Jarvis Landry or Tyler Lockett
Who Should I Start? - Week 7
Can't Decide? Leave it up to the Fantasy Gods
The Fantasy Gods have spoken. Start {{ state.players[state.winningPlayerIndex].player_name }}
Experts' Pick | |||
Tyler Lockett WR - SEA  Tyler Lockett WR - SEA at ARI, Sun 8pm EDT |
Jarvis Landry WR - CLE  Jarvis Landry WR - CLE at CIN, Sun 1pm EDT |
 | |
Expert |
100% Recommended by 167 of 167 experts |
0% Recommended by 0 of 167 experts |
Add Player |
| Most Accurate Experts | |||
| Top ExpertsTop WR ExpertsTop Player Experts |  See who the Most Accurate Experts would startUpgrade Now | ||
| Rankings | |||
| ECR | # 11 | # 38 | - |
| Best Rank | # 8 | # 35 | - |
| Worst Rank | # 19 | # 51 | - |
| Matchup | |||
| Opponent | at ARI | at CIN | - |
| Matchup Rating | This is a 2 star matchup. WRs perform worse than their average vs ARI | This is a 5 star matchup. WRs perform better than their average vs CIN | - |
| Stats Allowed | |||
| Rec | 19.7 | 19.4 | |
| Rec Yds | 212.7 | 222 | |
| Rec TD | 1.3 | 1.4 | |
| Fantasy Points | |||
| Season Total | 58.2 | 37.4 | - |
| Avg Game | 11.6 | 6.2 | - |
| Avg Projection | 11.6 | 7.5 | - |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 4.0 | - |
| Misc | |||
| Injury Alert | ‐ | ‐ | - |
| Weather | Indoor | ‐ | - |
| Expert Ranks | |||
|
|
Tyler Lockett | Jarvis Landry | Add Player |
10 h | #13 | #38 | - |
10 h | #10 | #38 | - |
10 h | #6 | #38 | - |
10 h | #12 | #39 | - |
10 h | #9 | #39 | - |
10 h | #9 | #39 | - |
10 h | #14 | #43 | - |
10 h | #12 | #40 | - |
10 h | #12 | #47 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #11 | #35 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #35 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #12 | #37 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #37 | - |
10 h | #12 | #42 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #13 | #38 | - |
10 h | #13 | #37 | - |
10 h | #11 | #37 | - |
10 h | #8 | #40 | - |
10 h | #10 | #37 | - |
10 h | #11 | #46 | - |
10 h | #8 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #11 | #40 | - |
10 h | #7 | #40 | - |
10 h | #10 | #42 | - |
10 h | #13 | #42 | - |
10 h | #12 | #38 | - |
10 h | #9 | #40 | - |
10 h | #11 | #40 | - |
10 h | #11 | #40 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #8 | #45 | - |
10 h | #10 | #50 | - |
10 h | #11 | #41 | - |
10 h | #6 | #42 | - |
10 h | #17 | #41 | - |
10 h | #13 | #47 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #32 | - |
10 h | #9 | #44 | - |
10 h | #12 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #41 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #11 | #37 | - |
10 h | #5 | #28 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #14 | #37 | - |
10 h | #12 | #37 | - |
10 h | #12 | #37 | - |
10 h | #15 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #15 | - |
10 h | #11 | #42 | - |
10 h | #8 | #39 | - |
10 h | #10 | #38 | - |
10 h | #10 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #47 | - |
10 h | #16 | #37 | - |
10 h | #10 | #47 | - |
10 h | #11 | #52 | - |
10 h | #14 | #37 | - |
10 h | #12 | #41 | - |
10 h | #12 | #37 | - |
10 h | #3 | #39 | - |
10 h | #12 | #25 | - |
10 h | #11 | #38 | - |
10 h | #11 | #37 | - |
10 h | #11 | #37 | - |
10 h | #17 | #37 | - |
10 h | #7 | #42 | - |
10 h | #25 | #38 | - |
10 h | #14 | #38 | - |
10 h | #9 | #29 | - |
10 h | #14 | #38 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #11 | #39 | - |
10 h | #12 | #46 | - |
10 h | #12 | #48 | - |
10 h | #11 | #36 | - |
10 h | #14 | #38 | - |
10 h | #14 | #35 | - |
10 h | #17 | #46 | - |
10 h | #25 | #38 | - |
10 h | #11 | #24 | - |
10 h | #11 | #46 | - |
10 h | #10 | #39 | - |
11 h | #12 | #37 | - |
11 h | #16 | #37 | - |
11 h | #21 | #40 | - |
11 h | #15 | #46 | - |
11 h | #11 | #38 | - |
11 h | #23 | #40 | - |
11 h | #8 | #28 | - |
