | #96 | - |
19 h | #28 | #120 | - |
21 h | #30 | #124 | - |
21 h | #26 | #129 | - |
1 d | #14 | #239 | - |
1 d | #28 | #124 | - |
1 d | #31 | #124 | - |
1 d | #30 | ‐ | - |
2 d | #32 | #129 | - |
2 d | #29 | #119 | - |
Stefon Diggs WR - BUF Stefon Diggs WR - BUF | Alexander Mattison RB - MIN Alexander Mattison RB - MIN | |
| 2020 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | vs. NYJ 9 tar, 8 rec, 86 yds, 0 td | vs. GB 6 rush, 50 yds, 0 td 4 tar, 4 rec, 30 yds, 0 td |
| Week 2 | at MIA 13 tar, 8 rec, 153 yds, 1 td | at IND 3 rush, 13 yds, 0 td 2 tar, 1 rec, 3 yds, 0 td |
| Week 3 | vs. LAR 6 tar, 4 rec, 49 yds, 1 td | vs. TEN 8 rush, 27 yds, 0 td |
| Week 4 | at LV 7 tar, 6 rec, 115 yds, 0 td | at HOU 7 rush, 17 yds, 1 td |
| Week 5 | at TEN 16 tar, 10 rec, 106 yds, 0 td | at SEA 20 rush, 112 yds, 0 td 3 tar, 3 rec, 24 yds, 0 td |
| Week 6 | vs. KC 8 tar, 6 rec, 46 yds, 1 td | vs. ATL 10 rush, 26 yds, 0 td 2 tar, 1 rec, 4 yds, 0 td |
| Week 7 | at NYJ 11 tar, 6 rec, 48 yds, 0 td | BYE WEEK |
| Week 8 | vs. NE | at GB |
| Week 9 | vs. SEA | vs. DET |
| Week 10 | at ARI | at CHI |
| Week 11 | BYE WEEK | vs. DAL |
| Week 12 | vs. LAC | vs. CAR |
| Week 13 | at SF | vs. JAC |
| Week 14 | vs. PIT | at TB |
| Week 15 | at DEN | vs. CHI |
| Week 16 | at NE | at NO |
| Week 17 | vs. MIA | at DET |
Stefon Diggs WR - BUF Stefon Diggs WR - BUF | Alexander Mattison RB - MIN Alexander Mattison RB - MIN | |
| 2020 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 8.6 | 8.0 |
| Week 2 | 21.3 | 1.6 |
| Week 3 | 10.9 | 2.7 |
| Week 4 | 11.5 | 7.7 |
| Week 5 | 10.6 | 13.6 |
| Week 6 | 10.6 | 3.0 |
| Week 7 | 4.8 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total | 78.3 | 36.6 |
| Average | 11.2 | 6.1 |
Stefon Diggs WR - BUF Stefon Diggs WR - BUF | Alexander Mattison RB - MIN Alexander Mattison RB - MIN | |
| 2020 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 9 | 4 |
| Week 2 | 13 | 2 |
| Week 3 | 6 | 0 |
| Week 4 | 7 | 0 |
| Week 5 | 16 | 3 |
| Week 6 | 8 | 2 |
| Week 7 | 11 | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
Stefon Diggs WR - BUF Stefon Diggs WR - BUF vs. NE, Sun 1pm EST |
Alexander Mattison RB - MIN Alexander Mattison RB - MIN at GB, Sun 1pm EST |
|
| Expert | ||
| Kyle Yates FantasyPros | Diggs has come crashing back down to earth, along with the rest of the Bills offense, but he's still commanding a large target share. With Diggs' involvement in the offense, plus his talent, he's always worth rolling into your lineup as a high-end WR2/low-end WR1. | Mattison failed to deliver in his prime matchup in week six and now goes back to being a backup option behind Cook. He can be avoided this week. |
| Mike Tagliere FantasyPros | Well, he got the targets we thought he would against the Jets last week. Unfortunately, the results of those targets weren't what we'd hoped against the Jets weak secondary. This is one of those situations where you say process over results, as I'd play Diggs as a WR1 all over again if I knew he'd be getting 11 targets against that defense. We do have to start baking the risk of Josh Allen's inconsistency into Diggs' ranking, but despite the recent struggles, Diggs has still caught at least six passes and scored 14.9 PPR points in 6-of-7 games. The Patriots are surely going to have Stephon Gilmore cover Diggs, though that hasn't been a matchup that's a must-avoid this year. He's allowed 15-of-24 passing for 209 yards and two touchdowns in his coverage, which is good for a 100.9 QB Rating. As crazy as it sounds, the Patriots have allowed the third-most yards per target to wide receivers as a whole. Diggs should remain in lineups as a solid WR2. | Despite missing half of a game and already having his bye week out of the way, Cook ranks second in the NFL in broken tackles (24) on the ground. You know how we all love the Panthers matchup for running backs? Well, the Packers have allowed more fantasy points per game to the position than any other team in the league, including the Panthers. Running backs have actually outscored quarterbacks by 14.54 points per game when playing the Packers, which is the second largest gap in the NFL. They've produced in both the run and pass game, as evidenced by the 4.54 yards per carry and 7.92 yards per target. If Cook can get a handful of targets, they can go a long way, as the Packers have allowed a league-leading 2.06 PPR points per target to running backs, while no other team has allowed more than 1.85 per target. Despite the Packers already getting their bye week out of the way, they still lead the league in touchdowns (10) allowed to running backs, as they've scored once every 16.8 touches. All of this amounts to 1.14 PPR points per opportunity for running backs, which is the highest number in the NFL. As long as Cook gets in a full practice, you should have zero concerns about playing him in this matchup. In fact, he should be considered a lock for top-five production if he's healthy. Mattison would go back into his backup role with Cook active, though if Cook is not 100 percent, we could see 10 or so opportunities for Mattison, which would carry RB4 value in this matchup. Stay tuned for updates. |
| Derek Lofland FantasyPros | The Patriots are just 18th against fantasy wide receivers, Diggs should be a solid WR1 at home this week. | |