11 h | #12 | #32 | - |
11 h | #14 | #37 | - |
11 h | #10 | #41 | - |
11 h | #20 | #37 | - |
11 h | #13 | #39 | - |
11 h | #9 | #47 | - |
11 h | #16 | #37 | - |
11 h | #10 | #39 | - |
11 h | #11 | ‐ | - |
11 h | #15 | #40 | - |
11 h | #4 | #43 | - |
11 h | #13 | #45 | - |
11 h | #19 | #42 | - |
11 h | #15 | #41 | - |
12 h | #11 | #38 | - |
12 h | #15 | #41 | - |
12 h | #12 | #42 | - |
12 h | #12 | #39 | - |
12 h | #11 | #44 | - |
12 h | #17 | #38 | - |
12 h | #12 | #37 | - |
12 h | #11 | #39 | - |
13 h | #13 | #38 | - |
13 h | #11 | #46 | - |
13 h | #11 | #38 | - |
13 h | #14 | #38 | - |
13 h | #12 | #41 | - |
13 h | #10 | #38 | - |
14 h | #24 | #55 | - |
14 h | #11 | #38 | - |
14 h | #11 | #38 | - |
16 h | #9 | #45 | - |
16 h | #15 | #39 | - |
17 h | #16 | #38 | - |
18 h | #21 | #38 | - |
19 h | #14 | #36 | - |
19 h | #12 | #42 | - |
22 h | #11 | #35 | - |
22 h | #12 | #54 | - |
22 h | #13 | #37 | - |
22 h | #14 | #39 | - |
23 h | #11 | #38 | - |
23 h | #17 | #44 | - |
24 h | #14 | #40 | - |
24 h | #14 | #38 | - |
24 h | #11 | #42 | - |
1 d | #10 | #38 | - |
1 d | #13 | #38 | - |
1 d | #14 | #36 | - |
1 d | #14 | #39 | - |
1 d | #7 | #38 | - |
1 d | #11 | #37 | - |
1 d | #8 | #51 | - |
1 d | #17 | #38 | - |
1 d | #8 | #40 | - |
1 d | #11 | #41 | - |
1 d | #17 | #37 | - |
2 d | #16 | #38 | - |
3 d | #14 | #45 | - |
3 d | #23 | #34 | - |
3 d | #12 | #38 | - |
3 d | #14 | #38 | - |
3 d | #13 | #40 | - |
3 d | #13 | #39 | - |
4 d | #19 | #40 | - |
5 d | #13 | #39 | - |
5 d | #13 | #36 | - |
Tyler Lockett WR - SEA Tyler Lockett WR - SEA | Jarvis Landry WR - CLE Jarvis Landry WR - CLE | |
| 2020 Schedule | ||
| Week 1 | at ATL 8 tar, 8 rec, 92 yds, 0 td | at BAL 6 tar, 5 rec, 61 yds, 0 td |
| Week 2 | vs. NE 8 tar, 7 rec, 67 yds, 1 td | vs. CIN 3 tar, 3 rec, 46 yds, 0 td |
| Week 3 | vs. DAL 13 tar, 9 rec, 100 yds, 3 td | vs. WAS 4 tar, 4 rec, 36 yds, 0 td |
| Week 4 | at MIA 4 tar, 2 rec, 39 yds, 0 td | at DAL 6 tar, 5 rec, 48 yds, 0 td |
| Week 5 | vs. MIN 5 tar, 4 rec, 44 yds, 0 td | vs. IND 9 tar, 4 rec, 88 yds, 0 td |
| Week 6 | BYE WEEK | at PIT 5 tar, 3 rec, 40 yds, 0 td |
| Week 7 | at ARI | at CIN |
| Week 8 | vs. SF | vs. LV |
| Week 9 | at BUF | BYE WEEK |
| Week 10 | at LAR | vs. HOU |
| Week 11 | vs. ARI | vs. PHI |
| Week 12 | at PHI | at JAC |
| Week 13 | vs. NYG | at TEN |
| Week 14 | vs. NYJ | vs. BAL |
| Week 15 | at WAS | at NYG |
| Week 16 | vs. LAR | at NYJ |
| Week 17 | at SF | vs. PIT |
Tyler Lockett WR - SEA Tyler Lockett WR - SEA at ARI, Sun 8pm EDT |
Jarvis Landry WR - CLE Jarvis Landry WR - CLE at CIN, Sun 1pm EDT |
|
| Receiving | ||
| Receptions | 5.9 | 4.6 |
| Rec Yards | 77.7 | 60.7 |
| Rec TDs | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Rushing | ||
| Rush Attempts | 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Rush Yards | 1.5 | 0.6 |
| Rush TDs | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Points | ||
| Fantasy Points | 11.6 | 7.5 |
Tyler Lockett WR - SEA Tyler Lockett WR - SEA | Jarvis Landry WR - CLE Jarvis Landry WR - CLE | |
| 2020 Points | ||
| Week 1 | 9.2 | 6.1 |
| Week 2 | 12.7 | 4.6 |
| Week 3 | 28.0 | 3.6 |
| Week 4 | 3.9 | 10.3 |
| Week 5 | 4.4 | 8.8 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 4.0 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Total | 58.2 | 37.4 |
| Average | 11.6 | 6.2 |
Tyler Lockett WR - SEA Tyler Lockett WR - SEA | Jarvis Landry WR - CLE Jarvis Landry WR - CLE | |
| 2020 Targets | ||
| Week 1 | 8 | 6 |
| Week 2 | 8 | 3 |
| Week 3 | 13 | 4 |
| Week 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Week 5 | 5 | 9 |
| Week 6 | ‐ | 5 |
| Week 7 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 8 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 9 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 10 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 11 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 12 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 13 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 14 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 15 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 16 | ‐ | ‐ |
| Week 17 | ‐ | ‐ |
Tyler Lockett WR - SEA Tyler Lockett WR - SEA at ARI, Sun 8pm EDT |
Jarvis Landry WR - CLE Jarvis Landry WR - CLE at CIN, Sun 1pm EDT |
|
| Expert | ||
| Isaiah Sirois FantasyPros | The Browns receivers haven't been great this year. Both of their median points per game sit below 10 points: Beckham at 8.4 and Landry at 7.35. While Beckham has had tons of upside -- he posted 35.9 points in Week 4 -- he doesn't have much floor. Landry has also struggled with floor, as he has put up two performances with fewer than six points, but he lacks Beckham's upside. Beckham is a high-upside play at WR3 for me, while Landry is a shaky WR4 at best. | |
| Kyle Yates FantasyPros | Lockett's been a bit of a disappointment the past couple of weeks, but he simply deserves to be in your starting lineup every single week. He's attached to arguably the best QB in the game and he's still seeing the targets in the key areas of the field that can lead to top-tier fantasy production. He should be viewed as a high-end WR2 this week with upside. | Landry also struggled last week, along with the rest of the Browns offense, but he should bounce back in a plus matchup here. He can be viewed as a low-end WR3. |
| Mike Tagliere FantasyPros | He's taken a backseat to Metcalf this year, though it's worth noting Lockett has seen just one less target than him. Don't let the last two games deter you from Lockett, as he's still capable of single-handedly winning you a week. The Cardinals have allowed just the second-fewest fantasy points per target to receivers, so it hasn't been a smash spot, though if there were one spot that I'd label as a weakness among their cornerbacks, it's the slot cornerback Byron Murphy, which is the guy who'll defend Lockett in this game. He's allowed 22-of-36 passing for 275 yards and a touchdown in his coverage. The only slot-heavy receivers who saw more than five targets against the Cardinals were Jamison Crowder, who popped off for eight catches, 116 yards, and a touchdown (WR7), and CeeDee Lamb, who snagged seven balls for 64 yards (WR27). If you were to pick which Seahawks wide receiver had the better cornerback matchup in this game, it'd be Lockett. He should get back into lineups as a high-end WR2. | On the 2020 season, Landry has essentially been forgotten by fantasy managers, but did you know that him and Beckham have the same number of yards despite Landry seeing 10 fewer targets? Again, Beckham gets top-tier cornerbacks in coverage, so it's not apples to apples in real-life football terms, but in fantasy, points are points. Both have been disappointing in Kevin Stefanski's offense, and it's left Landry outside the top-40 receivers through six weeks. He's topped six targets just once, and that was in a game Mayfield threw the ball 37 times, something that won't happen very often. The last time they played the Bengals, he threw the ball just 23 times. They had Chubb that game, so we should expect more pass attempts against a team whose opponents have averaged 66.7 plays per game. Mackensie Alexander was their big free agent signing to come in and cover the slot, but he's struggled a bit, allowing 14-of-18 passing for 150 yards and a touchdown in his coverage. It's far from a guarantee, but Landry should be considered a low-end WR3 this week. |
| Derek Lofland FantasyPros | Locket has 6 receptions for 83 yards and no touchdowns in his three games since scoring 3 touchdowns in Week 3. Lockett is a boom / bust WR3 in a game that could turn into a shootout. | |
